• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Just Stop Oil Donor Received £110 Million in Green Subsidies from Taxpayer

by Chris Morrison
8 July 2023 7:00 AM

Alternative energy companies run by Just Stop Oil and Labour Party paymaster Dale Vince have collected taxpayer subsidies of around £110 million over the last 20 years. Vince’s company Ecotricity claims it is a “not for dividend” company with its money – “all of it” – going into our mission “to green-up Britain”. But every labourer is worthy of his hire. In Vince’s case, over £43 million (pre-tax) from the company in the form of salary, share buybacks, loans and receipts from the sale of a subsidiary. Some of these payments, it seems, are more tax efficient than paying dividends.

These financial details, and a comprehensive debunking of many of the wild environmental claims Vince has been airing in public media of late, are contained in a recent substack article written by the investigative Net Zero writer David Turver. Over the last 10 years, Vince has given the Labour Party about £1.5 million. Recently the Labour Party said it would ban all new oil and gas drilling, causing widespread concern among its dwindling working class supporters. Vince has also given many hundreds of thousands of pounds to the disruptive Just Stop Oil protesters, whose loutish tactics have led to costly delays on British roads and irritation at major sporting events. Recently, Vince justified his financial largesse by telling the Guardian that “I do want to influence policy doing the things that I do”.

Turver takes a different view on Just Stop Oil, noting that it is “trying to bully us into accepting their worldview without having to bother with minor inconveniences like the ballot box”.

Certainly Vince has a political interest in keeping the renewable subsidy gravy train rolling. Despite constant claims that green energy is getting cheaper by the day, British electricity buyers are forced to pay £12 billion in subsidy every year for renewable energy that provides barely 5% of total U.K. energy consumption. In Vince’s case, Turver asks if it could be possible that he is dependent upon a never-ending stream of subsidies from hard-pressed bill payers to keep his empire afloat? 

There are a number of ways wind and solar suppliers can collect subsidies for producing energy. Investigative journalist Ben Pile has calculated that Ecotricity has collected £89 million from the Renewables Obligations Certificate scheme since 2002, with £53 million of that since 2014-15. In addition, Turver found another £9 million of subsidies within subsidiary companies. Ecotricity has also declared over £16 million in “other income” for administering feed-in tariff schemes, another form of subsidy for electricity production. 

Dale Vince has been every busy of late pushing his green dream and the prospects of Ecotricity on a number of radio and TV channels. Turver suggests a possible economic explanation for all this activity. Despite all the subsidies and the high prices it charges its customers, money seems a little tight. A new holding company has benefited from a loan from Vince, but at the end of April 2022 it had £70.8 million in cash. However, £29 million of this was restricted by banking covenants. Set against this, notes Turver, there is over £182m of debt due within one year, including money repaid to Vince. There is also £44.2 million of eco-bonds outstanding. With interest rates currently rising, Vince would have been “trying to burnish his green credentials to persuade investors to keep his bonds”.

The company has been stress testing various scenarios, and details are given below.

Due to its “strong green credentials”, Ecotricity can raise prices, while asset sales and alternative sources of funding are possibilities. Happily, the company can forecast that in all individual scenarios, it has enough cash to meet its commitments.

As noted, Vince is a regular media presence but not all recent interviews have been of the “why are you so very virtuous and wonderful?” kind. Last month he met his match on Ian Collins’s Talk TV lunchtime show when he faced Ben Pile. The amused, self-satisfied, old hippy persona rapidly fell away under Pile’s relentless demolition of his eco-claims, to be replaced by scowls, insults and frequent interruptions.

During the interview, Vince made a number of ludicrous claims including the statements that the UN’s IPCC says global temperatures will rise by 3°C within five years, and four million people have died from climate change over the last 30 years. The first statement is flat out wrong, and there is no evidence for the second. Indeed, total deaths from natural disasters continue to fall according to all reliable statistical evidence. He also claimed that if we switched from fossil fuels to renewable energy, “we can bring bills down to the lowest place they have ever been” and eradicate fuel poverty. Turver looks at this claim in more detail and made the obvious point that since Ecotricity offers “100% green electricity” we might expect it to offer the cheapest energy to customers.

Alas, a comparison with Octopus, another supplier burnishing its green credentials, along with Eon Next and British Gas shows that Ecotricity has “by far” the most expensive unit rates for electricity and gas. And if times get tough, as we have seen from the company’s stress testing, its “strong green credentials” can jack the prices up even higher.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

Tags: Climate AlarmismClimate changeDale VinceJust Stop OilLabour PartyNet ZeroPropaganda

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

News Round-Up

Next Post

Refusing to Fund Your Partner’s Gender Transition is Domestic Abuse, Says Crown Prosecution Service

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

46 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
1 year ago

That should provide enough pollution to offset all the so-called benefits of the buses.

224
-2
TheGreenAcres
TheGreenAcres
1 year ago

That doesn’t look like it will be helping the air quality in the area – quick double the ULEZ charge!

141
-1
NeilofWatford
NeilofWatford
1 year ago

Oh, joy!
Another nail in the Carbonocracy coffin.
Presumably every ebus will now be grounded?
Like airliners, they should have escape chutes fitted with the proviso all the passengers must be able to escape within 90 secs even if half the exits are blocked.

Last edited 1 year ago by NeilofWatford
106
-1
Jon Garvey
Jon Garvey
1 year ago

Overreaction – there are far more fires on diesel buses. I mean which of us can’t remember having to jump off a bus to avoid the flames at some stage during our lives? Or, come to that, having to jump off their bicycle when it caught fire?

204
-2
wokeman
wokeman
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

I almost bit 😂

107
-1
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

It would be interesting to know what caused this, many bus fires start due to heat soak from the air brake compressor due to insufficient thermal isolation. Of course an electric bus can also have air brakes and a compressor.

17
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

Don’t electric buses usually have regenerative braking to store the energy from the momentum back into the batteries?

Edited for clarity (I hope).

Last edited 1 year ago by soundofreason
28
0
JohnK
JohnK
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

They will have, but also conventional friction brakes as well for low speed, heavy braking, or when the traction battery is full.

16
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

there are far more fires on diesel buses

There used to be – when we were allowed to smoke on the upper deck.

Nah, I don’t really miss smoking with my schoolmates on the upper deck of the 362 or 363 bus.

18
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

I don’t know about busses but it is true that there are vastly more fires per 100,000 vehicles started by diesel/petrol vehicles than electric vehicles.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/lithium-ion-battery-fires

0
-87
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

I wonder if that’s true if we take into account the ages of these vehicles? Per 100,000 vehicles less than 5 years old?

I haven’t read your linked item yet – perhaps it addresses that.

29
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

A reasonable point but we are talking about fires being over 20 times more common in petrol/diesel than electric so age would have to make an enormous difference.

0
-42
JXB
JXB
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

The point being, petrol/diesel fires are easy and quick to extinguish, battery fires not so as they are runaway thermal reactions.

Also the sample size ICE v BEVs are not comparable.

85
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  JXB

The diesel/petrol fires are two-part exothermic chemical reactions. The fuel and the air. Block out the air and cool the fuel and the reaction (fire) stops.

A lithium ion battery ‘fire’ is not combustion (though it can set light to other stuff around it). The energy is stored in the chemicals inside with no air required. Once the energy is being released in an uncontrolled way it will continue. You can try to dilute it with water but the best bet is to isolate and cover the chemicals with something non-combustible like sand and wait for the reaction and heat to die down.

54
0
GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

I saw a video from Australia, where several e-bikes caught fire at night in a residential property. The fire brigade doused them and helpfully left them outside the property, where the morning sun prompted another explosive flare-up.

As I understand, the only sure way to extinguish these fires is to flood the battery with salt-water, thus shorting out the individual cells.

22
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  JXB

Both these points are addressed in the reference:

  • Yes they are harder to put out but at least in part that can be put down to firemen not being trained in electric vehicle fires.
  • The figures are per 100,000 vehicles so the sample size is irrelevant.
1
-47
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

Another aspect is the speed at which the fire proceeds, making it very difficult to get the vehicle away from other flammable objects and abandon it without injury. In some cases this is a major risk to people.

23
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

Your reference’s reference separates out hybrid vehicles from electric vehicles:

‘Hybrid vehicles actually come in number one with the most fires per 100K sales.’

Hmmm…….

25
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Odd isn’t it? Maybe there is something about the design of hybrid vehicles.

6
-9
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

Hybrid vehicles are constantly charging and discharging the battery. It is under greater stress and hence inherent faults are exposed more rapidly.

A fire in an EV cement mixer lorry in Australia was diagnosed as being caused by a single faulty cell among thousands. Nearly all of which combusted eventually after 10 minutes or so.

21
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

Not really.

‘This interesting blend of power sources, although innovative and efficient, unintentionally generates a significant amount of heat. While this heat is crucial for the operation of hybrid cars, it also poses a potential threat to the integrity of the lithium-ion battery.

When a cell of this Lithium-ion battery overheats, it can enter a process called ‘thermal runaway’ ……when heat and gases fuel even higher temperatures and still more gases, including hydrogen and oxygen, in a self-fulfilling loop until the cells begin to burn and burst. A toxic vapour cloud develops, bringing with it the risk of deflagration. Once thermal runaway has started, no battery management system or circuit breaker can stop it. “A battery fire can be controlled but it cannot be extinguished,” 

Autocar Nov 2023

‘Combustion vehicles catch fire for a number of reasons, but the biggest is a collision. According to data from the National Fire Prevention Association, an estimated 560 people died in car fires in 2018, with the majority of these fatal fires caused by collisions.

You’re more likely to see a gas car fire after a collision than an electric car fire, simply because electric vehicles aren’t as common on the roads as gas vehicles. However, this doesn’t necessarily mean that electric vehicles are less likely to catch fire.

Electric vehicles and hybrids tend to catch fire because of their batteries. Battery fires are dangerous and harder to put out than gas fires.’

Autoinsurance: Gas vs. Electric Car Fires Dec 2023

Field Marshal Haig knew a thing or two:

‘I feel sure that as time goes on you will find just as much use for the horse—the well bred horse—as you have ever done in the past.’ (1926)

Last edited 1 year ago by Monro
18
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

‘I feel sure that as time goes on you will find just as much use for the horse—the well bred horse—as you have ever done in the past.’ (1926)

Lasagne?

Updated to add: That Monty Python sketch…

You can’t cook a piston engine!

You can’t eat it raw.

Last edited 1 year ago by soundofreason
10
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Should be excellent but you’ll have to be quick:

‘In fact, Mr Leban is the French capital’s last remaining horse butcher and his establishment is on its last legs. “You can find horse meat in markets sometimes but I’m the capital’s last horse butcher,” says Mr Leban, a “cheval extra” label behind him beside rows of red wine.’

DT 28 Dec 2023

Last edited 1 year ago by Monro
8
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

I was thinking more about the horse meat scandal.

The scandal being that the makers of the processed foods didn’t know what was going into them – not that it was horse meat.

8
-1
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

I’ve never (knowingly) tried it although I had my suspicions about some of the tinned (known as ggg: gopping green) goat meat in certain overseas ration packs.

Italians clearly prefer the combustion engine:

https://myitalian.recipes/recipe/horse-meat-with-mustard-and-thyme

Last edited 1 year ago by Monro
5
-1
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

I am intrigued by the down arrows. Is it because readers don’t believe the figures or because they simply don’t like reading anything that conflicts with their prior beliefs? Or maybe they just automatically click down on anything I write?

1
-35
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

We don’t do that, and the figures should stand for themselves. Mind you I watched an interesting video where a Chinese BYD EV in China was fired 5m vertically when its traction battery exploded. It also blew the doors off 😜

9
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

What is it you don’t do?

1
-17
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

I don’t automatically down vote you, although some of what you write I don’t think is properly evidenced. I’m this case I think the figures may be correct, although as ever statistics can be impenetrable.

In the China video, there was a Chinese guy asking why BYD cars often burn or explode after a crash. He pointed out that Teslas rarely do this and expressed concern that the Chinese-made vehicles seem to do it in a noticeable proportion of crashes.

Last edited 1 year ago by Tyrbiter
9
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

So when you wrote “we don’t do that” you meant “I don’t do that”? (Which is entirely reasonable).

2
-22
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

I was hoping that others share my sense of fair play.

10
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

More seriously – I imagine that most readers here think of themselves as not being misled by alarmist MSM stories and making judgements based on data and evidence. It seems to me that in the case of EV fires the reverse is true – even Will Jones has fallen for the MSM stories.

1
-20
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

I think we should ask why vehicle fires are reported so much these days, when they were not until the last decade or so. And then why is it that those same reports shy away from mentioning battery fires even when they definitely are EV or hybrid fires.

19
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

For example?

1
-13
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

A combination of EV and Hybrid stats (and bicycles, scooters etc.) for fires make scary reading; both spontaneously combust as a consequence of battery technology.

Petrol and diesel cars mainly catch fire due to pilot error: collision.

References above.

Last edited 1 year ago by Monro
16
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

So what? A combination of fossil fuel and hybrid would be even scarier.

1
-6
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

But that would be just plain silly because petrol cars are not combusting due to battery fires.

Hybrids and EVs are combusting for similar reasons.

8
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Why assume that hybrids are combusting for similar reasons to EVs when they combust at a rate like petrol cars?

1
-5
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

Because that is where the evidence leads:

‘Both hybrid and electric vehicle recalls were all related to battery issues. This is a stark difference from the gas recalls, which were recalled for issues with fuel leaks, electrical shorts, and anti-lock braking systems (ABS).”

https://www.autoinsuranceez.com/gas-vs-electric-car-fires/

Last edited 1 year ago by Monro
6
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Recalls are not the same as fires. The number of recalls for the hybrid models was minute. So even if they were all for battery issues it doesn’t explain the large number of hybrid fires. After all if they were down to joyrides and collisions that would not feature in the recall data. The article draws quite unjustified conclusions from the recall data.

1
-6
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

Errrr…….the reason that the vehicles were recalled was because so many of them were catching fire when new…….

The recalls simply indicate the problem area: the battery.

Hybrids catch fire most frequently because hybrid batteries have a higher duty cycle than EV batteries, which leads to cells failing due to an internal short circuit.

The problem for EV proponents is that most people prefer hybrids to EVs, but hybrid technology is still high risk, expensive to insure.

Also statistical sample sizes in this area are still too small.

Last edited 1 year ago by Monro
8
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

There are quite a few Australians on here.

4
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

For a moment I actually thought you meant 5 miles… 🙂

4
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

Please don’t fall for the evangelist 20 / 1 ratio nonsense!
The biggest causes of vehicle fires are 1: arson 2: crashes
Youths who like to joyride with other people’s cars usually set them on fire afterwards, they have not and do not normally joyride electric vehicles!
More ice cars on the road = more ice crashes hence -fires
Petrol and diesel does not combust on its own for no reason, vehicle fires are usually the result of electrical or hot mechanicals problems not the fuel, are easy to put out and don’t poison the air or ground water with toxic chemicals!
The key word in the report you linked too is ‘involved’ not spontaneous combustion!

Last edited 1 year ago by Dinger64
23
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Dinger64

You seem desperate that there should be bad news about electric vehicles!

The 20 to 1 was for Sweden, the US figures are more like 60 to 1. Are you claiming that these figures are wrong or simply that they are explained by the propensity for electric vehicles not to be stolen for joy rides or crash?

1
-20
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

There is no shortage.

Mr Dinger64 makes a good point. Joyride fires in petrol vehicles will account for a good percentage of those figures (and close to if not zero for EV/hybrids).

Last edited 1 year ago by Monro
10
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

But isn’t that an advantage of EVs – less likely to attract joyriders and get into collisions (according to Dinger64) and therefore less likely to catch fire?

1
-12
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

It would be if it wasn’t for the fact that they don’t attract joyriders because, frankly, they’re a bit rubbish.

15
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

Sorry mate but facts are facts! Cars in general do not combust on their own, there is always an ignition point and then the fuel and oxygen take over, the cause of the ignition doesn’t care which vehicle it takes place in!
And btw, wide use of electric vehicles will be bad news for everyone as these hotter (2500°C compared to ice fuels 900°C) more destructive fires (fracturing reinforced concrete and melting structural steel) become more common place

Last edited 1 year ago by Dinger64
18
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Dinger64

I get that but are you disputing that fires are far more frequent in petrol/diesel vehicles than EV vehicles?

1
-13
Dinger64
Dinger64
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

No need to dispute, its irrelevant, fire is fire, however, consequences of fire differ, ev fire are worse no matter the cause, if evs are involved the consequences will be worse!

Last edited 1 year ago by Dinger64
9
0
Nicholas Britton
Nicholas Britton
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

The difference is that petrol/diesel vehicle fires are much easier to extinguish. If you catch the fire early you can put it out yourself with a fire extinguisher. With EVs, if the fire involved the battery, then it takes vast quantities of water to put the it out and the fire can re-ignite hours, days, or even weeks later. The fumes and water run-off are usually contaminated with toxic chemicals from the battery which can be a serious pollution issue. The batteries also burn a lot hotter than fossil fuels (over 2000 degrees Celsius) increasing the risk of the fire spreading to anything nearby. In short, an EV fire is a much more serious incident than an ICE vehicle fire and is a lot more costly for the emergency services to deal with.

17
0
MTF
MTF
1 year ago
Reply to  Nicholas Britton

That’s why it is important to extinguish electric fires properly (not using vast quantities of water). See my reference and also soundofreason’s comment.

1
-8
Dinger64
Dinger64
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

There is no way to extinguish thermal runaway in a lithium-ion battery!
The official fire department advice is, let it burn itself out!

9
0
Chips
Chips
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

Hi, I’m in the habit of clicking through and reading sources. For what it’s worth I drive an EV. You’re right, and also:

  • diesel/petrol vehicles are older, which somebody else commented on below. As your source states “In older vehicles, the wiring and batteries start to break down, putting them more at risk of catching fire in an accident. Since most electric vehicles aren’t yet at the advanced age of older gas vehicles, there currently isn’t any data showing if they will be at a higher risk of battery and electric explosions as they age”. I know somebody mentioned this elsewhere and you kind of dismiss it; there seems a reasonable risk as we get many more 5 and 10 yr old EVs, the stats can become less favourable by 20x or more…we just don’t know
  • age of vehicle can also be related to driving styles. If newer cars are more carefully driven, maybe that affects the risk and type of fires? I don’t even know if EV fires can be connected with a crash.
  • Here I’m speculating, but driving style could also mean battery care. Once EVs get older and are driven by poorer people then (as you see with older ICEs) you’ll get people eking out old bangers. I’m thinking aged bangers with batteries at 50% of original capacity…and people still trying to go 0-100% fast charge and use all the milage, which can accelerate further deterioration and stress.
  • As others have said, it’s not just the number, but the severity of fires. ICE fires can be extinguished, and the fume inhalation danger is trivial compared to burning lithium and manganese.

Also worth noting the summary / op-ed you link to isn’t very clear on its sources. Instead of linking to the actual data table, it takes you to the data repository, from where it’s going to take time I don’t have to find it. Call me a cynic but I’m always suspicious of that….I have previously found it’s like “I’m going to misrepresent something in a slightly subtle way and I’m just going to make it a bit harder for anyone to call me out.”

2
0
robnicholson
robnicholson
1 year ago
Reply to  MTF

That one lost the room!

0
0
JXB
JXB
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

Daily.

5
0
Jon Mors
Jon Mors
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

You got me, until I read the last sentence (although, isn’t magnesium used in some cycle frames – I hear that burns pretty well).

2
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

The oxide layer that forms on metallic magnesium inhibits burning quite effectively, The school (unless elfin safety has banned it) chemistry experiment where magnesium ribbon or powder burns bright white and gives off much white smoke only works with very thin metal. Of course, if you get a bar of it hot enough to break the oxide layer you’ll have an ‘interesting’ experiment – burning at 3,100 C.

2
0
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Mors

I think it is a magnesium alloy not the pure stuff that was the delight of school kids.

1
0
GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

I agree. Small fires occur approximately 3000x every second. Lethal.

2
0
varmint
varmint
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

Apparently there are more people killed by donkeys than Aeroplanes. But ofcourse if you are never near donkeys (which probably most of us are not) then this statistic is meaningless. ——-So how many diesel busses are there and how many electric busses are there?

3
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

You almost had me there, Garvey young fella mi lad

0
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago

A London Fire Brigade spokeswoman told MailOnline: “Firefighters have been called to a fire involving a bus on Wimbledon Hill Road in Wimbledon.

“Part of a double-decker electric bus is alight. A 25-metre cordon has been put in place as a precaution and road closures are in place. There are currently no reports of any injuries.

“The Brigade was called at 7.21am. Three fire engines and around 15 firefighters from Wimbledon, New Malden and Wandsworth fire stations are at the scene.” …

OK. A couple of odd things here:

Thing 1: ‘Part of a double-decker electric bus is alight‘. Very odd. Many years ago a neighbours VW Beetle burst into flames. We certainly didn’t ask ourselves ‘is that flame coming from the engine or the fuel tank?‘. If this LFB statement isn’t lining up to suggest that it wasn’t the battery that spontaneously combusted then I’ll be very surprised. Mrs SoR immediately suggested they’re going with ‘it was one of the motors, not the battery‘. So that’s OK then.

Thing 2: ‘spokeswoman‘? This makes me almost certain that the spokesperson was born with a penis

25
-2
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

The bus in question has the electric motors in the wheel hubs, so the fire was either in the battery or something ancillary.

5
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
1 year ago
Reply to  soundofreason

I know we can vote without being logged in but I wonder what the down tick is for?

My guess is that it’s for ‘Thing 2’.

Spokesman is a neutral term but it has effectively been banned and replaced with the clumsy made-up portmanteau neutral term spokesperson. I can think of two reasons why the report uses the almost equally clumsy term spokeswoman instead:

Possibility 1: The LFB spokesman is actually a woman and the report writer has inadvertently used the non-neutral term.

Possibility 2: The spokesman ‘identifies’ as a woman and the reporter has deliberately chosen the non-neutral term to show how woke they are.

My guess is Possibility 2.

7
-1
Monro
Monro
1 year ago

‘They all do that, sir’

17
0
JXB
JXB
1 year ago

BEVs – “Safe & Effective”™️

28
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago

The way in which The Khant spins this should make for an interesting read.

22
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
1 year ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Nice one! That will be interesting

2
0
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
1 year ago

Nasty fire with these batteries which is very difficult to put out. I think the whole thing is crazy. In a car you’re sitting on top of a giant battery. You are assured that there will never be a collsion because of ‘sensors’. This is cosetted thinking. The world is not going to be a smooth ride like it has been over the last few decades.In a few years time this battery technology will cease to exist along with many other things.You have to tune in to your spirit in order to find the sources of real and imminent danger and you can only do that when you have found your tribe. There will be no answers coming from the materium.

6
0
lymeswold
lymeswold
1 year ago

I’ve been waiting for this to happen to a London bus. Maybe they could channel the flames coming from the rear to give the bus extra propulsion.

6
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
1 year ago
Reply to  lymeswold

No point, 20mph zone!

10
0
D Jenner
D Jenner
1 year ago

Half an hour later and this could have been very serious. This bus is used by Kings College boys to get them up to school from Wimbledon station. Happened just the right side of 7.30am.

Last edited 1 year ago by D Jenner
4
0
RPWisdom
RPWisdom
1 year ago

1000 EV busses over 10 years and one is at first sight sufficiently low to fob off. By 2020 consensus, we have 38m licenced vehicles on UK roads, suggesting (pro-rata) 3800 fires a year or 10 a day. Looking at NFCC, the estimate is 80,000 fires a year, though I have never heard of an ICE suddenly igniting unless in an accident. I think its the sudden combustion of EV without provocation that is a concern here.

3
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.38: Chris Bayliss on the Commonwealth Voting Scandal, Sarah Phillimore on the Bar’s Scrapped EDI Plans and Eugyppius on ‘White Genocide’

by Richard Eldred
30 May 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen

29 May 2025
by Hannes Sarv

German Pensioner Receives 75-Day Prison Sentence in Latest Speech Crime Scandal to Hit the Federal Republic

29 May 2025
by Eugyppius

News Round-Up

30 May 2025
by Toby Young

Miliband Accused of Pitting “Neighbours Against Neighbours” After Scrapping Heat Pump Rule

29 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

BBC ‘Damages Countryside’ to Film Chris Packham’s Springwatch

30 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen

25

German Pensioner Receives 75-Day Prison Sentence in Latest Speech Crime Scandal to Hit the Federal Republic

21

News Round-Up

18

Miliband Accused of Pitting “Neighbours Against Neighbours” After Scrapping Heat Pump Rule

16

China Backs Starmer’s Chagos Deal

15

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

29 May 2025
by Ben Pile

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

POSTS BY DATE

July 2023
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Jun   Aug »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

July 2023
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Jun   Aug »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen

29 May 2025
by Hannes Sarv

German Pensioner Receives 75-Day Prison Sentence in Latest Speech Crime Scandal to Hit the Federal Republic

29 May 2025
by Eugyppius

News Round-Up

30 May 2025
by Toby Young

Miliband Accused of Pitting “Neighbours Against Neighbours” After Scrapping Heat Pump Rule

29 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

BBC ‘Damages Countryside’ to Film Chris Packham’s Springwatch

30 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen

25

German Pensioner Receives 75-Day Prison Sentence in Latest Speech Crime Scandal to Hit the Federal Republic

21

News Round-Up

18

Miliband Accused of Pitting “Neighbours Against Neighbours” After Scrapping Heat Pump Rule

16

China Backs Starmer’s Chagos Deal

15

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

29 May 2025
by Ben Pile

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences