• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Sir Keir Starmer’s Plans to Turn Britain into a ‘Green Energy Superpower’ will Bankrupt Households and Cripple the Economy

by David Craig
5 June 2023 4:00 PM

At 47 U.S. cents per kilowatt hour (c/KWh) the U.K. has some of the highest household energy costs in the world. Countries like India (7 c/KWh) and China (8 c/KWh) and South Korea (9 c/KWh) pay around a fifth of U.K. prices. The U.S. at 18 c/KWh, France at 21 c/KWh, Singapore at 22 c/KWh and Japan at 25 c/KWh pay around half of the U.K.’s prices. Only Germany at a massive 52 c/KWh and Denmark at 53 c/KWh pay more than we do.

What effect will Sir Keir Starmer’s ambition to turn Britain into a “clean energy superpower” and ban any further oil and gas exploration have on the price we will pay for our electricity, assuming he becomes our next Prime Minister?

In general (there are some exceptions such as Germany) the more coal a country uses for its energy, the cheaper that energy is (source Our World in Data):

India energy cost 7 c/KWh, 57% of energy from coal
China energy cost 8 c/KWh, 55% of energy from coal
South Korea energy cost 9 cKWh, 24% of energy from coal
USA energy cost 18 c/KWh, 11% of energy from coal
Britain energy cost 47 c/KWh, 3% of energy from coal
Germany energy cost 52 c/KWh, 17% of energy from coal

We have, of course, plenty of energy-rich coal in Britain. But we’re not allowed to use it because the CO2 emissions will supposedly cause a climate catastrophe possibly wiping out the human race. As Prince, now King, Charles warned us in May 2009, “The best scientific projections indicate that we have very little time left – indeed less than 100 months – in which to alter our behaviour drastically.”

There are many other analyses we could do. For example, you could compare how much nuclear energy a country uses with its energy cost. If we take three neighbouring countries – France, Britain and Germany — we see that France with energy costs of 21 c/KWh gets 36% of its power from nuclear, whereas Britain (47 c/KWh) only gets 6% from nuclear and Germany (52 c/KWh) 5% and is closing down the last of its nuclear power stations in the next few years.

However, as Sr Keir plans a massive increase in wind and solar power for Britain, an issue which might worry British households and businesses is that that the more renewables – solar and wind – a country uses, the higher its energy costs seem to be in spite of our politicians claiming that renewables such as solar and wind will give us a glorious green cheap energy future:

India energy cost 7 c/KWh, 3% of energy from solar and wind
China energy cost 8 c/KWh, 6% of energy from solar and wind
South Korea energy cost 9 c/KWh, 2% of energy from solar and wind
USA energy cost 18 c/KWh, 6% from solar and wind
Britain energy cost 47 c/KWh, 10% of energy from solar and wind
Germany energy cost 52 c/KWh, 13% from solar and wind

But the situation with supposed ‘clean energy’ such as solar and wind may be much worse than the above figures suggest. Why? Because we’re not actually paying the full cost of unreliable, intermittent and expensive solar and wind. Instead, our rulers are hiding the full cost from us by giving massive subsidies from general taxation to solar and wind projects. For example, in the five years from 2016 to 2021, the British government was reported as paying £8.7 billion in subsidies to renewable energy companies. That’s £1.74 billion a year – a cost that should have appeared on households’ and companies’ electricity bills were there no subsidies from general taxation.

Moreover, the costs for ‘green energy’ don’t include the cost of keeping gas, oil or even coal plants available to be fired up on days when there is no sun or too little or too much wind.

The United States recently approved a $430 billion new green energy subsidy package labelled the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), offering tax breaks for components used in renewable energy technologies on condition they’re made in North America, again hiding the true cost of ‘green’ energy to homes and businesses.

Looking at the figures, there appear to be two quite distinct energy worlds. There’s the real world in which countries which burn a lot of coal and use very little wind and solar have low energy prices of just a few cents/KWh and staggering growth rates as industry and jobs naturally gravitate towards countries with low energy costs. Then there’s the green energy fantasyland where massive taxpayer subsidies and hiding the true costs of green energy allow politicians to claim that the transition from fossil fuels to supposed ‘clean energy’ like wind and solar will give their countries cheap, reliable energy security.

It will be interesting to see what happens to the prices British households and businesses have to pay for their electricity as the country moves towards our politicians’ nirvana of carbon neutrality.

As for Sir Keir ‘Just Stop Oil’ Starmer’s boast that he’s going to make Britain a ‘clean energy superpower’ – the figures from many countries show this is complete nonsense. All he’s going to do is push up U.K. energy prices, export British jobs, crush the U.K. economy and bankrupt Britain.

David Craig’s latest book There is No Climate Crisis is available as a paperback or ebook from Amazon.

Stop Press: In a strong editorial, the Daily Mail warns that Keir Starmer’s “mad dash to Net Zero” will leave us all poorer.

Tags: Climate changeCoalEnergy CostsNet ZeroNuclear

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

The Covid Inquiry’s ‘Commemorative Tapestry’ Reveals its True Purpose – Comforting the Afflicted, Not Afflicting the Comfortable

Next Post

Giant Pride Flag on Bromley Hospital Criticised by Health Secretary

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
10navigator
10navigator
1 year ago

Excellent paper-trail along the path to net zero and its destination: penury.

84
0
Dinger64
Dinger64
1 year ago

Green energy will never = “superpower”
It will = “intermittent power” at best!

70
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago

Do politicians ever read anything….or do they just witter to each other and screw things up……..

‘The authors find that Net Zero – the global movement to eliminate fossil fuels and its emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases – to be scientifically invalid and a threat to the lives of billions of people.

Among the paper’s findings are:

• Net Zero proponents regularly report that extreme weather is more severe and frequent because of climate change while the evidence shows no increase – and, in some cases, a decrease – in such events.

• Computer models supporting every government Net Zero regulation and the trillions of dollars subsidizing renewables and electric cars, trucks, home heating, appliances and many other products do not work.

• Scientific research and studies that do not support the “consensus” narrative of harmful man-made global warming are routinely censored and excluded from government reports such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the National Climate Assessment.

• Conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that contradict the narrative of catastrophic global warming from fossil fuels are rewritten by government bureaucrats for public reports to support the false narrative of Net Zero.

• The many benefits of modest warming and increasing carbon dioxide are routinely either eliminated or minimized in governmental reports.

• Eliminating fossil fuels and implementing Net Zero policies and actions mean the elimination of fossil fuel-derived nitrogen fertilizers and pesticides that will result in about half the world’s population not having enough food to eat. Many would starve.

• The adoption of Net Zero is the rejection of overwhelming scientific evidence that there is no risk of catastrophic global warming caused by fossil fuels and CO2. Net Zero, then, violates the tenets of the scientific method that for more than 300 years has underpinned the advancement of western civilization.’

‘Challenging ‘Net Zero’ with Science’ Lindzen, Happer, CO2 Coalition 23 Feb 2023

Last edited 1 year ago by Monro
74
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Covid and net zero – the suicide of the West, or murder?

76
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

I am in the ‘accidental death’ camp….because of the astonishing stupidity on display from those in power:

‘What did surprise us is we hadn’t really thought through the economic impacts.’

Melinda Gates

Hancock: “We frighten the pants off everyone with the new strain.”

Poole (Hancock’s media advisor): “Yep that’s what will get proper bahviour [sic] change.”

Elysee official: “We had to clearly threaten him to make him finally budge,” “The way it’s presented is a bit harsh, but we were indeed preparing to close (the border),” March 2020

And so on and so forth

But, I agree, it beggars belief that, again, no realistic cost/benefit study has been done regarding the economic impact of net zero……utter madness….but then, to me, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron/Clegg, May, Johnson, Truss, Starmer, all appear hopelessly and completely away with the fairies…..

Last edited 1 year ago by Monro
60
-3
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

I dunno – I just don’t buy the idea that they are all mad or stupid. To climb the greasy pole requires a certain amount of savvy. But then I’ve never know one personally so hard to be sure.

35
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

Apparently they are not really batty, just victims of ‘protective cognition theory’

‘Identity protective cognition refers to the tendency of culturally diverse individuals to selectively credit and dismiss evidence in patterns that reflect the beliefs that predominate in their group.’

‘Misconceptions, Misinformation, and the Logic of Identity-Protective Cognition’ D. Kahan 2017

‘Anyone who has ever found themselves in an angry argument with their political or social circle will know how threatening it feels. For a lot of people, being “right” just isn’t worth picking a bitter fight with the people they care about. That’s particularly true in a place like Washington, where social circles and professional lives are often organized around people’s politics, and the boundaries of what those tribes believe are getting sharper.’

‘How politics makes us stupid’ Ezra Klein Apr 2014

Last edited 1 year ago by Monro
26
-1
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Indeed, but where did it start? Or is it just collective insanity that started with one person presenting an idea that suddenly took hold? Take covid – where did the madness start? Who was following who?

20
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

The madness started in China, which country has undue influence over ‘Teddy’ at WHO, aided and abetted by the Gates foundation.

The proliferation of supranational political organisations has meant that the global body politic has fallen prey to protective cognition theory.

That is why we need a radical rethink regarding our politicians…I think double their pay to encourage more strong minded mavericks to have a go…..

13
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Perhaps China, yes. Damning indictment of the “free” world that we dug ourselves into a hole copying the CCP.

13
0
DomH75
DomH75
1 year ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

Our fault for enriching the most murderous nation in human history in order to game the currency and get cheap gadgets made by a slave workforce! Chinese slaves build our smartphones in conditions we wouldn’t allow, and Western governments use the smartphones to enslave their people!

26
0
Steve-Devon
Steve-Devon
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

Or we could try; no pay for politicians and indeed no politicians, would we notice any problems if they all just disappeared?

21
0
DomH75
DomH75
1 year ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

The eco-crap and Agenda 21/30 can be put at the door of Maurice Strong, a sort of contemporary of/prototype Soros.

Last edited 1 year ago by DomH75
23
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Reply to  DomH75

Ah yes, WEF, UN, moved to China…

11
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

You forgot the fishy Rishi Sunak

12
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

Dangerous to mention on here but I am a supporter of the present Prime Minister.

He is just as fallible as the rest of us but I think and hope he has a backbone to go with the ability…….

I’ll get my coat…….

1
0
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
1 year ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

It was lockdowns and the jabs, not covid.

To net zero can be added ongoing mass immigration – which uttely contradicts the claim that there’s a climate emergency – the indoctrination and demoralisation of our children, the trashing of our history and culture, the trans evil, de facto and increasingly de jure second class status for the indigenous population, preferential treatment for Islam, the destruction of the countryside… I could go on.

This is not a case of lots of accidents in the same direction. It has been planned for a long time, but it seems to me that they’ve revealed themselves in recent years to be in a desperate rush.

45
0
varmint
varmint
1 year ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

All part of the Great Reset. A world run by technocrats. You begin to see all the pieces. At first you think why are we having all of this Woke Capitalism, till you realise it is just another cog in the globalist wheel. The Bud Light fiasco is another example of pandering to social justice than simply making profit and ofcourse it is costing them money in the short term with the hope that they can come aboard the collectivist Stakeholder Capitalism in the long term.

4
0
varmint
varmint
1 year ago
Reply to  Monro

You did well in that comment. I have been stating a lot of that stuff on different mediums for 15 years or more and I am still having to do it yet because we are falling deeper and deeper into the Green (Red) hole of Eco Socilaism masquerading as saving the planet.————You might also want to read “Taken by Storm” Essex and McKitrick. “Energy and Climate Wars” Michael J Economides, and a monster of a book called “Hubris” by Michael Hart.

22
0
Monro
Monro
1 year ago
Reply to  varmint

Thank you and very well done. Your efforts are very much appreciated.

‘Watts Up With That’ is, for me, a mine of information and really good for morale during this utter mind blowing lunacy…..again.

18
0
varmint
varmint
1 year ago

Germany and Denmark have the highest prices because they rely the most on wind. Yet I often hear the wind is FREE. I also often hear the renewables like wind are now cheaper than fossil fuels. ————-Ha ahahha aha.jeez— How vomit inducing are Green liars going to get before we rise up and vote these charlatans out? ——-But then you realise that the whole political class is in on this eco scam, so you can’t vote them out. It is bit like having the Wolves and the Lambs all eating the Rabbits.

53
-1
varmint
varmint
1 year ago

“The best scientific projections indicate that we have very little time left – indeed less than 100 months – in which to alter our behaviour drastically.”————–Projections are NOT science. They are the result of assumptions speculations and guesses put into a computer model. Computer models full of assumptions are NOT science. Which is why none of the climate models have matched what is actually happening in the real world. But as long as 85% or more of the public don’t realise that and think it is all about science then the eco socialists (which includes the King) are seemingly going to get away with the pseudo scientific fraud.

50
0
NeilofWatford
NeilofWatford
1 year ago

I confidently predict there will be no Labour Government.
Hung Parliament most likely, or slim Tory majority.
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. Or multiple mistakes.

24
0
DomH75
DomH75
1 year ago
Reply to  NeilofWatford

The biggest issue will be turnout: many Tories are so angry about the lockdowns and Net Zero that they claim they won’t vote for the party again – still my intention. Will fear of Labour’s genocidal ideas (the energy plans will cause death on a massive scale) persuade them to swallow their anger, will they vote Reform or Reclaim or will they simply not vote? Similarly, the SNP is self-destructing, but will that translate into Labour votes? If it does, that presents a significant problem. I’m afraid there’s a storm coming, whether it turns out to be red, blue or yellow clouds on the horizon. We have political parties that are in power for the sake of being in power, that would be delighted if most of the population just died and the rest could be turned into slaves.

38
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Reply to  DomH75

Frankly I am amazed that so many, still believe that Net Zero cobblers is a genuine policy owned and pushed by British politicians. It is nothing of the sort. This eco nuttery is being pushed by the Davos Deviants and our politicians are simply the foot soldiers in the same way they implemented the C1984 mayhem.

This is their reset and squabbling about which political party is less stupid than the next is barking.

Net Zero is just one phase in the plan to destroy the West, depopulate and enslave those who survive the cull – temporarily.

It appears a few people are still half asleep.

Our salvation will not arrive via the ballot box. (TM)

43
-1
LaptopMaestro
LaptopMaestro
1 year ago

He would certainly be worse for the UK than Biden is for the USA

22
0
DomH75
DomH75
1 year ago

Sri Lanka, here we come!!

32
0
RTSC
RTSC
1 year ago

We know exactly what reliance on wind and solar power will mean for the British people.

A return to the living standards of the Middle Ages. And that’s exactly what is being planned for us.

17
0
Covid-1984
Covid-1984
1 year ago

We all know Big Ears Windsor is a numpty but with regards to Starmer. Will we EVER be blessed with an intelligent leader in the nation again?

16
0
Sontol
Sontol
1 year ago

Excellent informative article.

In spite of the constant lies about ‘renewable’ power generation now being cheaper than its conventional counterparts I have always known intuitively that trying to grab energy directly from the wind and sun must be massively more expensive than utilising highly concentrated fossil fuel alternatives (coal, oil, gas etc).

However trying to dig out comparable cost figures from underneath the morass of direct and hidden subsidies plus deliberate deceptions involved in this area has proved to be almost impossible; so these clear-cut international numbers are an invaluable contribution to the debate.

The most useful are probably:

China: 8c per Kwhr / 55% coal / 6% renewables.

USA: 18c Kwhr / 11% coal / 6% renewables.

UK: 47c Kwhr / 3% coal / 10% renewables.

Enough said; and it is vital to remember that energy underpins just about every other domestic and commercial activity, in the light of which the UK economy and general material well-being of the population is in a fundamentally and entirely self-inflicted hugely undermined condition;

One which both the Conservative and Labour Parties seems determined to exacerbate rather than alleviate.

And in the latter case to ever increasingly grind down the already poorest and most vulnerable who both suffer first and heaviest from Net Zero measures, and Labour explicitly claim to most care for.

Keir (!) Hardie will be spinning in his grave.

Last edited 1 year ago by Sontol
2
0
Pembroke
Pembroke
1 year ago

I was watching one of my local wind turbines yesterday, it took approx 20 minutes to complete half a revolution. That’s the problem with weather systems that don’t move far with constant pressure, as we’ve been experiencing in the UK recently. There’s little or no wind.

4
0
SomersetHoops
SomersetHoops
1 year ago

Starmer is obviously an imbecile when it comes to economics and science. Please people who are not similarly imbecilic, don’t vote for him, or he will cripple our country more than the Tories already have.

3
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 38: Chris Bayliss on the Commonwealth Voting Scandal, Sarah Phillimore on the Bar’s Scrapped EDI Plans and Eugyppius on ‘White Genocide’

by Richard Eldred
30 May 2025
2

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Comedian’s Show Cancelled Over Liverpool Parade Crash Joke

30 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Did Muslim Home Office Staff Block Persecuted Christian Woman’s Asylum Claim?

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Comedian’s Show Cancelled Over Liverpool Parade Crash Joke

58

News Round-Up

41

Did Muslim Home Office Staff Block Persecuted Christian Woman’s Asylum Claim?

20

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

16

Are Schools Actually Institutionalised Childcare?

14

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Are Schools Actually Institutionalised Childcare?

30 May 2025
by Joanna Gray

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

POSTS BY DATE

June 2023
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« May   Jul »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

June 2023
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« May   Jul »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Comedian’s Show Cancelled Over Liverpool Parade Crash Joke

30 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Did Muslim Home Office Staff Block Persecuted Christian Woman’s Asylum Claim?

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Comedian’s Show Cancelled Over Liverpool Parade Crash Joke

58

News Round-Up

41

Did Muslim Home Office Staff Block Persecuted Christian Woman’s Asylum Claim?

20

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

16

Are Schools Actually Institutionalised Childcare?

14

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Are Schools Actually Institutionalised Childcare?

30 May 2025
by Joanna Gray

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences