Will you sign up to Dry January this year? If you do, you won’t be alone. According to its organisers, you’ll join a staggering nine million drinkers who are expected to don the hair shirt of for a whole month. Why would you do it? To prove to yourself you’re not an alcoholic, to virtue signal or to improve your health ? 0ne or more of those certainly.
Dry January was first invented 10 years ago by a U.K. charity called Alcohol Concern with a single purpose: “To reset after a month or two of holiday festivities (such as) office parties, fun nights out, and boozy nights in.”
Fair enough, perhaps, after an over-indulgent Christmas. But the goalposts have since been uprooted and replanted throughout the whole year. In February 2023, the charity (now rebranded as Alcohol Change) launched another abstinence drive: “Sober Spring – your three month break from alcohol, your chance to break habits, start new ones and experience life alcohol-free.” Hmm… What with the invention of two more monthly clones, Sober October and Sober September, there soon won’t be many more days in the year for drinkers to quaff a bevy or two without looking over their shoulders to see who’s eyeing them accusingly.
It’s beginning to look like a return of the Temperance Movement by stealth. In the 19th Century, drinkers were exhorted to “sign the pledge”, undertaking to renounce alcohol for life. Today, that pledge has now morphed into an app on your phone, enabling Alcohol Change to monitor your behaviour, and remotely shame you if you succumb to the temptations of the demon drink. In the 1800s, the Temperance Movement was all about preventing domestic violence; today it’s about preventing ill-health.
I’m a medical research journalist and I first got interested in this issue after stumbling across the fact that although booze “contains” lots of calories, it does not make you put on weight. Clinical trials on human volunteers, as well as experiments on rats and mice, have demonstrated this surprising fact conclusively. The evidence is clear: if you replace food calories with alcohol calories, you will lose weight. And yet the medical authorities have repeatedly told us that drinking causes weight gain, one of many health reasons to give up drinking.
That mismatch between medical advice and medical evidence set me on the path of seeing what else ‘they’ were misleading us about. That led to a deep dive into the published medical research and my discovery that, although the health authorities were routinely bombarding us with anti-alcohol rhetoric, there are astonishing health benefits from drinking.
Seriously? Can alcohol really be good for your health? Yes. In addition to the weight issue, the evidence shows that sensible drinkers have less heart disease, less diabetes, less dementia and often even less cancer than teetotallers. Those, plus a myriad of other health benefits, have the predictable upshot that moderate drinkers live longer and healthier lives than non-drinkers. Those discoveries were the meat of my 2013 book on the subject: The Good News About Booze, a deliberately populist title intended to disguise the fact that the book was a serious in-depth enquiry based on literally hundreds of references to evidence published in international medical journals.
After that, I thought I had finished with alcohol as a topic, but I recently had a rethink. In the last seven years, without any evidence to support the clampdown, the medical authorities have begun turning the screws on drinkers. Again, it all started in Britain where in 2016 the existing alcohol guidelines were slashed in half, setting the upper safe limit at two units a day. What’s two units? Less than a pint of beer, a small glass of wine, or a shot of whisky – so almost a maiden aunt’s level of intake. Nevertheless, we were warned that exceeding even that very low level would harm our health. In fact, England’s then Chief Medical Officer, Sally Davies, went further, trumpeting that the latest research showed that “there is no safe level of alcohol intake”. Really? How come?
It turned out she had commissioned a survey of the existing research data from Sheffield University– a questionable source, as Sheffield is a bit-part player on the international alcohol research stage. In any case, we now know, thanks to journalist Chris Snowdon’s Freedom of Information ferreting, that Sheffield initially reported quite a lot of Good News about alcohol and health. However, that displeased the CMO who ordered the university to downplay alcohol’s health benefits and ramp up its hazards. The final Sheffield report, which incidentally was never formally published in a peer-reviewed journal, then became the justification for the new British guidelines…. which were, to put it mildly, based on dubious science.
Nevertheless, the 2016 British anti-alcohol initiative soon spread around the world, with many countries also reducing their guideline levels, sometimes to ridiculously low levels. For example, Holland, despite its liberal laws about marijuana smoking, now reckons that drinking more than half a bottle of lager a day will shorten your life. And even the French, who until a decade ago had no official guidelines at all, have now decided that drinking more than the quarter litre carafe of wine which every Frenchman has with his lunch, is a health hazard.
I was puzzled. I was pretty sure the health evidence about drinking hadn’t significantly changed since my 2013 book, but I decided to check. Another deep dive into the evidence did indeed reveal some apparently worrying findings. There was a major Cambridge University research paper with a sample size of over half a million people which said it had disproved the idea that drinking had any health benefits whatsoever. An even bigger study conducted in China claimed the same. A third said that drinking wine is as dangerous as smoking.
However, on examination, none of these stacked up. The Cambridge claim was straightforward misinformation: its study had in fact found health benefits from drinking, but had buried the positive findings in the depths of a voluminous appendix. The Chinese study was of questionable value, as it’s well known that Orientals genetically respond to alcohol very differently from Europeans. As for the ‘wine is as harmful as tobacco’ study, it offered not a scrap of evidence for the claim.
By contrast, my deep dive into the research database did reveal some new, very positive information about alcohol and health – in particular, the benefits of wine. It also meant I could assess the value of the new entrants in the wine arena since my 2013 book: organic/biodynamic and alcohol-free wines. I was intrigued to discover what extra health punch they each might provide; the answers greatly surprised me.
The result is a new book The Very Good News about Wine, which came out this month. Citing over three hundred studies published from the 1970s to the present, the book is a serious challenge to the anti-alcohol propaganda increasingly dominating the media – largely driven by a nefarious alliance of the medical authorities, a small coterie of vocal anti-alcohol activists and Alcohol Change.
My hope is that people will use the book as an authoritative resource when they next hear another rent-a-pundit trotting out the old saw that wine’s supposed health benefits are “an old wives’ tale” (quote, Sally Davies). 50 years of solid medical data are a rare example of where the science is settled: it cannot easily be overturned by anything you might read in your daily newspaper, trumpeting the latest shock-horror discovery that a glass of wine will tip you into an early grave.
So will you sign up to Dry January?
Personally I won’t, as the medical evidence is overwhelming that drinking a few glasses of wine with an evening meal is good for one’s health. You may have different motives, of which proving to yourself you’re not an alcoholic seems superficially attractive. On the other hand, you wouldn’t want to give up brushing your teeth for a month, or stop your daily exercise routines – two addictions you should embrace, as they’re obviously health-promoting. In principle, moderate wine drinking is no different.
Of course, it’s ‘your body, your choice’ whether you take the January pledge or not. However, Alcohol Change probably won’t give a toss one way or the other. The organisation’s latest accounts show that their dry months marketing ploys have already netted them over £12 million in assets.
Temperance propaganda is clearly Very Good News for them too.
The Very Good News About Wine by Tony Edwards is available on Amazon priced £10.99.
Stop Press: A woman with a sticker on her car window saying “I’m not drunk. I’m just avoiding potholes” was arrested and found to be twice the legal limit. The Mail has more.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
On-topic (current news): the US-EU-British-Canadian agreement to cut off certain Russian institutions from certain western-based banking facilities when they get enough “round tuits” may mean they know Russia is about to crash the sh*t out of the western financial system at a time that is likely to be soon and also of the Russian government’s choosing. The reason they look weak – by threatening to, er, do something when, er, when they get round to it – is because they ARE weak. If they were strong, they would already have done it.
“When you have to shoot, shoot – don’t talk.”
Sky News:
Ooh-er!
…planning to…
…as soon as next week…
…create a register…
…would (not “will”) unmask…
…potentially…
The “government” will surely need both “queen’s consent” and “prince’s consent” before it even tables this bill.
(Requesting such consent is the process by which the government checks with the said two members of the royal family if it wants to introduce a bill that might affect their financial interests. Note to journalists: don’t call members of the royal family “oligarchs”, okay? They’re selfless people-servers, and don’t forget the current monarch changed vehicle tyres in the army during WW2. And don’t say anything at the current time about Prince Michael of Kent whatsoever. In particular, don’t mention that he is Patron of the Russo-British Chamber of Commerce.)
Should have been done years ago.
The Chief Constable of the Devon & Cornwall Police Service has STRIPPED ‘Prince’ Andrew (henceforth known as Hapsburg-Gotha) of a plaque in his honour from the foyer of Torquays main Police Service Station following a complaint from a member of the public about his alleged behaviour in America from another member of the public.
Daily Telegraph:
“How Volodymyr Zelensky, a comedian-turned-leader, stepped up to the role he was born to play“.
Yeah, right. If only Philip Green had owned the rights to “Yes, Minister”, he could have put Paul Eddington in as prime minister for the Yes Minister Party.
Re Ukraine, (yes I know
) The problem for The West is that they are so far up their own ars*s they believe restrictions on banking/trade facilities available to punish Russia will bring them to their knees.
No they won’t.
‘Ukraine’ is not even a real place, just a word to define a geographical area similar to ‘Salisbury Plain’. An area that used to be within Russia’s sphere for the collection of taxes and soldiers which is now reverting to that status. (being reverted?).
The West’s ‘weak and feeble respons’* being the threat of restrictions when it should be (as you infer Star) “Shoot To Kill”.
(Not actually weak & feeble, just cowardly and feeble)
The West imagines Money (notional) and Finance (Digital) to be the end game of everything but, especially when in a War Crisis, what really matters are food and energy both of which (wheat and gas/oil) Russia is already self-sufficient.
The whole point of Putins’ Expansionism (apart from diverting attention from his declining domestic popularity as is usual) is to enhance and guarantee that self-sufficiency which is why he started off in Crimea (access to Black Sea oil) and is now taking back Ukrains’ wheat production.
None if this will necessarily mean success for Putin. Long-term war victory revolves around industrial production. Russias’ entire economy is no bigger than either South Korea or Italg; it is only half of the former USSR and depends far too much around primary productivity (food/energy) which turns out to be a two-edged sword for Russia.
rubbish.
Putin has stated categorically that he is in Ukraine for two reasons, and two alone. Either you don’t know, or lie by omission.
He wants to de-militarise and de-nazify Ukraine. When he’s done. He will retreat back to Russia.
Not my downtick btw.
My point is not “rubbish” but is open for debate.
From a Russian point of view a hostile (‘Nazified’ as you infer) Ukraine is a dagger to their heart when it should be an integrated friend.
Russias current borders are similar to when Lenin surrendered his country to the failing Keiserreich, only to be rescued when the Western Allies brought about that regimes downfall.
What does it matter what Putin says his War Aims are ? What he wants is power, as is usual; with a takeover of Ukraine he retains that power yet we in The West do nothing substantial against it.
(see map) Ukraine = most of the big white bit between the Black Sea and the Baltic or NATO/Russia but the top white third being Belarus which is an integrated friend of Mosscow/Russia while Putin already has control over the bottom third which should alsobe pinky-red.
Either you don’t know or lie by ommission.
Here we go, bit clumsy but it makes my point about a Putin takeover of The Ukraine.
Why would he retreat ?
Perhaps for the same reason that he retreated from Georgia a couple of years ago after engaging in a similar country-wide manoeuvre to prevent/halt ethnic cleansing against the South Ossetians there?
Don’t let us stop you going off to join the Ukrainian freedom fighters, but best pick up some Nazi regalia before you go, as that will get you in their good books. They will likely need all the help they can get and you could just make the difference.
Dailysceptic Management quote.
“Abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban”.
I have no idea why you brought Nazis’m into this debate but I regard it as “abuse”.
This is not a debate about Nazi/not Nazi; simply one persons’ power over another country, commonplace throughout history.
I think the reference was in connection with the publicly documented fact that a neo-nazi group/force ( banned from facebook for their views and actions ….. until a week ago … ) makes up a not insignificant part of Ukrainian military strength, at least on the ground and particularly in the Donbass region which is largely populated by ethnic Russian peoples who the neo-nazis have publicly expressed a desire to eliminate or remove from Ukraine.
PS. The neo-nazi group is called Azov. There’s at least one battalion of them, and Putin has expressly said that he wants to “de-nazify” the Ukraine before leaving. He initiated this special military operation in response to requests for military aid from the two newly formed republics of mostly ethnic Russian ( suffering from increasingly concentrated attacks, killings, etc ) under the official heading/justification, which has been used by the US in at least a few of its own military interventions … known as “the duty of responsibility”
Thank you for that, while take your point.
1. Being banned from Facebook means sod-all.
2. Expressing support for a group (not that that I did) that is also supported by extremeists does not make you an extremist.
3. The Soviet Union imposed ethnic Russians on all of its minorities as a matter of policy with the aim of suppressing separatism. Small wonder some wish to reverse the result.
BA is under cyberattack – it grounded all of its short-haul flights from Heathrow yesterday.
It attacked itself by outsourcing its IT work to cheapo labour in India.
Source?
Loads of UK outfits outsourced their IT/computerised Customer Service functions to cheap 3rd world companies (being employed by such firms counts as Middle Class and desirable in those countries).
It sometimes backfires and they have to bring that function back home.
One tiny example is the taxi firm I use. When Covid arrived it was decided that the in-house computerised call-centre facility they used was too small for the number of staff taking those calls and so the number of locals employed was reduced (much to the employers delight) and an Indian Telemarketing Angency was taken on to handle ‘excess’ calls.
Apart from the language barriers (mutual incomprehension) the total lack of “local knowledge” on the part of Telephone Agents based in India led directly to numerous false bookings which is not good for a customer hoping to catch a plane or attend an interview (or just ‘going down the pub’ come to that).
Solution》 rent a bigger local facility and for-hire those employees who had been ‘let-go’; not that all did return.
On the rare occasions that I still get put through to the Indian facility I politely hang up to recall in the hope of talking to someone who knows their way around our city and locale to some degree, though not as well as actual Taxi Drivers of course.
Roundup 1.
“The ghosts of Lockdown past . . . .everywhere. . . haunting . . . signers, stickers, instructions . . . ” won’t go away soon.
Daily Telegraph.
To be paid no more attention than for the fading 15 year old sticky labels on the entrance to every interior public space (including bus stop shelters with a rear and two nominal sides).
Is it still a legal obligation to display those instructions after all these years of auto-compliance by the public? Might as well display The Ten Commandments.
So I bit the bullet and coughed up £29.00 for 12 months internet access to D. Telegraph articles (not least via links from here at D Sceptic). Last time I bought a proper published edition was 2 years ago, £2.20 I think. It was full of Covid shite so I haven’t bothered since.
What about the blue ghosts aka discarded face masks?
Good subject for a confrontation but best started as a new thread
Next year they will do you for the full rate (£120/year or so) unless you threaten to leave. But enjoy that £29 one while you have it. Pity there is very little news in the Telegraph these days, last year all covid, now shifted to total Ukraine.
I have found that once you have had a subscription you can still access it all provided that you are signed in.
Just copy and paste any URL to archive.vn and forget that paywall…
Yes, they are already demanding more £.00 to access some of their app articles (by mainstream journos) which came as a surprise.
Big business and government get bitchy, police are confronted non-confrontationally, and how to vote Australian.
https://gregoryno6.wordpress.com/2022/02/27/covid-catfight-and-other-news/
The most common lockdown ghosts around here are the blue ghosts.
Something else the seals will choke on eventually.
In October 2020 I posted a similar, home-made close-up, photo of three such abandoned facemasks. As yours, set in brilliant sunshine on an embankment of yellow-brown oak leaves.
My post, entitled simply “Fall” (it was the start of Aurumn) with no accompanying text, proved quite popular as it was a novelty for the time.
Sadly I deleted the pic from my files.
Given the tens of millions such masks either sold or dished out F.O.C. (government offices) I have seen remarkable few such lazily discarded masks and those mostly as part of larger piles of rubbish.
Most that I’m seeing would appear to be lazily discarded, or perhaps not stuffed far enough into a pocket.
Image found online by the way, but a blue ghost is a blue ghost.
Only free of charge to some users. I am contributing to them all despite not using them (except in my workshop for dust).
I didn’t say “Without cost”, I clearly intended “F.O.C. to the end user”.
All the faceless, people, where do they all come from?…
Pantsdown’s modelling. Garbage programming using garbage non-data by an egomaniac with an abominable track record who knows that the more dire the garbage figures, the more prestige he gets.
Perfect reason to wreck the world.
They shoot traitors, don’t they?
Obviously not any more – Drakeford lives!
CDC: ‘”We want to give people a break from things like mask wearing when these metrics are better, and then have the ability to reach for them should things worsen. If and when we update our guidance, we will communicate that clearly and it will be based on the data and the science,” Walensky claimed.
You have been warned. Don’t sell your shares in the blue-plastic-trainer-facepants manufacturing companies.
As for the last sentence above- we know how to value that.
Ah the data and the science, not data and science, or real world evidence as it used to be called.
I have come to the conclusion that the refers to modelled science and model data, including the undefined political parameters.
I’m reeling again from red pill/eye-opening discoveries/revelations. I was shocked in March 2020 by the extent of govt lies, MSM propaganda, the censorship and smearing of esteemed/reputable scientists etc, big pharma influence/power, and WEF reset plans, vax mandates and vax passports, etc, etc etc … and I thought that was it …..
But now really getting that other perspective on the world, on its main powers, in which the US and its allies/satellites/gang members including the UK, are not only a massive blight on the world, violent enforcers of economic hegemony, a group of bullies, etc, but are also seen that way by many/most other countries in the world, because they *are* the worst gang in the schoolyard.
https://thesaker.is/playing-the-mighty-wurlitzer-vs-reality/
“And in the event that you are worried about China, they just posted this from their Russian embassy. They truly understand that this time it is Russia, but for the throw of a set of dice, it could have been China.
“Never forget who is the real threat to the world” …. “USA Bombing List: The Democracy World Tour”
Thank you, Daily Sceptic, and fellow commenters and their informative posts, links, etc, for supporting and encouraging my scepticism this last two years, the opening of my eyes, in the company of many like minds. It has been and continues to be a revelation.
Russia invades a neighbouring state and the West are the villains.
I’m outa here. Goodbye. it was nice knowing some of you, in the beginning.
The west are the villains because they/NATO and the US and their allies took down the democratically elected leader of the Ukraine in 2014 ( the Maidann events ) because he wouldn’t sign accords with the EU and NATO, and replaced him with a puppet president who basically does as he’s told, and one of the things he’s been doing is to break the Minsk agreements which the Ukraine had signed, which gave the Donbass region cultural autonomy and protection.
The Ukraine puppet govt has been erasing the ethnic Russian culture, languages and people ( 13,000+ deaths ) of the Donbass region for the last 8 years.
In addition NATO in getting Ukraine to join it is breaking the agreements that it signed with Russia not to extend its reach further east.
And the “west” has been pouring arms into the Ukraine for the last 6 months.
Putin has repeatedly attempted to solve the situation by diplomacy, talks, non-violent methods, but the puppet govt in the Ukraine, with the powers of NATO, the USA, etc encouraging it, has continued to accept US/NATO provided arms and to oppress and kill the ethnic minority of the Donbass.
PS. Annie, remember how the president of Belarus refused a huge loan and benefits from the IMF (?) because he’d have had to agree to their demands for covid regs and vaxx programmes. This is related/similar.
And yes, please don’t go. Would miss you and your posts very much.
Seconded.
I love in particular how western media is proclaiming the godliness of an actor turned puppet-president, who is indiscriminately issuing heavy weapons to the general population and instructing them to throw Molotov cocktails at an overwhelming well-trained army. Additionally they nestle artillery I’m the middle of dense tower blocks. Since when was using the civilian population as cannon-fodder a virtuous act?
I agree. Am not a lover of Putin but I have watched his most recent speech and it is more coherent than anything Biden or Johnson manage to say.
He is behaving very rationally as a Russian patriot.
The west has been stupid. This has been through trying to weaken Russia by advancing NATO, but ultimately it lacks the will to apply real force against a well equipped adversary who is able to push back. So, instead ministers post hash tags and make all sorts of useless threats.
That is not a coherent strategy and is ultimately the most dangerous approach: you fail to restrain Putin and end up looking weak. Who would choose to be an ally in such circumstances? You are egged on but then you get no support that matters when you need it.
Overall, our current political and governing class are fundamentally incompetent. The one thing they seem good at is creating internal propaganda and signaling virtue. Corporate media (as with Covid) have also just swallowed the official line, with the exception of GB News and some critical pieces in The Spectator.
Vladimir Putin in calling out NATO and the USA and receiving only name-calling in return just might feel emboldened and decide he’ll pick up a few more bits of real estate. Let’s see, the old favourite Poland perhaps?
Who or what’s going to stop him? Thick and stupid willy waving Bozo?
Biden will keep shouting way back in Washington but he’ll do duck all.
We could be in for a right ducking.
Don’t poke the bear.
Yeah , don’t poke the bear so that it can eat you unmolested….good luck with that.
Another Salmondesque useful idiot joins the club.
And that’s my understanding.
I also believe that Putin believes in Russia: its people, its history, its way of life. The US, the Five Eyes are hell bent on destroying everything good and decent about our countries and our peoples.
Great Britain, shortly to become a vassal state in some monstrous Orwellian behemoth that would make hell a viable alternative.
How many Labour camps are there in the Lake District?
Putin no more believes in Russia than Stalin or Lenin – the “people” are expendable .a commodity just like an AK 47 – something to be used against the “enemy”.
Many many British servicemen and Merchant Servicemen sacrificed their lives to ensure vital supplies to the Russian military thus enabling them to fight Hitler when their internal economy was……worse than second rate. Putin cares not one devalued rouble for that – his rigged elections should inform you exactly what he thinks of “its people”.
Staggered at the less than juvenile level of understanding of the threat Putin poses; you must all have gone to certain Universities in the Sixties and then joined the Public sector — if not , I have no explanation for your collective ignorance.
I’ll miss your posts
Oh no ! Please don’t go Annie.
Annie is not alone in being pretty disillusioned with some of the Ukraine postings here and on Reddit. I said my goodbyes on Reddit yesterday, may be following her on here as well.
Why not just ignore the posts, or engage with them and make your argument? Maybe there are sceptic forums where no-one posts off-topic and/or you agree with all of the posts, though I doubt it. Isn’t open debate healthy?
Yes whatever the wrongs of the Ukraine government these do not justify the wholesale invasion of the Ukraine
and you know this how? Ukrainian, Russian are you?
You know about the 10+ US-funded bioweapon labs dotted around the Ukrainian border….you know about the neo-Nazi goon squads that run the regions and terrorise their neighbours?
Their hand has been forced. Ukraine is a western client/puppet state which has been attacking ethnic Russians in the east for 8 years with western weaponry; if it joins NATO, that would mean (more) WMDs on Russia’s border. It’s existential for Russia. Not about gaining territory, so not a wholesale invasion, but about disarming and weakening Ukraine.
Exactly. Putin has had enough and said “no more.”
In the language of the schoolyard it’s:
Come and have a go if you think you’re hard enough.
Come back on that when some of those responsible for the far more murderous illegal wars of aggression by the US and/or UK in Yugoslavia, Iraq and Libya have been meaningfully punished.
Justification is inherently subjective. The issue here is really explanation, which leads to the correct attribution of responsibility.
Otherwise you are merely playing some kind of moral gotcha, whereby the dominant world power (hint: it’s not Russia) can just keep pushing and pushing an enemy towards the abyss until that enemy responds in what they believe is the only effective way possible, and then screams: “there, see what an aggressor they are?”
educate yourself and then return
I am firmly with you – some folks here who are unreconstructed US haters are being extremely naive about Putin….very scary.
PS. RT is under constant DdOS attack such that can’t access it anymore, which is really annoying/frustrating and also a measure of just how massive the censorship and suppression of Russian news and information has become in the last 24 hours.
Amtrup – keep an eye on The Saker site I shared with you on Friday – he has daily updates
https://thesaker.is/
Thank you. Am doing so.
Without wishing to sound too Pollyanna-ish, there’s been a silver lining in all this. Many daily sceptics have been created.
I’m sure that people gravitated to Lockdown Sceptic in 2020 because they thought the lockdowns were crap, while holding all sorts of views (some relatively uncritical) on other subjects.
In March 2020 I found the climate change rhetoric annoying because I can tell propaganda when I can encounter it, but it was not much more than that to me. Now I read avidly and widely on the subject. In other words, I am more sceptical.
And, like so many, I was an innocent when it came to vaccines in general. I just didn’t know. Now RFK Jnr’s book is daily reading – it’s detailed and immensely thorough.
https://www.industryweek.com/technology-and-iiot/article/22026518/lithium-batteries-dirty-secret-manufacturing-them-leaves-massive-carbon-footprint
Thank you!
I agree. I was a full on Sceptic before I found DS, and thank God I did, but now my starting point for any official announcement is:
‘aye, aye, what’s this all about?’
My trust is SHOT.
Shame the Telegraph didn’t spot the fake pandemic at the beginning and stand against it
Good to see mainstream US politicians daring to speak up against vaccination, even if it is just against vaccinating kids. It’s a start. We have to demolish the extremist pro-vaxx thinking that is so dominant – vaxxes are just tools, evaluate each one on its merits.
Excellent broadcast here showing how power is being transferred from West to East, the deep relationship between Russia and China (both in the grip of Kissinger and the gang) and Israel, and the significance of the Belt and Road and Buntings Clover Leaf map.
111. Russia & China Embrace, The Pan Eurasian Super State Takes Shape
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHFIAmO16qk
Every Sunday paper has shrieking headlines about Ukraine. Words such as “freedom”, “innocent victims” and “lionhearted” are being used.
Well. I have three words to say. Canada. Australia. New Zealand.
Where the f….fishtank has the media been for the past two years? When Trudeau went full totalitarian against some Canadians, closing bank accounts, sending in mounted police, confiscating livelihoods; all because a group of truckers dared say no to him? When Aboriginal people in Australia were taken from their land, with allegations that some were forcibly injected with the magic vax? When New Zealand closed itself off completely, even to New Zealanders who couldn’t get back into their own country? When some bod in Australia ( cant recall which one) said he wanted unvaccinated people to have lonely and miserable lives?
Don’t forget the demonisation of people across the world generally; those who chose not to take a so called vaccine, how several countries have shut them out of life, fined them, coerced and bullied them, thrown them out of jobs and threatened them in all manner of ways.
Where were you lot of journalists then?
I have no brief for Putin. I feel desperately sorry for ordinary Ukrainians whose lives are being shattered. But when people all around the world are slowly waking up to what has gone on these past 2 years, how they have been manipulated, and how their freedoms have been taken away from them, this eastern European trouble could not have come at a better time. A huge distraction, which is working splendidly. No end of people are putting the Ukrainian flag on their social media; that’ll show Vladimir Putin what’s what, eh?
And I bet the vast majority of people cannot point out Ukraine on a map or tell you anything about it and its history.
Truly the wolves have an easy prey.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Great Post.
Bravo! I am Ukrainian., my parents told of the ways of the communist s. I am under no illusion much as it pains me to say that Ukrainians have been daft enough to believe all the b’s fed to them by Western backed media.
It is very complex to understand that Russia has been a historical enemy to Ukrainians yearning for their own autonomy for centuries.
Much is said about ww2 and the associated sacrifices made by all sides. Understand this please, then see how this situation deserves a much closer look. The Soviet propaganda dumped onto the rsfr states to eradicate non russian culture was huge and inhuman. This caused much hatred towards Russians. Russians on the other hand were fed propaganda that they were superior to other ethnic groups.
I am here to say this has been a long time coming and the west has certainly not helped. It should have stood by these nations when they wanted independence and not had an eye on oligarchs money enticing them otherwise.
The word nazi has connotations and deep historical significance, however it should be noted that it needs clarification here. What the west says is a nazi and what Putin says is a Nazi could be completely different.
We know nothing really of what’s going on save for msm ramping up a chosen narrative.
I pray that people use their god given common sense in Ukraine and Russia. There are things going on we are neither party to or remotely aware of.We need a peaceful outcome here. World Peace please.
The biggest forecasting failure was SAGE’s prediction of an initial peak in June (as stated in evidence from Cummings to parliament). The reality is that even a schoolboy plotting the growth in cases in the UK would have known it had to peak in April, because at the rate of growth (seen in the UK and every other country) by the end of April the entire population of the UK would be infected.
How on earth did SAGE predict June? It seems that they never bothered to look at what was actually happening, and instead just plugged the assumed R value (about 2.3) into their model and then (as usual) asserted it was right and predicting a peak in June.
The result was that sometime end of March beginning of April, the sht, hit the fan. That is what caused the panic, that is what led to the headless-chicken panicking and over-reaction, from which we are only just recovering.
If SAGE had correctly predicted April …yes there would have been panic … but back in February with two months to prepare. Instead, they finally admitted they were wrong, within days of the peak of infections.