- “Watch: Laurence Fox asks ‘who would shag’ female reporter on GB News” – GB News has been forced to suspend two of its leading presenters over offensive and sexist comments about a female journalist, reports the Telegraph.
- “GB News must save itself from itself” – GB News can do important work if it gets out of its own way, writes Ben Sixsmith in the Critic.
- “MRNA detected in breast milk after COVID-19 vaccination can be passed on to infants: New study” – A new study has found lactating women recently vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine had detectible mRNA in breastmilk that could potentially transfer to their infant, reports the Epoch Times.
- “Lockdown harm to children was preventable, Government told” – A report by leading campaigners argues that locking down children could have been avoided if ministers had considered how much harm it would do them, says the Telegraph. If only someone had made that argument at the time!
- “Fauci diverted U.S. Government away from lab leak theory of Covid’s origin, sources say” – Fauci allegedly attacked the lab leak theory at meetings at the CIA, the State Department and the White House, according to Public on Substack.
- “Why and how did Tony Fauci secretly try to steer the CIA investigation on the origins of SARS-Cov-2?” – On Substack, Alex Berenson discusses Fauci’s secret visit to the CIA’s HQ to influence their investigation into the origins of Sars-CoV-2.
- “Andrew Cuomo: Lockdown would be more difficult now” – The former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo says that people no longer trust the Government so would be less likely to lock themselves in their homes if they’re ever told to again, reports UnHerd.
- “Rat population spirals ‘out of control’ after being kept as pets in lockdown” – The RSPCA has warned that Britain’s rat population is spiralling out of control because inexperienced owners who bought them as pets during lockdown have let them overbreed, says the Telegraph.
- “Can Dr. Jenny Harries accept her lockdown mistake?” – Next time there’s a pandemic, the advice of Dr. Jenny Harries, the head of the U.K. Health Security Agency, will be crucial, writes Fraser Nelson in the Spectator.
- “Breath cycle: Sing your way to better health” – If Long Covid is impacting your health, Scottish Opera wants to help. Get practising with their exercises on demand or register to take part in their weekly online sessions. Alternatively, just admit it’s not a real disease.
- “Suella Braverman is right – integration is essential in a multi-racial democracy” – Do defenders of ‘multiculturalism’ really know what they are standing up for, asks Rakib Ehsan in CapX.
- “Liberal outrage at Suella Braverman’s Washington speech is skin deep” – It’s not so much what was said, or even the way it was said. It was who said it that really provoked the liberal reaction to Suella Braverman’s comments in Washington, writes Trevor Phillips in the Times.
- “The racism of multiculturalism” – Suella Braverman’s dimwitted critics are going out to bat for an ugly, divisive ideology, says Tom Slater in Spiked.
- “Sadiq Khan risks being booted out as London Mayor by Tory maverick, poll shows” – The Conservative candidate in next year’s Mayoral election in London could beat, reports the Sun. A new poll has them virtually neck and neck.
- “Using leather footballs on a school playground is made illegal by ‘absurd’ council order” – Using leather footballs in school playgrounds was made a criminal offence, it has emerged, amid calls for a crackdown on the use of “cowboy laws” by local authorities, says the Mail.
- “The Gen Z abortion crisis” – The Critic’s Christian Hacking discusses the sad causes and consequences of a rise in abortion among young people.
- “Ding, dong, Dan is gone!” – After resigning, Victorian Premier Dan Andrews leaves a legacy of brutality, debt and corruption, says Rebekah Barnett on Substack.
- “Justin Trudeau’s Nazi blind spot” – Canadian MPs rose to their feet and gave rousing applause to an old bloke who once fought on the same side as Hitler, writes Brendan O’Neill in the Spectator. Is it time to bow out, Justin?
- “Climate change: Six young people take 32 countries to court” – Six young people have taken 32 countries to court, claiming their slow action on climate change violates their human rights, according to the BBC. Can we get a group of six sensible young people to sue their governments for pursuing pointless, virtue-signalling, green policies that will immiserate them?
- “Rosebank oil field given go-ahead by regulators” – The controversial Rosebank offshore development off Shetland, the U.K.’s largest untapped oil field, has received regulatory consent, reports the BBC.
- “Net Zero zealots will probably find a way to stop Rosebank” – Is it still possible for the Government to issue new licences for oil and gas extraction when they have legally committed themselves to Net Zero by 2050, asks Ross Clark in the Spectator.
- “Welsh drivers don’t need a speed limit of 20mph – they already drive too slowly” – The pursuit of Net Zero has caused chaos in Wales, with traffic at a standstill, says Allison Pearson in the Telegraph.
- “Sadiq Khan confirms Blackwall tunnel toll from 2025” – Car drivers in London will be charged up to four pounds to use the Blackwall tunnel if Sadiq Khan is re-elected, reports the Times.
- “The heat pumps farce has reached a new low” – The Government is backing down on Net Zero, but doubling down on fining manufacturers that sell too many gas boilers, writes Matthew Lynn in the Telegraph.
- “Corporations are now a threat to free speech like the mighty state” – Over the last few years, large corporations have come to exert enormous power over the ability of citizens to speak their minds, says Yascha Mounk in the Evening Standard.
- “Anyone can be a hate criminal now” – The Executive Head of ADF International Paul Coleman speaks to Spiked’s Brendan O’Neill on how hate-speech laws are used to criminalise mainstream opinion.
- “What happened to Ibram X Kendi’s ‘anti-racist’ centre?” – The anti-racist movement has been captured by grifters and self-promoters, says Angie Speaks in Spiked.
- “Sacked and vilified – caring teacher who dared to question a girl’s trans demand” – In TCW, J.J. Starky discusses the suspension and dismissal of a U.K. teacher because of his decision to address a student by her actual name instead of her made-up one.
- “Male ‘trans ambassador’ presented with ‘Outstanding Female’ prize at women’s awards gala” – A trans-identified male, who works for a U.K.-based charity that provides ‘diversity training’, has been honoured with the Outstanding Female LGBTQIA+ Champion 2023 award, reports Reduxx.
- “Proportion of young women aged 16-24 identifying as LGBT hits 10%” – New data suggests that the proportion of young women in the U.K. identifying as lesbian, gay or bisexual has more than doubled in five years to around 10%, says the Mail.
- “Gender-neutral toilets stink in more ways than one” – Shared loos have been imposed on the population in the cause of making a tiny minority feel comfortable – and they’re awful, writes Allison Pearson in the Telegraph.
- “Australian Human Rights Commission decision prohibits female-only events for lesbians” – Australia’s Human Rights Commission has released a preliminary decision prohibiting lesbians from holding events for females if it means excluding men who identify as women, according to Reduxx.
- “But Johnny can’t spell G-A-Y” – With large majorities of students incompetent in English and math, Los Angeles schools have decided to… ramp up gay pride and gender indoctrination, writes Heather Mac Donald in City Journal.
- “Matt Hancock: I regret the lack of leadership” –Jonathan Pie has posted a video on X of Matt Hancock in Celebrity SAS, showing just why he’s changed his mind about politicians going on reality TV shows.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Why don’t we just call fact-checked stories wrongspeak? At least we would all know where we were.
How about calling these misleading statements/fact checks ‘trans-facts’?
Or just ‘trash talk’?
In other news foxes vote to guard hen houses, and men enjoy having sex with women. Of course socialists like to censor ppl that’s what they do, non lefties are utterly deluded to believe rational debate is possible with these folk. You disagree with a lefty fundamentally it’s the gulag for you in their perfect world. Socialism emerged from the French Revolution with its main enforcer the guillotine and little has actually changed since.
See also the case of Professor Richet, first mentioned I think on Wattsupwiththat.
He wrote a perfectly sensible article for a history of science publication called Copernicus. Peer reviewed and ready to publish, pressure on publisher led to its withdrawal.
All he said was that, looking at the last four glaciations over about half a million years, when times started to get cold carbon dioxide levels stayed high for about eight hundred years. So change in co2 concentration follows temperature change and therefore cannot be the cause of that change. Decarbonisation unnecessary.
Copernicus, eh? How ironic.
https://www.history-of-geo-and-space-sciences.net/2021-05-26_hgss-2021-1_latest-version-of-the-manuscript.pdf
If AFP were being honest it would call its piece an “Opinion Check” of claims, made by people who depend on climate catastrophe claims to keep their positions and funding flowing from the unwitting taxpayer.
Anthropogenic climate change for dummies: Take 100 scientists – 50 who believ CO2 is the primary driver of climate change and 50 who don’t. Out of the second group, trash / tarnish /cancel the reputation of 90% of the scientists and their papers and coerce publishers to withdraw or not publish. Result! The science is now settled as published papers show that 95% of scientist believe that anthropogenic CO2 emmsisions are the primary driver of global climate. Repeat for vaccines, mask mandates etc and use captured media sources to reinforce.
Potsdam, Otto and Springer.
Does one need to know more?
It’s at the point where we should just stop calling it science, and instead refer to it by the more accurate: “Tik-Tok / CCP-driven agitprop designed to present all pro-growth, patriotic and individualist policies in the West as evil fascism, so we accelerate our decline to the benefit of China.”
It’s very easy to see what Otto is writing about. Quoting Wikipedia
Otto works together with lawyers in lawsuit that seek compensation for victims of extreme events from companies and governments with historical responsibility for climate change.
In other words, she seeks to extract climate change reparations from American and European governments and companies based on a methodology she developed for associating natural disasters with so-called climate change. As is the case with all the other green scammers, her vocation is making up justifications why she and her buddies are entitled to other people’s money.
Springer has blocked numerous “Covid skeptical” papers without explanation, so my bet would be on them blocking this one. Funny how “Climate and Covid skeptical” is a pretty clean dividing line between people; it’s taken over from “left” and “right” to a large extent.
Whether global warming is real or not, and I am still not sure, there is enough evidence to suggest that changes in the climate are related to naturally occurring events and to man made events other than the burning of fossil fuels. In the latter category are rainforest destruction and water diversion (check out the climatic alterations around the Aral Sea). But anyway we know that sea levels were much higher even 1000 years ago when our locality, Romney Marsh, was largely under water. What we don’t know is what the polar ice caps looked like then. To balance the question of how emissions cause warming, I would like to know what effect the air mixing caused by wind farms has on meteorological conditions.
Who is the woman in the photo? It doesn’t say, damages credibility, looks like a random person. Also, you should include a link to the SkyNews clip.
Science is never settled. And if someone/some people is/are proposing a counter-argument to the “received wisdom” then it demonstrably isn’t settled.
If the evidence for man-made climate change/climate emergency was overwhelming, you’d think the advocates would be only too keen to debate the issue and present their evidence to be challenged.
But it isn’t science, it’s a cult and the cultists mustn’t be challenged.
It is blatantly apparent that any organisation or policy with net zero or climate change within its title, is there to promote or enforce its own agenda as any slight to their existance questions their validity and purpose. The term Peer Review in the case of these organisations is to get a mate to agree with your data.
Why are the facts about CO2 not publicised by mainstream media:-
1) the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is currently 0.042%
2) CO2 at this current slight increase contributes significantly to plant and crop growth and is reducing starvation in some countries.
3) If CO2 levels fall below 150 parts per million (0.015%) plant growth would fail to the point of the whole world suffering from lack of food.
4) progressively increased levels of CO2 do not proportionally contribute to global warming and current levels have not increased it very much. Other greehouse gases that we can’t easily control have a much greater effect.
5) The Uk’s additional contribution to CO2 is so small by comparison to that by China, India and the US that any change we made would make no significant difference.
6) The current drive to nett zero CO2 is driven by incorrect virtue signalling and the money made by companies who benefit from products that are said to reduce it. Many products made by these companies produce more CO2 in their manufacture than they will ever save in their lifetime. That applies to some electric cars.
7) Most climate models are deliberately fed with wrong inaccurate data to give the result wanted and so far every one claiming climate disaster over the last few decades has proven to be wrong. Its difficult to prove whether models covering longer periods could be correct but the track record of them would suggest they will be inaccurate as well.
8) CO2 is one of the things required for life on our planet and is not a pollutant.
MSM aren’t at all interested in facts. They just get in the way of the opinions put out by those who drive the ‘official narrative’, a.k.a. “The Science”
As scientists become more and more dependent on government funding, and climate science is almost entirely funded by government, then their findings require the greatest level of scrutiny. We often hear things like “research shows” or “scientists find” etc. But since climate science is mainly computer model projections of future climate full of assumptions then nothing has been “found”. It has been speculated. Anyone who thinks government funding does not influence science is really very naive, and many of those same people would be quick to hammer any science that was funded by fossil fuel interests as being “agenda driven”. But what makes those people think government have no agenda? Ofcourse they do. The regulatory state always has an agenda.