The World Health Organisation’s (WHO) proposed Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) will hand the international health body unprecedented powers to declare pandemics, lockdowns and vaccination mandates, with the force of international law, leading experts have told MPs.
Speaking to U.K. lawmakers at a meeting of the Pandemic Response and Recovery All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG), Dr. David Bell, a former WHO scientific and medical officer, and Professor Garrett Wallace Brown, Chair in Global Health Policy at the University of Leeds and Director of the World Health Organisation Collaborative Centre on Health Systems and Health Security, said that the changes would fundamentally alter the relationship between WHO and member states and put vital health programmes at risk.
Dr. Bell explained that the two agreements, as currently drafted, will hand the WHO the authority to order measures including significant financial contributions by individual states, censorship of scientific debate, lockdowns, travel restrictions, forced medical examinations and mandatory vaccinations during a public health emergency of its own declaring.
He said:
The WHO was established in 1946 with the best of intentions, to help coordinate responses to major health issues and advise governments accordingly. Over the decades we have seen a significant change in direction as funding streams have shifted to private ‘specified funding’, particularly from private donors. This has led to the WHO becoming a far more centralised and externally-directed body in which private and corporate funders shape and direct programmes. What we have also seen shifting is the definition of a health emergency, making it extremely broad. It is a worrying background against which the IHR amendments and the Treaty are being negotiated.
These pandemic instruments are founded on a fallacy regarding the frequency and impact of pandemics and would, if ratified, fundamentally change the relationship between the WHO and national governments and their citizens. Of particular concern are the amendments to the IHR which constitute a dangerous increase in power and authority bestowed on just one person. The Director-General would be able to proclaim health emergencies, whether real or potential, on any health-related matter that they, influenced by their private and corporate funders, say is a threat. The WHO would be able to issue legally-binding directions to member states and their citizens. In light of the catastrophic harms the WHO’s policies have caused during this pandemic, probably greater than the virus itself, the potential economic and health-related harms of such power cannot be overstated. There is a vast pandemic industry waiting for these buttons to be pushed and I am in no doubt that policymakers should reject WHO’s pandemic proposals.
Professor Brown and his research team has been advising the WHO and others on the $31.1 billion a year plan for pandemic preparedness and whether it is defensible or even feasible. Vital public health programmes are suffering globally as a result of the misguided shift to focus on post-Covid pandemic preparedness, he warned.
The post-Covid policy environment has triggered a remarkable grab by various institutions to capture the pandemic preparedness and response agenda and its corresponding financial capacities. This raises concerns about the legitimacy of the policy processes in terms of the representativeness of the emerging pandemic preparedness agenda. One particular concern involves the $31.1bn per year price tag, particularly the more than $24bn a year required from low-and middle income countries. The concern is whether this number is appropriate or even feasible. Nations need to be able to address their individual public health needs, to encourage better population health and resilience and the sort of sums they will be required to contribute to pandemic preparedness could threaten to divert resources from where they are most needed. We already saw this happen during the pandemic and there is evidence to suggest this has continued.
For example, tracking Overseas Development Aid for health from 2019 to the present shows that vital and established preventive public health programmes have suffered globally as a result of policy shifts to Covid and post-Covid pandemic preparedness and response. Evidence shows that malaria, tuberculosis, HIV, AIDS, reproductive health and non-communicable diseases have been impacted by resource shifting. Overseas Development Aid saw a 34% decrease in funding for basic health and a 10% decrease for basic nutrition in developing countries. The fear is that emerging pandemic preparedness instruments will be a continuation of this trend, which will have significant population health effects.
Listening to the speakers, APPG Co-Chair, Conservative MP and former Government minister Esther McVey said:
In April, I spoke at the Westminster Hall debate on this topic [and] much more parliamentary scrutiny and debate is needed. As the COVID-19 Inquiry begins to hear evidence, how we prepare for future pandemics must be carefully considered. We have heard concerns about the expansion of the WHO’s powers, the encroachment on national sovereignty and the rights of the individual and the sheer cost of the plans. These are vast amounts of public money to prepare for pandemics when we have a proportional, evidence-based pandemic plan, formulated to prevent the avoidable suffering and loss we have now experienced. The Government abandoned those plans in early 2020, despite knowing the likely outcomes.
The Treaty and IHR amendments could cement a disastrous approach to future pandemics. It seems unwise to give an unelected and largely privately-funded supranational body power over sovereignty and individual rights with seemingly no oversight. My constituents are concerned, not least because the WHO has a poor track record when it comes to pandemics. I question whether we want to hand such authority to the WHO, whose focus in recent decades has moved away from its laudable founding principles, to blunt instruments such as lockdowns and a one-size fits all approach to public health with the terrible consequences we are now seeing.
APPG Co-Chair, Labour MP Graham Stringer MP, added:
I am opposed to these plans as they could represent a huge expansion of the WHO’s powers, to the detriment of public health. The authority it could gain would surely pressure countries into complying with diktats of its choosing. We saw the unaccountable and extreme influence of China on the WHO when it refused to investigate the Wuhan laboratory and the origin of SARS-CoV-2. It’s also worrying to see the increase in commercial interests within the WHO.
We experienced the WHO’s unscientific volte face on mask wearing, despite there being no strong evidence that they had suddenly become effective. It was an entirely political decision, much like many of the decisions taken by the U.K. Government, often in the absence of any real parliamentary scrutiny. We appear to have learnt nothing from that experience, in terms of both the eye-watering cost and the vast collateral damage, which the Treaty and amendments seem set to enshrine in the WHO’s principles. If these plans come to be, we would be handing over powers to an organisation with less clinical and scientific expertise than our own.
It may not be clear how the WHO will enforce these powers but we know the potential is there as we lived through it, and not just with Covid but also swine flu previously. The ease with which unelected bureaucrats can dictate damaging public health policy and erode democracy, civil liberties and individual rights is something we never want to happen again. This is why these plans demand robust debate, and an open review in Parliament and in public. As Sweden did during the pandemic, and is an example to us all, we must make our own decisions about how we manage public health threats in this country.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Now stay behind after school Will and write out 100x, “They are not infections“
Three people dead after Ottawa Police crackdown on peaceful truckers
https://vancouvertimes.org/index.php/2022/02/19/three-people-dead-after-ottawa-police-crackdown-on-peaceful-truckers/
By admin
Don’t get complacent. Let’s keep getting the message out with our friendly resistance. British MPs have no problem with Trudeau’s tyranny
Monday 21st February 2.30pm to 3.30pm
Yellow Boards By the Road
High St,
(near Marlow Suspension Bridge & All Saints Church)
Marlow SL7 2AA
Stand in the Park Sundays 10am make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Telegram
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Who says it’s not Tiananmen? I hope one day these brave people will have statues, they inspired the world.
Yes, indeed. They are brave against lots of ‘police’ ready muzzled and fully equipped with Star Wars gear, posted in to ‘quell’ them (as if they needed any ‘quelling’).
Today someone made a video (posted on Yootoob) that shows two UN passenger aircraft at North Bay.
It’s worse than that. If what supposedly gives us the confidence to open up is falling infections*, then all it will take is a rise in infections* to bring back restrictions.
They may suspend “free” tests and the obligation to isolate for now. But they are definitely going to keep the tests in places like hospitals. They will use hospital tests like a canary in the mine. The moment they start going up in hospitals, they’ll bring them bask in the general population.
That is the basis of the new order that has been put in place in the last two years. The state has given itself the authority from now on to monitor the population for diseases, just like we do with animals, force testing if necessary and force treatments it considers appropriate.
We have been reduced to the status of cattle and it has happened just like Huxley predicted: we’ve asked for this servitude and we love it.
(* a positive coronavirus test)
Even if they were infections – seriously folks have we forgot we are now dealing with what amounts to the common cold? Mind I will continue to support Will, as he and others on this site are some of the few standing up against this madness.
Yes. After all this time!!!!!!
Yep, really angry at a so called sceptic site constantly deploying the enemies warped terminology and fake stats against us. All we can do is keep calling it out.
Cut him some slack – at least he didn’t call them ”cases”.
Givesendgo hacked
Trucker Convoy Donors DOXXED! – YouTube
So anti-government solidarity over the internet wasn’t as easy as many mistakenly thought.
It’s a bit like thinking you can act in solidarity with other people by leaving messages for them at the local police station or Pinkerton office.
Still time to work up a good panic
Shocking clot shot uptake figures, I naively thought there might at least be a bit more reluctance to get the booster. Bozo’s exhortations worked well.
I wouldn’t take that percentage at face value. The Government persist on using the wrong data for the total population which makes it look as if more people have had the gene jab than is actually the case.
I hope you’re right, it’s disturbing how gullible people are, even on this site.
As always, I’d like to see the total number of test that gives these figures… I’d be surprised if anywhere near as many people are testing themselves now?
Indeed, the Zoe project is not yet showing a fall in incidence. It’s curious how much longer it’s taking for these waves to subside, compared to the spikes of 2-4 weeks in low income countries.
“Waves” of what? Isn’t it all somewhat meaningless? Have we ever before micromeasured people feeling poorly in this way?
Spector read Spectre – taken over ages ago by the covid establishment I suspect. 007 may be just what is needed!
Actually, there’s no mystery why the Zoe count takes longer to subside. They use a 14 day moving average, which will appear to stretch out the outbreak. Currently in my area their estimate of active “cases” is dropping by roughly 1/14 every day, suggesting that there are now few new “cases”.
A rellie of mine who watches FaceAcheBook (but doesn’t partake) says she is appalled just how many people seem to be completely in thrall to ‘testing’ – even comparing results, with a ‘mine’s bigger than yours’ mentality.
I’m watching Hull FC v St. Helen’s. Nothing to do with this story, I just want to see if I get a down vote.
There is a sad individual who scans every post for a couple of hours downticking each one without commenting.
A psychologically impaired bedwetter who is too much of a coward to reply.
I hope your team wins.
I have upticked you.
Let the Phantom Downticker do his worst.
I’m doing better than my team, Hull.
Come on folks, give the poor downticker soul a break – just a burdened individual who needs our pity surely?
If this was a woke website, they would respond by removing the ability to downvote
There’s a new variant of concern emerging among internet users – Down Syndrome.
As a fellow Hull FC supporter, have an uptick
This was always a pandemic of tests.
We never had mass testing for flu or the common cold.
Stop all testing and if you have symptoms do what people have done for thousands of years, look after yourself and try not to spread it to anyone else.
We don’t need a label for every virus.
A thousand times, yes!
All of us must have been told as children not to hug and kiss our grandparents when we had a cold (especially if they themselves were unwell). We weren’t traumatised, masked and tested within an inch of our lives – we were taught gentle lessons about thoughtfulness and behaving responsibly.
They are labelling them in the same way they now label bad weather – to make them stand out from the normal pattern of events and give them unwarranted importance.
Tests aren’t cases.
We are the 8.6%.
That figure is false.
It’s the figure quoted in the article ……
“Vaccination data shows 91.4% of people aged 12 and over have had at least one Covid vaccine,”
Please link to the data that shows the figure which you believe to be correct.
This is the trouble with this ‘sceptic’ site. It continually quotes lies as if they are facts, and sceptics believe them because it was on this site. January Surveillance Report said this…
I think you will find that we take all official figures with a pinch of salt.
Unfortunately they are the only ones we have.
This site has constantly stated that the official figures for the unjabbed are understated which makes the effectiveness of the jabs look better than they really are.
“The Prime Minister is set to unveil his blueprint for ‘living with Covid’ on Monday…”
Why would we need a “blueprint” to “live with” a bit of a sniffle? This idiotic idea is at the root of our troubles.
It’s the official announcement of the new order.
If we were returning back to normal life, there would be no need to set out a blueprint.
We are about to be informed that unlike previously when our health was our own business and no one else’s, the state is now ultimately in charge of our health and will step in to dictate how we live our lives whenever it considers necessary.
Everyone will applaud it as sensible and will celebrate that the UK is once again ahead of its European neighbours.
Yep.
More Bozo BS, he probably gets pep talks from Terdeau.
The figure of 91.4% injected is a lie, and the DS editorial staff know it. Last months surveilance report showed that less than 70% were injected.
This lie is being repeated to make us appear small in number, and thereby undermine our resolve.
The resistance is 15 million strong. .
Those stats are three months old and before Bozo started spouting about mumbo jumbo, has much changed since then?
The stats are a month old. Do you really think ten million resistors went and got their first injections last month?
They are reported SARSCoV2 infections, not “Covid infections”.
No, they are reporting SARSCov2 test results, at what CT value we know not.
Its not just the CT value thats the problem. Its also the type of probes and primers used, and the fact the Lighthouse Labs are asserting a positive result based on single gene testing.
Yes and this is all due to the great vaccine rollout.
Credit to our great government and our magnificent Scientists.
That is about as credible as the 91.4% of people over 12 having had at least one “vaccine”.
Absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the act that err, viruses actually do what they always do. I think it’s called nature and we mess about with things beyond our comprehension at our peril.
All we have done is to accelerate the number of future variants available to infect the vaxxed who, courtesy thereof, now enjoy compromised immune systems.
GVB.
And this :-
https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas
By downvoting this message you are agreeing to donate £1000 to this site. Click on the thumbs down symbol if you agree.
The data could not be trusted on the way up and the data cannot be trusted on the way down
I appreciate DS should report this sort of information but my reaction is:
Am I bovvered?
Now that it would appear that three dissidents have been murdered by the Canadian Police all mention of Ottawa has been removed from the BBC News website
The Canada story has been replaced by an item informing us that some crabs and lobsters have been killed by the joke storm
I haven’t been able to bring myself to watch any BBC media (TV, radio, website) since March 2020. It would make me physically sick.
Interestingly the Beeb still allows any answers contributors to speak truth to power, today’s had almost everyone siding with Putin and against ‘NATO’ aka the US military industrial complex/State Department and the EU. Only a couple of those phoning in were of the ‘the only good Red is a dead Red’ type who fails to see the issue from the POV of the country who doesn’t yet have a US occupying force but would rather not become one.
I’ve read a very interesting post by Tom Luongo, that suggests it’s all a bit more complicated than Russia vs The West.
He makes a good argument that the big winner is the EU, which is actually looking to gain influence at the expense of the US.
I have scanned the local Ottawa press/TV output and there is not one mention of casualties. Just support of the police operation. The cover up is in full operation.
Bit disappointed with MTF and leek performance today – they’ve not managed to even try and pick irrelevant holes in a Will Jones article.
I am suffering from RSI so very limited typing. Anyway Will has only repeated the Mail article which reports good news about the epidemic. No problem!
It’s been a painful couple of years and sometimes its hard to imagine people will ever see the light. I live in Wales and when I to go the supermarket (masks are still mandated here) I just despair. I feel like I live in a parallel universe. I guess this is human nature and would be repeated should we have another pandemic. Acceptance and a calm silence helps me cope when I find it hard to swim upstream and share my views.
HRA Reform – Tips for responding
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/human-rights-act-reform-a-modern-bill-of-rights/human-rights-act-reform-a-modern-bill-of-rights-consultation
Some points you might like to consider, and paraphrase in your own response if you resonate with these:
1. The “Modern Bill of Rights” you propose MUST NOT contradict, contravene, or in any way reduce the rights of any human being already established in UK’s existing body of laws. If it does, it will be unconstitutional in whole or in part.
2. The most important human right is bodily integrity. That means NO bodily interference without fully informed consent, freely given. The right to bodily integrity, therefore, MUST be included as an UNQUALIFIED right in any “Modern Bill of Rights.”
3. Attempts to prevent frivolous or dubious human rights claims (for example, a sociopathic/psychopathic killer wishing to avoid extradition/deportation by claiming a right to family life, his family being his cat or dog) MUST be addressed only by the discretion and wisdom of the courts, on a case by case basis and NOT by prescriptive legislation, because the latter will inevitably lead to unintended consequences (for example, if society became conditioned in the future to believe that mass vaccination was more important than bodily integrity or informed consent, then a “permission stage” could block access to legitimate and important claims from individuals who believe in bodily integrity and informed consent.
These are just a few ideas, if you’re concerned about your MEDICAL FREEDOM being compromised.The above can be integrated into your responses within the online process, answering specific questions OR can be emailed as a freeform response.
If emailing, begin with a sentence to introduce your response (“I’m responding to the consultation on the HRA Reform proposal….. I’m a [mum/student/teacher/electrician/etc]……. I feel it’s important to….. etc”) and conclude with a sentence thanking for the opportunity and entrusting the recipient to carefully consider what you’ve written (“thanks for your time, I’m sure you will consider each response carefully/respectfully/….. future society depends on the decisions we make today/etc”)
Outlaw Medical Mandates, Everywhere, FOREVER:
GOV.UK
Human Rights Act Reform: A Modern Bill of Rights – consultation
The truckers have won, for the govn, Trudeau never negotiated with them and had to resort to brute force to move them and get them out…no negotiation, just brute force, so in effect, the government has lost fully; you have to look at the big picture here…
These vaccines have placed our police and military in a very harmful situation and I will write it knowing the implications as a global scientist heavily worked and knowledgeable in COVID; it is my opinion that many of our police and soldiers will have medium and long term consequences of the vaccines and up to death; many have died from these already and the vaccine makers, nor CDC or NIH have ensured the proper studies to rule out the harms and risks.
I fear for our police and military and they were mislead and lied to by the public health officials at Health Canada and PHAC, as well as the provincial public health people under Premier Doug Ford.
https://palexander.substack.com/p/i-cannot-say-more-today-i-had-to?utm_source=url
And if they stopped this ridiculously pointless ‘testing’ then it would disappear from the eyes of men (and the others) completely.
When nearly 90% of our population are vaccinated there are bound to be more of them infected and with other effects from Covid than the low numbers of unvaccinated. To give this information honestly the poportionality of vaccinated and unvaccinated needs to be applied to the graphs and data. I am strongly against giving the Vaccine to under 16 children, although am fully vacinated myself and am not pro or anti vaccine in adults. It will take at least two years to discover whether long term effects of the vaccines are worth their massive expense and profits handed to the big pharma companies whose only objective is profit.