- “The outrageous ousting of Boris Johnson” – We have just witnessed a technocratic coup against the democratic wishes of the people, writes Brendan O’Neill in Spiked.
- “Boris undone by ‘minuscule nibbling mice’” – An editorial in the Mail on Sunday is unimpressed by the people who have hounded Boris out of parliament.
- “Lockdown finished Boris – but for all the wrong reasons” – Who are the real clowns, when a man is forced out of politics because he was found in the vicinity of uneaten cake? asks Dan Hannan in the Telegraph.
- “Nigel Farage claims around 10 Tory MPs could defect” – The ex-Brexit Party leader challenges the former Prime Minister to join him in a “new attempt to break the mould of British politics”.
- “I’ve been blocked from sharing Covid WhatsApps, claims Johnson” – Boris has accused the Cabinet Office of deliberately frustrating the work of the Covid inquiry after it warned him against disclosing hundreds of WhatsApp messages, reports the Times.
- “What did COVID-19 really teach us about science, evidence and society?” – An important new paper from John P. A. Ioannidis and colleagues argues that the failures of biomedical science during the pandemic easily outweighed its successes and call for the systemic reform of science.
- “It finally happened” – Alex Berenson reports that someone who ostracised him during Covid finally said it out loud: “You were right. Never again.”
- “The work-from-home fanatics owe the rest of us an apology” – Matthew Lynn in the Telegraph says time’s up for those working from home.
- “Labour will rip up planning rules to build wind farms” – Labour will tear up planning rules to speed up the construction of onshore wind farms and nuclear power plants if it wins the next election, according to the Times.
- “Britain’s green energy disaster should be an awful warning to Americans” – Citizens of the USA, give thanks that you hardly have any offshore wind power. It’s proving to be a disaster in the U.K., argues Capell Aris in the Telegraph.
- “Moving Earth away from the sun could solve global warming, expert says” – Albert Zijlstra, a Professor of Astrophysics at the University of Manchester, suggests shifting the Earth further back from the sun by about three million miles could stop temperatures rising, reports the Mail.
- “GB News tycoon Sir Paul Marshall eyes up £50 million Spectator deal” – The hedge fund tycoon Sir Paul Marshall is among the billionaires circling the Spectator, now that the Telegraph group has gone into receivership, reports the Times.
- “All new editions of P.G. Wodehouse’s novels are given trigger warning” – Penguin has issued the works of P.G. Wodehouse with a blanket trigger warning over concerns about the novels ‘outdated’ social attitudes, says the Mail.
- “Why I believe the Bank of England’s CBDC consultation amounts to a national scandal” – Susie Violet Ward in City AM lays bare the shocking inaccessibility of the Bank of England’s CBDC consultation.
- “George Soros Hands Control to His 37-Year-Old Son: ‘I’m More Political’” – Alex Soros, who’s now in charge of the Soros family’s $25 billion philanthropic enterprise, says it will be used to help the Democrats.
- “The end of Putin’s empire could be sudden” – History teaches us that empires can collapse very suddenly, writes Robert Tombs in the Telegraph. Wishful thinking?
- “Leave white guilt behind, says race report author” – Britain needs to stop being driven by ‘white guilt’ in order to help ethnic minorities thrive, says Dr. Tony Sewell in the Times.
- “Almost 7% of people in U.K. changed sexual identity in six years, study suggests” – Research finds the over-65s are almost as “sexually fluid” as 18-24 year-olds, reports the Guardian.
- “Government ‘fanning culture war’ over free speech, says U.K.’s first LGBTQ+ history professor” – Crisis? What crisis? asks Oxford’s newly appointed LGBTQ+ history prof when asked about free speech on campus in an interview in the Guardian.
- “Tate Britain employs ‘vibe checkers’ during Pride events” – Dedicated officials are tasked with ensuring visitors enjoy LGBTQ+ activities in a “safe, inclusive and respectful space”, says the Telegraph.
- “Anglers quit England team after trans woman picked for female squad” – Becky Lee Birtwhistle Hodges, a male rugby player in a former life, has been selected to compete for the England ladies’ team in the shore fishing championship, reports the Telegraph.
- “Man dressed as a woman is allowed to stay in a female-only dorm” – Women fleeing from domestic violence were horrified to wake up next to a half-naked man calling himself Allison in the female-only dorm, reports the Mail.
- “No-Vax Djokovic has just won his 23rd Grand Slam title at the French Open” – Michael Shellenberger celebrates Djokovic’s latest victory, which earns him the most impressive record in the history of men’s tennis.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The moral of the Boris Johnson story: when you try to please everyone, you ultimately end up pleasing no one. Now a man without a country, may his name and memory be blotted out.
I am struggling to understand all the screams of “Saint Boris was ousted unfairly, so was Thatcher, what an assault on democracy!!!!” Is he not finally being made to face some consequences for his actions (even though he’s now going to become richer and richer, with even less responsibility)? Or am I missing something? He clearly was not fit for the job, but many people voted for him because he’s a comedian, not a statesman. Is he the closest thing we had to a politician resisting calls for lockdown, he really didn’t want to do it, but his hands were forced, so is this one reason why even the lockdown sceptics are sorry he’s “gone”? (Was he ever there for his constituents?) In classic Boris style, he has not admitted to any wrongdoing at all.
The status quo is called “democracy”, but I struggle to understand how blatant liars such as Tony Bliar and Saint Boris, both “fairly and democratically elected”, and so thought they were God, are allowed to carry out their ruinous business and blatant crimes with total impunity, total lack of accountability, and, it seems total immunity from prosecution. (Yes, Saint Boris got a fine for attending a party or two, but what is £50 to that wealthy buffoon? Surely lying to the Queen and to Parliament should carry a much heavier penalty? The general public can be sent to prison for lying about far less, such as who was driving a speeding car.) Both clearly cared about nobody but themselves, such was obvious before they were elected. Both have now made themselves incredibly rich, off the taxpayer. (I suppose many politicians do, but we don’t hear about the others.) How is it democracy that there seems to be no checks and balances on them at all once they are in power? The fig leaf of democracy that we have is being able to choose between professional liars every few years. Bliar was able to award himself a 50% pay rise when he was re-elected in 2001 (does anyone remember that?), and to take the country into his illegal war with seemingly no checks and balances, and as for the lockdown saga, it is clear that Saint Boris was not the one calling the shots; whoever really was doing it was unseen, unelected, unregulated, while Saint Boris recited the script put in front of him “no Prime Minister wants to do this, it is with a heavy heart, it would be inhumane to cancel Christmas – oh, I’ve just done it, significant normality by Easter, irreversible roadmap to freedom on 19th June which can be changed on a whim, blah blah blah…” It seems that nobody was able to hold the government to account at all during lockdown. The “opposition” completely failed to voice a word of opposition, speaking only to say “we would have locked down earlier, harder, longer”. It is now emerging that the government was actively suppressing “lockdown dissent” – this news does not surprise me at all.
And all this is “democracy”, and people are screaming about somebody who cannot tell the difference between himself and God being “unfairly ousted”?
Thank you, 1984imminent. So well put.
Comedians can be good politicians. Zelensky anyone?
Sorry but zelensky is far from being a good politician, he’s a great salesman though, he’s sold a war to meet his own ego! And chump Biden has taken it hook line and sinker!
A fine post.
Brilliant post.
But less about Bunter I couldn’t give a flying one!
We need new breath in politics, not stale old hot air!
Well said, that man! I’m flabbergasted by all these articles, written by fellow lockdown sceptics, that are overreaching themselves to portray Boris’ ousting as a coup, the machinations of the Blob, etc There was even a BTL comment the other day about Boris being a “victim”. What’s going on? This useless, entitled, shopping trolley of a man exercised his enormous powers to lock us up, pointlessly, three times, and wreaked havoc on society, the economy, education, health, and so on and on, the effects of which will be felt for years, if not decades. He the proceeded to blackmail perfectly healthy people with no or very little vulnerability to C-19 into taking a useless, nay, dangerous (I’ve said these words before here) “vaccine” that has caused immense harm, not just to health but to society and relationships. My partner’s sister hasn’t spoken to her for 2 years after she revealed she wasn’t going to have it; and I know of many similar situations. My sister has lost over half of all her close friends because it too!
Of course the noble way to have brought Boris down would have been an about turn by TPTB on the whole “pandemic” debacle, with an honest reckoning on all the immense failings of both government and the institutions that propped up the authoritarian nonsense. But that isn’t going to happen any time soon (fingers crossed for one day, though) and so as far as I’m concerned, anything that brings this man down, puts him in the public square of shame, is to the greater good. Yes, there is the danger that the opprobrium of the lockdown zealots gains control of the narrative, i.e. Boris needs to be punished not for his hypocrisy and his actions belying the massive charades that NPIs were, but because he was genuinely putting people’s lives at risk; but it’s up to commentators on our side to take that position on rather using Boris’s downfall as a way of foregrounding a completely different concern, that this is some kind of remainer’s remerge plot, etc. Let’s not muddy the waters: Boris was undone by matters related entirely to his lockdown policies; so let’s focus on that alone to keep everyone’s sights on that single act of malfeasance.
Yes in so far as that led to an inability to lead. He just wasn’t a very good leader. He was a good thought leader for the country, as a journalist but terrible as a politician with executive controls and responsible for leading the herd of cats known as cabinet and MPs. And he also, being led by a certain part of his anatomy, he sought too much to please Carrie which led him to adopt climate policies I’m fairly sure Telegraph journalist Boris would never have adopted. When it came to the pandemic my analysis based more on observation of his personality type and values and a very small dash of inside knowledge, is as follows.
First the dash of “inside knowledge.” It was often written by various journalist commentators that Boris’s instinct was anti-lockdown but I know many of us anti-lockdown types, observing government action, surmised this must surely be nonsense.
Well many journalists do have their ears to the ground and do have their inside sources, and in this case, I have a source also. Discretion means unfortunately I can’t even hint at who that is, and it involves a spousal link, so it’s not direct-direct. but I too, from a trusted source, was getting confirmation Boris was – in-spite of government policy and noises – very anti-lockdown.
That’s it. That’s the extent of my “insider knowledge” and it is hardly that useful to others as other’s, not knowing who my source is, won’t share the same level of trust. All I can say is that I have independent corroboration adding to the chorus of reports saying the same thing. Boris was arguing far stronger against lockdown than anyone outside would otherwise – based on government response and policy – have guessed.
So how did he not hold sway? Firstly this somewhat confirms his inability to lead the cabinet, civil servants and MP’s. His time in hospital at a critical juncture no doubt played a significant role in this regard and played against him. In my experience if as a leader during a large project you have a period of incarceration, it can be difficult and requires real leadership qualities to recover authority. Qualities he evidently did not sufficiently have.
But based purely on observation of his personality type and his apparent “first instincts”, this is what I speculate was actually the most significant factor:
Boris had a very ‘boys own” naive view of British Science but is actually pretty bad at science himself. His childhood, like mine, was one where Second World War comics were still available and every schoolboy knew in immense detail the (no doubt propagandised) success stories of British science and engineering. The engineering of spitfire, Barns Wallis and the bouncing bomb and all that.
He is a patriotic public school boy who really loved those tales (and Churchill of course) and that came across in his writing. My guess is he eagerly pushed far too much power to the scientists early on in the pandemic, setting them up to occupy a position that ensured they were an independent information source that playing against his limited leadership skills and into the hands of colleagues with opposing policy views. His instinct was “our scientists are the best, they’ll sort it” but he was, to put it bluntly, wrong (least with regard to government the significant scientists he was wrong). And being bad at science himself, he was wholly unable to make his counter points with authority. It turned out the scientists he set up were awful ‘safetyist” career civil servants with completely the wrong instincts and no inclination (indeed probably also fear of doing the proper science circumstances required). So right from the outset the management trajectory was terribly, calamitously wrong.
Many experienced project managers would probably agree with your judgment. The whole project was “terribly, calamitously wrong” – and we’ll be paying for the aftermath for a long time. Perhaps they’ll re-organise the Civil Service; after all, they are used to that.
So it was a cock-up. Dear, oh dear, oh dear.
Just a reminder – all the government scientists and “experts” had been bought off before the Scamdemic. Whitty held out for a bit admittedly but sold his soul shortly after March 20th.
So some clever scientist thinks it would be a good idea to meddle with the earth’s orbit. What could possibly go wrong? Who pays these idiots to think of solutions to non existent problems.The earth’s climate is just about perfect and has managed perfectly well in sustaining life for millions of years. This is just another example of science being used for the wrong reasons by scientists without anything useful to do with their time and their government grants.
Who is it who pays this “well educated” “scientist” for coming up with this unworkable, disaster ridden drivel? He should leave the Earth alone and take up snooker instead.
“He should leave the Earth.”
Very true. And take up residence on a large asteroid
Before a pandemic of “mad science” breaks out across the globe, we should construct quarantine facilities for anyone who tests positive for “crackpot ideas” so we can contain it and “stop the spread”.
Well it’s brief but here is a response to Will’s recent article about how the flu *really did* disappear, from Martin Neil and Jonathan Engler;
”The Daily Sceptic article presents an argument based on:
We have actually presented comprehensive evidence that rebuts all of these points in previous substack articles, specifically:
So, the Daily Sceptic article has made no attempt to comprehensively take on the totality of our evidence against the claim that flu vanished and unfortunately has instead simply ignored much of the evidence we have mustered.”
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-daily-sceptic-are-absolutely
I very much like a lot of what Martin Neil has said throughout the pandemic, but in this case I will defend Will and say I think Neil’s response is inadequate. His article he points to regarding flu testing false negatives does not explain one year there being many flu test positives and the next, after the start of the pandemic, there being very few. It is disappointing he does not concede this point or directly address it because it rather smacks of clinging to a view in the face of contrary evidence. Worse, the article itself does little more than make the same point as is made in the single sentence reference pointing to the article. This smacks of attempting to provide a response with references simply to provide a response with references (cynically knowing most people wont click through). Not what good science is about so I’m disappointed. I take this apparently minor point seriously because there has been far too much of this kind of pretending to do science when doing politics, most of it coming from the other side. It’s disappointing to find a source I have relied on has adopted this limited form of reasoning which seems more about protecting the argument than doing science.
i don’t “like” the data Will found. I tried to work out ways it might be saying something other than what it appears to say. But it is what it is and we should take it on board.
P. G. Wodehouse and “outdated social attitudes.” “Outdated” is a slippery word, isn’t it?
“Warning by order of the Fuhrer:
Parents are warned that this edition of A Child’s Life of Jesus contains outdated sympathetic social attitudes towards a Jewish character, and is therefore only suitable for adult party members, with due authorisation.”
Thank goodness I have some really ancient copies of Wodehouse then! Love the fact that they are so of their time as well as beautifully observed & written.
Christine Anderson joined us yesterday evening to talk about totalitarianism & tyranny
As ever, she was on sparkling form. Well worth a watch when the recording is uploaded later today or tomorrow at: https://rumble.com/user/cbkovess
“Moving Earth away from the sun could solve global warming, expert says”
And here was me thinking solar activity had nothing to do with ‘climate emergency’. Perhaps what we ought to do is to fire Prof. Zijlstra, into space. About 3m miles should do it.
An expert in what? Stupidity?
The article omits to mention that the Earth’s orbit is elliptical. The closest and further distances to the sun occur in Jan and July, within a few days of the solstices. At perihelion, at the beginning of Jan, the sun is about 91.4 million miles away. At aphelion, at the beginning of July, the sun is about 94.5 million miles away. So when it’s summer in the northern hemisphere, we are 3 million miles further away from the sun than in winter.
My conclusion is therefore that this Prof is another grifter seeking climate change funding, and he made up the figure of 3 million miles which in planetary terms is equivalent to a gnat’s c*ck.
An update from Mark Sexton recorded yesterday.
Sunday the 11th of June 2023.
This video is from retired police constable Mark Sexton and lawyers Philip Hyland and Hannah Rose, with involvement and direction from a senior human rights Barrister.
They explain about their judicial review application to The High Court in London submitted on the 9th of June 2023, to force the Metropolitan police, as is their lawful duty, to reopen and investigate crime number 6029679/21.
Crimes committed by the U.K government, regulators, civil servants, media bosses and senior police officers against the men, women and children of the United Kingdom.
Please watch and share.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3uPoF5LKMQRU/
Thanks for the information BB.
My pleasure.
I am not clear that Johnson was ousted by a cake issue. The problem was that he, an dCummings before him, had been telling lies, or at best had been economical with the truth. Truth will usually out. Other examples – the downing of the Malaysian plane over Ukraine, Mrs Vardy, Philip Scofield, if the various parties had confessed instead of making feeble excuses or blaming others much of the furore in each case would have sunk without trace. Classic example: when the Iranians accidentally shot down a civilian plane they confessed promptly, and few remember that episode now.
prverbs – honesty is the best policy, and after hubris comes nemesis.
“Why I believe the Bank of England’s CBDC consultation amounts to a national scandal” I thought it was just me when I filled in the consultation and found the language dense and inaccessible so it’s good to know that I’m not alone and I’m a writer and work with words every day. The CBDCs and the Digital ID are the Two Towers of the control grid and I find myself increasingly concerned about them. I have said on here and elsewhere that I will not comply but is that just bravado and when push comes to shove comes to throttle, will I be going along with it if it’s a question of staying alive (and I don’t mean in a Bee Gees sort of way!)? It’s something much on my mind. Will there be any option but to go along with it or can I exist without them? How strong are our communities to resist this? Vast swathes of the UK are not aware of this at all and are happily getting on with their lives in ignorant bliss. Ignorance does have a large quotient of bliss attached to it. It means not having to take responsibility for anything like truth or one’s life. You outsource your life to others to tell you what is true and how to live it and then you can carry on beeping your card – or phone – at the tills, driving your car where you like, going on a holiday abroad, getting your booster shot and gabbling away about nonsensical rubbish like Hazzer and Megs or Scofield or football scores or politics or whatever else it is. They won’t mind when it’s time to have a Digital ID or can’t use cash. And that is most people unfortunately. Somehow I can not not bring myself to be part of a world that is built on lies and falsehoods but I do want to live. That is the conundrum. Where do other people sit with this?
Great post, Aethelred. That pretty much captures where I am in my thinking. Sadly, I agree that most people will go along with the regime, being convinced by the “convenience” and other “benefits” promised. We can be sure there will be a big cost attached to non-compliance (inability to fly, buy petrol, buy food, etc).
Cheers, Michael, very kind of you to say so. I don’t need to fly anywhere and could possibly do without the car – I’d get a horse or a mule – but I do need food. Maybe I’ll have to resort to taking the odd pigeon or rabbit for the pot with a catapult… It’d be a hard path but perhaps there is some deep earth wisdom along that path to be learned that could be useful for others. Who knows? At some point that bridge will have to be crossed.
As an aside, does everyone else know there is a new kid-on-the-block 2-series jab from S.Korea, authorised by the MHRA since 26/05/23 for adults 18+?
I must have missed this in the email updates from gov.uk I regularly receive.
I can’t make out if it is still EUA or full marketing authorisation granted by the malodorous MHRA numpties.
SKYCovion is not mRNA based but they can still shove it as far as I’m concerned.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/skycovion-covid-19-vaccine-authorised-by-mhra
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-covid-19-vaccine-skycovion
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/sk-bioscience-receives-marketing-authorization-110000305.html
Why another ‘authorisation’ for a c19 jab??
..old Mr Gum got an email from our surgery the other day ‘reminding’ him there are treatments available for Covid!! LOL! So he can have ‘run death is near’ free of charge….!!
What is so annoying and upsetting is that many people, including elderly that this is targeted at will have no clue that Remdesivir, Molnupiravir and the other treatments have very poor efficacy, and some serious side-effects..it’s criminal….
They are still following the narrative, aren’t they? I suppose they still have lots of
s**tstock to shift.Yeah I’ve posted twice about this now.
Apologies, I missed your posts too. In my defence, I don’t ‘clock in’ to DS every day. I need some time out to stabilise my blood pressure. Instead of reading / writing, I attack the weeds in the garden instead, aided and abetted with an appropriate drink.
haha, no I get it. The most recent one I posted was basically just a link to Prof Fenton’s article on his substack where he goes into more details on this particular new jab. It’s worth popping over to read because he’s listed the issues he finds concerning or wants confirmed by June Raine so he’s submitting them in a FOI request.
What a shame that the son of George Soros is just going to interfere in politics ‘just like his dad’..wouldn’t it be wonderful if one of these ‘crazies’ took all their money and built hospitals throughout the world..trained doctors and nurses..made sure people had clean drinking water..I don’t know, just kind, sensible compassionate things most ordinary people would do if they had the money……..shitbags!!
“Moving Earth away from the sun could solve global warming, expert says”
And these dildos claim to be clever?
You have to give these people credit for maintaining the comedy industry. Move the earth…how? Forklift? Nudge unit? Tickle it under its armpits? It should be ridiculed mercilessly until the end of time itself…
Nothing like that – just a nice, harmless asteroid!
Good morning all..
I’m on hols at the moment, so dipping in and out…..
Firstly an apology to Huxleypiggles ..that post a couple of days ago was meant for Freddy, who had mentioned that Toby and James were having a ‘Twitter spat’..
(confused.com!!LOL)….
second this is part 2 of the excellent ArkMedic substack regarding the ongoing lies and obfuscations in relation to using the vaccines on pregnant women…..
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/debunking-viki-male-part-2-the-calvert
We must never forget what People will do for fame/money/advancement…!
“Firstly an apology to Huxleypiggles”
Thanks, but no need to apologise ebg. I know who I can trust on here.
“The Ukrainian Army Has Already Lost Half Of Its Unique Leopard 2R Breaching Vehicles”
Just another hunk of metal then?
Notice how they call them “breaching vehicles ” when things go wrong! Obviously the Germans don’t want them associated with the word “tank” now do they?
““Almost 7% of people in U.K. changed sexual identity in six years, study suggests” – Research finds the over-65s are almost as “sexually fluid” as 18-24 year-olds, reports the Guardian”
“reports the Guardian” is all you need to know about this…
Oh, the long conversations I’ve had over a pint of mixed with my pension age mates in the pub concerning our general state of sexual fluidity!
“All new editions of P.G. Wodehouse’s novels are given trigger warning”
In that case, life should be given a trigger warning! It’s so risky I don’t know why we bother!
‘What ho, Jeeves! What’s all this bally nonsense about a gal with a bristly moustache called Eustace leading the women’s tennis team at Chuffnell Hall? It’s enough to send a chap, a real trouser wearing chap, completely doolally and likely to put him into a tail-spin into the drink…and I’m not talking a double whisky and splash!
“a gal with a bristly moustache” Oh mate your a tonic!
“Novak Djokovic just won his 23rd Grand Slam title at the French Open, earning him the greatest record in men’s tennis history.”
WITHOUT BEING VACCINATED?!! Good god, whatever next?
Djokovic is one hell of a talisman for the non-“vaccinated” everywhere.
https://off-guardian.org/2023/06/11/this-week-in-the-new-normal-65/
Off-G’s excellent round-up.
Pay attention to item number 2. Aldi requiring QR codes to enter a store.
And yet there are all these people in the store mindlessly buying stuff with not a care in the world. Imagine if they lost their phones, they wouldn’t have a clue how to live or do anything. Zombies.
https://off-guardian.org/2023/06/12/from-net-zero-to-glyphosate-agritechs-greenwashed-corporate-power-grab/
Colin Todhunter with another excellent breakdown of big tech destruction of the farming industry. If their methods continue the planet will become an uninhabitable desert.
Emphasis on ”voluntary” ( for now ) but basically farmers are being bribed to close down their farms;
”For farmers who decide to close their companies, the government launched a “once-ff, financially very attractive termination scheme.” There are two buyout schemes. The first is for dairy, pig, poultry, and veal farmers who fall under the peak load target group. Registration for this scheme is open from July 3 until April 5 next year. The second scheme is for a larger group of livestock farmers. Registration for that one closes on December 1 this year.”
https://nltimes.nl/2023/06/12/nl-launches-voluntary-buyout-sustainability-support-scheme-peak-nitrogen-polluters
I don’t know how this move to buy out farmers and shut down farms cannot be seen for what it is – a deliberate policy of depopulation.
The world needs all the food we can produce but the second largest food producing country on the planet is to have it’s farming industry decimated and there us absolutely NO reason for this.
DEPOPULATION.
“Moving the earth away from the sun could solve global warming”???
What’s that you want to do? Get some robots to direct an asteroid TOWARDS earth, for some long-range planning of, you know, just a few billion years ahead and risk an asteroid collision with earth? Well, what could possibly go wrong? I mean, even if it does crash, well, the dinosaurs came through that OK, didn’t they?
This scientist needs a check-up from the neck-up, as does the Mail for giving this crackpot any credibility. Will we be using those reassuring computer models to ensure it all runs like clockwork and doesn’t instantly annihilate all of humankind, because, you know, it’s not like it’s been tried and tested before? If so, then we can all breathe a sigh of relief because the past 3 years have demonstrated how incredibly accurate those can be!
At least think about consulting Buzz Lightyear first.
I’m sure I’ve seen this film, what you do is set off a massive nuclear device on one side of the earth and its pushes the planet away from the sun! or was it towards the sun? anyhoo it was called “the day the earth caught fire” very poignant at the moment!
I think this idiot needs his head moving further away from his body, a couple of feet should do it!
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-06-11-nyc-safe-drug-vending-machine-narcan-fentanyl.html
In the depopulation agenda don’t forget:
“Every little helps.”
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-06-09-who-gets-record-budget-increase-and-more.html
And here’s some real news.
Oh, and the WHO is offering a $35 return for every dollar “donated.”
I see.