A civil servant at the Home Office has said that his colleagues would “ring the mental health services to check in on my sanity” if he were ever to propose ways of cutting immigration. Here’s an excerpt from his damning, anonymous article in the Telegraph.
Despite our change in boss, when it comes to controlling Britain’s borders nothing will change. I know this because I have worked for some time as a civil servant on immigration policy, and – in my experience – no priority is further from the Home Office in 2023 than stopping the boats or cutting net migration.
For all her strident bearing, Suella was cringingly apologetic in speeches to Home Office staff. Instead of instilling much needed discipline, she would tell us what a great job we were doing, not that this got her any kind of loyalty. She was mocked and insulted by London-based staff furious at the refusal to extend safe routes to an ever growing number of countries.
Home Office officials have a moral and legal duty to do everything in their power to deliver the Government’s priorities on immigration. Political impartiality is a central tenet of the civil service code, but this has morphed into a culture of ‘stewardship’, as our permanent secretary Matthew Rycroft openly admitted in 2021 (when he was recorded telling colleagues there is no need to “slavishly” follow government policy on diversity).
What this means in practice is accepting the bien pensant view that immigration cannot and should not be controlled, overruling the instructions of ministers and thereby their democratic mandates, with many of my colleagues viewing their role as being part of the resistance to what they see as a radical Right-wing Government determined to ignore the rules to punish innocent migrants. This culture of defiance is so widespread that any suggestion of border controls is sneered at or ignored.
There is widespread understanding that our asylum rules are open to abuse. Any Border Force officer or civil servant who works on asylum policy will tell you this openly. Yet any suggestion that asylum rules be tightened or asylum seekers be refused is rejected out of hand as cold-hearted evil.
If I were to walk into a meeting and suggest reducing migration or ask how we could immediately deport small boat arrivals or foreign criminals, my colleagues might think to ring the many mental health services we are provided to check in on my sanity.
Even the most moderate attempts to do anything about migration are met internally as either unreasonable or not legally possible, with discussion being stopped dead by allusion to ‘international law’.
Instead of dealing with the national crises facing Britain, including record legal and illegal migration, endless time is wasted. Senior staff hold events on Black History Month, Windrush and microaggressions. We are told to attend quarterly ‘away days’ (held online usually, most of us are in the office just one day a week) where we are given prizes and are told by senior civil servants just how wrong any political or press criticism of our work is. In meetings nominally discussing policy, we are forced to listen to HR directors give lectures on diversity and hand out awards about inclusivity. We are patronised and treated like children.
Worth reading in full.
It’s just further evidence of how desperately needed civil service reform is, moving away from the delusional model of a ‘neutral’ civil service to an explicitly political one like in the U.S., where the heads of Government departments and agencies are political appointments under the direct control of the Government. But you can put that down as yet another opportunity never grasped by the Tories these past 13 years, leaving the Blob to run rings around them.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Richard Tice has always said the only way we could change the situation is to bring in an independent company and staff to manage the boat people.
I would go back to the old bounty system and pay per migrant returned.
Shame there’s no English subtitles but this clip has gone viral. Apparently this woman who lives in Israel celebrated the Hamas attack on Oct 7th on social media and now she’s being sent back to Gaza. Can you imagine how awesome it would be if European leaders would send everyone who has demonstrated hate and disrespect for our countries and culture back to where they came from? Many of our problems would be solved immediately.
https://twitter.com/benonwine/status/1724769299099722116
Thanks M. Not so funny when you get caught out. Would love to know if she is on benefits & cheap State rent.
That would be a start, but how many people born in this country hate the UK?
If these people don’t have dual nationality where can they be sent.
If other countries won’t accept people we don’t want here then what? This is the reason why we can’t put illegal immigrants who’ve crossed the channel on a boat straight back to France, quite sensibly the French were only too glad to see the back of them and won’t take them back.
If you were born here and provably despise or hate this country, and are siding with enemies, then you too should be ejected. We need some harsh policy and harsh direct action here.
“Where can they be sent”? ———–Back to France. The same problem exists with those playing the system who chuck their passports or any form of identity. I say to those.that if you don’t reveal who you are and where you come from you will never be allowed to live here or get a UK passport. But in all these matters we are being trumped by foreign courts. ———Apparently if you are not prepared to be subjected to ECHR you must some how be uncivilised. But how about a UKCHR? Are we not civilised enough to decide who comes here?
All the civil service cares about is their pension. If a minister explained finally salary pensions would be phased out next week if the boats didn’t stop this would end tmw. It’s to the Tories eternal shame that they haven’t simply ended the absurdity of civil service independence and started sacking the worst offenders. Labour would tolerate this.
Privateers. Private pirates paid on performance. £100 per migrant turned back or sent back to Africa/middle east/Albania, Turkey and any country with Stan in the title
The UK always wants to be “world leaders” in everything. Or they pretend they want to be——-Why not “world leaders” in border control? ———OOPs sorry that would be asking to much wouldn’t it? I forgot they only want to be world leaders in Liberal Progressive agenda’s, and anyone who wants to control a border must be some kind of right wing nut job and Islamophobe.
How about a world leader in upholding the Nuremberg code.
LOL, I just posted this in the Rwanda article. But if you want to read it in full use this link, so as to avoid the stupid paywall;
https://twitter.com/StevenEdginton/status/1724762963213480011
There needs to be a major cull of civil servants. These people are meant to carry out government policy and yet, like Sir Humphrey of Yes Minister, they run rings round politicians and do exactly as they please. The fact that the civil service is overrun by woke liberals doesn’t help matters. Every migrant is to be treated as if they are a special case and given precedence over our own poor and homeless. It’s a shitshow for sure.
I doubt they would ring the mental health services, but would instead report them to HR as being Literally Hitler, ensure they were shunned, ostracised, overlooked for promotion and hounded out.
There’s a really, really simple solution to this. Move these bureaucratic offices out of London and somewhere past Birmingham. The horde of virtue-signalling, lefty tw*ts who inhabit these offices, who are unelected but who have huge influence on policy-making, will find some other London haunt to slither under. We’ll call it the The Great Civil Service Replacement Theory.
And let the government bring in more of its own staff like in the US. They do not have permanent secretaries.
Wishful thinking, but look at the other departments that have relocated outside London, places like Bristol, Cheltenham, or the Beeb outfit in Salford. In the past, I had a lot of expertness re transferring outfits outside London in the Railway industry. It’s a long drag to try moving employees around before significant changes occur, although it probably looks good to the Chancellor in the short term. I expect most organisations, either parts of the Gov, or large private outfits, experience similar issues.
‘….you can put that down as yet another opportunity never grasped by the Tories’
All roads lead to Bunter. He had the majority to actually do something….
As the man said:
‘He talks the talk, but he doesn’t walk so good….’
Suggestions about moving the Civil Service out of London as a cure all are utter nonsense. The whole organisation is infected with super woke, left wing grotesqueries.
Sack the lot.
I think we should ring fence all those who work in the civil service and send them to Rwanda, home office first, I wish.
And we don’t need to send the invasion illegals there because it is easy!!! we just turn the boats around add a remote control engine and steer them back on to the French beach.
All this court ruling waste of time!! is avoiding the obvious? tow them back.
If they jump in the sea? Save them dry them off, dry clothes pop them in another dinghy and take them back.
Rinse and repeat it is common sense!
Sack the entire civil service as they are not working for this country and are also neither civil nor a service. I’m sure the majority of civil service hate Laurence Fox for not being submissive, while they will gladly allow migrants in that are not only hostile to any non-heterosexual but are actual real misogynists.
Yes, agreed. These protests have no sign of easing off, quite the opposite. Who needs to wait for the weekend?? This one’s going on right now outside Parliament. I did like how somebody handily shared the definition of ”useful idiot” in the comments below. Because this stupid woman, plus god knows how many more, are certainly text book cases. The terrorists must be looking at these Westerners and loving this;
https://twitter.com/ArchRose90/status/1724852701509403033
re “where the heads of Government departments and agencies are political appointments under the direct control of the Government”
In theory yes but very far from the truth. The US Civil Service hardly managed by the political appointees at the top unless it is a Democrat administration and the government packed with Democrats, it seems.
Tories maybe like a bit of political S&M from those naughty lefties. All those posh boys and girls in the tory party maybe like being dominated politically. There’s probably a psychology PHD in this theory …
The UK is now the most densely populated country in Europe having overtaken Holland some time ago. Perhaps the real insanity is trying to stuff more and more people into the clutter that already exists. If this net immigration of 600,000 per year continues and these people will have to live somewhere (presumably in a house) then where are we to put all of these people? Where are all the hospitals and doctors and appointments? Where are all the schools. Where are all the houses, the dentists, the jobs and on and on and on. Uncontrolled mass immigration is insane, and those who think there must be something wrong with people who challenge it need to be sectioned.
The explanation for this attitude is quite simple. Photographs of Home Office personnel in various publications reveal that they are largely immigrants or descendants of immigrants. The last three Home Secretaries, including the recently appointed one are descended from immigrants. So is the current PM and the mayor (aka The Ruinator) of London.
Not rocket science, is it?