After years of injecting themselves with foreign-made mRNA injections, patriotic Japanese Covidians will finally get the chance to put some domestically made lipid nanoparticles into their bloodstreams. From NHK World:
A Japanese Health Ministry panel has said a coronavirus vaccine developed by Daiichi Sankyo can be used for inoculations in Japan. It would be the first Japanese-made Covid shot available for practical use.
Would you be surprised to know that the majority of the panel still wears masks?

The panel of experts held a meeting on Monday. The experts said they confirmed the vaccine’s effectiveness, and that they have no serious concerns over its safety.
Banzai! Unfortunately, the article doesn’t give any details of the effectiveness the experts apparently confirmed. Fortunately, Daiichi-Sankyo previously put out a press release joyously announcing that the primary endpoint had been reached in the Phase Three trial of their Covid vaccine (DS-5670). So did DS-5670 reach 95% effectiveness like Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna did?
The primary endpoints of the booster vaccination trial were the geometric mean blood neutralising antibody titer and immune response against SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron BA.5 subvariant) four weeks after the investigational vaccination. Results on the endpoints in the DS-5670 group were higher than those in the control group (Omicron-adapted bivalent vaccine approved in Japan), statistically demonstrating non-inferiority of DS-5670.
In other words, DS-5670 produced more antibodies against BA.5 than the Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna bivalent jab, neither of which has ever been shown to be effective. How many more? Dunno yet.
Detailed results from the booster vaccination trial will be presented at academic conferences and in publications.
You may be thinking, “Hang on. Are you telling me that Japan just approved a completely new Covid jab based on unpublished antibody titers?” Yep, that’s exactly what I’m telling you.
But Daiichi-Sankyo is using the same mRNA platform as Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, so at least the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (MHLW) is not green-lighting new technology for them…
Rise of the Replicons
Unlike for Meiji Seika Pharma, where the MHLW is green-lighting new technology for a second new Covid jab. From the company’s press release:
Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. announced today that it has received approval for the manufacturing and marketing of ‘Kostaive™ for Intramuscular Injection’ (ARCT-154), a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine against COVID-19, from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) in Japan. [emphasis added, here and below]
This is the world’s first approval of a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine. So what’s a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine? An mRNA vaccine that self-amplifies, obviously.
The mRNA in Kostaive is designed to self-amplify once delivered into cells, so that it generates a strong immune response and the potential for extended duration of protection while using lower doses of mRNA compared to existing mRNA vaccines.
In other words, your cells can become even more efficient mRNA factories. The below image and description come from an article in the top immunology journal Cell ominously titled ‘Rise of the RNA machines – self-amplification in mRNA vaccine design‘. Note that self-amplifying mRNA can also be called replicon RNA.

Once released in the cell, the mRNA is translated to produce the protein of interest. In contrast to mRNA, replicon RNA encodes alongside the protein of interest, self-amplifying genes (depicted in blue) that amplify the replicon RNA. This intracellular amplification will subsequently result in higher expression levels of the protein of interest.
I don’t claim expertise here, but I doubt this is going to fix the problem of spike protein overproduction seen with the original mRNA platform. The Cell article even suggests as much.
At present, the main challenges involved in the global authorisation are potential safety concerns regarding the replicative character of these vaccines… For example, replicon vaccines could persist in immunocompromised individuals as clearance may be less efficient.
Because no other self-amplifying mRNA vaccine has previously been approved, the MHLW at least demanded the company do a large-scale randomised controlled trial to test the jab’s real-world effectiveness against infection and severe disease, right? Haha, no. Back to the press release.
In the Phase III clinical trials for booster vaccination conducted in Japan, 5 μg Kostaive™ elicited higher (p<0.05) and longer-lasting neutralising antibody titers against the original strain, as well as the Omicron BA 4-5 subvariant, compared to 30 μg COMIRNATY ® , a licensed conventional mRNA vaccine targeting COVID-19.
At least this time there’s a pre-print available (here). Whereas the Phase Three trial for Pfizer/BNT’s Comirnaty started with about 40,000 unvaxed participants, this one had only 828, who’d all had three shots previously. Such a small-scale trial clearly can’t tell us if the new platform causes any of the same safety issues associated with the original platform let alone any different ones (which is kind of the point). But Kostaive (ARCT-154) interestingly still managed to, er, amplify the rates of chills, headaches and myalgia (muscle aches and pains) compared with Comirnaty despite one sixth of the dosage. That’s the magic of self-amplification, I guess.

However, the version of Kostaive in the trial targeted the wild-type virus that went out of circulation in early 2021, so Meiji Seika Pharma won’t release that one. Instead, the company plans to release an updated version of Kostaive in 2024 and is currently conducting another Phase Three trial of a bivalent version, again comparing antibody titers.
So not only did the MHLW approve a vaccine that uses new technology based on antibody titers, it didn’t even approve it based on antibody titers from the vaccine that will actually be released. The old definition of ‘regulation’, like those of ‘safe’ and ‘effective’, appears to have died due to Covid.
This seems to be one of the enduring legacies of the COVID-19 pandemic: regulatory agencies have dropped the pretence of doing their jobs properly and will happily rubber stamp any application for approval from favoured companies on the basis of essentially meaningless data. Despite what they claim, the MHLW’s experts haven’t confirmed that the new jabs offer any benefit to anyone other than the vaccine makers, but they have confirmed that they themselves certainly don’t.
This article first appeared on Guy Gin’s Substack page, Making (Covid) Waves in Japan. Subscribe here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
In a free country children would learn to admire their heroes, their top scientists and inventors. And this has been the case in England. The success story did not stop with Nelson and with Newton. Inspired by such exceptional people the generations that followed built on their achievements and the country has won world wars and harvested the highest number of Nobel prizes in Europe:
United Kingdom 142 Germany 115 France 76 Sweden34.
Now, we proudly celebrate as “our” hero the other Nelson from South Africa, whilst our servicemen are treated as garbage. As for scientists, they have all gone with the brain drain and have been replaced by legal immigrants with foreign qualifications.
Sir Isaac Newton’s contribution to maths and physics will live forever.
One day all this woke bullshit will be gone. Passé, kaput, finished, forgotten. An embarrassing glitch, some historical anomaly when a group of people had some weird ideas. Like 70’s fashion. It’s just noise. Shrug and move on.
Sir Isaac Newton will not be forgotten. Every time we do differential and integral calculus, he’s there behind the equations.
70’s fashion is again in fashion at the moment. Just more mass-produced than individually hand-made.
Sorry I didn’t know that. I am ignorant about fashion. Are those boots worn by Abba still around?
Not just Abba, also Mott the Hoople, Slade. Sweet… too many to list…
Ah. I may have revealed too much.
Good if 70s dramas came back, Z Cars to name a few, no woke BS in those days.
They already have on the less well known channels.
But, with trigger warnings.
I wish I could agree with you, but as always, to the victor the right to write history. Give it thirty years, white Europeans will be the minority and the Imams will be dictating education and history. I don’t think I will witness it, but with Sir Sadiq Khan bragging about London being a great city because of it’s population of one million Muslims, I think the inevitable path is already walked.
I agree. Demographics are everything unless you are prepared to repel invaders.
Racialising the history of science is going to be tricky for the anti-whitists. The madleft knows – as does every adult – that the great technological and scientific developments of the past 300 years are overwhelmingly the product of Western science and Western inventiveness. This means white men were the innovators and discoverers. But white men are the madleft’s most hated group, the group scheduled by the madleft for extinction. So, if the madleft racialises the teaching of the history of science our children will see very clearly who the achievers were, and who the achievers weren’t. This will make the anti-white project much more difficult.
Not just white men. Marie Curie springs to mind straight away. Also Annie Maunder.
Western science was happy to nick the Arabian idea of a placeholder digit for zero – just as well we used Indian digits instead of Arabic as we’d have confused ourselves when the idea of decimals came along. I think it’s interesting that the USA still uses (or is in the process of moving away from) fractional inches and suchlike rather than ‘metric’ measures (they still can’t spell ‘litre’ though).
Can I give a credit to Ada Lovelace too. The forerunner of every coder and programmer in existence today.
I saw a film of hers once, although I thought her name was Linda…
Countess Lovelace once wrote a program which never ran for a computer which was never built¹. Wrt to Get immensely famous by creating something completely useless nobody understands, she could probably be regarded as forerunner of today’s AI researchers (still using methods proposed by Marvin Minsky in the 1960s) but that wouldn’t do her justice as this was all posthumously because of her eminent suitabilty as woke icon (probably helped by the fact that she was dead) which puts her in contrast to real female innovators in computer science like (US) Rear Admiral Grace Hopper.
¹ Supposed to calculate Bernoulli numbers and written a programming language Charles Babbage had created for his analytical engine.
Yes.
Without naming them or knowing anything about their backgrounds or the society they lived in it would be difficult to understand their (Lovelace and Hopper’s) relative merits and impact on the modern world.
We need to keep referring to Newton’s laws or Copernicus’ understanding of the solar system or Pythagoras’ ratios. Divorced from their history how will we understand how we got to where we are? For that matter how we got to the point of forgetting their names?
Americans use fraction measures mainly for nominal dimensions such as hole diameters or plate thicknesses.
Mist other dimensions are given in thousandths which make for easy interpretation.
It’s a perfectly usable system, eminently practical.
And why the heck should we accept French spellings of stupid words like “meter” and “litre” when we have perfectly viable easiest such as yards and pints whi h have stood the test of hundreds of generations?
Get a grip.
Metre.
The French invented it, Though the definition has since changed.
Why keep the French spelling? To distinguish it from a measuring device. Why Litre? To be consistent – but it’s not a hill to choose to die on.
Yes, of course it’s possible to learn and ‘do’ science and engineering in other units (such as Imperial). Obviously, exactly what one means by ‘ounce’ for example might be open to interpretation depending on what one is weighing. Also ‘gallon’ or ‘pint’ depending on where you are in the world. A more consistent set of units has certainly helped the development of science.
Thou as a unit? Far too coarse for many purposes – 25.4 microns. However, it’s usable for some purposes: I remember using feeler gauges to adjust the contact breaker (points) gap on my Minis to 15 thou (0.38 mm) until I discovered the dwell meter (not metre).
Of course, in most construction work, it is big smile, thumbs up, “Cock on!”
I have read that the French found the measurement in one of the Pyramids. Wow! I’ve found an article on it:
https://metricviews.uk/2013/06/07/was-the-metre-invented-by-the-ancient-egyptians-4500-years-ago
From Wikipedia:
It seems that there is plenty of pressure to make Farenheit 451 reality. Just like 1984. Is there reason to be alarmed? I think so.
The central theme of Fahrenheit 451 is that information and learning confuses people and makes them unhappy and that the task of government is to ensure that they remain mentally undisturbed and happy instead. They’re supposed to sit in front of their TV walls and to be entertained by soap operas expertly created for this very purpose. There are some hints of that in our present but Bridge, Rachel & The Climate Changers certainly don’t want us to live mindless, happy lives in a world where everything to enable us to remain so exists in abundance.
I’m looking forward to streaming the next episode of ‘Bridge, Rachel & The Climate Changers’. Any ideas when it’ll be released?
Early next year would be my guess.
A year after we have reached NET Zero?
There is little doubt that almost all our Beloved Leaders and their Civil Serpents view their “Settled Science” in the same light as the TV adverts with Albert Einstein, no less, explaining that “Smart” Meters will save you money.
It does. Calls for Newton’s laws to be renamed beause of slavery have already been made years ago. But that’s a sideline issue. The actual core of this idea is to stop teaching science in so-called science classes and use them to do political indoctrination in criticial this-or-that theory instead. That’s exemplified by the
It is essential that all children feel included in the sciences by valuing their experiences and through the thoughtful use of contexts, imagery and narratives.
Teaching science is about other people’s experiences and ideas which necessarily tower far above anything directly experienced by school children in their own lives because they’re school children and not groundbreaking scientists (whose discoveries and theories are worthy of being learnt about). The statement above is thus the credo of someone who’s dedicated to avoid teaching science. Instead, it’s supposed to become, minus appealing to the minds of children with various behavioural tricks, about how
some individuals, groups, cultures and nations were disadvantaged in their ability to participate in or to resource research and less able to claim credit and ownership for ideas that had been developed by them.
That is, teach critical race theory instead.
OK, let them try to design a bridge, engine or medicine using critical race theory and let’s see how they manage.
We won’t need those, existing in our 15 minute cities.
That’s right.
But once this has been introduced, they will be able to lower the voting age to 12. So long as they aren’t pale and male, of course.
ie teaching children that truth is subjective, thereby dismantling any chance of them developing enough critical thinking skills to challenge their poisonous orthodoxy and leave their cult. Fortunately not all children are as dumb as Bridget Phillipson so many of them will prevail.
This is a way for more and more teachers to not have to teach subjects which are too difficult for they themselves to understand, never mind the kids.
I remember my own maths lessons, where it was impossible to be wrong. You were merely encouraged to “express yourself”.
Made life a lot easier for the teachers.
“Describe a typical day in the life of Pythagoras”, “Draw a picture of Archimedes”, etc etc.
What about having an Archimedes Screw?
“non-Western” contributions to science. Make two lists and compare.
Yes like Black History month – make a list and that lasts about 5 minutes, not a month.
The Chinese invented gunpowder. Erm…
And why did they not match the achievements of Great Britain? Glass!! Or lack of it. No optical instruments without glass.
On the Origin of Species – Authors name withheld
“Someone’s” Theory of Special Relativity
“Someone’s” Third Law of Thermodynamics
Is that the idea?
Darwin – Junk science
Relativity -disproven more times that a bird sings in the spring.
Thermodynamics – which disproves Relativity – better.
Much of ‘Science’ is rubbish. It is dogma.
And what is taught is very very selective.
Why isn’t the Michelson Morley 1887 experiment which disproved the Earth’s mobility ever taught? Or Sagnac 1913 who disproved the invariance speed of light?
Dogma that is why.
Not all science is dogma. Some $cience is influenced by a sort of dogma but not real science.
Yes. Well spotted.
Obviously Lammy’s outstanding performance on Mastermind in 2009 was the precursor to this.
No it was caused by this… er.
Going to have problems with Boyle’s Law, Charles Law, Youngs Modulus, Ohm’s Law, Kirchoff’s Law, the Faraday Cage, Morse Code, the Avogadro Constant, Roentgens, Pascals, Saybolt Seconds, etc
And the SI units, including Ampere, Kelvin, Newton, Joule, Watt, Maxwell, Coulomb, Hertz, Pascal, Coulomb, Volt(aire), Farad(ay), Ohm, Siemens, Weber, Tesla, Henry, Becquerel, Gray, and Sievert. There’s the katal but, unfortunately, no Mr Katal, Miss, Ms or Mrs Katal, or even Lord or Lady Katal.
But there is the Gilbert, Maxwell, Orsted, Gauss, Rutherford, Curie, and degree Celsius.
If Sir Isaac Newton is cancelled does gravity cease to exist.
Another example of how the left are desperate to make sure that mass immigration of alien cultures is accepted. Evil.
This argument about how science should be taught neatly ignores the current woke culture which distrusts science per se. From basic things such as biologically-determined gender to the inability of basic face masks to stop the passage of minute virus particles. From the inability to perceive natural fluctuations in global temperatures over millennia to the idea that fossil fuels can be simply replaced with “renewable” sources of energy that are both free and inexhaustible. Science is being subverted. Everything we are told is based on a slanted interpretation of selected scientific findings, with inconvenient truths ruled out on the basis that “the science is settled”. Science is all about investigating, questioning, hypothesising, testing, proving. None of this fits into woke culture.
Science is being subverted
Exactly right.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDHarKGM0Jo
Decolonizing light? Conceptual penis? Chemistry prof urges feds to remove DEI from research funding
I don’t recall learning about any scientists in school science lessons, it was not (and should not be) part of the curriculum, which was simply about The Science.
Did you not learn of Boyles Law (maybe it was just a guideline)? Did nobody demonstrate a Wilson’s Cloud Chamber with alpha, beta and gamma radiation? Or a van der Graaf generator? Did you not learn about Dmitri Mendeleev’s development of the periodic table of the elements? What about Gregor Mendel’s experiments with genetic inheritance? You missed out on a lot of interesting stuff!
Put aside all the Woke bollox, we can all agree it is all Bollox so no need to comment further on that. But history could be a bit more honest about our historic leaders. Churchill was a WW2 hero, fair enough but lets not forget how he talked about the Welsh (I’m here in Wales) people in say, Ceylon etc. An article in The Light covered the Firestorm of Dresden after the allied bombing of the town; a town with no industrial power base or munitions factories and refugees from the east.
The article quotes Churchill and if what he said is true, that is disgraceful.
“I don’t want any suggestions how to destroy militarily important targets around Dresden. I want suggestions as to how we can roast the 600 000 refugees from Breslau in Dresden.”
The morning after the firebombing Churchill ordered low flying planes to machine-gun the survivors on the banks of the river Elbe where they had dragged themselves to try and find shelter from the suffocating heat, by water immersion.
I’ve seen this (the quote) in German a couple of times but I seriously doubt that it’s accurate because it simply doesn’t fit into Churchills role in this. He obviously knew what bomber command, that is, Arthur Harris, was doing and what it accomplished but he wasn’t enthusiastic about it, that was just something he tolerated and hid (in its details) from British public because it was a means of waging a war he was waging. It’s the first time I’ve seen Breslau mentioned here. The Dresden bombings occured from 13th – 15th of February 1945 and famously, the fortified town of Breslau (Festung Breslau) capitulated a few days after the German general capitulation on 8th of May 1945.
Here’s another quote I read somewhere (either in Friedrich’s Der Brand or Overy’s The Bombing War but I can’t give an exact location right now). In winter 1944/45 the Russians had asked for something to be done to help with their push into German territory and one of the motivations for the Dresden bombings was
Show the Russians what Bomber Command can do.
It’s its technocratic brutality, I find that much more telling than the supposed Churchill quote.
Another important thing: The RAF didn’t do daytime attacks because this was deemed too costly in terms of losses. Daytime raids, including the supposed machine-gun attack on civilians in Dresden, would have been done by the Americans. It’s also unclear if this ever really happened. Overy (from memory) says it might have been a fight between German and American planes which gave this impression.
There are other first-hand accounts of American fighter-bombers doing daytime attacks of civilians and civil infrastructure, so, some of them probably happened. But the Dresden one is questionable.
Well the article mentioned Mustangs (US) that machine-gunned the people in the town the next morning.
Gwendoline is truly evil.
Here is some chemistry, and by definition, science. It is the history of the acquisition of all of the elements of the periodic table and more. Notice the nationality of each discoverer. This time table goes back to 1250 when the 10th element was discovered.
Good chart. I’d never seen one like that before.
I have been a Member of the Royal Society of Biology for a long time but will not be renewing my subscription for many reasons – a list that is too long for here.
In essence I have disagreed with their so-called “policy” submissions (submissions that are supposed to represent members’ views) for years but their method of reflecting member views is flawed; another issue which would require explanations.
So, the news that they (ie the management of the RSB) have performed their usual trick of imposing another ludicrous woke-infested proposal and have only succeeded in adding to “educational vandalism” comes as no surprise to me.
This education submission from the RSB, the RSC and Institute of Physics is particularly bad and in my opinion, the role of these “professional” bodies should be subject to review along with the rest of the woke bureaucratic machinery that infests the UK.
The fact that RSB management sign off emails with pronouns just shows how utterly “woke” and “un-biological” the RSB is.
They want to be the heroes in their own curriculum. How degrading.
What a load of bollocks. These people despise Western achievement. I bet the Chinese don’t do themselves down. Anyone who watches the NHK channel, will see just how proud the Japanese are of their culture, their history, their traditions, their science, their engineering etc. Not our elite though; they are embarrassed by it all.
My career consists of projects outside of the UK, mainly across Asia and the Middle East. When I discuss the topic of this article with people there, who are citizens of those countries, they near universally find it to be hilarious. It seems only to be in the UK and Canada where anybody takes this ‘de-westernisation’ narrative seriously.