Nigel Farage has said that NatWest Group boss Alison Rose is “unfit” to run the bank after she tonight admitted she was the source of the BBC’s incorrect story about his de-banking row with Coutts – but, ludicrously, the bank’s Board has said it still has “full confidence” in her. The Mail has the story.
In a statement released this evening, Dame Alison conceded she was “wrong” to have discussed Mr. Farage’s account with the BBC’s Business Editor Simon Jack.
She offered her “sincere apologies” to the former UKIP leader, as well as saying sorry to the Board of NatWest Group – which owns Coutts – and her colleagues. But the bank’s Board has said it still has “full confidence” in its under fire leader.
Dame Alison has been under pressure after it emerged she sat next to Mr. Jack at a charity dinner the night before the BBC wrongly reported Mr. Farage was dropped as a Coutts customer due to a lack of wealth.
It has since been revealed how Mr. Farage was ditched by Coutts due to his political views.
But the controversy does not seem to have threatened Dame Alison’s future at the beleaguered banking group.
NatWest Group Chairman Sir Howard Davies this evening said the Board “retains full confidence” in Dame Alison as Chief Executive.
He also praised her as an “outstanding leader” as he backed her to remain in post, although he suggested she could suffer a bonus or pay cut as a result of the scandal. …
Speaking on his GB News show this evening, Mr. Farage again called for the resignation of senior figures at NatWest and Coutts.
He added that the Government, which owns a 39% stake in the banking giant, should say it has no confidence in its management at an investors meeting due to take place this Friday.
The Brexit campaigner said: “It is perfectly clear to me that Peter Flavel, the CEO of Coutts, has not done his job at all.
“It is perfectly clear to me that Alison Rose is unfit to be the CEO of a big group and that Howard Davies, who is supposed to be in charge of governance, has failed as well.
“Given that we have a 39% stake in this, we the great British public, I think at that investor statement on Friday morning, the Government ought to say we have no confidence in this management.
“Frankly, I think they should all go and that is my conclusion from what we’ve learned this afternoon.” …
He accused the bank leadership of acting against the Financial Conduct Authority’s code of conduct.
“I think they [the Board of Directors] are doing their best to prop up Alison Rose, her remuneration will be hit. She might not get the £5.2 million she got last year – gosh, my heart bleeds, I’m sure yours does to.” …
Sir Howard said the NatWest Group Board would commission an independent review of the closure of Mr. Farage’s account with Coutts and would publish its findings.
He admitted the “overall handling of the circumstances surrounding Mr. Farage accounts has been unsatisfactory, with serious consequences for the bank”.
But, offering his backing to Dame Alison, Sir Howard added: “As she recognises, she should not have spoken in the way she did.
“This was a regrettable error of judgement on her part. The events will be taken into account in decisions on remuneration at the appropriate time.
“However, after careful reflection the Board has concluded that it retains full confidence in Ms. Rose as CEO of the bank.
“She has proved, over the last four years to be an outstanding leader of the institution, as demonstrated by our results.
“The Board therefore believes it is clearly in the interest of all the bank’s shareholders and customers that she continues in post.”
Worth reading in full.
Dame Alison Rose’s statement in full:
I recognise that in my conversations with Simon Jack of the BBC, I made a serious error of judgement in discussing Mr. Farage’s relationship with the bank. Given the consequences of this, I want to address the questions that have been raised and set out the substance of the conversations that took place.
Believing it was public knowledge, I confirmed that Mr. Farage was a Coutts customer and that he had been offered a NatWest bank account. Alongside this, I repeated what Mr. Farage had already stated, that the bank saw this as a commercial decision. I would like to emphasise that in responding to Mr. Jack’s questions I did not reveal any personal financial information about Mr. Farage. In response to a general question about eligibility criteria required to bank with Coutts and NatWest I said that guidance on both was publicly available on their websites. In doing so, I recognise that I left Mr. Jack with the impression that the decision to close Mr. Farage’s accounts was solely a commercial one.
I was not part of the decision-making process to exit Mr. Farage. This decision was made by Coutts, and I was informed in April that this was for commercial reasons. At the time of my conversations with Mr. Jack, I was not in receipt of the contents of the Coutts Wealth Reputational Risk Committee materials subsequently released by Mr. Farage. I have apologised to Mr. Farage for the deeply inappropriate language contained in those papers and the Board has commissioned a full independent review into the decision and process to ensure that this cannot happen again.
Put simply, I was wrong to respond to any question raised by the BBC about this case. I want to extend my sincere apologies to Mr. Farage for the personal hurt this has caused him and I have written to him today.
I would like to say sorry to the Board and my colleagues. I started my career working for National Westminster Bank. It is an institution I care about enormously and have always been proud to be a part of. It has been the privilege of my career to lead the bank and I am grateful to the Board for entrusting me with this role. It is therefore all the more regrettable that my actions have compounded an already difficult issue for the Group.
Former Tory cabinet minister David Davis said: “I’m afraid I think that Dame Alison Rose has little choice but to resign. And frankly, I’m astonished that the Board of Directors indicated full confidence in her.”
Jacob Rees-Mogg has expressed his doubts that Dame Alison would still be in post by Friday’s shareholders meeting, saying: “I think the pressure on her is going to get bigger and bigger. You can’t admit to this type of indiscretion and remain [a] senior banker, you have broken [a] key rule of [the] bankers code.”
The Telegraph is reporting that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Chancellor Jeremy Hunt are understood to have “significant concerns” about Dame Alison staying in her post and there is expectation within the Government that she will have to quit.
Quite why that isn’t obvious to Rose and the NatWest Board yet is anyone’s guess, but I imagine it has something to do with not wanting their prized ‘diverse’ CEO to become the victim of dastardly Mr. Brexit.
Stop Press: According to Sky News, Dame Alison is due to quit on Wednesday morning following an emergency meeting of the NatWest Board. The focus will now shift to Sir Howard Davies, the Chairman of the Board who initially said it had full confidence in her, and Peter Flavel, the CEO of Coutts. Will all three be gone by the end of the week? We can but hope.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Obviously Alison Rose has to go for breaching client confidentiality. Now Howard Davies and the rest of the Board need to go for the gross error of judgement in standing behind her after such an admission. Flavel, CEO of Coutts should go too for presiding over a system that discriminates against people because of their political opinions. None of them are fit and proper people to run a bank.
But the bigger story is the data that banks and service providers like Refinitiv are harvesting about people that can be used in mass screening programmes. This includes political opinions, philosophical beliefs, health data, sexual orientation, sex life and genetics. Yes genetic data. It’s the architecture of a social credit system. This cannot be allowed to continue.
https://davidturver.substack.com/p/what-a-wunch-of-bankers
Aaaaaand, she’s gone!
Fortunately she still has a role to play on the International Banking Committee of the WEF.
Yes, that WEF…Still just a cock-up Toby..?
She claims that it wasn’t a “breach of confidentiality” because it was actually a lie and not actually “leaked data”
It strikes me that this bank is wholly out of control and senior management are trying to put up a facade of a steady ship. The reality is that a lot of half asleep, dozy morons have had their normally somnambulistic state disrupted and have decided that so long as everybody pretends everything is OK the whole mess will soon clean itself up and they can return to pipe, port, papers and slippers.
With a management team so hopelessly out of it’s depth the only realistic option is mass resignation. These people have no business running banks.
It strikes me that a more appropriate name for the bank at this time would be Rat’s Nest Bank
“Expressing full confidence” is a common portent of defenestration. I doubt that Mr Farage will be easing the pressure until it happens.
Looks to me like Nigel has been flourishing his cape and circling the management of Rats Nest Bank like a top matador and has now drawn his sword and gone in for the kill.
The “full confidence of the Board” means they don’t have to sack her and it means she knows she needs to resign. All terribly British don’t you know.
Because sacking her would be more expensive…..all terribly North British……..
And she’s resigned…..those bankers didn’t get to where they are today……
Suggesting that you weren’t in breach of the Data Protection Act of 2018, because the “leak” was, in fact, not leaked data due to being untrue, is, at best, disingenuous, and at worst deep state corruption.
I’m wondering what all the other clean and not so clean Coutts customers are thinking now, particularly given that its the closest to a Swiss-style ‘ask no questions’ private bank in the UK….
Well, even with her gone, the acid test of the board’s “full confidence” will be whether its customers have full confidence in a bank led in its breach of privacy and false accusation from the very top.
The Entire Board who endorsed “full confidence” in a CEO who has committed Gross Misconduct in Office (not “an error) need to go.
And so does the CEO of Coutts, Flavel and the head of the Stasi-Team who authorised and endorsed the Report into Mr Farage’s political and social opinions.
It will claim that it wasn’t in breach of the Data Protection Act of 2018, because the “leak” was, in fact, not leaked data due to being untrue.
Football Managers get the dreaded “vote of confidence” just before they clear their desks. Bye Dame Al
So she’s gone. Unlike whoever at the BBC felt it appropriate to leak the confidential details around the financial excommunication of Mr. Farage. To believe that such information is in the “public interest” is beyond rollocks.
The BBC’s ability to make themselves more and more loathed is without compare.
Cheering news of hrr resignation.
But, being a cranky old curmudgeon, this doesn’t entirely satisfy.
It would be entirely appropriate if she (and her Board supporters) went to jail for a period, “pour encourager les autres.”
Surely, after the last four years, SOMEBODY will, for once, be held to account for their malevolence?
If Alison Rose had picked on and ‘de-banked’ a client who was a Pakistani kebab shop owner from Rochdale whose hobby involved the gang rape of schoolgirls; the screams of “Waaacist” from the London Banksters would have echoed in the hills of the Shetland Islands.
She might have gone to jail faster than Tommy.
In fact she will without doubt be found a cosy and remunitive sinecure somewhere below the parapet.