Another month and another set of immigration figures. 672,000 net immigration for the year to June 2023. At least that’s not quite as many people as at first feared. After all, the Mail earlier this week reported that it “understood” from internal Home Office forecasts that the number could be as high as 700,000. “The figure for the year to June is expected to top 700,000, beating the high of 606,000 for 2022, sources said.” Of course, as the piece went on to point out, the final figure from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) is likely to differ from that of the Home Office due to differences in methodology.
What are we supposed to make of the final figure of 672,000? Thank heavens it was only 672,000 and not 700,000 because that would have been disastrous? It seems that is indeed the purpose of the briefing of these pre-official numbers. It is a form of crude psychological manipulation that the Nudge Unit would barely get out of bed for, residing as it does at the more elementary end of behavioural science. Anchoring is a technique that has been used by retailers for years and is why the expensive bottle of wine in Waitrose makes £14.95 seem reasonable. This crude trick has been played in previous announcement cycles this year and will probably be played again by the Government although for it to work, it would help if the anchor number were a good deal higher than the actual one. It appears that more Government creativity is being put into managing our perception of immigration growth than into actually reducing it.
A second stream of gaslighting activity is being performed in parallel by the Left with enthusiastic participation on the part of the BBC. This is more subtle and can be summarised as the ‘Britain-has-always-been-a-nation-of-immigrants’ narrative. The lesson to be drawn from this narrative is that from the dawn of this country’s history, immigrants – black people in particular – have always played a big part and that any suggestion of a recent influx, wave or surge in immigration indicates racism, xenophobia and being self-evidently far-Right.
The latest contribution to the narrative was reported in the Daily Telegraph this week. A study by the Museum of London alleges “structural racism” in 14th century England as being behind a disproportionate mortality rate among London’s black population during the Black Death. This was, it is claimed, particularly the case for women who are described as victims of “misogynoir” (sic). The study does not appear to offer an estimate of what percentage of London’s population during the Black Death was black but the higher death rate is based on comparing the skulls of a sample of plague victims with those of a sample that died from other causes. As the Telegraph points out, this method of identifying ethnicity has a shaky track record. The Roman-era remains known as the Beachy Head Lady were claimed as those of a woman from sub-Saharan Africa but it later turned out that she was from Cyprus.
The BBC hit the news last month for including content material in its 2023 Black History Month programme containing the assertion that Roman emperor Septimius Severus was black. He was born in what is now Libya but was of Italian and Carthaginian parentage. African yes, black no. Like, say, Elon Musk. While this programming has been withdrawn, this and similar claims have been made for a while by the BBC, most memorably in its ‘Been Here From the Start’ video for CBBC’s Horrible Black History dating from 2021. It is still available to watch here. Every claim on the video from Cheddar Man to the Tudors was recently debunked expertly by historian Tom Rowsell.
The BBC, the Museum of London and others would all have us believe that Britain has ‘always’ been a country of immigrants. While it is true to state that immigration has always played a role, it has been pretty modest since the arrival of the Angles, Saxons and subsequently, the Normans. Modest, for century upon century – until this one. Because in the 21st century, as David Goodhart pointed out in his 2013 book The British Dream: Success and Failures of Post-War Immigration, New Labour drastically increased the levels of immigration.
From 1066 until 1950 immigration was almost non-existent – about 50,000 Huguenots in the 16th and 17th centuries, about 200,000 Jews in two waves, and perhaps one million or more Irish over 200 years during most of which time they were internal migrants within one state.
As Goodhart goes on to point out, since 2004:
More people arrive on these shores as immigrants in a single year than in the entire period 1066 to 1950 (excluding the Irish and wartime flows). [italics in original]
So, the latest immigration figures tell us that net migration in the year to June 2023 was almost three times the total immigration from 1066 to 1950. This extraordinary fact gives the lie to the idea of immigration being a continuous and ancient trend. There really has been a dramatic and gargantuan increase. The numbers bear this out.
The Left inverts reality across a number of dimensions in order to mask the truth. As a closing observation, reflect upon how it does the opposite with climate change, which really has been with us from the beginning. However, rather than accept that we live in one of a number of inter-glacial periods across history during which cooling and warming has occurred naturally, climate alarmists have to confect an ever more dramatic narrative of a sudden surge in man-made warming – the term ‘global boiling’ comes to mind. Perhaps we will come to think of this as the reverse gaslight.
Ian Price is a Business Psychologist and author of the Anti-Human Substack. Find him on X.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
This is why they didn’t make much fuss about the 75th anniversary of the Windrush: if there have always been lots of black people here they can only have got here by boat, so what is so special about one particular boat in 1948?
(Where were all the black people hiding when I was growing up in inner-city Leeds in the 60s?)
Ppl are far too generous with socialists and this idea we debate and find a common ground is for the birds. Socialists have demonstrated they are motivated by 2 things, envy and control. They hate anyone succeeding but themselves since their own self esteem is utterly battered and other ppls success makes them feel worthless/inadequate. Second they finding the world doesn’t place them top feel they need to reorder it entirely to ensure it’s fair, ie they are somewhere near the top. One only needs to look at the personal life of Marx to see the above is true, this a man of such low moral value he knocked up his own maid and refused to acknowledge the child, as well as coveting boozing, fine art and cigars. The latter is not so bad but is hypocrisy, the former issue sexually abusing his maid/refusing to acknowledge his offspring make him human scum.
It’s high time we stopped behaving like these ppl are reasonable and call them out for what they are, evil, mad and human hating dressed up in sheep’s clothes of “kindness”. For those still living in the old paradigm all mainstream parties are either full fat socialist or eco Marxist or something in between.
Master Marx also sponged of family and friends as he was not a productive member of society.
Tom Rowsell is phenomenal.
I have not come across Tom Rowsell but just watched the YouTube video and found it informative and enjoyable. Plus he gives el Beeb a thoroughly good kicking.
So, in 2000 years prior to the 20th century we had about half a dozen named black people and somehow these are now “famous black Britons.” ‘Kin hell, that’s making it up as you go isn’t it?
Racial differences are not the issue. It is cultural differences that matter.
Kicking off in Dublin !!
Good news.
We’re being told quite a bit about the “rioters” …. they are, natch, described as Far Right.
But we’ve heard nothing about the person who stabbed 5 people, including children, which kicked off the trouble. Funny that ….. I wonder what they’re trying to hide? (I think we can all make a reasonable guess.)
The number of new arrivals last year (1.2 million people) is more than the entire number of immigrants who entered the country between Alfred the Great’s time and WW2.
We are NOT a nation of immigrants. Prior to Windrush we were a remarkably settled population, most of whom (if records were available) would have been able to trace their families back for a millennium or longer.
You can only assign this destruction of our society to “the left” if you admit that the Not-a-Conservative-Party is also a left-wing Party.
The fact is that the Establishment Parties (LibLabCON) have ALL deliberately advanced the project to destroy our peaceful, settled society by mass immigration.
This massive immigration is not only happening in Britain but also in Australia, Canada, USA, Germany and Ireland. All western countries. This has to be an organized co-ordinated attack on white western countries. This is not happening by chance. Politicians are pretending they cannot stop it. This is most likely being organized and driven by globalist elements at the UN & WEF. There have been reports in Mexico of immigrants to the US have prepaid Visa Cards. Someone is funding this. We are fools to sit back and believe these globalist politicians can do nothing and allow western countries to be destroyed.
The other ‘gaslighting’ if I’m using the term correctly (pulling the wool over peoples eyes?) is that the government figures only refer to legal immigration, as far as I’m aware it does not include the Channel boatmen.