One of the giants of modern science, Dr. John Clauser, has signed the World Climate Declaration (WCD) that states there is no climate emergency. Dr. Clauser is last year’s joint winner of the Nobel physics prize, and he recently sent shock waves through the climate industry by stating the popular climate narrative “reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy, and the well-being of billions of people”. The WCD argues that climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound critical science.
Last August, the Daily Sceptic highlighted the WCD in an article that went viral on social media. The WCD has drawn comparison with the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) which publicised the views of eminent medical scientists who dissented from the disastrous Covid lockdown episode. As with the GBD, the WCD has been ignored by mainstream politicians and media. But since last August, it has attracted another 500 signatories, and the current list numbers 1,609 scientists and professionals. Over 300 academics at professorial levels have signed the list, while Clauser is the second Nobel physics laureate to lend support.
The WCD holds that climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science. For his part, Clauser told a recent group of young Korean scientists that they must follow the scientific method based on good observations and experiments. Good observations always overrule purely speculative theory. Referring to climate science, he noted the world was “literally awash, saturated, with pseudoscience, with bad science, with scientific misinformation and disinformation”. At a time when the unhinged head of the United Nations Antonio Guterres was claiming the world had entered an era of “global boiling”, he gave his opinion that the UN-funded IPCC “is one of the worst sources of dangerous misinformation”.
The WCD is wide-ranging in its criticism of the current ‘settled’ climate narrative that has been ruthlessly compiled over decades to promote an extremist Net Zero agenda. It notes that climate models are “not remotely plausible as global policy tools”. They are said to “blow up” the effect of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and “ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial”. There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying natural disasters and there is no climate emergency. There is no need for panic and alarm, it advises.
But of course panic and alarm plays a vital part in pushing the collectivist Net Zero agenda. As Clauser observes: “Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience.”
The latest signatories to the WCD include many distinguished scientists. These are a few of the recent additions.
• Emeritus Professor Michael Wilson, former Executive Dean at the University of West Sydney. Over 30 years of teaching and researching environmental chemistry.
• Emeritus Associate Chemistry Professor Neils Harrrit, University of Copenhagen.
• Dr Hendrik Schlesing, 30 years working at the Huggard Consulting Group on a number of scientific topics including international environmental impacts.
• Dr Stefano Gallozzi, researcher at the Italian Institute for Astrophysics, Astronomical Observatory of Rome, and president of the Safeguarding Astronomical Sky Foundation.
• Paul P A Mazza, Associate Professor of Quaternary Geology and Paleontology and Archeozoology at the University of Florence.
• Physics Professor Julian Schins, specialist in near infrared spectroscopy at the Delft University of Technology.
• Mikael Lindgren, Professor of Physics at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, specialising in optics and spectroscopy.
• Isabel Lopez Garcia, Assistant Professor of Physical Chemistry and Applied Thermodynamics at the University of Cordoba.
• Dr M M Ali, Senior Scientist at the Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies at Florida State University. Dr Ali’s main research interest is ocean-atmosphere interaction with special reference to wind stress and ocean heat content.
The WCD is the work of the Clintel Foundation, a body in the Netherlands that is becoming increasingly influential in the fight against bad science promoting an unworkable Net Zero political ideology. Earlier this year, it published an in-depth and highly critical review of the recent sixth assessment reports of the IPCC. It found that the IPCC rewrote climate history, emphasised worse case scenarios, and displayed a “huge bias” in favour of bad news. It reported the shocking fact that 42% of its impact claims rely on improbable rises of 5°C in less than 80 years that even the UN body considers of “low likelihood”. Even worse, it was disclosed that about half of all climate science papers used these implausible assumptions.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.
Stop Press: A reader reports that the Avast software she has installed on her computer, supposedly to guard against viruses, has blocked the above link to the World Climate Declaration, which Avast has apparently ‘blacklisted’. She attached this screenshot as proof:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
He sums up things pretty well:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hxOQlFfnvIwq/
Yes – the establishmant in this cuntry has become totally corrupt and, imo, EVIL !
iane,
Was that a Freudian slip in your spelling of ‘country’?
It must be spiritually demoralising to work for the BBC, ITV and Sky, I should imagine. Lying and deceiving for a living can’t be good for your soul. Eventually someone will crack and say something truthful, off-script and live on air.
Yes – but only after their career has ended! The history is pretty conclusive on this.
Well, quite a few well known politicians have ‘accidentally’ said things near a live mike! Wait and see; after all, there are loads more live mikes around these days.
Probably 98 percent of the people who visit this site suspect that many COVID storylines that wouldn’t fit “the narrative” are “off limits” to journalistic inquiry. To me, this shows the prevalence of a diabolical form of “groupthink” in newsrooms. This is why and how we get “pack journalism.”
I’m a FREELANCE journalist who has tried to get “contrarian” pieces published at mainstream sites, with only very rare success. A piece I wrote many months ago – about likely/possible “early spread” – DID get published at one little-known site. I think my piece is original – and, yes, important – because it provides EVIDENCE that a real “search for the truth” is NOT occurring. This “evidence” involves public health officials and editors and journalists.
To me, this larger point is far more frightening than this virus.
Here it is for those who didn’t see it (everyone here).
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/07/13/covid-19-is-a-real-search-for-the-truth-now-taboo/
Thanks for that link. It’s an interesting article, and the concept that the SARS-Cov-2 virus emerged rather earlier hasn’t made it in the usual media. In fact, the idea that it was around in late 2019 is ignored by many. Those of us who had minor infections in late December (before the new one made it publicly), and offered the option of a valid sample for relevant testing to see what it might have been, have been ignored, in effect.
I still know more people who had covid-like symptoms between October 2019 and February 2020 than had an official covid diagnosis here in Suffolk, and I’ve heard similar tales from the West Country and elsewhere. But why would anyone bother to look? It doesnt sell vaccines.
Latest news someone told me, a school up the road is “riddled with cases”, well not surprising as the poor little buggers are being tested twice a week. You find what you look for and ignore the rest.
Instinctively you warm to this analysis of the failings of news and politics that are so propagandized and have no checks.
But :
“Collectively citizens are vastly better informed and capable than a closed circle of politicians and their fixated ‘expert advisers’, but our governments have no desire whatsoever to draw on our insights and wisdom.”
Really?
I think there is a lot to contradict this broad assertion. Not least in the present scam where – in actuality – the possibility of getting round the MSM is massive.
Let’s face it – this site – and a look at Round Up demonstrates that a large proportion of the population could be better informed. But are they? Will they be? I have yet to be convinced by this proposed mechanism.
We live in an era where the ability for individuals to disseminate information is greater than ever before, so why is it that ‘democrats’ (small ‘d’) assume that the problems now can be solved by even more democratisation of information?
I’d argue that the problem is one of a lack of group action, not individualistic information democratisation. Ultimately, the MSM presents a unified front, is financially secure and relies on the individual’s tendency to follow herds in order to push an agenda. They are unassailable by contrary information presentation precisely because their power is not intellectual but psycho/economic. It’s political power.
Individuals are vulnerable, they have there own life problems, financial worries, insecure employment that is contingent to an extent on what they say in public (they have to tow the line or face persecution) etc. Corporate and state power suffers very little in this way. Only through groupings of individuals who can put aside their differences and unite on certain propositions that matter most will power transfer hands. At the top of this must be the priority of establishing a system of mutual support. People cannot allow their fellows to be picked off without defence.
Yes. I don’t want to be classed as ‘cynical’ – but it is a massive problem that won’t be soluble by good will, motherhood and sliced bread.
At root are systemic problems that involve issues of control and checks to it : the need for balance. This isn’t a problem that starts with the media – although its a vital component.
I don’t mind being classed as cynical, I’m too old to bother. The problem is that anyone/everyone who gives out facts on this issue and others ( sorry Rick but climate change is the other obvious one) is routinely deplatformed.
I only occasionally dip into UKColumn, mainly to read Iain who posts there now rather than his own site. They are pretty harmless types giving some decent interviews at times and not too extreme in views. Now they have overstepped the mark by giving air time to a bloke who has suffered badly after an injection. So now they face the full force of the state onslaught.
I can’t imagine, that if its serious this new site not suffering the same fate. ‘If’ its serious, I am cynical enough to think it might be a put-up job to keep dicontents happy talking to themselves.
The Brits might pour scorn on the French , but when it comes to street confrontations there is a lot to be learned. Macron is scared silly of having another ‘yellow-vest’ type confrontation on the streets of Paris about covid/vaccines especially close to elections. If people are serious about removing the foot on the neck they have to step up the ‘peaceful’ marches in central London and create some real confrontation that will resound around the world, nevermind the Beeb.
God, where is the emotion and anger of the 60s and 70s?
Agree, because based on the lack of impact of the 500k+, or whatever large number, of peaceful demonstrators it is clear that such actions do not, and most likely will not, make the slightest bit of difference. Also logical debate has been shown to be a complete waste of time. But the drip feed of furlough and other state funded help ensures nothing will happen; revolutions are fuelled by hungry people.
“MSM bias” is actually the biggest and most important (untold) story of our times. I imagine 99 percent of the people who visit this site can identify this bias in COVID reporting (or non-reporting as the case may be). But I hope most visitors to this site also realize that this same bias is found in the “coverage” of countless other stories. It’s not just COVID stories that are giving the world a flawed “narrative.”
I’d add that Big-Brother type censorship efforts that have rapidly accelerated with COVID are also making it far less likely that other bogus or dubious narratives ever get challenged. So, we haven’t seen anything yet. Our “new normal” is now a world where the real truth is even harder to ascertain.
For anyone interested in examples of bias, the Observer coverage of the London march (Sun 25th) is a real classic.
Evidently, the story was about police officers being injured.
Did you see any of the footage? After the march, back at Hyde Park a large group of police appeared from nowhere and started attacking and hitting the innocent crowd of people singing and playing music. Then the crowd fought back…and won. The police subsequently just disappeared, and people carried on partying! But I’m suspicious that this was set up, so they could get their pictures.
The Guardian story is all about how angry the Police are that 8 of them got injured.
Judging from HelenaHandcarts excellent report above it sounds like they deserved it.
The estimate is that there were 1,000,000 at the London march yesterday, and no coverage on BBC, ITV and Sky..? Draw your own conclusions.
And 1,000,000 cannot all be wrong!
Who estimates this?
It really doesn’t matter if it was 1m, 100k, or ‘tens of thousands. If you only follow the BBC it simply didn’t happen.
If it was a million those predominately young people will have 20-30 family, friends and colleagues.
Half the country will know by Monday lunchtime.
A drone shot here shows the size of the crowd. Stretching at least from Bloomsbury, all the way up Oxford Street as far as the eye can see.
https://twitter.com/ToniaBuxton/status/1386241222919041027
So the largest demonstration since the Iraq war, is completely ignored by the BBC and The Guardian and given negative headlines elsewhere ie “clashes with police in Hyde Park”.
A 12 year old, who doesn’t understand the word disinformation, is the BBC’s conspiracy disnfo expert and chose to whip up hatred of the protestors on Twitter, rather than do a balanced report. I’m guessing she’s been hired as the useful idiot to be thrown under the bus, when the time comes.
This is dystopian level censorship.
The largest UK demonstration for 20 years….And the MSM ignore it. Shame on them, they’re disgusting. But the truth will out, and their cover up(s) will ALL be exposed one fine day!
I’ve thought about this long and hard and concluded that there is no real way to “drain the swamp” until the newsrooms have also first been (largely) drained. Alas, this isn’t going to happen either. Thus the only solution is for more entrepreneurs like the man who started this site to do the same thing. We need a heck of a lot more sites like “Lockdown Skeptics.”
Don’t laugh, but I actually had the same idea as this site. I was going to call mine “Covid Contrarians.” But someone beat me to it. Plus, I couldn’t surpass the excellence of this site. But my idea envisions expanding the site from just COVID topics. Pick your subject (any topic that’s largely off limits to mainstream journalism inquiry) and plop the word “Contrarian” after it: Epstein Contrarian, The Economy is Great Contrarian, China is Going to Get us Contrarian …
The topic doesn’t matter. Whatever it is, our journalists, researchers and citizen correspondents will, from Day One of operations, have a monopoly on subject matter the mainstream press isn’t going to cover, or will cover in only ways that gibe with the authorized narrative.
If “the narrative” is dubious and the narrative actually is the Thing that matters (and it is), the only way to change faulty narratives is – not politicians or even democracy – it’s real watchdog journalism. Which we don’t have … and won’t get unless someone does it himself. A lot of someones preferably.
Hi Bill,
I agree with your sentiments and the good news is that there are a growing number of DIY journalists and reporters who, collectively, are making an impact. ‘peyrole’ mentioned UKColumn – which I recommend, then there’s The Lotus Eaters, Spiked, James Delingpole, New Culture Forum, Paul Joseph Watson, Politico, Reasoned, Mahyar Tousi etc. – the list goes on – and is growing. I’m hopeful that as the legacy media declines and the new media grows, the imbalance and bias that so riddles the BBC and their ilk will be get exposed more and more.
I included “Epstein Contrarian” as a possible outgrowth of my Covid Contrarian site. I want to make clear that I don’t think Epstein is still alive. I included him (and I could have included his main accomplice, Ms. Maxwell) simply as an example of a story where “conventional wisdom” is wrong. The “conventional wisdom” surrounding Epstein and Maxwell believes/accepts that both were arrested for running a “sex trafficking” operation … but this isn’t true. Look at the actual charges the government brought against both individuals – none deal with actual “trafficking.” Or, if these two people were trafficking young girls for sex they were trafficking these people only to THEMSELVES. The fact is they were running a major, international sex trafficking operation that continued for decades. It actually continued after Epstein was jailed in Palm Beach. The point is that prosecutors and the FBI are NOT going after the real customers/clients of this sex-trafficking operation – all the VIP “johns” who are “off limits” to prosecution or even investigative inquiry. In short, these people are being protected by bringing charges that don’t really deal with real sex-trafficking. So too are the FBI, DOJ which knew about this for decades.
Germane to my above post, the press is also not investigating the real, important story.
So true ….
I would love to see a movement where all pub owners in the UK ban all politicians and their scientific lackeys from their premises, along the lines of how Rod Humphris treated Keir Starmer, and the group of Welsh pubs which barred the First Minister of Wales.
Trivial in practical terms, of course, but symbolically quite powerful. We, the people, do not want you, the self-styled elites, on our premises.
Perhaps restaurants, wine bars and hotels, other sectors of the hospitality industry which have been treated abominably, would like to join in to humiliate the swaggering incompetents of the political class.
It’s not just MSM that are churning out propaganda. Universities, doctors, schools, councils, police, government are all subjugated, influenced and manipulated by target culture, hidden agendas and bribes. Science is bastardised for profit and power. Education is used as a weapon of political grooming and thought control to maximize profit for vested interests. Medical care has been warped into a weapon of mass surveillance and thought control. TV entertainment is dumbed down to the lowest form of crass behavioural nudging to groom a compliant population. Even mumsnet seems to be infested by a behavioural nudge unit, promoting total compliance and the idea that the state must be involved in every aspect of your daily life.
Every institution supposedly set up for public benefit has morphed into a crock of shite.
Democracy doesn’t work if free speech, open debate and holding a different opinion are forbidden.
This mornings aim is to get discussion of a million people marching into the school. One million angry people is nigh on 10 times the size of all our armed forces.
As the BBC were having a bit of a snooze during Saturday’s march, how about we wake them up on the next one by marching past Broadcasting House?