A quarter of Americans know someone killed by the Covid vaccines and nearly half of Americans would join a major class-action lawsuit against the pharmaceutical companies, a new poll has found. Steve Kirsch has more.
Rasmussen Reports has just released yet another devastating survey about the Covid vaccine.
Its latest survey, released at 10:30am EST on November 2nd, confirms (yet again) that the Covid vaccine is a train wreck, the biggest healthcare disaster in our lifetime.
The key conclusions:
- 47% personally know someone who was killed by the Covid virus.
- 24% personally know someone who was killed by the Covid vaccine.
- 42% said it was somewhat likely or very likely they would join a major class-action lawsuit against pharmaceutical companies for vaccine side effects. That would make it the largest class action in U.S. history by a long shot.
I believe the vaccine death numbers are very conservative. I’ll explain why shortly.
Bottom line: this is not sustainable.
Earlier this year, I suggested to Rasmussen that it might be interesting to take a second look at Covid vaccine injuries.
They did.
Why? Because they are one of the few honest polling firms in the U.S. Nobody else wants to know about vaccine injuries and deaths. Fact check that one.
And the results are stunning, as you’ll see below.
The full results here (Excel spreadsheet which includes cross-tabs).
Note how the answers are very consistent regardless of demographic (scroll horizontally).
Remember this is a poll of a random sample of all Americans (sample size 1,110) carried out by a mainstream polling company. Such results are astounding.
Steve shows how Rasmussen has a strong track record in predicting elections and the new poll’s results tally with a similar poll last year, reinforcing its reliability. A poll is just a survey of what people think, of course, not proof of anything. But combined with other evidence it seems to be confirmation of a major problem.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
1-The first graph – ‘do you know any who died from Rona’ is wrong. Died from is not dying ‘with’ a fake test and fake MCCD issued by handwaving quacks who get paid per death.
1a-This stat is fundamentally false given the reality that dying from Rona = 8% on average of the gov’t death tally. We can’t forget the data fraud they used to push the scam.
2-The data needs to be extended by including people you know who were injured by the Rona quackcines. That number + those who know someone who died = 75% imo.
2a-That is the real number of those harmed and killed and comports with 42% who would sue the criminal Pharma industry and their political-gov’t mafia abettors.
Criminals the entire flocking lot of them.
I agree that many deaths thought to be from the virus may have been deaths with the virus, but nevertheless asking people do they know anyone who died from Covid is the right question, whereas asking them do they know anyone who died with Covid would be the wrong question, and a pointless and silly question.
The answers to the ‘from‘ questions may of course include deaths which were not from Covid, because of the way these deaths have been officially reported, but will be more accurate than a question asking about deaths with Covid.
The polling company is asking about people’s perceptions rather than established facts which nobody really knows as they are being hidden from us.
But the same applies to “Do you know any one who died from the vaxx?”. Just asking people isn’t very accurate on either side, people like to say what they think they should say, or exaggerate, or misremember details. Of course there’s no hope of obtaining any accurate statistics any time soon, but I don’t think the data above are going to be of much use. I find it as difficult to believe as 30% of people claiming to have Long Covid.
Yes, that’s correct, you’re not going to get a very accurate figure by asking people do you personally know someone who died from the Covid vaccine, but it’s likely to be more accurate and honest than the official claim that barely anyone has died from the vaccine, and clearly casts doubt on that official claim.
The question doesn’t give a completely inaccurate indication of how many have died from the vaccine. If the vaccine was as harmless as a vitamin pill, you wouldn’t get 24% of people saying they personally know someone who died from vaccine, just as you wouldn’t get 24% of people saying they personally know someone who died from vitamin pills. That many people claiming they personally know someone who died from the vaccine simply can’t be dismissed and ignored, especially when it’s not the only indication that many people have died from the vaccine.
This question in this poll on its own isn’t proof that the vaccines aren’t as safe as claimed, but along with all the other evidence, it’s yet more evidence to anyone without a conflict of interest that the Covid vaccines are not as safe as officially claimed.
I wasn’t claiming that people haven’t died from the vaccine, that the claims should be dismissed or that it’s totally safe. I probably didn’t word it very well. It just doesn’t seem right to claim that 47% can’t have died from covid, whereas the vaccine figure must be correct. Both should be treated with the same suspicion IMO.
I wouldn’t say both should be treated with the same ‘suspicion’, I would say they both need to be treated with the same understanding, as the polling company is not claiming that because some people believe something, it therefore must be true. The poll tells us what people believe, not that what they believe is true.
But if 24% of Americans say they believe they personally know someone who died from the vaccine, the question needs to be asked why do so many believe they personally know someone who died from the vaccine, especially as “There are almost no political differences on these questions. For example, 25% of Republicans say they know someone personally who died from side effects of COVID-19 vaccine, as do 24% of Democrats and those not affiliated with either major party.”
When you test everyone with a PCR test that also says the semi-skimmed milk in your fridge has Covid and when they die officially class them as a Covid death, then that figure is probably closer to 100%.
So that is how Covid really spread. Now I see why so many are using non-dairy milk substitutes.
Interestingly, a better question might have been “Do you believe a class-action lawsuit should be taken against pharmaceutical companies?”, as this number is likely to be bigger than those who would actively JOIN a lawsuit.
I was initially sceptical about the 24% statistic, as I thought that the results may be skewed by the fact that you’re more likely to go ahead with a phone interview, say, if you or anyone you know has been vax-injured / bereaved. But that probably isn’t true, because there’s a majority (69%) who took part in the survey and answered “no”. Would there have been more “no’s” if there had been financial incentives for taking the survey (paying people to do so), and hence ensuring equal likelihood to take part whether or not they knew anyone who had fallen victim to the genetic experiment? We’ll never know, but still this result, having been arrived at by apparently sound methodology, must indicate unequivocally that something is amiss, and cannot be ignored.
People saying they know someone who died from the Vaxx is entirely different from being able to say factually that they did.
It’s a good start, but the RPTB will bat this away easily.
We need post mortems on these deaths so the bastards can be nailed .
If you don’t look, you will not find.
It took decades to nail bigtobacco so don’t give up hope.
People’s opinion of whether or not someone they know died from the vaccines can be skewed both ways. No doubt a lot of sheeple still believe the vaccines are safe and effective, therefore if someone they knew died a couple of weeks or months after being jabbed they wouldn’t think that the person might of been killed by the jab.
Still ‘baffled’ by the decision, early on, that in order to find out more about the pathology of this “terrible, unprecedented disease” we should…er…not conduct post-mortems. Where was The Science when that decision was taken? Unless…
Anecdotally: I carefully followed the ‘deaths with covid’ stats from my nearest major hospital (very large, covering massive catchment area). Total deaths ‘with’, over two years: fewer than 200. But I know they will say “ah yes, but we only kept it that low by our heroic efforts at infection control” (ie refusing to let people in). What a complete collapse of civil/social principles, like a mass possession.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/agenda-un-who-total-enslavement-humanity-global-health-dictatorship/5834338
The article details the efforts of the usual, the WEF, WHO and UN to enslave humanity.
How many interviewees were referring to the same persons? I.e. how to avoid double counting?
Whatever the survey poll says across the pond, remember that the manufacturers were granted legal indemnity in the UK. No shortage of publications about that, e.g. https://www.jurist.org/news/2020/12/uk-government-grants-pfizer-civil-legal-indemnity-for-covid-19-vaccine/
A quarter of Americans (and probably a far larger proportion) don’t know the difference between correlation and causation. Unfortunately, many judges probably sit in this category.