- “Henry Kissinger, refugee from the Nazis who swept to power serving Nixon as U.S. Secretary of State” – Unlike Nixon, Henry Kissinger was gregarious, had abundant charm and could mesmerise journalists even while taking the greatest care to hoodwink them, says the Telegraph.
- “Henry Kissinger shaped politics like no other” – Kissinger was the most enduringly influential Secretary of State in the history of the United States. He was also the most controversial, writes Niall Ferguson in the Mail.
- “Kissinger: The lone cowboy who kept Americans safe” – In the Telegraph, Tim Stanley delves into Kissinger’s realist philosophy and complex legacy.
- “Henry Kissinger saved us from a much worse world” – In the Washington Free Beacon, Andrew Roberts reflects on the life of Henry Kissinger, as well as his own personal encounter with the influential Secretary of State.
- “How Henry Kissinger lived to 100 years old” – Henry Kissinger wasn’t certain about the secret to his own longevity, as the former diplomat enjoyed a diet rich in fats and led a sedentary lifestyle, according to the Mail.
- “Henry Kissinger: Chaos and order in a changing world” – In a 2017 article for CapX, Kissinger discusses how Margaret Thatcher’s principles of decisiveness and principled leadership can guide responses to current issues, including relations with Russia, China and the Middle East.
- “Nothing will stop Israel from ‘eradicating’ Hamas, Netanyahu warns White House” – Benjamin Netanyahu has warned the U.S. that “nothing will stop” Israel’s army from “eradicating” Hamas as he faced mounting diplomatic pressure to scale back the assault on Gaza, reports the Times.
- “U.S. and Israel considering exiling Hamas terrorists to shorten conflict” – Israel and the U.S. are reportedly discussing how to exile thousands of Hamas terrorists from the Gaza Strip as a way of shortening the war in the territory, according to the Telegraph.
- “Douglas Murray: Wartime diary” – In the Free Press, Douglas Murray recounts his experiences covering the impact of Hamas’s attack on Israel.
- “BBC presenters accused of sharing ‘toxic and anti-Israel’ content online” – Multiple presenters at the BBC have been accused of posting “toxic” and “anti-Israel” content on social media about the Israel-Hamas war, reveals the Telegraph.
- “MSNBC scraps anti-Israel host Mehdi Hasan’s show ” – MSNBC has canceled far-Left host Mehdi Hasan’s show following his disparagement of Israel during its war with Hamas, reports the Washington Free Beacon.
- “Germany: Teens allegedly planned Christmas market attack” – Germany has arrested two teenagers who were allegedly planning terrorist attacks on a synagogue and Christmas market to take revenge against “infidels”, according to DW.
- “Elon Musk is one of us” – Elon Musk is right in highlighting Jewish groups supporting progressive causes and now facing the consequences, says the Washington Free Beacon in a leading article.
- “Matt Hancock denies lying as he appears at Covid Inquiry” – Matt Hancock furiously denied lying to colleagues and attacked the “malign” Dominic Cummings in his evidence to the Covid Inquiry, reports the Mail.
- “Matt Hancock’s ring of self-protection fails in another TV humiliation” – For six-and-a-half hours at the Covid Inquiry, Matt Hancock’s many ineptitudes were tipped on top of him like buckets of cockroaches, writes Tom Peck in the Times.
- “Unmasking the lie” – On Substack, Laura Dodsworth reacts to the head of the U.K. Health Security Agency admitting that there is no proof that face masks work.
- “Spoon feeding at the Inquiry, indeed” – The lead counsel of the Covid Inquiry fed evidence to Michael Gove, while senior ministers are now contradicting each other on the legitimacy of the Government’s exercise of lockdown powers, says UsForThem on Substack.
- “The Hallett Inquiry: Eminence-based medicine Part Five” – On Substack, Dr. Tom Jefferson and Prof. Carl Heneghan present the fifth in a series of posts focussing on the evidence given to the Covid Inquiry by the Chief Scientific Advisor Prof. Dame Angela McLean.
- “First, do harm: A sorry tale in the Daily Mail” – HART criticises a recent Daily Mail article for perpetuating myths about the U.K.’s medical system instead of engaging in genuine reporting.
- “Absurd policies” – Was there a more bizarre Covid policy than the Scottish travel ban on Manchester residents, ask Dr. Tom Jefferson and Prof. Carl Heneghan on Substack.
- “Is Karl Lauterbach replacing two-thirds of the ‘independent’ German vaccine advisory body to ensure the approval of new RSV jabs from Pfizer and AstraZeneca?” – On Substack, Eugyppius questions the motives of German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach in reorganising the country’s public health system.
- “The censorship began earlier and went further than we thought” – In the Epoch Times, Jeffrey A. Tucker discusses revelations that Covid censorship started earlier and extended further than previously thought.
- “In China, every cough and sniffle is a crisis” – Chinese hospitals are always overwhelmed, making it nearly impossible to discern the onset of a respiratory illness, says Prof. Roger Watson in TCW.
- “Barclay family set to regain Telegraph with Abu Dhabi backing” – The Barclay family is set to temporarily regain control of the Telegraph after agreeing an Abu Dhabi-backed refinancing of their debt to Lloyds Bank, reports the Times.
- “Spectator seeks ‘cast-iron assurances’ over UAE sale” – The Spectator has called for its effective sale to an Abu Dhabi-backed investment fund to be halted unless there are “cast iron assurances” about how its editorial independence could be protected, reports the Times.
- “The Government could tackle immigration – if it really wanted to” – Voters in the U.S. and the U.K., who seek to slow the drastic reshaping of their societies, are disenfranchised, writes Lionel Shriver in the Telegraph.
- “Sue Gray’s son picked as Labour candidate for Beckenham and Penge” – Sue Gray’s son has been picked by Labour to run for a plum seat at the next election in a move that will spark a fresh row over nepotism within the party, reports the Telegraph.
- “New Zealand is back, and it’s leaving woke Britain in its wake” – Kiwis have ditched their failed Labour Government for a conservative coalition. So why are the Tories following in St. Jacinda’s footsteps, asks Sam Collins in the Telegraph.
- “The insidious powers lurking in the Criminal Justice Bill” – The Conservative party used to be the party of individual liberty. No longer, it seems – at least if the Criminal Justice Bill is anything to go by, writes Andrew Tettenborn in the Spectator.
- “School trust boss cries over pupil violence” – An academy trust head has said he “cries” over violence in a Kent school where teachers are on strike for their safety, according to the BBC.
- “How China cornered the green market” – Beijing is miles ahead in a green tech race that western countries hadn’t quite realised was underway, writes Cindy Yu in the Spectator.
- “‘It’s not a great look that we’re sending three private jets there, is it?’” – On LBC, MP Mark Spencer tells Andrew Marr that he “accepts the hypocrisy” of the U.K. sending three private jets to Dubai for Cop28.
- “BBC radio host claims to struggle with ‘too many white colleagues’” – BBC presenter Nihal Arthanayake has told a diversity conference that no Muslims are involved “in the senior editorial processes” at Radio 5 Live, according to GB News.
- “France’s Government ministers to ditch using WhatsApp for French app Olvid over security fears” – French ministers have been ordered to ditch WhatsApp for a homegrown alternative in a push for “technological sovereignty”, reports Euronews.
- “Twitter CEO stands by Musk telling advertisers ‘to go f*** themselves’” – X CEO Linda Yaccarino has doubled down on Elon Musk’s “go f**k yourselves” message to advertisers who are pulling their money from the platform, reports the Mail.
- “Why does this crowd want to replace Christmas celebrations with messaging about the war in Gaza?” – On X, author Yoram Hazony reacts to images from the Rockefeller Centre Christmas tree lighting, where a crowd gathered waving Palestine flags.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The trans zealot brown shirts are bullying us again!
I have never read a word of Harry Potter or anything else that JK Rowling has ever written, but I have huge admiration for her..
The time may be coming when those of us who understand biological reality may need be to stand with HER!
It is time everyone realised that if it is to be a crime to misgender anyone then it would be a crime to deny the genders of 99.9% of the population.
What does this mean?
It means not calling a boy a “boy” or not calling a girl a “girl” could become a criminal offence like this:
So what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
Time to wake up and smell the coffee.
Lock ’em all up and throw away the key.
And if one calls a trans woman a ‘woman’ as that is misgendering all women should indirect misgendering be a crime too?
Just as the law recognised direct and indirect discrimination then it surely will have to recognise direct and indirect misgendering for not just trans people but also for everyone else.
I can’t see a billionaire going to prison. Those less well known or wealthy – not so lucky.
Her “Solve et coagula” tattoo is quite fitting for the times we live in. Society is being broken down before it can come together in a new imagining.
Denying biological reality is going to become a hate crime, but telling people to punch a TERF in the face is OK! Could this country be any more f***ed up?
“Hate Crime”——It doesn’t get much more sinister and totalitarian than that.
“Could this country be any more f***ed up?“
I’m sure someone will think of something.
They have not let us down so far.
We’ve had 13 years of it under this government. Sur Kurr Stammer’s lot don’t look like giving up any time soon even after they win the next election.
I will defend her free speech BUT….What was her position on jabs, Lockdown. What was her position on free speech before the Trans attack on her? would she defend people like us with such rigor. From what I remember (this was Twitter around 2015) she was a bit of a feminazi!
Hi Ron – it doesn’t matter. When she’s right she’s right, when we think she’s wrong, we call her out. No one is perfect and I have certainly got things wrong in the past.
Every divorced man knows women are always right.
Its one more reason for men wanting to be trans.
[Only joking].
She will have lots of company in jail then, with those of us who do not do personal pronouns; like me an adult female.
But wait jails are full we are told, so could we have our own barge for biological reality prisoners, with waiter food service, like illegal migrants have.
I think Labour will need more than one prison as we are many.
Hasn’t Starmer finally confirmed he knows what a woman is though? Or is the slippery parasite going to insist there are different types of women. Some of them being indistinguishable from men. Maybe there is no need to do any distinguishing though since as Occams Razor (the most likely thing is usually the real thing) would tell you——-Maybe they are really just men after all.
“Hasn’t Starmer finally confirmed he knows what a woman is though?”
No. That’s what he wants you to think. He is a politician. He hasn’t got a clue. Just ask his wife. He still doesn’t know where children come from and that is after having two.
Just because he does not know something does not mean he can’t pretend he knows when necessary to get votes.
So that’s the truth.
Only joking.
If you read my whole comment instead of just replying to the first sentence you would have seen that I am perfectly aware that him saying he knows what a woman is doesn’t fool me at all.
Try reading my comment again.
And then read the one immediately after it which says “Only joking“.
yawn———you were joking …ok then
Thanks for the comment.
That is way better than some of the people here who mindlessly downvote.
Are you sure he fathered them?
Presumption of legitimacy – legal term for – “I know they have the milkman’s nose but you have to give Dad the benefit of the doubt“.
Can be rebutted though.
Sometimes I admit there can be grudge pregnancies – where someone had it in for him.
Yes maybe they are really just men after all.
Transgender people? Surely they mean transvestites?
Actually no.
I used to shop at a supermarket frequented by a six foot four man who dressed as a woman and who had some surgery including implants in the derrière.
The surgery had been done very very badly and the implants were lumpy and all over the place.
It was at that moment I realised how sad and hard it must be for someone to want so much to be physically the other sex to their birth sex that they would go to such lengths to achieve that.
I cannot think of an analogy which might put this into a context which has resonance to those of us who do not have such desires.
Truly terrible.
And I am not sure misgendering such a man to be a woman [because it is misgendering in the biological sense] is going to help someone with such a strong desire.
All of this woke trans crap is not in fact helping anyone like that. It is making it us vs them when it should be us vs the people pushing all this wokism.
What we all need is a true understanding of the nature of the problem for trans people and to find ways of helping them live as normally as it possible in all the circumstances.
It is clearly tough.
And of course there are complications like sexual predators who pretend to be trans.
That does not help us one little bit to help true trans people.
It’s time for a “I’m Spartacus” moment !!..
…”an.”
A brave stand, but then she knows the Authoritarians wouldn’t dare “take her on” in Court.
Instead, they’ll pick on some poor sap who has no money for defence; no public profile and “make an example” of them.
It’s what bullies do.
If someone has decided to identify as a hippo and I identify them as a person is there something wrong with me or is it the alleged hippo that is in need of help? It really is a crude as that. Ordinary people cannot be expected to be told a pillar box is now an aeroplane because the pillar box says so and be prosecuted for insisting the aeroplane is actually a pillar box and identifying it as such.
Am I in an episode of Postman Pat? Talking pillar boxes?
Someone in my street put a knitted wooly hat on the pillar box but I can’t tell if it is a trans pillar box or not.
What do I call it? He or she or it?
Will calling it ‘it’ be misgendering under Sur Kurr Stammers Labour government next year?
Blimey. The French have a serious problem. All their nouns are either male or female.
What is a noun decides it is going to be trans?
They won’t be able to speak French in the UK next year without facing hard time in chokey.
I read somewhere that someone has invented a trans pronoun for the French but I don’t have the full details.
Will they have a defence if they use it?
The Germans do similar stuff as Mark Twain pointed out in his “The Awful German Language”
Deleted. Posted in the wrong place.
I (and a couple of friends of mine) have experience of wanting to call a trans man ‘he’ and wanting to call a trans woman ‘she’ – two people we knew in two different situations – and it is actually extremely difficult. When talking among ourselves about either of them when they weren’t there, we would constantly unintentionally ‘misgender’ them. We’d try to get it right but about four times out of five we get it wrong, and then laugh about how difficult it was to get it right.
It’s difficult because informally talking is something we generally do without thinking too much, it’s spontaneous, and if in your mind you perceive that a trans woman is actually a man, and a trans man is actually a woman, then it’s very difficult to remember in normal spontaneous conversation to refer to them in a different way from how you think about them.
So although nobody is suggesting it should be a ‘hate crime’ to unintentionally ‘misgender’ someone, it could be extremely difficult to determine if the misgendering was deliberate or not.
How things get blown out of proportion. This whole thing derives from this sentence in Anneliese Dodds’ speech at the Labour Party conference:
Under Labour, everyone who falls victim to hate crime will be treated equally under the law, and the perpetrators of anti-LGBT+ and disability hatred will no longer dodge longer sentences.
Note
It is about enforcing sentences for existing crimes.
It is not specific to transgender – it refers to LGBT and disability hatred
There is no implication that it means simply using the wrong pronoun
This is the Daily Mail twisting things to create a false scare about what Labour might do.
I would watch those cornflakes your munching on this morning if I were you. I think they might be a bit tainted. But then again it is all down to personal taste isn’t it? Wokery would run riot if left to it’s own devices so stop being an apologist for it.
It is striking how many people on this site respond to my comments with stuff about me as opposed to the issues being debated – perhaps I should be flattered?
“Flattened”?
Spelling?
Your cornflakes are more important than you though and it was them I was commenting on.
It’s not specific to transgender, nobody said it was, but if a Labour government enforces its policy of stricter sentences ‘for abuse targeted at transgender people’, it could include the ‘hate crime’ of deliberately misgendering, as “Deliberately misgendering someone is already a hate crime if it is motivated by hostility to the victim’s transgender identity, the Government said last year”.
Although they are wrong in cases where it is motivated by not believing a man is a woman and vice versa.
Just another way of looking at it.
“This is the Daily Mail twisting things to create a false scare about what Labour might do.”
How can you be confident it is a false scare? They might be bang on the money.
Vote independent – it’s the only thing we can do. This has just popped up and may be worth a look https://theindependentalliance.org/