- “A tribute to Jeremy Clarke” – Spectator Editor Fraser Nelson pays tribute to the Spectator’s Low Life columnist, who died yesterday at his home in France.
- “The best of Low Life: Jeremy Clarke remembered” – The Spectator has pulled together a few extracts from Clarke’s Low Life columns – some of them very, very funny.
- “Jeremy Clarke, Spectator magazine’s much-loved, funny and unsparing Low Life columnist” – Telegraph obit.
- “Martin Amis’s Comic Music” – Good piece in the New Yorker about Amis by literary Critic James Woods.
- “Howard Jacobson on Martin Amis: ‘His prose never begged to be loved – you either got it or you didn’t’” – Howard Jacobson pays tribute to the great comic novelist in the Telegraph.
- “South London council scraps planned LTN after huge outcry from residents” – Southwark Council has been forced into a U-turn over a planned LTN after the official consultation was bombarded with hundreds of angry responses, reports the Telegraph.
- “Low-traffic zones ‘just greenwashing’, says lobby group” – The Government has been accused of ‘greenwashing’ by supporting low-traffic zones since there’s no evidence they’re good for the environment, reports the Times.
- “U.K. faces ‘disastrous’ scenario if Russia cuts off vital links” – Fears are growing that Russia could target the arteries that keep the U.K. alive: Cables and pipes that carry everything from gas to electricity, banking data to military communications. The Daily Mail has more.
- “Michael Gove’s Department to spend £160,000 for staff to work from home” – The Department for Levelling Up has put out a tender asking for “chairs and desks for staff working from home, in order that the Department can fulfil its obligations of duty of care to its staff and their wellbeing”, reports the Mail.
- “Tagged A Racist Climate Denier, Anti-Authoritarian Professor Challenges Climate-Crisis, Diversity Narratives” – Nice profile of climate realist Dr. Matt Wielicki in the Cowboy State Daily.
- “Transgender rugby player bid to change laws banning players born male” – The ban on biological men playing women’s rugby was put in place after World Rugby found transwomen increase risk factors for biological women by as much as 30% due to power and strength differences, reports the Mail. Now a trans rugby player wants to overturn it.
- “No, a woman did not discover DNA” – Gavan Tredoux in Aporia Magazine debunks the myth Rosalind Franklin discovered DNA.
- “Biden White House and Big Disinformation have policies to ban ‘true content’ on Covid caccines” – How can social media companies police ‘vaccine misinformation’ when Big Pharma is paying them hundreds of millions for advertising, asks Paul D. Thacker at the Disinformation Chronicles.
- “Prime Minister vows to rip up sex education curriculum” – Rishi Sunak predicts that a consultation about sex education will find many parents are deeply unhappy about what their children are being taught in school and hints at big changes, reports the Mail.
- “Jeffrey Epstein ‘threatened to expose Bill Gates’ 2010 affair’” – Jeffrey Epstein used his knowledge of Bill Gates’s 2010 affair with a Russian bridge player to threaten the Microsoft billionaire, a bombshell new report claims. The Mail has the details.
- “The myth of New World genocide” – The story about New World genocide is a novel take on European colonialism that almost no historian agreed with prior to 2010. Why did so many suddenly start labelling it a ‘genocide’ overnight, asks Jeff Fynn-Paul in the Spectator.
- “At Oxford students now live in fear – they think cancelling each other will help them get ahead” – Brilliant account in the Telegraph by an anonymous member of the Oxford Feminist Society of what it’s like to be a student at Oxford, surrounded by the woke Stasi.
- “Those who want to silence free speech ‘do not speak for us’, says Oxford Union” – Members of the famous debating society have written a letter to the Telegraph condemning the abuse they’ve received for inviting gender-critical feminist Prof Kathleen Stock to speak.
- “The fight for free speech at Oxford” – Dr. Jan Macvarish, the Free Speech Union’s Education and Events Director, joins Christopher Snowdon and Tom Slater for the latest episode of Last Orders, a Spiked podcast, where they discuss the free speech crisis at Oxford, among other things.
- “She has every right to set out her case in the public square” – Yours truly on GB News defending the right of Kathleen Stock to speak at the Oxford Union and welcoming the recent interventions by Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor and Pro-Vice-Chancellor, who, along with the FSU, have forced the Students’ Union to do a U-turn about banning the Oxford Union from freshers’ fair.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I wrote a story today about Pfizer becoming a “corporate sponsor” of the Southeastern Conference (14 well-known colleges). In the story, I mention how ridiculous it is this sports league continues to push vaccines for student-athletes. I linked to two myocarditis studies (one showing 1-in-1000 risk, the other as low as 1 in 3000). I guess I need to go back into the story and add a link to this story/study.
I don’t think the 14 colleges of the SEC have thought enough about what this partnership could mean to them in the future. The potential liability is vast and they are not doing anything to improve their credibility with prospective future students.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-southeastern-conference-is-now
So, is the mRNA technique flawed across the board, for any “vaccine” drug, or just the Covid-19 one? Does anyone actually understand the biology of it (yet)? It wouldn’t be the first time that the company involved made serious mistakes.
What are the other mRNA drugs?
Genuine question.
You can find drug research reports on TrialSite News, SciTechDaily, Cnet Science, and sometimes even Interesting Engineering, to name but four…
Thank you. One has become far more curious of late…
They had ones to treat things like cancer a while back. But there were apparently a lot of problems with it.
Far more likely to cause cancer it seems….
Funny how that works. Whether it’s cancer or covid, mRNA gene therapy really seems to be gasoline on the fire!
Robert Malone has gone into detail about this. He asserts that the mRNA technology is sound, but the problem less with the genetically engineered spike protein and the delivery mechanism (e.g. lipid nanoparticles for Pfizer).
Personally, I have a fundamental problem with the idea of genetic treatment. Prefer nature to take its course and what will be will be.
So other than the delivery mechanism and the stuff inside the delivery mechanism, it’s sound?
The delivery mechanism and the spike protein inside it is pretty much the whole thing, isn’t it?
What else is there left?
Th delivery mechanism into the cell, not the delivery mechanism from the cell into the body i.e. the translation of the mRNA. Listen to Robert Malone.
Hey, I’m not promoting this sh*t, I’m just repeating what I’ve read/heard.
“What else is there left?”
The 5G chemicals?
Aside from ‘unknown’ substances related to the adjuvants, the information for which is currently withheld for commercial reasons, it contains yummy things like:
Polyethylene glycol: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251011/
Incomplete RNA which is still biologically active – and with unknown effects: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-the-cia-and-national?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#play
Mould: https://khn.org/news/article/pfizer-new-vaccine-plant-persistent-mold-issues-history-of-recalls/
Metal fragments: https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/international-research-groups-find-sharp-metal-objects-in-covid-vaccines-very-frightening/
Toxic metals: https://rumble.com/v1npo1k-dr.-mark-trozzi-toxic-metals-in-covid-shots.html
Other particulate contaminants: https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/failure-to-scale-covid-19-injection-vials-must-be-independently-tested-for-conformity-to-label.-9a77eba4
Others report such wonderful things as E coli, glass fragments, fibres, other diverse fragments – and a fly leg. Dr Hughes summarises some of the data here: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/52/96
To quote Alexandra Latypova – it really is a toxic garbage soup. https://rumble.com/v1p69bf-c-19-injections-regulatory-and-manufacturing-fraud-tessa-lena-tallks-to-ale.html
Thank you for submitting all these links.
Do you remember the scene from Disney’s Fantasia where the apprentice sourcerer is mixing up a spell? The list above shows that it is still about witch craft but using a lab rather than a cave, a white coat rather than a black cloak and pointy hat…
Good comparison: most people will remember The Sorcerer’s Apprentice scene in Fantasia.
Nature, by way of our immune system, is definitely not keen on any foreign body hijacking our body cells and rearranging their chemistry and function which is what virus and thecmRNA junk do. At the first sign, it sends T cells and cytotoxic agents to kill such cells. (And if those cells are in muscles, like the heart…)
That alone should tell us not to do it deliberately.
As I understand matters, and I do so in simple terms only, mRNA gene therapy was initially and still is used as a delivery system for cancer treatment by way of immunotherapy. Basically it seeks to turn on, or off, and thereby amplify, the activities of targeted cancer seeking cells, to enable them to destroy cells which have become cancerous. Look at CTLA-4, Jim Allison and Coley….Books, not google!
Used in this manner mRNA has great potential, but the downside is that it has to turn off elements of the immune system in order to work.
It didn’t take long for bigphama’s vaccinators/genetic engineers to realise mRNA would be the perfect delivery system for a new generation of “vaccines”.
However, the problem is they know next to nothing about how the immune system actually works (mind you, no one does) and, disastrously for the jabbed even less about the long term effects.
This paper gives a clue though:-
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
The paper also explains the inevitable blood clot risks.
Thanks for your response (and those from the others as well). The linked article is interesting, and I’m glad I didn’t accept the offer in March 2021. Then I said that I might change my mind when it becomes as established product. Not much chance of changing my mind now, given the emerging evidence.
Dr Palmer and Dr Bhakdi think it is. A quote from the article linked above: –
‘We note that the damage mechanism is which emerges from the autopsy studies is not limited to COVID-19 vaccines only but is completely general—it must be expected to occur similarly with mRNA vaccines against any and all infectious pathogens. This technology has failed and must be abandoned.’
Dr Bhakdi said at a recent MD4CE meeting that the human immune system is already perfect & adding anything to it will displace the balance. Good health, good diet, clean water, sunshine, fresh air & exercise are the best things to promote a healthy immune system.
And now they are trying to make mRNA flu jabs and RSV jabs and God only knows what else?
If it is getting into the bloodstream and producing an immune response there, that would suggest it’s a flaw in the design, clearly other vaccinations into the arm are not triggering a response like this.
Or a flaw in the administration of the stabs – the individuals who have been fast tracked into the role of “stabber” have not been aspirating the needle to check for blood to ensure the tip has not entered a vessel.
Probably both. The spike protein itself is toxic, and the mRNA technique goes everywhere in the body and makes it produce whatever protein it is designed to produce, ad infinitum.
Professor Sukharit Bhakdi posted on his Telegram group that it is now possible to distinguish the spike protein generated via the jab and the spike protein from the virus. He calls it a game changer.
Why is it a game changer?
Pathology.
The dead can’t lie… Hence the push & rush to destroy the evidence via cremation.
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651
The autopsy in Dresden of the 76yr old which Will described seems to be the first instance where this method was applied and this result obtained.
Hence a game-changer to Bhakdi.
Not sure whether he doesn’t know about the one of the 55yr old, or whether that was later, then used the same method etc..
As I understand it SARS Cov-2 is a respiratory tract infection therefore the only exposure is ‘air side’ so it’s not clear to me how it would get into the blood stream. The disease attacks the lungs not the circulatory system.
The injection on the other had goes into the shoulder, it was supposed to remain local but we now know for a fact that it does not, so it’s reasonable to assume it is reaching the blood supply (unless there is some plausible other route around the body that bypasses the bloodstream).
So given the above two statements, it’s not clear how a natural infection in the respiratory tract would cause an immune response in the circulatory system (it’s this immune response which causes the clots I believe), however it is very clear how a jab would cause this.
It seems too obvious to be true in all honesty, would anyone like to comment on my reasoning?
You are right. It is idiotic to inject someone in the deltoid for a virus which attacks your respiratory system. Blood poisoning is the only result. Akin to cutting off your hand to save your foot from gangrene.
All of these quacksines contain poisons, that most people can’t pronounce or spell. They don’t do anything against a virus, hence the quacksinated making up the 90% death rate ‘from’ rona. Follow the money is what they mean by follow the science. The speed of science means the velocity of money which can be made.
Indeed, there is no plausible mechanism for how an injection in the deltoid can induce mucosal immunity in the respiratory tract. That is why a nasal vaccine would theoretically make more sense than an injectable one, but so far no successful one has emerged yet.
“The speed of science means the velocity of money which can be made.”
I do hope John Campbell calls in here because he really did not understand ‘the speed of science’ and I am sure your explanation will help him and many others. It has certainly enlightened me.
Many thanks.
Look at any development project. The balance between development itself and testing, fixing, certification, obtaining approvals etc is probably in the ratio of 20%:80%. The “speed of science” was only possible because they didn’t follow all the testing and certification stuff.
The virus can sometimes enter the circulatory system VIA the lungs, of course, but usually it does not do so in quantities anywhere near large enough to even approach the level of spike protein from the jabs.
Wow, just lovely. But it couldn’t be the “safe and effective” jabs, no. It MUST be the virus, climate change, working too hard (per Billy Joel), or maybe even karma. But not the jabs!
There’s even some blaming artificial sweeteners!
There are swathes of people I believe who should definitely take the booster without delay; yup!
Does that make me a good person or a bad one?
Blessed are the unvaccinated, for they shall inherit the earth. Or at least the west.
Peace of mind – not having to worry about every little twinge: blessedness indeed.
I’m feeling pretty blessed at the moment
Does anyone know why MPs continue to,think the covid vaccines are safe and effective when the data says otherwise. I continue to get responses from our Mp Simon Jupp to say the vaccines are safe and effective. Isn’t it the responsibility of the MPs to be current on their information about covid vaccines as they are being doled out to every Uk citizen despite not having an efficacy or safety data and certainly no long term data.
I have to admit, if I were an MP I sure would like to be on the right side of this debate when certain people are dragged into court and found guilty of criminal negligence, wouldn’t you?
Just lovely. Today I found out that one of my FB friends has congestive heart failure and was told she could die suddenly. She just turned 38. Kinda young to have something like that. Sure enough, she was jabbed about a year ago, then got a really bad case of Omicron shortly after that put her in the hospital. And now this. So much for “safe and effective”, right?
Why hasn’t anyone addressed the fact that the very nature of mRNA vaccines means that they will cause automatic damage to the body?
Consider this, the mRNA vaccines function by causing healthy cells to present pathogenic spike proteins on their surface so that the immune system will respond. What is the immune response? The destruction of that cell!
Therefore, ANY cell that takes in that mRNA material and starts to make spike proteins will be targeted for destruction by the immune system! Whether it is heart calls, blood vessel cells, organ cells, or nerve cells, if they present the spike protein, they will be destroyed!
So at BEST these shots make your immune system target arm muscle cells, and at worst your own immune system will be targetting what would normally be healthy cells all through out your body!