Britain has been drilled to comply with lockdown under a future pandemic through wearing face masks and working from home, the Chief Executive of the Government ‘nudge unit’ has said. The Telegraph has the story.
Professor David Halpern told the Telegraph that the country had “practised the drill” of wearing face masks and working from home and “could redo it” in a future crisis.
Last Tuesday, Matt Hancock told the public inquiry that Britain must be ready to combat future disease outbreaks with wider, earlier and more stringent lockdowns.
Speaking on the Lockdown Files podcast, the Government adviser Prof. Halpern predicted that the country would comply with another ‘stay at home’ order because they “kind of know what the drill is”.
In an interview given before Mr. Hancock’s testimony, the leading behavioural scientist even suggested that the nation’s prior experience made it “much easier to now imagine” the population would accept future local restrictions.
Prof. Halpern said that while fear-based messaging in general is not effective, he defended its use in extreme circumstances.
“There are times when you do need to cut through… particularly if you think people are wrongly calibrated,” he said.
The suggestion that Britain might be primed to accept further social-distancing restrictions is likely to alarm lockdown-sceptics concerned by the collateral damage such measures cause.
When the pandemic hit, Mr Hancock’s department enlisted the professor’s Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) – better known as the ‘nudge unit’ – to provide them with “frictionless access to behavioural expertise”, according to a £1 million contract.
BIT used earworm slogans such as ‘hands, face, space’ to maximise compliance with Covid rules.
In his most wide-ranging interview since March 2020, Prof Halpern explained that his unit’s campaigns were devised to help reinforce new behaviours.
He said their posters acted as visual prompts so that “when you go into a shop or somewhere else, it re-reminds you, it cues, it acts as a trigger for the behaviour”.
The professor said that this messaging encouraged mask-wearing, meaning people felt “naked” when they forgot to put one on.
“Put it this way,” he said. “You would feel like, ‘Oh my God, I haven’t got my mask’. You feel naked, right?”
Once the public has learnt a new behaviour, Prof. Halpern said: “In principle, you can switch it back on.”
“You’ve got the beginning, particularly, of what is called a habit loop: if this has happened, then you should do that,” he said.
Major disasters “leave this enduring trace on society”, he explained. As well as knowing the drill, this “quasi-evolutionary” impact is a strong indicator of future behaviour, he claimed.
Faced with another contagious disease, the professor predicted that the British public would start wearing masks again “relatively rapidly if they were persuaded”.
“They might protest, ‘do we really have to do it?’ [Showing] good healthy scepticism. But once you’ve exercised those muscles, they’re more likely to be reused again,” he said.
As a result, the British public – having learnt to work from home – would be more likely, he believed, to accept stay-at-home measures being used to clamp down on local outbreaks.
Worth reading in full.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
How did this scheister get the job? Hancock and him…um….‘wrongly calibrated’? I wonder where he was brought up. Communist China? People like him should never have a job in the public sector. Isla Bryson would love his company in prison. 🤣
Very sinister chap. He needs recalibrating – by the rapid insertion and withdrawal of a 2-inch-thick bramble into and from an area where, as I’ve heard, the sun doesn’t shine.
I hope David Halpern burns in hell for what he’s done.
Sweden. Or rather, to quote that guttersnipe Hancock, “****ing Sweden”…
Cough.
They can just F off the lot of them. Never complying with this nonsense ever again.
This Open Letter published by the HART group relating to ethical concerns is definitely worth (re-)reading.
https://www.hartgroup.org/ethical-concerns-arising-from-the-governments-use-of-covert-psychological-nudges/
Two things (although there are a gazillion others I could mention) ….. Firstly, “working from home” is only possible if there are plenty of others not working from home to support them. Secondly, when is anyone in this enquiry going to be questioned about why it was necessary to “reinvent the wheel” with respect to pandemic management? The established pandemic plans and associated ethical guideline are based on recognition of how damaging it is to shut down society in order to deal with one specific disease. Why are the participants in this enquiry not getting absolutely drilled on why these plans and ethical guidelines were cast aside in favour of experimental “lockdown” strategies?
Because its a stitch up, a whitewash.. something for the dimwits who watch the BBC to consume and feel ‘looked after’..
What a disgusting dreadful little man. Lock the bugger up and jettison the key preferably into space.
So there you have it! We were “wrongly calibrated” but fortunately now, thanks to a “habit loop”, we should have been recalibrated and programmed to comply automatically in future. It sounds rather like mass vaccination without any consideration of the harm it causes!
That strikes a familiar chord and my habit loops, I am very pleased to say, are already signalling danger. My distrust and scepticism are on high alert and a cynical storm seems highly likely.
Halpern seems to be quite proud of helping create a dystopian culture – a cross between 1984 and Brave New World.
Be afraid! Be very afraid!
Halpern is delighted his methods led so many lemmings to the slaughter. He’s definitely put himself at the Blair level of innocent deaths to get a knight of the garter.
Just goes to show that education and intelligence are not necessarily linked.
There’s a massive difference between functional and emotional intelligence.
I read somewhere that at the end of it we’d breath a grateful sigh and the words “Tutorial Mode Complete” would appear in the sky. I thought it was a joke.
Somebody have a word with this tosser, please.
yes.. preferably with a 9mm Gl0ck.. 😉
Professor ! C-nt more like !!…
Yet another hostile, corrupt – in every way – foreigner in a position of authority.
Well, at least this nasty piece of work has put us on our guard against him, Hancock and their ilk. We’re all better prepared now
He said their posters acted as visual prompts so that “when you go into a shop……..it acts as a trigger for the behaviour”.
Ever increasing anger, in my case and more determination not to do it.
Basic advertising theory : Triggers at the point of sale which act on the subconscious.
Of course you can avoid all that by not watching the excreable TV or listening to “news” radio. There’s plenty of old programmes on the net or even streaming which still carries traditional view points and values.
Halpern and the WHO’s Susan Michie are amoral Proftitutes who revelled in their ability to manipulate the sheeple than the morality of doing so. In the dock alongside them must be Halpern’s colleagues Hugo Harper, Mark Egan as well as Richard Pemberton and Ms Kathryn Scott of British Psychological Society who upholded their despicable work.
Well, I’m a psychologist (BPS Chartered) albeit retired & provided these remarks are correctly attributed and not taken out of context, I am appalled. It just seems like a throwback to BF Skinner and behaviorism from the 1950s. Skinner & other behavioral psychologists believed that all human experience could be explained through the measurement & control of behavior. There was no room for internal experience or consciousness. I knew that one of the aims of the British Psychological Society was for psychology to be given credence at a political level but rather naively thought this related to things like better decision making at a Govt level. If this type of thinking is at the heart of the decision making process, I genuinely fear that we’re stuffed. Writers like Laura Dodsworth & others can make a difference on an individual level but Halpern is talking about population level influence which is a different ball game altogether. Basically, he is talking about the creation of an “out group” for those of us that don’t conform. I know we’ve been there already but if these ideas really take hold then it could be on a different level. Lord of the Flies anyone or… Read more »
Well said.
I don’t think the government or the state has any business employing psychologists to influence behaviour.
Protect our borders, keep the peace, provide services that cannot easily/satisfactorily be outsourced.
I don’t think the government or the state has any business employing psychologists to influence behaviour.
Leaving the question whether or not this actually works aside, this is literally antidemocratic. In a so-called democratic society, opposing parties are supposed to set out the arguments which speak in favour of their preferred policy and the counter-arguments speaking against the preferred policy of the other party. So-called informed and educated citizens are then supposed to make up their own minds based on these arguments and counter-arguments and make an election decisions according to the conclusions they came to.
In contrast to this, the theory behind the behavioural model is The government and its experts are obviously right about XY-anything and the clueless population just emotionally refuses to accept that because it’s wrongly calibrated. Which mind/ behaviour manipulation techniques can we employ to change that? The informed and educated citizen rationally making up his own mind about something doesn’t exist anymore. Instead, there’s a a herd of voting cows which have to be prodded by voting cow herders to make then run in the right direction.
This obviously implies that elections no longer have any inherent legitimacy as the voting cows cannot… Read more »
The sad truth
I always found Huxley’s works superior.
You & me both.
Well said, but why have the BPS failed to condemn the actions of Halpern’s team?
There may be lots of reasons for this. I suspect one of them is that psychology has often been regarded as a second rate science. The BPS is a professional body whose aim is to further the cause of psychology. Halpern’s team (along with Susan Michie) etc are getting psychology status and influence in positions where it matters. For some psychologists this is the equivalent of the Holy Grail.
With apologies to Star Trek: “It’s status and influence Jim, but not as we know it.”
Correct. Looking at the US the majority of people are already on some form of soma and breeding has ceased amongst “right-thinking individuals”. The media is about 95% controlled. It is only independent media and the pesky Christians (and other religious types) who are holding out against the waves of propaganda
Dr Mengele was proud of his work as well.
The notion that some guy in a suit can decide that people are wrongly calibrated
and then set forth to recalibrate them by applying brainwashing techniques is inherently incompatible with a free and democratic society. People have every right to be wrong and what precisely constitutes being right and being wrong is a matter of opinion in most cases.
I have a drill and I’d like to practise using it on this smarmy toad.
I will not comply with any lockdown ever again.
“if you think people are wrongly calibrated” Machines are calibrated, which is exactly how this polyester suited individual views us. He is like the rest of his ilk a danger and a menace to humanity, he has lost the right to live amongst humanit, he and his fellow sociopaths need to be placed on a remote island, without hope of escape, without electricity, or communications and left to get on with it, I am sure they will make a succesful and happy life of calibrating each other.
Hear, hear.
The most devastating weapon we can use against them TODAY is to laugh at them. Once the British Public has started to laugh at a situation it will be re-calibrated and not in the way the BIT and Halpern mean. It really is a pantomime and Professor Pantsdown and Professor Drill-BIT should be “nudged” by Monty Python, “wink, wink, know what I mean Squire” Eric Idle Monty Python: the 10 funniest sketches | BFI .
David Halpern – ah, yes – another nice World Economic Forum guy.
I have very carefully considered my thoughtful response to Professor David Halpern, and I am happy to share it with you all here, now:
FUCK OFF YOU SHITTY LITTLE WEASEL WITH YOUR “DRILLS”. WE ARE NOT YOUR FOOT SOLDIERS.
TOUT CA C’EST JEUX DES ROIS.
I WALKED SLOWLY ACROSS THE FRONT OF NEW SCOTLAND YARD WITH MILLIONS OF OTHERS AND ROARED AT THE COMPLIANT COPPERS TO TAKE OFF THE MASKS. AND I WILL DO IT AGAIN AND AGAIN UNTIL YOU AND YOUR TYPE ARE IN THE GUTTER.
MOD: Please forgive this very necessary statement.
“There are times when you do need to cut through… particularly if you think people are wrongly calibrated,” he said.
Once the public has learnt a new behaviour, Prof. Halpern said: “In principle, you can switch it back on.”
You’ve got the beginning, particularly, of what is called a habit loop: if this has happened, then you should do that,” he said.”
Are these really the words of an empathetic human being?
If I am being generous the words spouted by this creep prove that he is wholly unsuited to his job. If he really is oblivious to the hundreds of papers already published which confirm that all NPI’s were utterly useless and indeed harmful then his employers need sacking at the same time as this buffoon.
If I am being honest however this anti human piece of crap will be well aware that he is lying for forty pieces of silver. Yes he is a traitor too.
I developed a new “habit loop” right at the start of this depopulation program and it hasn’t let me down yet – treat EVERY pronouncement by somebody official or who adopts quasi officialdom as a BIG LIE.
As I said, it hasn’t… Read more »
I am well aware that officialdom is clueless, their pronouncements on subjects I know about are uniformly incorrect which means that they will be equally wrong on subjects on which I am less informed.
If he’s a psychopath, he’s ideally suited for the job. It would also explain the lack of empathy.
Most high level job candidates have to take a psych test. Obviously only those that are psychos/sociopaths are considered in government positions.
With only a few notable exceptions that have proven they are worthy of the title I am now beginning to really develop an aversion to the word ”Professor”. That’s two today and it’s not even lunchtime! My god, the arrogance! He’s basically viewing the British public as dogs and he’s Pavlov. What should be apparent to anybody by now, and especially any lawyers worth their salt, is that what was done to the public, this massive, elaborate and protracted PsyOp, was unlawful because it was all based on absolute, irrefutable, debunked to Timbuktu and back lies. How many people would have complied with restrictions and mask-wearing or gotten a novel, experimental pseudo-vaccine if they hadn’t been told there was a deadly viral pandemic and theirs’ and their loved ones’ lives depended on it?? Off the charts scandalous!
Uncanny Mogs.
If what was done was proposed as a research project, it would be rejected for being unethical. This experiment enrolled the population without consent.
He can FOAD.
The “pandemic” also put faces to some of the enemies of the people working behind the politicians who may have been less widely known before hand. Halpern is one of them.
Exactly. There is at least one benefit to this pantomime of an enquiry.
The British Deep State has “Practised the Drill” for Lockdown and is Ready for power grabs, Says the rest of us.
Climate? Lockdown!
Flu? Lockdown!
Renewable energy fail? Lockdown!
‘Insert your crisis HERE …’ Lockdown!
Never again will I comply, even if it means jail or death.