In what seems like an inevitable development, scientists Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman have been awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Medicine for their role in developing the mRNA technology underlying the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, which were rolled out in late 2020.
But in a paper published as recently as 2018 and which is extensively quoted in an article at MedPageToday, none other than Drew Weissman warned that prior clinical trials of mRNA vaccines had produced results which were “more modest in humans than was expected based on animal models… and the side effects were not trivial”, including “moderate and in rare cases severe injection site or systemic reactions”.
Further summarising the paper by Weissman and three colleagues in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, MedPageToday notes:
Their chief safety concerns, which they said should be closely watched in future trials, were about local and systemic inflammation, as well as keeping tabs on the “expressed immunogen” and on any auto-reactive antibodies.
“A possible concern could be that some mRNA-based vaccine platforms induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity,” they wrote. “Thus, identification of individuals at an increased risk of autoimmune reactions before mRNA vaccination may allow reasonable precautions to be taken.”
The authors also noted that extracellular RNA could contribute to edema, and cited a study that showed it “promoted blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation.”
The MedPageToday article is titled ‘Want to Know More About mRNA Before Your Covid Jab?‘ How many readers actually went ahead and got it after they knew?
Robert Kogon is the pen name of a widely-published journalist covering European affairs. Subscribe to his Substack and follow him on X.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
What’s with the masks? Aren’t they protected by their amazing Nobel prize winning vaccines?
Presumably it’s an earlier picture from the time of the covid terror.
But in any case their wearing those masks in an award ceremony, knowing full well they don’t do any good makes you wonder what else they do out of peer pressure that goes against their scientific knowledge.
And if they didn’t know the masks do no good, then … well, not sure what’s worse.
Since the picture shows them with the medals, it is not an earlier picture.
Can’t be that prize. The presentation isn’t until December.
This wouldn’t be the first time that the Nobel committee got involved in politics. Arrhenius got into a dispute but I cannot recall if he was an alleged victim or an alleged perpetrator of the skullduggery and allegations of fixes nor the details. Similarly the recent award of the Nobel Peace Prize (done by a different organisation) to the IPCC Climate perpetrators was contentious. It looks like the Medicine Prize is being similarly devalued, by being awarded to politically loyal members of The Pharmocracy.
Hiding their identity from families of their victims?
Showing compliance to their masters with their muzzles firmly in place.
We can’t miss it, can we? In Oct 2023? Masks worn by the Covid vaccine geniuses? What about 2 meters apart? Wash their hands singing god save the Nobel Prize? As De Santis said, stop this Covid theatre now.
Excerpt from the Want to Know More … page:
“We know broadly that the overall approach is pretty safe,” Burton said, but noted that it was important that adverse events are monitored and followed up.
He cautioned that just based on the sheer number of people who will be vaccinated for COVID-19, events will occur, and most will likely be unrelated to the vaccine. If people feel that concerns about those events are adequately addressed, they should be less likely to harbor reservations about taking the vaccine, and more inclined to help achieve the levels of herd immunity needed to end the pandemic.
That’s Covaxx-cheerlying straight from the book (the article is dated 12/03/202).
12/03/202
Is that 2020?
If the dropping of the VX-bomb turns out to have caused more injuries than the dropping of the A-bomb then the “modellers” and moralists will have their work cut out to defend the UN/WHO massvax policy, starting with The Trolley Problem. Given past form with the UN/UNFCC Climate Bomb there will be plenty of funding available for “further research”, provided the “correct” conclusions are forthcoming.
“Thus, identification of individuals at an increased risk of autoimmune reactions before mRNA vaccination may allow reasonable precautions to be taken.”
So people with MS, for example, should not have been given or offered the jab at all (not that any of us should have been really), yet they were one of the first groups of people to be offered it, because they were ‘particularly vulnerable’. Maybe this is why two people I knew who had MS, one of them being my GP (who I had frequent and regular contact with), nose dived within a week or two of receiving the jab and are now dead.
Dr John Campbell made video about a link between the injections and MS: –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9S2jooTxkQ
i tried to warn family member with ms. wouldn’t listen said is misinformation , as usual!.
‘Then along come Drs. Katie Kariko (U Penn and later VP BioNTech- formerly a Hungarian spy) and Drew Weissman (U Penn- trained by Dr. Anthony Fauci)- about a decade later after my work and initial reduction to practice- who wrote a review paper in a high profile academic journal discussing my ideas without citing my work. They then tour widely promoting the logic and technology. This review then becomes the basis of a series of Wiki pages, promoting this pair and others as the original inventors…..‘
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/update-moderna-and-pfizer-mrna-vax
Thanks for that. The entire article is well worth reading and an eye-opener.
Hiding in plain sight ! Pathetically obvious that they are corrupt individuals working for a corrupt global blob who think that this masked up prize giving can bluff us that it’s a good thing they’ve done !
The Nobel prize-giving ceremony is later. I wonder if they will be masked for it. It’s like school prize-giving used to be: badges and cash for not breaking a school rules, being a compliant child, diligently copying the set textboik neatly into one’s textbook and sucking up to teacher.
But they’re still going to accept the Nobel prize while knowing this?
Jeez.
Prior to 2020 this tech was only offered to cancer patients who were in the last chance saloon. Says it all.