• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Free Speech Union Highlights New Risk to Free Speech in the Workplace: Carbon Literacy Training

by Toby Young
25 August 2023 1:00 PM

The Free Speech Union has just published a briefing on carbon literacy training by Thomas Harris, its Director of Data and Impact. The FSU is concerned that it will have a chilling effect on free speech in the workplace in the same way that unconscious bias training and anti-racism training does, with employees reluctant to challenge the ideas behind it for fear of jeopardising their careers.

Carbon literacy training is spreading rapidly across UK offices and places of study, with over 67,000 citizens certified as ‘carbon literate’ according to the Carbon Literacy Project (CLP), the main organisation behind the initiative. (Between financial year-end September 2021 and September 2022, CLP’s income grew from £183.8k to £637.7k, an increase of nearly 250%.) The training takes it for granted that we’re in the midst of a ‘climate emergency’ and recommends that employees embrace various radical solutions, including net zero.

The Free Speech Union is concerned that this training is embedding a particular orthodoxy about climate change in British workplaces, leaving employees feeling unable to challenge it. While it’s indisputable that average global temperatures have increased since the mid-19th Century people hold a range of views about the causes and severity of climate change and that in turn influences their opinion about the best way to tackle it – or, indeed, whether tackling it is possible or necessary. Different solutions to the problems created by climate change are informed by different values and recommending one approach over another inevitably involves making a political choice. There is no-such thing as an apolitical, ‘scientific’ solution. Consequently, employees should not be put under pressure to endorse a particular approach or threatened with disciplinary action if they fail to adjust their behaviour to follow this approach, particularly in their private lives.

In those companies seeking accreditation as a ‘Carbon Literate Organisation’ (CLO), up to 80% of staff are expected to become ‘carbon literate’. Carbon literate accreditation requires employees to embrace a particular view about climate change and identify at least one action they can take to reduce their own carbon footprint, as well as at least one action involving other people. The FSU fears that employees may be penalised if they refuse to comply with these requirements because they do not share a particular point of view.

The FSU first became aware of this new threat to free speech in the workplace when it was contacted by a member who is concerned about his career after he challenged the carbon literacy training provided by his employer. The FSU believes he was right to be concerned. To secure CLP’s platinum, gold, and silver CLO accreditation, companies are expected to embed carbon literacy in the annual targets of staff members and evaluate their performance accordingly. This means that employees who don’t subscribe to a particular view on climate change could find themselves missing out on pay awards or promotion unless they self-censor or pretend to hold convictions they don’t have.

If you’re being forced to undergo carbon literacy training in your workplace and are worried you might get into trouble for challenging the climate activist agenda behind it, you can contact Thomas Harris at the Free Speech Union here. And if you’re not already a member of the FSU, you can join here.

Tags: Carbon Literacy ProjectCarbon Literacy TrainingFree Speech UnionThomas Harris

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Biden Probe Censored Findings of Intelligence Agency Scientists That Covid was Likely Made in Lab

Next Post

The Day I Was Sexually Assaulted by the BBC’s Derek Cooper

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Freddy Boy
Freddy Boy
1 year ago

Amazing ! If only we had known these things before this Crucial Survey ! Life could have been so much different , we are so far up our own arses now ( if you’ll pardon the pun) that I wonder if it would be better if we did die out due to chasing the chocolate starfish instead of the bonus hole ! 🤯

60
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Freddy Boy

🤣🤣🤣 Well I’m glad you beat me to the ‘tone-lowering’ of the thread. I was about to reinsert the pic of Huw Edwards moony, because for once I’d be on-topic!🤭 However, I really can’t be arsed…🙈🍑

28
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Couldn’t resist. Not sorry! 😮

https://todayleaked.com/why-is-huw-edwards-trending-on-twitter-snapchat-photo-leaves-internet-scandalized-amid-bbc-presenter-scandal/

10
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Freddy Boy

Oh, I say.

7
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  Freddy Boy

“chocolate starfish instead of the bonus hole ! 🤯”

Oh, I say.

14
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I vote Freddy for giving sex ed in schools. He’s quite the wordsmith and has the lingo nailed! Who could fail to enjoy such imagery?😂

Last edited 1 year ago by Mogwai
9
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

Go on. Behave like macaques. It’ll be fine.

18
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

And here’s me thinking it was only the bonobo that was into this sort of behaviour. I consider myself enlightened! lol

12
0
Arum
Arum
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Many mammals have private lives that make those of BBC presenters look tame by comparison – dolphins really are sleazy, for example. However, they’re not ‘gay’, even if they have lots of same-sex action.

8
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago

Firstly it’s one of my bug bears when animal studies are extrapolated to imply anything whatsoever to do with humans ( like that mouse city article the other day ) but also my heart sinks whenever I see ‘ICL’. They’re like the QAnon of the academic world, so ridiculous is the bilge that we’re used to seeing them produce. I mean, of course this stuff will get published straightaway ( and not get retracted ), unlike quality and meaningful work which has significant impact, such as the McCullough et al Lancet paper about the autopsies proving the death jabs are just that. I just assumed monkeys did this because they couldn’t get a girlfriend anyway, but if the majority were that way inclined I guess they’d eventually die out. Same as the human race really.

27
0
nige.oldfart
nige.oldfart
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Ref mouse city, there was no mention of the Douglas Adams report on the vastly hyperintelligent pandimensional beings that are the white mice that gave us the answer of 42, for the meaning of life. Pour me another pangalactic gargle blaster. no ice.

5
0
AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
1 year ago

Let’s face it, monkeys just don’t care. They’ll have sex with a scooter if they could. Their sex drive is legendary, just ask Tarzan…

32
0
Chris P
Chris P
1 year ago

Gives a new meaning to the line “I’m the King of the Swingers” from the Jungle Book song.

27
0
True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
1 year ago
Reply to  Chris P

LOL

6
-1
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 year ago

Yeah, and worms are asexual.

So what?

17
0
George L
George L
1 year ago

I’m actually self-identifying as a Gibbon for the entirety of this thread, and I don’t want any smartarse remarks suggesting I’m ‘out of my tree’.. 😉

13
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  George L

Would that be one of the Funky ones?😶 Here, have a 🍌 😁

4
0
George L
George L
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

But of course.. is there another sort.. 😉

5
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/under-starmer-or-sunak-things-can-only-get-worse/

An OT Dump.

Simon Dolan failing to understand that our politicians are now simply order takers and their orders are to destroy the country socially, politically and economically. Very naiive.

11
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Specifically what part of this is naive and fails to recognise that they are “order takers”? If you mean the bit where he talks about them wanting to get elected, I sort of agree as I’m not sure they care much – certainly the top people on both sides seem to have more of an eye on their next job with the WEF, EU, UN or whatever.

But his sentiments about the wrongness of what’s being done are correct.

3
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago

I suppose anyone who has used the “homosexual behaviour is aberrant – you don’t seen animals doing it” has kind of walked into this one. I would answer this though:

  1. Animals can be aberrant too
  2. There was only one monkey that was exclusively homosexual – the rest were doing their bit to reproduce

But agree with points BTL that applying this to humans is a bit daft to say the least. If none had been “gay” the authors may not have been so keen to draw conclusions and would have said “ah well humans are different”.

13
0
RumpoMidwinter
RumpoMidwinter
1 year ago

Some points: one, are these people actually telling us to behave like a more primitive species of primate? Two, are they hence suggesting that we should be violent, careless, tribal, unthinking? And three – the standout point – why do they fail to emphasise the extreme rarity of exclusively homosexual behaviour (1 monkey in 236)? We know why, of course, because, following their own logic, it suggests that it might indeed be regarded as an abnormality.

Now compare the way that foolish fellow Tom Holland, with his latest rubbish about ancient Rome, is saying that antique sexuality was vastly different, that it didn’t matter with whom or with what a person “went to bed” etc. But only thirty years ago, in “Courtesans and Fishcakes” among other publications, another author – whose name escapes me – pointed out that whilst casual buggery was not uncommon in ancient Greece, those who could not or would not consort with women at all were derided and mocked. From these two examples, we can see that today accounts of the past are being twisted to accommodate either extreme “liberalism” or its ugly “woke” offspring.

Surely the truth, emerging both from this study of monkeys and earlier studies of ancient society, is this: that where erotic behaviours are concerned there has always been a degree of flexibility among humans – think of old style public schools and prisons; and the marker is not what a person is willing or capable of doing but that of which they are incapable. And anything which blocks a vital biological and species function, such as reproduction, is ipso facto an abnormality.

If we’re going to draw conclusions from nature studies, this strikes me as the most germane and powerful to emerge from this peep into the lives of macaques. But nobody in public life dares even to hint at such a possibility. Perhaps the scientists have put out this nonsense about the splendours of bisexuality to cover themselves against “cancellation” for the other, much more important findings of their research.

12
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  RumpoMidwinter

Wouldn’t it be interesting if you cold measure the amount of gay people that existed throughout history, starting right from before records began, and obviously taking into account relation to population size? I wonder if humans are gay due to our highly evolved brains. Of course it can’t possibly be called ”natural” in the context of reproduction because being homosexual is hardly conducive to the survival of the human species, which is why they will always remain a minority, but they are sizable minority.
I’m also wondering if there are more gay people now just because it’s more socially acceptable or are there just literally more gay people now anyway? However, if Islam didn’t condemn homosexuality would there be more gay Muslims? It’s a very interesting topic once you scratch the surface. I don’t even know if there were gay cave men and women, but that’s something we’re never going to know for sure with no records. Any way you look at it having a highly evolved brain is a double-edged sword.

5
0
RumpoMidwinter
RumpoMidwinter
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I’m convinced that there is a good deal of truth in what you say, which – if I may extrapolate – seems to suggest that the relations between sexuality and consciousness are not as simple as we’ve all been taught to think; that erotic desires and behaviours can themselves be affected by the wider condition of the consciousness and that if this is diseased or oppressed in some way, sexual processes can be adversely affected.

1
0
RW
RW
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I’m absolutely not convinced that a majority of humans have highly evolved brains.

15
0
RW
RW
1 year ago
Reply to  RumpoMidwinter

The question is really immaterial. Homosexual behaviour is perfectly normal for humans and has been documented for millennia. It’s ubiquitious in Xenophon’s Anabasis, Thucydides mentions it normal occurence in Athenian society and at his time, Caesar’s enemys mocked him as someone who Was a woman for men and a man for women. Different cultures have and had different appreciations of it: The monotheistic religions from the near and middle east (Islam, Christanity and Judasim) reject it as against the will of God. The ancient Greeks considered it perfectly normal, explicitly including men having sex with boys. The Romans regarded it as normal but somewhat shameful for Men who were women to other men. Historic Icelandic society (presumably extending to other Germanic peoples) strongly disapproved of it as unmanly and dishonourable conduct. Germanic and Christian traditions caused it to be strongly disapproved of in Europe from the end of antiquity until the end of the 20th century. The postmodern, hedonistc consumer society of today celebrates it in the same way it celebrates all (lucrative) ways of achieving instant physical gratification of some animal desire.

7
-3
RumpoMidwinter
RumpoMidwinter
1 year ago
Reply to  RW

But aren’t you ignoring the point about exclusively homosexual behaviour? How acceptable has that been? Has it ever been enshrined as preferable? Or preferable for the majority? Or the norm? Would societies which managed any such tricks survive?

The point, I repeat, about ancient Greece – as some say with modern Afghanistan – is that an overarching commitment to heterosexuality for most people, most of the time confines alternative practice to some people with some others at certain moments of their lives.

No society before ours has pretended that it is just a matter of “choice”; or that there is no difference between the sexualities when it comes to the foundations of family life. And no society before ours has pretended that the two forms of expression are each as central to humanity or its survival as the other.

The traditional variables, I put it to you, are merely forms of permission and / or toleration, and these were always limited by social factors. Even the monotheistic religions in deciding heavily against even that, in practice left wide areas of latitude through wilful ignorance.

And had the whole business been viewed as purely abstract and symmetrical, such that the choice between which sexuality should prevail or predominate would appear as arbitrary, then I put it to you that the society indulging in such anti-natural nonsense would have sunk into the desert sands.

Yes, there has always been homosexuality, but there has always been cancer, madness, genetic disease. To say, therefore, that these are “normal” in the way that health, sanity and heterosexuality are normal is no more than a hackneyed abuse of language.

Last edited 1 year ago by RumpoMidwinter
10
0
RW
RW
1 year ago
Reply to  RumpoMidwinter

No society before ours has pretended that it is just a matter of “choice”

It’s a matter of choice for Xenophon’s Greeks fighting their way back into Greece from Persia: After conquering another city, some of the men of the army prefer taking female prisoners, some prefer male prisoners and some take both. The difference is that it’s not regarded as some form of hallowed, innate identiy which is to be celebrated as the ultimate meaning of life. The warriors Xenophon describes are, first and foremost, warriors and expected to have some very traditional (from our viewpoint) male qualities like courage, strength and a readiness to sacrifice themselves to accomplish some higher end if need be. They have little in common with contemporary effiminates wearing high heels and painting their nails.

What I’m trying to get at is that (to the best of my knowledge) no society before ours has ever openly chosen sex as the golden calf to dance around.

3
-3
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
1 year ago
Reply to  RW

I read it decades ago – in English translation -but remember Xenophon regarding the queers with mild contempt.

1
0
RW
RW
1 year ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

Didn’t seem that way to me. The one episode I remember was one of the men being slightly mocked because he was so much infatuated with a certain boy, ie, not because his sex partner of choice was a boy but because he overvalued him so much. But I read it only once and may well have missed something.

1
0
RW
RW
1 year ago

A one-off observation of 236 monkeys from a colony of 1700 (Why were 86% of the colony excluded? Desired phenomon not showing up?) means absolutely nothing for monkeys, let alone humans. That’s just another case of someone having been provided with a budget to go and find something the people the budget came from wanted to be found.

29
-2
True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
1 year ago

Well, it does certainly put the lie to the tired old zombie canard that homosexuality/bisexuality is somehow “unnatural” and therefore wrong, because reasons. And it does dovetail nicely with what we already know about bonobos, as well as various ancient and so-called “primitive” human cultures too. The famous book “Sex at Dawn” by Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jetha, as well as “The Bonobo Way” by Dr. Susan Block, certainly come to mind.

And while of course we should not read too much into studies like these, they still provide important information nonetheless. And for those who think it is somehow a million miles away from humans, especially modern humans, please feel free to take a look at the Kinsey Reports or the Wolfenden Report. Or any number of studies done after that as well.

Last edited 1 year ago by True Spirit of America Party
1
-13
True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
1 year ago
Reply to  True Spirit of America Party

To all the downvoters, you know it’s true. Methinks they doth protest too much, lol.

1
-3
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
1 year ago
Reply to  True Spirit of America Party

Blindness and deafness are natural.

1
0
True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
1 year ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

Talk about missing the point, lol.

0
0
johnboy12
johnboy12
1 year ago

Anyone else fed up with ‘experts’ & ‘scientists’?

15
-2
Dinger64
Dinger64
1 year ago

A hole is a goal to a non centiant creature!
It’s not by intention it’s a safe guard to ensure the procreation of the species. I’m sure humans are intelligent enough to know males can not give birth to young and no matter how much you shag the male he never will!??? …and right there is a problematic box of frogs 🐸!

3
0
True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
1 year ago

True, humans are not monkeys. We are in fact the only species dumb enough to do the following:

1) Pay to live on the planet on which they were born.
2) Believe that if they work themselves into an early grave to make the rich richer, they too will become rich via the “trickle down” theory.
3) Turn billions of barrels of dead dinosaurs into…microliters of dopamine.
4) Wage large-scale wars for fun and profit, and also access to #3 as well.
5) Believe that infinite growth on a finite world is somehow possible or desirable.
6) Destroy the Earth in pursuit of the above.

“Homo sapiens” is a misnomer, as we are not very sapient after all, it seems.

Last edited 1 year ago by True Spirit of America Party
4
-4
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
1 year ago
Reply to  True Spirit of America Party

If you believe that oil is made out of dead dinosaurs you’re operating on an intellectual monkey level.

Last edited 1 year ago by Nearhorburian
5
0
True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
1 year ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

Perhaps the abiogenic petroleum hypothesis is correct after all. I am on the fence about that myself. In fact, I was waiting for someone to say that.

Last edited 1 year ago by True Spirit of America Party
0
0
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
1 year ago

I can believe that homosexual men have the sexual self-control of monkeys.

4
0
MikeMayUK
MikeMayUK
1 year ago

Reminds me of one of my bosses back in the 80s who went on holiday to Gibraltar and sent us a postcard (remember those) picturing some of the macaques. “Help! It turns out “monkey” is Spanish for gay,” he wrote, continuing, “And I only wanted to feed them fruit and nuts.”

3
0
Alan
Alan
1 year ago

Are they incestuous?

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.37: David Frost on Starmer’s EU Surrender, James Price on Broken Britain and David Shipley on Lucy Connolly’s Failed Appeal

by Richard Eldred
23 May 2025
8

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

News Round-Up

29 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Dominic Cummings: Nigel Farage Could Definitely be Next PM

28 May 2025
by Toby Young

US to Deny Visas to Foreign Officials Who Try to Censor US Social Media Platforms

28 May 2025
by Toby Young

Starmer Dragged Into Free Speech Union’s Koran-Burning Court Case

28 May 2025
by Toby Young

US to Deny Visas to Foreign Officials Who Try to Censor US Social Media Platforms

21

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

19

Dominic Cummings: Nigel Farage Could Definitely be Next PM

19

AI Data Centre Blitz Threatens Labour’s Net Zero Hopes

17

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

12

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

29 May 2025
by Ben Pile

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

Lies, Damned Lies and Casualty Numbers in Ancient History

26 May 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

POSTS BY DATE

August 2023
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Jul   Sep »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

August 2023
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Jul   Sep »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

News Round-Up

29 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Dominic Cummings: Nigel Farage Could Definitely be Next PM

28 May 2025
by Toby Young

US to Deny Visas to Foreign Officials Who Try to Censor US Social Media Platforms

28 May 2025
by Toby Young

Starmer Dragged Into Free Speech Union’s Koran-Burning Court Case

28 May 2025
by Toby Young

US to Deny Visas to Foreign Officials Who Try to Censor US Social Media Platforms

21

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

19

Dominic Cummings: Nigel Farage Could Definitely be Next PM

19

AI Data Centre Blitz Threatens Labour’s Net Zero Hopes

17

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

12

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

29 May 2025
by Ben Pile

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

Lies, Damned Lies and Casualty Numbers in Ancient History

26 May 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences