By now, almost everyone has heard of the ‘New Zealand whistleblower data’. Many people are discussing it, and I want to weigh in with my sceptical opinion. While I oppose Covid vaccines, I owe my subscribers a duty to report truthfully. My post should not be interpreted as ‘pro-vaccine advocacy’.
Be aware that the ‘leaked New Zealand data’ is problematic; even the story accompanying it is less than entirely believable.
I spent an entire day analysing it.
I downloaded it as a CSV file, uploaded it to my MySQL database server, and analysed it. As I will show…
- The ‘whistleblower data’ is missing huge chunks of information that should logically be present
- Liz Gunn of NZ is misinterpreting it by trying to pass normal nursing home deaths as evidence of “super deadly batches” and “mass vaccine casualties”
- The data has problems that are incompatible with the story of its origin. It cannot be a full snapshot from a working payment database. Therefore, the story of its origin is suspect
- The actual vaccine casualties may reside in the missing pieces of data that the ‘database’ does not provide
The Story
You may have heard that a brave whistleblower, a database administrator in New Zealand, saved secret Covid vaccine death data and passed it to Liz Gunn, leader of the NZ Loyal Party.
The data he extracted includes four million records containing:
- Individual person ID
- Vaccine type
- Batch Number
- Vaccine dose number
- Vaccination date
- Date of birth
- Age
- Date of death, if applicable
In my post below, I will refer to the above video and question the ‘official’ story.
What I Did
I downloaded the data as a ZIP file. Inside was a large CSV file named “nz-record-level-data-4M-records.csv” with 4,193,438 records. I imported the data to a MySQL database. I chose the combination of individual ID and dose number to be the primary key. Due to 47 records with duplicate primary keys, only 4,193,391 rows were populated.
An example of one of such 47 duplications is shown here: Person 152,535 was recorded, in contradiction, as having received their first dose twice, on the same day, 12-07-2021; one AstraZeneca and one Pfizer:
Missing Pieces
The total number of ‘distinct individuals’ in the ‘leaked’ database is only 2,215,729, even though 4.3 million New Zealanders received Covid vaccines.
So, half of vaccinated New Zealanders are missing.
A lot of doses are also missing, with some people having only dose five, or doses three and five, etc.:
461,900 people have only doses four and five recorded:
Only 966,989 records of dose one exist, even though the database contains information on 2.2 million people and 4.3 New Zealanders were vaccinated.
Over half of the people in the database (1,248,740) are missing records of dose one:
Out of 2,215,729 individuals in the database, a little under half (1,024,375) are missing the record of dose one and two:
Mess With Batches
The batch_id is supposed to refer to a particular batch of a particular vaccine, like Pfizer or Novavax. Instead, there are numerous ‘batches’ that contain multiple vaccine types:
Deadly Batches, Mass Murder Sites or a Total Misunderstanding?
The Liz Gunn video poignantly discusses “deadly sites” and “deadly batches”.
The video by Kim Dotcom reports that 21.38% of people receiving “Batch One” died:
However, the numbers do not match the leaked database, which has 2,979 people who received Batch One, and 375 of them died. That’s 12.59%, not 21%.
What kind of people who received Batch One died?
People who received Batch One were quite old. The average age of all Batch One recipients is 67 years old. The average age of all dead Batch One recipients is 86 years old. Batch One was given 2.5 years ago, so recipients had plenty of time to die naturally.
Another fragment of the video discusses “deadly sites”. According to Liz Gunn, some sites were mass murder vaccine sites. For example, Liz and the whistleblower refer to one vaccination site, Te Hopai Hospital, where 32% of vaccinated individuals died after vaccination:
But Te Hopai Home and Hospital is a ‘nursing home’ for old and dying people unable to care for themselves.
Is the death rate of 32% in a nursing home where residents had 2.5 years of post-vaccine exposure excessive? I am not a nursing home expert, and I am not sure – but discussing a 32% death rate without mentioning that this is a nursing home is disingenuous.
Is This ‘Leak’ a Psyop?
I do a lot of things. One of them is administering the database for Algebra.com, a website with millions of monthly visitors and over a million of answered math questions.
So, I understand database administration. The story of a bona fide ‘leak’ does not make sense to me. The data does not have the integrity that a full leaked data set would have.
This is supposed to be a payments database containing information for payments to vaccinators.
How can a payment database have such holes and missing data?
Was data selectively removed from the database before the leak?
How can batch IDs refer to multiple vaccines?
Did both the ‘whistleblower’ and Liz Gunn honestly forget to check that these ‘deadly vaccine mass murder sites’ are nursing homes?
Do the missing records of first vaccinations (doses one to two) hide real vaccine deaths, making Liz Gunn go on about “deadly nursing homes” instead of looking at deaths actually caused by the Covid vaccine?
Was the ‘leak’ a psyop and an intentional attempt to sow confusion, as it occurred with the old, pro-WEF and vaccine-crazy N.Z. Government still in place during the last days of it? This question is speculative, but something I would like to clarify.
There are many questions to which I do not have an answer.
I am thankful to Arkmedic and Nick Hudson for alerting me to the questionable nature of the ‘leak’.
I want to invite my readers to discuss this ‘leak’. I expect vigorous disagreements and hope my mistakes, if any, will be highlighted and corrected.
This article was first published on Igor’s Substack page. Subscribe here.
Update: A lot of things have happened since I wrote my previous post. First, I spoke with Steve Kirsch, who assured me that the data was genuine and the whistleblower was sincere.
A big discussion followed my post, as well.
Celia Farber also reported many additional facts today:
- This information was offered to other groups before (see VFF’s statement)
- The alleged whistleblower, identified as Barry Young, has been arrested
The New Zealand Government has obtained an injunction prohibiting the spread of the data. Steve Kirsch’s hosting account has been terminated, and he has moved the data to a new account.
In addition to offering a new way to download whistleblower data, Steve also provides additional details worth reading.
At this point, I believe that Barry Young was more likely to be sincere than insincere in his intentions and actions.
My previous questions and comments about Liz Gunn’s statements about nursing home deaths and data quality still apply, with one exception: The partial nature of the data is explained by the fact that some shots were not paid through the system that Barry Young was supposedly administering (I hope more clarity emerges).
This clarification is vital since I questioned the sincerity of the person who possibly risked his life to disclose data.
I greatly hope that, after thorough analysis, the data will yield useful information.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I heard about it first from Steve Kirsch who I have been following for a very long time.
I trust his opinion a lot higher than Igor Chudov.
Kirsch puts his money where his mouth is and bets people millions of dollars to refute his claims in front of independent experts.
No-one takes him up on it.
Kirsch is one of the leading people claiming that the experimental jabs are killing millions.
Yes I too was wondering if this was a psyop designed to discredit people like Steve Kirsch. However Steve Kirsch has been tweeting about how the data was reviewed by Prof Norman Fenton. I have a lot of respect for Norman Fenton and I know he too understands large datasets and how databases “work.”
My expectation now is that the data is problematic and incomplete, but nevertheless genuine. From what Steve Kirsch has been saying it appears Prof Norman Fenton has had the opportunity to interact with Barry Young and this is somewhat reassuring.
As for the data “anomalies,” this is a real live database and health system databases are often very incomplete. I’m not saying this is a correct interpretation however, the fact the database contains about half the vaccine records as the number of overall reported vaccinations – that is no surprise to me whatsoever. We have see governments are ENTIRELY able to lie about such matters as the number of vaccinated and will take every opportunity to big up the figures. Plus there is a likely some underreporting due to technology factors. Perhaps there are additional manual systems in place where not all vaccinations are registered not the database (I haven’t looked at this closely so could easily be wrong based on the known information about this).
Additionally that there are missing “doses” is not necessarily surprising for the same possible reason.
Bear in mind our own ONS have doubled the figures for number of migrants to the UK on at least three occasions (this is relevant because number of unvaccinated is based on vaccinated subtracted from total population and as such it is an entirely unreliable figure – the adjustments or admissions, I believe, were made because otherwise bad data would have looked simply preposterous. As it is it still looks like it is being manipulated) . The last time being during the Pandemic. I noted at the time, this curiously coincided with having to account for other data anomalies that would have related to the vaccination figures. In other words they didn’t voluntarily report the problem, they were forced to because it would have been evident their figures didn’t add up if they didn’t, and even so, Prof Fenton has provided evidence they need to go further – so the ONS appear still to be in the “cover up as best we can” mindset. I would not be at all surprised to learn the NZ authorities have been doing exactly the same.
Prof. Fenton’s post and take on it. https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-new-zealand-vaccine-data-what?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2.
That appears to indicate not just a smoking gun…….more like a fore and aft broadside.
Bombshell is a term I use a tad indiscriminately – perhaps very appropriate here?
Have I missed seeing the correlation from batch ID>date of injection>date of death ( and by inference death certificate stated “cause of death” )?
How can these data be reproduced for the US CDC/NIH, EMA and UK UKHSA/ONS?
I hope Mr Young has “some good people” watching his back.
How timely for Mr Bridgen and his colleagues to discuss today.
Meanwhile, Radio Silence from the British Brainwashing Corporation…
I for one appreciate your due diligence on the facts of these claims, the truth is the truth, If only all parties admitted such!
If the deaths data do not list cause of death then hard to see how it is useful. As the article says; a 30% death rate over two years in an elderly care home setting is not a red flag.
I do believe the vax is highly suspect but I can’t see how this data on its own proves that.
Take US VAERS data as an example. It was relatively simple to take the two datasets, join them together to get the batch numbers, and find that a small number of specific batch numbers we responsible for the vast majority of adverse events.
I am a data professional but the concept was simple.
For me and many others, the arrest is the official confirmation that the data is indeed genuine and devastating.
Regulators ignore clear vax damage evidence
latest leaflet to print at home and deliver to neighbours or forward to politicians, media, friends online.
I was able to reproduce the results of Craig Paardekooper’s analysis of VAERS data – this data reveals it is almost impossible to argue that Pfizer (at least) did NOT knowingly insert “vaccine” batches which were highly toxic and were responsible for the vast majority of “adverse events”.
The inestimable Nick Hudson also has concerns about this data. He even suggests it could be a trap.
These mRNA vaccines need to be taken off the market.
There was already compelling evidence these vaccines were causing harm and people were starting to vote with their feet.
So in my view this NZ whistle blower has not done us any favour. Even if he is sincere, the data appears incomplete and there is no comparison with an unvaccinated cohort. So using this data runs the risk of undermining the main message that mRNA vaccines are not a good idea.
Thank you Igor for your meticulous care with this. Craig P, Sasha L, Norman F et al have proven beyond doubt that the data shows the jabs are toxic, but alarm bells have been ringing on some of the protagonists in this piece since they appeared on the scene, and the headline numbers from this data don’t pass the smell test. Thank you for putting detail on the what was making many of our antennae twitch.