In June of this year, more than two million people looked with bemusement at Kings College NHS’s announcement that it had installed a permanent display of the gender ideology flag on one of its buildings.
— King's College NHS (@KingsCollegeNHS) June 2, 2023
Delighted to officially open the new connecting link-bridge at the PRUH today!
The bridge proudly features a large re-production of the Intersex-Inclusive Pride flag, designed and unveiled by @ValentinoInter!#valentinovecchietti #Pride pic.twitter.com/DIm5BFgiJp
Bemusement for three reasons.
- Gender ideology is harmful pseudo-science – it posits that we all have an inner gender identity around which it is reasonable to align our bodies by hormonal and surgical interventions which are irreversible and cause life-long harm. How can an actual NHS Trust complacently endorse this?
- The NHS is cash-strapped – why is it spending money on promoting harmful ideology?
- Flags matter – we should want to take them seriously. There are regulations around their display on public buildings. Kings College NHS effectively flouts these regulations; it’s a painting of a flag but it loudly does what flags do: “this is what we stand for.”
So what internal process led to such a prominent and public commitment to pseudo-science from an NHS Trust? What conversations took place? What money was spent? Does anyone dare object?
I decided to find out using the FOI process.
Firstly, the painting of the flag cost a paltry sum in the scale of NHS spending. What is most depressing about this FOI response from Kings College NHS (apart from the lackadaisical not-doing-the-maths) is the EDI-speak:
Secondly, who was consulted? The answer is just the EDI team. In fact, if you think about it, why would you bother to consult people when their freedom of speech has already been stifled? Who wants to be accused of hate or phobia? Only one response is allowed anyway. But the NHS Trust was possibly a bit embarrassed about this obvious truth so it initially implied to me that there was wider consultation and enthusiasm. It firstly said this:
But when I consulted elected members of the Local Authority they responded with this:
Unfortunately the recent monstrosity at Bromley Hospital sat completely beyond Bromley Council’s remit to control or prevent (we were not party to it in any way) and the Planning process which is set on rigid guidelines as to what people can and cannot do, had no means of denying the NHS the ability to erect it either.
This from the Council’s Chief Planner:
Dear Leader,
I think the response from the Trust isn’t quite correct.
The display of a mural was not part of this application (murals can require advertisement consent and not planning permission if they are considered to constitute an advertisement) – the elevations showed rainbow colouring on the building but there was no application for advertisement consent for the mural and it was not considered in the grant of planning permission. I would not say that the Council had “granted planning approval” for this mural and if it did need consent (I should add that I am not convinced it does) it would require advertisement consent and not planning permission.
Even if an application for advertisement consent had been submitted for the mural, the content of an advertisement is not something that the Council can control.
I hope that this helps.
Regards
…
Did the Kings College NHS EDI team actually ‘make something up’ in its first response? It must have known that no planning permission was needed. This is another problem with gender ideology – it corrodes basic standards in organisations. Once a set of lies has been allowed to flourish inside an organisation how do you maintain a wider commitment to truth and standards?
I went back to them as follows:
I asked for any email exchanges that related to the planning of the flag/mural discussed below. You have not responded with any. But at point 3 you say that: “The viewpoints of our Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Trust Network representatives were taken and supported by our Director of Equality, Diversity and Inclusion.
1. Please can you provide me with the emails sent either to or from the Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Trust Network representatives which discuss the potential display of this artwork showing the Intersex-Inclusive flag at Princess Royal University Hospital, as part of a new walk-bridge for patients and staff? If not emails, other documents discussing this proposal? There must be something?
And here below, finally, is the result. Here is how you get an NHS Trust to permanently display its commitment to pseudo-science. (Although, note that there were also “several unrecorded MS Teams meetings where the artwork and schemes were discussed, and approval was given”.)
That’s it. To get a large and permanent display of a commitment to pseudo-science from an NHS Trust requires two emails between “Gents”. Thanks, Mates.
How to solve?
There is no mechanism in place to shut the EDI juggernaut down. Indeed there is an entire architecture set up to keep it in place. Because if you complain or dissent you will be accused of transphobia and hate. There are badges, and pledges, and training sessions, and identity-group networks, and paid permanent EDI staff with nothing else to do and a strong incentive to keep it all in place, indeed ramp it up.
The LGBTQIA+ network? Kings College NHS now pays it (and other networks) £10k a year. For what?
There are five staff diversity networks which represent people with specific protected characteristics:
- Inter Faith & Belief Network (religion or belief)
- Women’s Network (sex)
- Race, Ethnicity and Cultural Heritage Network (race)
- LGBTQ+ Network (sexual orientation and gender reassignment)
- Disability Network (disability).
Each network is allocated a budget of £10,000 per year from the EDI budget and is available on the basis that the network’s annual objectives and activities are agreed by the Network Steering Group and approved by the EDI Delivery Group on behalf of the Trust’s Executive team.
EDI staff? Kings College NHS has a Director and two Heads to oversee seven other staff. Surely this costs at least about half a million pounds a year for their salaries, pensions and office space. Extrapolate that across the NHS.
EDI gobbles up taxpayers’ cash when our tax burden is at an all time high.
When we have recruitment crises across sectors, EDI hoovers up staff diverting them from alternative jobs that could actually improve lives. Worse – it has them not just digging holes and filling them up – that would be bad enough; but no, they do real damage.
EDI divides us, trampling on free speech and diversity of thought, openness and dialogue in the workplace.
Most pernicious of all, EDI promotes and endorses pseudo-science which causes serious medical harm to vulnerable people.
How do we shut down the EDI industry? What needs to be done?
Stop Press: An X user tweeted images of what can be found adorning the inside walls of the same hospital.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I do.
Lots of them, all the time.
Physical books can’t be hacked, broaden your mind, take you places and meet people you’d never have met.
My library is ever expanding, fiction and non fiction.
Physical books can’t be retrospectively ‘edited’ of non-woke content, given ‘trigger warnings’ or taken away without warning.
How can readers decide that certain ideas are reprehensible if they can never encounter them?
Same here, but mostly non fiction, to broaden my knowledge. Mostly Kindle, but plenty of physical as well.
Normally on Kindle I have about 10 on the go at any one time and flit between them.
My family believe I just read conspiracy theories, I actually read conspiracy facts. Consciously try to avoid the confirmation bias trap. Ones I’m reading now:
The Accountability Deficit
Is that TRUE, or did you hear it on the BBC (Rereading)
NOT Zero
Green Breakdown
Empire of Chaos
Idiots (might not continue)
Gods of Money
Anyone who tells you vaccines are safe and effective is lying
Plandemic
Diary of a Psychosis (read)
Technocracy Rising
Our Enemy the Government
There is no Climate Crisis (read)
The Mythology of Global Warming
A state of fear (read)
etc., etc.
Bit heavy on the climate truth stuff.
“… mostly non fiction…”
Thank goodness someone does. So must Truss, as she knows the importance of cheap Energy to a 21st century prosperous industrial country. And that was a step too far for the Establishment.
I’m coming to the conclusion that too many politicians have read too many History books, and then, when in government, act out their fantasies.
Well, here’s about 2/3 of mine. I think nearly all have been read at least once, apart from reference works. Four of our grand-daughters, aged 6-9, are gratifyingly avid readers – admittedly more Harry Potter than Dostoevsky so far. The oldest (a teenager) prefers hockey, so is going to be very vulnerable to indoctrination at college, sadly.
I once posted this picture to a well-published atheist writer on evolution, who replied something like “Bloody Hell” – his shelf had about a dozen books on it, and presumably everything else he read was online.
This pretty much looks like my library except I have an Apple Mac and a keyboard rather than a guitar. ——-Because I run out of room some time ago though I now get most of my books on Kindle, where I find it easier to bookmark important bits and pieces. ——Cheers.
Way back when I was 10 reading The Famous Five and the Secret Seven by Enid Blyton I have always read books. I think the first book that really caught my imagination and stirred my emotions to realise the power of the written word was when I was about 13 and it was “White Fang” by Jack London. Even today when friends ask about a good book I recommend “White Fang”. ——Today though I tend not to read novels and am more concerned with text books, factual books, on issues regarding politics, science etc and have taken a big interest in the climate issue, in particular how the science has been hijacked for political purposes, and how those politics link in with other issues, regarding eg social justice, equality, diversity, race and gender politics. Issues around population growth, resources, energy politics and how Sustainable Development politics seeks to remove affordable reliable energy and replace it with unaffordable unreliable energy once again all for political purposes and using fear of a climate emergency as the excuse. ——–So from Enid Blyton to “Watermelons” by James Delingpole, and from Jack London to Bjorn Lomberg etc etc.——–All information is good . It is no information that is bad, and if you do not read books you will easily be manipulated by people with an agenda, whether that agenda be social justice, Net Zero, Race Card Politics or whatever. ——Books are Power.
Hear hear.
Kept all my Enid Blyton stuff. Apart from one Famous Five story, which fell apart.
She was banned, y’ know. A good indication if ever there was one.
I’ve got a book called “The shorter Oxford English dictionary”, third edition. It doesn’t have an entry for “anymore”.
People’s memories are getting shorter.
You need another book!
I’m English, dammit!
My Windows computer tells me that “updates are underway.”
What is “underway”?
If it’s Windows it’s probably a worse version of “underhand”.
Underway: A distinction from becalmed?
It’s really a naval term. A vessel is said to be underway (or under way) if it’s moving through the open water with sufficient speed that the rudder can be used for steering it. This a Germanic word with onderweg(en) and unterwegs being the Dutch and German equivalents. In figurative usage, it means on the way.
I think ‘underway’ is a close relative of the odious North American interloper ‘footway.’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underway
This applies mostly to sailing ships. Immediately after weighing anchor or unmooring, the ship sits in water without directed motion and it first has to catch enough wind to get underway before the rudder can be used. This means the sails have to be tuned carefully to the existing wind in order to get the vessel to move in some safe direction where it won’t run aground or collide with anything until it has picked up enough speed thay it can be steered.
This makes this a very British term.
Who had the link to the Piglet podcast, can’t remember what article it was under?
I read Blyton to my 5-year-old grandson … a bit advanced but he’s sticking with it, and so much better than the silly and pointless Julia Donaldson books that seem to be everywhere. C.S.Lewis’s Narnia series is lined up for when he’s slightly older.
I would be interested in age-appropriate recommended book lists by year of age…
Well, Julia Donaldson was anti-mask for a while, albeit not otherwise a sceptic.
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/01/07/forcing-children-to-wear-masks-is-dystopian-says-gruffalo-author-julia-donaldson/
For when your grandson is a bit older, maybe 10, I’d recommend the Susan Cooper books (“dark is rising”), and the Chronicles of Prydain.
I used to love the ‘alfred hitchcock and the three investigators’ books as a young boy, but sadly they appear to be out of print.
I still read – mainly old stuff I inherited from my parents.
My kids read tons when younger but nothing now they are grown up sadly.
I know a few people that still read books but plenty that don’t
About eight years ago I began reading books again after a long hiatus just reading articles. I now read and/or listen to about three books a week. About 95% non-fiction.
I’ve read the Peloponnesian War twice, although in an English translation from the 1880s. At present, I’m working my way through the German official history of WWI. And I also read all kinds of more entertaining books on the side. But I’m not only not paying the BBC license fee, I actually don’t watch TV and not even movies anymore.
I’m reading more now my free Disney+ and Apple TV subscriptions have run out, not as though I actually found much worth watching on either.
A second comment on the Peloponnesian War: I’d judge this a very good read for someone who’s generally interested in history but perhaps not entirely happy with postmodern history anymore, especially with the large parts of that which are really contemporary political preaching (eg, Keegan’s History of War, one of the few books I’ve thrown after reading it as it wasn’t worth the shell-space it was taking up). It’s a well written and lively account of an important era in European history which is really still very much relevant to our times, eg, can someone think of a present-day naval power with a habit of spreading ‘democracies’ everywhere in states it subjugated in order to get tributes from them?
It’s also an amazing feat of our culture: Someone wrote this by hand in Greek in the 5th century BC, ie, more than 2400 years ago. And we’ve kept it ever since. That’s something to remember when History of some illiterate black house servants-month comes up again.
True confession – I don’t. I was once an avid reader, now I barely read books at all. Now and then I buy one, then don’t get through it. My attention has become very fragmented. I don’t think I’m better off for that.
I prefer paper copies and almost always buy them second hand online.
I increasingly struggle with mustering the enthusiasm for fiction – maybe non-fiction is too interesting nowadays!
I’m a very slow reader so the books build up by no more than a foot per year.
Sitting in a coffee shop in Cambridge, I took down a James Hadley Chase from the shelf to read with my Americano. Within the opening dozen pages, we have a man wearing a “n** brown hat” and a “fat Wop at the end of the corridor.” I was pretty certain that none of the hipster undergraduates hunched over their laptops have ever taken down any of the decorative books to vet them.
In the ‘fifties, items such as cotton reels and coats were unselfconsciously described as ‘n****r brown, just as items of a different colour could be named ‘pillarbox red’ When I was a baby, my mother named the black family cat ‘N****r. She was using a word in common use, so there was no vilification.
It wasn’t ‘racism’ (then an unknown word) in the UK because we hadn’t kept African slaves and mistreated them as they did in America.
It was the advent of cultural Americanisation and mass immigration that made it a sensitive no-no word.
I’m working my way through my libraries popular science books at the moment, just borrowed Rationality by Steven Pinker in which he bangs on about the exponential growth fallacy then gives examples of things that don’t grow exponentially then mentions that they don’t grow exponentially after all…
I’m also reading the excellent Critical Mass by Philip Ball that I managed to buy second hand for £3.
I have a few shelves of books. Mostly art, economics or some eclectic historical works, ancient Roman recipes is a new one. Though I am admittedly not the biggest reader anymore.
But I work through audio books in the hundreds every year! The Sharpe series is keeping me going currently!
Once you finish Sharpe, I can recommend The Last Kingdom series also by Cornwell.
It’s on the list! I’ve seen the first series of the TV show. Have some sci fi next, James S A Corey’s ‘Expanse’ series.
The Last Kingdom books are better than the TV show. They rushed the end and spoiled it.
Speaking of rushed endings, I’m waiting for the next Game of Thrones book, and have been for many years.
The entire country should require a ‘Bunter Passport’, obtainable only once each individual has read the complete William George (Billy) Bunter series written by Charles Hamilton.
‘Bunter’s defining characteristics are his naive greed, self-indulgence, and overweight appearance. He is in many respects an obnoxious anti-hero. Besides his gluttony, he is obtuse, lazy, racist, nosy, deceitful, pompous, and conceited, but he is blissfully unaware of his defects. In his own mind, he is a handsome, talented, and naturally aristocratic young man….’
Once everyone has obtained their Bunter passport, it should be well nigh impossible (Hooray!) for another Bunter to reach No 10 Downing Street and impose silly lockdowns (Yarooh!) on us, all the while stuffing their face with cake.
I’ve just finished Trollope’s Barchester Towers. Actually it was read to me by Timothy West, just brilliant & laugh out loud funny.
Am now reading The Real Anthony Fauci, also brilliant…. but no very funny.
Ah Yes – the real Anthony Fauci – I read this on my kindle and managed to buy a hard-back version. Also a book by Sen Rand Paul is another very enlightening one.
Books are prohibitively expensive here(Thailand) hence I use a kindle. I have a mix of fact and fiction – all genres.
Don’t have a tv and prefer to ‘get lost’ in a book – or go to the bar to talk to my friends.
I’m none too sure that reading Trollope et al is exactly compulsory for the intelligent mind. Nor am I convinced of the idea purveyed that reading books is the only pure form of reading; surely reading anything is better than reading nothing.
I’ve read books all my life but now my reading is split between online, Kindle and physical. Once upon a time in a land far far away where Blair hadn’t murdered people I read a newspaper every day. Now I read numerous digital equivalents. Does none of this count? Indeed, would we be best served by not keeping up with the present and reading what Cicero had to say about his present?
The major factor is to understand, and extrapolate, what you have read. Animal Farm for example is completely applicable to today and 1984 lacked imagination. The descent into the second Middle Age (not a reference to Tolkien but actually, today and tomorrow, fact) will be written about, lied about and turned into something it never actually was. Will the future learn from it?
I mentioned this article to my wife and she just said “Well, people who think that kind of stuff just disappear up their own …”.
I think I read somewhere reasonably authoritative that reading from a screen is deleterious to one’s concentration. I have certainly found this to be true of myself.
Me. Borrow on average one a week form our local library. Can’t read off screens nor do I want to.
Lockdown saw me read
The Iliad
The Odyssey (both the Fitzgerald translations)
The Divine Comedy (Clive James wonderful translation)
Paradise Lost
The Bible, cover to cover with accompanying critical works. So good I am now rereading it.
Ulysses. At last. Loved it. Made me laugh out loud.
I read daily, always have from a small child , but I do understand what is being said, sad really, but even schools opt for the easy way out these days.
I read every evening. I try not to do any screen time in the evenings (and that includes the telly as we don’t have one). I have to admit that I’m often re-reading my old detective books (Michael Innes, Margery Allingham, Agatha Christie et al) – for pure escape from our dystopian world (which can get rather depressing!) there’s nothing better than a good detective story! However, I’m also reading Katherine Rundell’s book on John Donne and I plan to start re-reading my biographies and autobiographies. I try to read the Bible every day – it is my mainstay.
However I agree that our grandchildren’s generation appears not to read nearly so much and I am appalled (but not surprised) by what Joanna Grey relates.
I generally have 3 – 4 books on the go. One in the bathroom, one at the breakfast bar and a couple near the couch. None of them are novels and are either biographies or factual books. I am currently reading Mao by Halliday; Factfulness by Rosling; and There is No Climate Crisis by Craig. Additionally, I read the Daily Sceptic, Spectator, Conservative Woman, Conservative Home and Unherd; in that order daily.
I tell you this because until I stopped dairy farming at 50, I had no time to read any books but two separate careeers since, in planning and politics, have changed that. I am not of a view that reading is dying. My daughter and grandchildren all read avidly and one grand-daughter -18- collects First Edition books, but much of it is on Kindle type books.
Reading books often lead to conversation and book clubs abound around here in NE Scotland, so there is hope.
Yes, more than ever.
I certainly read books. I believe many other people do, too. When I was a teenager, I used to love reading science fiction. People like Joanna used to ask why I was reading such rubbish and tell me I should read some “real books”.
At school, they made us read interminable and boring “good books” that taught us nothing except that reading was a chore. (Luckily, I was sceptical enough to ignore that and read what I wanted to read.)
Areopagitica by John Milton? The Consolations of Philosophy by Boethius? If Joanna finds them interesting, good luck to her. If she is telling the children she mentors to read such things, she is part of the problem!
The Dark Ages (Part 2) haven’t dawned yet but they may be in the process of dawning.
Having read two books by Paul Strathern recently – ‘The Medici’ and ‘Death in Florence’ – I have come to an understanding of how the Renaissance began and spread throughout Europe. Previously, I knew the Renaissance happened but not how.
The emergence from the mediaeval world of superstition and suppression of learning imposed by dogmatic Roman Catholicism was a long time coming, but the wisdom/philosophy of the ancient Greeks (and some Romans) was eventually rediscovered. A new age of developing arts and sciences dawned, followed by the Reformation, the Enlightenment and so on.
We’re in an awful retrograde phase now, unfortunately, brought on by a combination of technology and the replacement of formal and self-education (via books) with poisonous ideologies promoted by poisonous people.
It may take a while for normality and sanity to be restored, but our prior emergence from the Dark Ages (Part 1) offers hope.
I should add that my interest in the Medici & Florence was inspired by watching a Netflix series. It was somewhat soapy but sparked enough curiosity for me to order books that could teach the history in detail. That is the result of a grammar school education 1959-1964 with teachers who extolled the value of lifelong reading.