On Monday night, a protest took place outside the BBC’s headquarters in London – jointly organised by the National Jewish Assembly, U.K. Lawyers for Israel and the European Jewish Association – against its continued bias and inaccurate coverage of the atrocities committed by Hamas.
No red paint was sprayed on the walls of Broadcasting House; there were no fireworks nor chants exhorting violence or ethnic cleansing. All that took place was a few speeches from campaigners, some songs and a few prayers.
The BBC’s decision to refer to Hamas as ‘militants’ rather than ‘terrorists’ is the latest example of a long history of sanitising Jew-hatred among Palestinians while demonising Israel’s efforts to defend itself. Given the scale and barbarity of the 7/10 atrocities, one has to ask the question: What would have to happen for the BBC’s leadership to get around a meeting table and agree: “Okay, Hamas has reached the bar now. Let’s start referring to them as terrorists”?
As a group of campaigning U.K. Jewish lawyers has already pointed out, Hamas is a proscribed terrorist organisation and has been for two years. That is not a matter of debate or discussion. It is a matter of legal fact.
As recently as July 2023, the BBC was compelled to apologise for the line of questioning taken by Anjana Gadgil with Naftali Bennet following a military operation in Jenin. She asked if “Israeli forces are happy to kill children”. This question and the pervasive BBC mindset behind it seems in particularly poor taste with the knowledge of what came to pass three months later. Unlike Hamas, the IDF has never entered a country with the express intention of murdering civilians.
The BBC has a history of sanitising the antisemitism that exists among many Gazans. The 2019 BBC documentary One Day in Gaza recorded daily life for Israelis in southern Israel and also that of Palestinians in Gaza. And yet when it recorded Gazans’ dialogue referring to Israelis as ‘Yehudi’ – Arabic for ‘Jews’ – it subtitled the word as ‘Israelis’. Why do this if not to sanitise Palestinian attitudes?
In the 2004 Balen Report, the BBC compiled its own investigation into historic antisemitism within the broadcaster but has not only refused to publish the report, it has spent some £350,000 of licence payers’ money on legal fees in order to prevent efforts to force it to do so.
In December last year, a parliamentary investigation was announced into the BBC’s coverage of Jews and Israel. This followed a petition set up by the Jewish Chronicle stimulated in part by the BBC’s coverage of an antisemitic attack on Jewish schoolchildren on London’s Oxford Street. The BBC said that an audio recording made during the incident included an anti-Muslim slur made from inside the bus, something for which there was no evidence. Ofcom found “significant editorial failings” in the BBC’s coverage.
At the same time that the parliamentary probe was announced, the BBC reformed its Arabic service, employing Output Monitors to enforce standards. As to how well that process went, we can only judge by some of the activity on social media by BBC News’s Arabic reporters. One endorsed a post describing October 7th as “a morning of hope”.
Language is important and never more so in the face of barbaric murder, outright terrorism and a climate of racial hatred and incitement to violence. During the Corbyn years, casual antisemitism and hatred of Israel became conflated but also normalised. The BBC has played an influential role in this normalisation. Last night’s small protest may have little or no impact and was dwarfed in scale by those over the weekend supporting Palestine. A small and marginalised Jewish community in Britain is grateful for government support and ministerial condemnation of those glorifying Hamas. It now needs the same from its national broadcaster.
Ian Price is a Business Psychologist. Find him on Twitter.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Surge? What’s a surge?
It’s when the amount of alarmist Covidbollocks in the news increases considerably over its (already high) background level.
An essential question to jog the gullible.
Whenever ‘surge’ is used instead of ‘increase’ you know its exaggerated hyped-up nonsense designed to make headlines more eyecatching and cause anxious readers to keep coming back for more sensationalised news.
‘Today there was an increase in deaths from the Delta variant’.
Ok – but this sounds much more dramatic and frightening …
‘Today there was a surge in deaths from Delta variant’
It’s what Bozo Scumbag has in his loins when his missus grabs him firmly by his bits and tells him what he will get later if he’s a good boy and does what she says.
Urges misspelt.
Important News: OPEN LETTER AND NOTICE OF LIABILITY FROM DOCTORS AND SCIENTISTS TO THE EMA AND THE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT REGARDING COVID-19 VACCINATION – More info, resources and useful links: https://www.LCAHub.org/
LINK: Open Letter from Doctors for Covid Ethics
Doctors for Covid Ethics: List of signatories
This is great work! How are these letters being “Served” ( In person / by registered mail ? ) and what will the follow up be ? Also … how will any (civil?) action be enforced ? If there crowdfunding to pay for lawyers / courts etc ?
They’re not being served on anyone, this is a bunch of well meaning Freementals on the Land having a laugh and a LARP.
You’ll notice that the “Who we are” section doesn’t say… who they are.
Doesn’t take too much work to discover (HINT: Try clicking the ‘link’): Doctors for Covid Ethics: List of signatories
If you are referring to “doctors4covidethics.org” then I don’t see any “Who we are” section you refer to, but I do see a main menu link on the home page to “About” which goes to the following:
https://doctors4covidethics.org/about/
Perhaps you need a new battery Mr Cyborg – or a new brain…
The ONS is just another tentacle of the same Government Kraken.
Hydra…
” . . .Are any of our once-trusted institutions safe from being co-opted into pushing the Government’s political agenda?”
Sadly not. This ought to be the headline story – not the BS put out by the MSM yesterday. Grrrr!
This is a major problem. It was always a danger for ‘independent’ government bodies, but we now have a degree of corruption where time-servers are in charge and are significantly perverting the role of such bodies.
I can confirm that “Ceefax” (not surprisingly) ran this “1%” story without mentioning the 70% rate in August and September. Bias or mendacity, it’s certainly not the whole truth. I suspect it’s the politicians’ version of “truth” where they quote information selectively that, while on its own is not an outright lie, gives a misleading impression.
The despicable deceit and deception continues. Is there any scientifically and mathematically literate staff in the mainstream propaganda media? Why isn’t this cherry-picked ONS data being forensically dismantled?
Lies, lies, lies, all the time. All of them have to go.
In fact, I can answer my own question. No, there are not many scientifically and mathematically literate staff in the mainstream propaganda media. I performed a longtitudinal study on this as part of my Master’s thesis. 30, 40 years ago there were, but not now. And that is part of the reason why the evil monsters behind this plandemic are getting away with it.
That was certainly true when I was a journalist. I doubt it has changed. Graduates are drawn to journalism because they like writing or politics, and journalism is unprofitable these days, so those good at maths and science would be foolish to go for it.
In addition, there are few cynical working class entrants – and the entrants from good universities have little cynicism about authority or received opinion. Life has perhaps been a little too easy.
While a lot of journalists may not be especially scientifically and mathematically literate, they are not in general so dumb that they could not make themselves more literate if they really wanted to. I know people in my line of work, in leadership positions, who are not naturally “technical” but make an effort to understand technical issues and be able to question “experts”. I don’t think lack of brainpower is the issue, it’s lack of interest in the truth. They just want to write stuff that pushes their point of view, so they just find experts who back that point of view and quote them.
It takes a high degree of literacy to craft facts to tell lies.
Actually, it’s not specific scientific literacy that is the major problem. The needed skills of analysis are much wider for an investigative journalist, and it is these wider skills that have been dispensed with.
I’ve mentioned several times in this blog Nick Davies’s book “Flat Earth News” as a seminal history of the decline of investigative journalism and the rise of what he labels “churnalism”. It really is worth the time needed if you are interested; particularly it sheds light on the recent history of the Guardian, which is often mistakenly cited here as a paper of the ‘left’.
Excellent, and finally a decent headline.
Since March 2020, truth has become irrelevant. The only factor under consideration has been getting the predetermined outcome.
So they’ve lied about how dangerous COVID is, about a symptomatic transmission, about the effectiveness of masks, about the reliability of PCR tests, about the safety of vaccines. And of course about the effectiveness of these jabs.
Just one more out of dozens of lies.
We live in a post-truth society. Nearly every thing the government does and/or every news item concerning anything the government does, has been a masterclass in corruption, lies and deception, to fool the masses…and they’re failing at that too!
I prefer to think we are living in a “lack of honesty” society….same coin , just the other side?
And the biggest lie is one of omission: namely the inferiority of gene therapy “vaccines” when compared to natural immunity conferred by recovery from this deadly disease – aprox. 99.8% of us.
I find it very strange that this is never mentioned, even on the BBC.
Spot on. Also about how hideously dangerous ‘variants’ are. Variants in this case represent snail like change amounting now to around 0.5% change in the sequence of the virus.
Naturally immune systems have not the slightest risk of not recognising any variant.
Job done, permanently.
I forgot another one: the lie that lockdown reduces virus transmission.
It is astonishing but there are no papers in learned journals showing the extent that lockdowns caused cases, admissions & deaths to plummet.
Any journal will be eager to print such an article.
The reason they’ve not been able publish is that the data don’t show it. ANYWHERE.
I think the underlying reason that LD has no detectable effect on transmission is simple: only a symptomatic person can be a good source of infection. But symptomatic people would classify themselves as “ill”. Sick people tend to deselect themselves from public places. Therefore when public places are emptied by LD rules, transmission isn’t much reduced because it wasn’t happening there in the first place!
Not that this will surprise many here, three studies published by the CDC, UK Government & Oxford University find the Covid-19 Vaccines do not work.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/12/three-studies-find-the-covid-19-vaccines-do-not-work/
Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD) published the paper.
Red Facts, Covid Terror, One Last Push!
Well done Will, excellent article.
“Why is the ONS Claiming Just 1% of Covid Deaths Are in the Vaccinated When PHE Data Shows the True Figure For August was 70%?”
Why indeed. It’s hard to explain without attributing dishonest motives to those involved.
Absolutely. The motive is to fool people. Sad to say, they’re doing it well.
Well, we all knew instantly that the 1% figure had to be a lie.
Thank you very much for dissecting it.
It is sad to see the demise of the ONS in this way.
Some of their data is still useful but their selective choice of what data to publish and their heavily biased reporting of that data is indicative of their role now as a propaganda arm of the government not as an independent provider of statistics.
Another worrying trend is in all cause mortality. Why is this currently running at about 10% above the 2015-2019 average? So few people are dying of covid that it can’t be that. And I don’t see how poulation structure can explain it. So ongoing vaccine related deaths and lack of access to healthcare must be candidates. This should be discussed in the mainstream media.
Here is a chart from the ONS data (prior to today’s publication due out in the next hour) based on all cause death occurrences in England and wales showing how it is trending above the 2015-2019 average
And these high levels of deaths are apparent in every adult age group. In particular in the age 45-64 age group you can see from the attached chart (again before today’s data) how all cause mortality varies little in the Summer and how abnormal Summer 2021 is.
Interestingly in the age 1-14 age group (a group where experimental vaccination hasn’t occurred yet), mortality is running below the 5 year average, but because absolute death numbers are low in that age group there is more variation so it’s hard to draw conclusions.
They are not overall ‘high levels of deaths‘ in a proper historical context.
That falls into a hyperbole trap based on a faulty (short) baseline – which is the same sort of misreading as the spamdemic rationale.
See above
The rise in all-cause mortality is obviously to do with the NHS not treating people for the last 18 months. It is they who are dying when, in normal circumstances, they would have received life-saving treatment.
That seems likely, as well as those who were too scared to go for minor ailments, which may have got worse. Lockdown deaths, as predicted here since last year.
The continuing number of home deaths (well above the 2015-2019 average) showing in the ONS figures (as compared to hospital deaths which are close to the 5 year average) would back this up
Chart from today’s ONS publication
“Some of their data is still useful”
A lot is. But sadly, the past year has seen a sad decline in reliability, and a faiure to vet official ‘Covid’ data, and with the head of the service actively engaging in the politics of Covid.
The 2015-2019 average covers the lowest years of mortality – ever. That current levels are slightly above is hardly surprising – a lot of duff analysis assumes that mortality should be ever-decreasing trend – which is a totally naive assumption gleaned from driving by looking in the rear-view mirror.
More detailed and careful analysis clearly shows an upturn in the trend before 2019.
I’m certainly not assuming that mortality should be an ever decreasing trend. But what I find surprising is that Summer 2021 mortality has been significantly worse than all of the Summers in the years 2015,2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 and that Summer mortality in each of the years from 2015-2019 has been very tightly bounded, it’s the Winters that vary a bit.
Are you saying that even if there had been no SARS-C0V-2 and no disastrous pandemic response that Summer mortality in 2021 was likely to be above the tightly bounded Summer mortality of 2015-2019? If you are saying this, what is your justification? I’m genuinely interested.
In particular what is your detailed and careful analysis that leads you to the assertion that there was an upturn in the trend before 2019? And what factors do you think are responsible for the reversal of the trend (in the absence of SARS-C0V-2)?
Certainly from my viewpoint there has been a worsening of metabolic health in the population that has been happening, but at the same time we seem to have been able to prolong life at its very end so there has been a short term trend that people are living longer even if healthy life may not have increased.
because 2019 was an unusually low year which lead to those nice big spikes in 2020/1?
when people ‘fiddle’ figures its because they have something to hide
Are any of our once-trusted institutions safe from being co-opted into pushing the Government’s political agenda? Doesn’t look like it, thank you Will
Actual data from the uk coronavirus daily dashboard.
Covid deaths from 1/6/20 ( when the initial wave started to subside) to 8/12/20(start of mass vaccination) thats 30 weeks without any vaccinations.
Covid Deaths 27,714.
8/12/20 to 30/6/21 Thats 30 weeks of mass vaccinations.
Covid Deaths 72,438.
So vaccinations have saved up to100,000 lives have they.
I see. So, co-morbidities are suddenly real again if you’ve been experimented on, but still don’t exist in free range humans? That’s the criteria for determining the Chinese Virus kill count now, is it?
I couldn’t see where it listed those unvaxed who died without co-morbidities anywhere
Vaccine boosters rushed out to avoid a winter lockdown – don’t make me laugh. We have to be seen to be doing something – so we are!
Boris to say, later:
Here is my plan for the winter. Unfortunately, the (fake) vaccines are providing 5 times the deaths of last summer (probably due to our random infection generating PCR tests). We will be ruining another full year of schooling (but don’t blame the unions. We will be keeping OUR NHS on an (overfunded) lockdown of it’s own. If we can manage to make the infections increase over time, we will then have to introduce Vaccine Passports, to stop us having to lock down. During November, we will manufacture a numbers crisis, and lockdown, anyway. We are hoping to get back to some kind of regularly boosted normality by Easter.
Is the problem that the majority of politicians are motivated by money and their is a lot of that sloshing around in the ‘Foundations’ from their illuminati friends. My granny used to say politicians would sell their own grannies, who knows.
“Are any of our once-trusted institutions safe from being co-opted into pushing the Government’s political agenda?”
It’s not the Government’s agenda, they are simply puppets abusing their positions of power to fulfil their master’s agenda.
It’s not political either, it’s an anti-human agenda.
To be fair, Delta surge began in April. But the essential point that stopping the data collection at 2 July is silly. My wife (age 48) didn’t get her 2nd jab until mid-July. I got my early, I think in May, but still, that’s a long time when most people weren’t doing me jabbed. Of course few deaths were among vaccinated at that point.
The far bigger issue is death totals were bound to rise once the NCS returned to being the NHS. Many long delayed procedures occurred (including chemo), and due to our lousy infection control, many people were infected in hospital (or came in with a mild case). When they died of cancer, heart issue or the like, they got thrown in the pile. The fact they got a positive test post-vaccination isn’t a surprise, nor is their sad death given our lousy NHS at this moment (I know, sacrilege). The numbers aren’t worth the paper they are scribbled on. I’m sure the vaccine is doing well in preventing death from Covid. Until it can also stop cancer from spreading or arteries from clogging, deaths with Covid will be with us…forever.
“To be fair, Delta surge began in April“. No it didn’t! Infections (+ve tests) were decreasing from the January peak throughout April and well into May. There was a slow increase from mid-May onwards, which started to accelerate throughout June, but with the real “surge” coming in mid-June and into July.
See data here.
The ONS figures are contradicted by the data in Public Health England’s technical briefing no.22 dated 3 September 2021. The briefing shows that, between 1 February and 29 August this year, there was a total of 1,798 deaths within 28 days of a positive test, 1,091 (60.67%) of which were amongst the double vaccinated and just 536 (29.81%) amongst the unvaccinated. The vaccines not only fail to prevent infection or transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant but appear to do more harm than good.
SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation (publishing.service.gov.uk)
Well spotted. The last line graph is the kicker – particularly if you have a think about why that blue line (two doses) is rather incredible.(First stage of analysis – just look)
“this works out at a vaccine effectiveness against death of 68.1%”
… which, of course, is a relative figure. As has been pointed out several times in the past week, the absolute difference is insignificant.
The figures the ONS published yesterday do not include all those who died of the vaccine.
Also, some countries change the parameters of a “case” for those who are unvaccinated and those who are vaccinated and are therefore skewing the data in favour of the vaccine. The UK government doesn’t give this information which is only available by a Freedom of Information request.
In the US (the UK maybe the same) the unvaccinated “cases” are those who had a positive PCR test within the last 28 days. A positive PCR test is noted when amplified (CT or Cycle Threshold rate) up to 45 times.
The vaccinated “cases” are those who had a positive PCR test within at least 14 days BUT at a CT rate of up to 28 only. Anything over 28 is dismissed.
Also dismissed as a “case” in the vaccinated are anyone positive under a CT rate of 28 who is asymptomatic or mild infections and will no longer be recorded as “covid cases”.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html
It is no wonder that so few vaccinated people are showing up as positive cases and as deaths.
Once again, officials massaging figures to give a lie to what has been going on. This morning’s Telegraph article (see link below – it’s paywalled) shows exactly why such ‘stats’ can’t be trusted, because it is HOW they are interpreted.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/09/13/just-59-double-jabbed-people-50000-died-covid-year-says-ons/
As some readers point out, they conveniently add in all the ‘unvaccinated’ (or not fully vaccinated) from Jan and to a lesser extent, Feb 2021 when hardly any people were singly, let alone doubly vaccinated, when the peak of the ‘wave’ was.
People under 50 weren’t even offered a vaccine until April, meaning most of the over 40s weren’t even fully vaccinated until June or likely July/Aug.
They interpret the (limited) figures to say what they want it to as part of their fearmongering / authoritarian campaign. Notice how the media – including the article’s author – Sarak Knapton, who has been, in my view, fair-er in her reporting than her Global Health Security Editor Paul Nuki (brought to you by a grant for $3.2M from the Gates Foundation), either (IMHO) didn’t understand this or has been lent on by the higher-ups at the DT.
Could it be because deaths within 14 days of vaccination are classified as unvaccinated?
It’s probably because a large proportion of deaths occurred when very few people were fully vaccinated, i.e. in Jan & Feb.
Basically the ONS is failing to account for the length of time that a person is fully vaccinated. Very few people were fully vaccinated in Jan & Feb. In fact, less than half of the population had received 2 doses by the end of June.
To provide a fair comparison we need to know the number of vaccinated-days, ie. total double vaccinated times the number of days since vaccination.
However this would still not capture waning immunity.
… and such analysis will be full of assumptions that ignores seasonality, the waning virulence of the virus etc. etc. Observational data just can’t cut the mustard in terms of confounding variables.
Also bear in mind the age-old, classic and trusted tactic behind the fraud of all vaccinations ever since their inception several centuries ago: Alter the definition by which a disease is diagnosed in the vaccinated as opposed to the unvaccinated.
The famous author, George Bernard Shaw, giving one example of the application of this classic ruse, said:
““During the last epidemic at the turn of the century, I was a member of the Health Committee of London Borough Council. I learned how the credit of vaccination is kept up statistically by diagnosing all the re-vaccinated cases of smallpox as pustular eczema, varioloid, or whatnot – [anything] except smallpox.”
Refer to Alfred Russel Wallace’s brilliant “Vaccination Delusion” for an in-depth and irrefutable breakdown and exposé of this fraudulent tactic used time and again in regards to the smallpox vaccination racket.
A recent example of the use of this fraudulent tactic is the “successful” elimination of Polio in India in 2011, after an intense vaccination drive set in motion and funded by the cabal fronted by Bill Gates et al. The medical establishment could not even be bothered with inventing an innovative name for the explosive proliferation of a “new” disease which happened to be “clinically identical” to (though 8 times deadlier than) Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis, simply renaming it Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis to which more than 490,000 children succumbed according to meticulous recording by the Indian health administration. For more information on this particular swindle, refer to the scientific paper, “Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India.”
Whatever figure is worked out in any analysis of the rate of covid amongst the vaccinated is a HUGE underestimate. It is based on public health data which is wholly unreliable and skewed massively towards being favorable to the vaccinated.
NHS guidelines, the protocols which doctors are basing their diagnosis on, and the doctors’ own biases towards vaccination make it far more unlikely that they will deem covid to be the cause of a casualty if the patient were vaccinated than if he or she were unvaccinated (e.g. flu symptoms amongst unvaccinated signal a classic case of covid, whilst flu symptoms amongst the vaccinated signal a classic case of … flu).
The fraud is now being committed in blatant daylight. CDC, for example, has gone on public record setting 28 cycles for PCR testing of vaccinated individuals, whilst keeping the cycles at 35 for unvaccinated – just one example of a whole slew of ingenious ruses, both open and underhand, being currently employed to skew the figures favorably towards the vaccinated.
Yet, even with rigged figures, in many analyses by objective researchers, the vaccinated are accounting for most of the hospitalizations and fatalities.
A better measure for the supposed health benefits of vaccinations would be a comparison of all-cause mortality rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. However, the medical authorities will rarely make the mistake of making available such data which would damn them.
When Drs. Søren Wengel Mogensen and Peter Aaby, two of the most authoritative vaccine scientists in the world, carried out a rare and unbiased (not subject to Healthy User Bias) natural experiment in Guinea Bissau comparing all-cause mortality rates between children vaccinated for DTP against unvaccinated children, they discovered that whilst the vaccine was “successful” in reducing incidences of Diphtheria, Tetanus and Pertussis, all-cause mortality rates were TEN times greater amongst the vaccinated! Refer to SW Mogensen et al. 2017.
Bear in mind that DTP shots had been in use for over half a century before this eye-opening and almost inadvertent discovery, and had become one of the most widely and frequently administered vaccines in the history of vaccinations. Imagine how many millions of children had perished over the past century as a direct result of this poisonous shot “improving” their chances of dying by a factor of ten. But no one cares because it did what it said on the tin – reduced incidences of D, T and P.
When analysing data from public health authorities, the author of this particular article (and other objective researchers) should bear in mind and take into account, the widespread employment of such insidious acts of subterfuge by health authorities worldwide to perpetuate the myth of the success of vaccinations.
A brilliant summary – thanks. Can you recommend a book that examines this in more detail, please? Thanks.
To be honest, I haven’t been able to find one modern book which uncovers the vaccination fraud in a satisfactory way. I’ve had to read quite a few to get a clear picture. Possibly the most useful one for me was the following one, available for free here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/advocacy-policy/critiques/1200-studies-truth-will-prevail/
Amongst the old books, I found “Vaccination a Delusion” to be an excellent exposé of the fraud. It can be found here:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/58918
The very same tricks employed by the vaccine industry which the author so expertly uncovered more than a century ago are still at play with modern vaccines, and even more so with the covid versions.
I thought the modern book ‘Virus Mania’ was pretty good on this topic.
Dr Sam Bailey does a lot on this, and related issues.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Pcr-Hustle-Odysee:5
I’m currently reading ‘Dissolving illusions’ that is another well researched book exposing vaccine lies.
Many thanks!
Dissolving Illusions by Humphries and Bystrianyk, 2015
Dissolving Illusions by Humphries and Bystrianyk looks at the history of vaccines from the earliest days. It’s a shocker, really jaw-dropping but not and easy read.
Great post. Thanks.
Very helpful and knowledgeable post – thank you so much.
A great post Abdul. Thank you. I have asked a few times whether, during triage, an unvaccinated person is more likely to be admitted to hospital if they test positive for covid? Further to this, is an unvaccinated patient more likely to be intubated if they end up in the ICU? We know intubation is deadly. Could the doctors be thinking they aren’t vaccinated, stick a tube into them and leave them to die while we concentrate treatments that “work” on the vaccinated?
“Ingenuous ruses” thus spotted cannot be that well thought through – with respect to your capacity to see through these things with ease.
Because I had recommended the 19th Century book, “Vaccination a Delusion” here, I thought I’ll have another quick look at it. I was immediately struck by the author’s preface. Notice how much of it bears an uncanny resemblance to the situation today:
Vaccination a Delusion
Its Penal Enforcement a Crime:
PROVED BY THE OFFICIAL EVIDENCE IN THE REPORTS
OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION
BY
ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE
PREFACE
This Essay has been written for the purpose of influencing Parliament, and securing the speedy abolition of the unjust, cruel, and pernicious Vaccination laws. For this purpose it has been necessary to speak plainly of the ignorance and incompetence displayed by the Royal Commission, proofs of which I give from their “Final Report” and the evidence they have collected and printed.
I most solemnly urge upon our Legislators that this is a question not only of the liberties of Englishmen, but one affecting the lives of their children, and the health of the whole community; and that they will be individually responsible if they do not inquire into this matter for themselves,—not accept the statements or opinions of others.
In order that they may do this with a minimum expenditure of time and labour, I have put before them the essential facts, in almost every case taken from the Reports of the Royal Commission or of the Registrar-General, and with references to page, question, or paragraph, so that they can themselves verify every statement I make.
I thus abundantly prove, first, that in all previous legislation they have been misled by facts and figures that are untrue and by promises that have been all unfulfilled; and that similar misstatements have characterised the whole official advocacy of Vaccination from the time of Jenner down to this day. I claim, therefore, that all official statements as to Vaccination are untrustworthy.
I then show that all the statistics of small-pox mortality, whether of London; of England, Scotland, and Ireland; of the best vaccinated Continental States; of unvaccinated Leicester; or of the revaccinated Army and Navy, without any exception, prove the absolute inutility of Vaccination; and I feel confident that every unprejudiced person who will carefully read these few pages, and will verify such of my statements as seem to them most incredible, will be compelled to come to the same conclusion.
I appeal from the medical and official apologists of Vaccination to the intelligence and common sense of my fellow-countrymen, and I urge them to insist upon the immediate abolition of all legislation enforcing or supporting this useless and dangerous operation.
Political agenda. It’s not the government agenda Toby, it’s been given to them.
Lies, lies and more damn lies…why are people living in denial?
Shock horror, government agency pushes government propaganda.
Here’s another version of the same story thats worth a look…Source: https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/15/30k-people-died-within-21-days-of-having-a-covid-19-vaccine-in-england/
Official Office for National Statistics data has inadvertently revealed that 30,305 people have died within twenty-one days of having a Covid-19 vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021.
Dozens of freedom of information requests have been made to Public Health England (PHE) over the past few months requesting to know how many people have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, but each and every time PHE have claimed they do “not hold the information requested”.
Thank you for signposting that article
Excellent work.
Clearly the most highly infectious disease gripping the nation at the moment is ‘lying’ and the super-spreaders are Government Ministers and Advisers, with the Prime Minister case-zero.
We know who are dying from Covid now. First of all, not many, second of all it is the double jabbed over 80’s for the most part. 1500 people die a day in Great Britain. Let’s get real. The vaccines are an utter failure. They do not prevent anything. All this nonsense that breakthrough cases are “milder” is a bunch of bullocks. 99% of people do just fine after a bout of Covid. It is well known the age and co morbidities at higher risk. It is also well known there are early tx’s for Covid that are effective. Finally everyone knows they should supplement their Vit D level, take zinc, Vit C and Quercetin, eat a healthy diet, get exercise everyday, get a good night’s sleep, and if overweight, lose it. Not really that hard, is it?