• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Keir Starmer Could Roll Out London-Style Ulez Zones Across Britain if Labour Wins Election

by Toby Young
21 May 2023 1:00 PM

Labour has come under pressure to rule out expanding a Ulez-style emissions tax from London to other major cities in the U.K. if it wins the next election. MailOnline has more.

A policy document drafted by Sir Keir Starmer’s party backs the idea of ‘clean air zones’ in major urban areas alongside expansion of public transport.

London mayor Sadiq Khan is facing a major fight over the Ultra-Low Emission Zones scheme, which sees the worse-polluting vehicles hit with a £12.50 daily charge.

It currently only applies to cars, vans and lorries entering central London, but from August will be expanded to include all London boroughs.

Greg Hands, the Conservative Party chairman and MP for Chelsea and Fulham, told the Telegraph: “Khan’s cash-grab Ulez expansion is hugely unpopular here in London. Labour need to rule out these unpopular moves on hard-working residents of our great cities.”

The document, first reported by the Labour List website, recommends Labour “support the principle of Clean Air Zones”, but adds that they must be “phased in carefully… and should be accompanied with a just transition plan”.

They are already in place in Bath, Birmingham, Bradford, Bristol, Greater Manchester, Portsmouth, Sheffield and Tyneside.

Tory candidates to run against Mr Khan in next year’s London mayoral election have pledged to scrap the Ulez extension to outer boroughs.

But Sir Keir last week backed the expansion, saying Londoners risk getting lung cancer without it.

He admitted it was “a lot of money” for vehicle owners to pay.

Asked on LBC Radio whether he was fully behind Mr Khan’s expansion of London’s ULEZ, the Labour leader admitted: “There’s many people who will look at the scheme and say, ‘That’s a lot of money for me to pay.’”

Worth reading in full.

Stop Press: In the Telegraph, Ross Clark says the Ulez expansion scheme could be the end of Sadiq Khan’s disastrous misrule.

Tags: Clean Air ZonesSadiq KhanSir Keir StarmerUlez Expansion Scheme

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Book Your Tickets to the Free Speech Union’s Live Discussion With Matthew Goodwin

Next Post

Macron Hits Pause on Net Zero

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

49 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago

Mr Starmer wants to supposedly save UK lives with a policy that just happens to align with those of special interest groups while increasing military spending to allow more people far away to die for profit. If there’s that much concern for health and well being, the policies should be consistent. The obvious answer to this inconsistency is there is no genuine interest in the health of this population or any other.

Last edited 2 years ago by DHJ
101
-3
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

‘…increasing military spending to allow more people far away to die for profit’

What on earth are you talking about?

Poland has just ordered 1250 tanks. The Baltic States are increasing their defence spending, as are Finland, Sweden.

This country was a founder member of NATO 1949, signed the Budapest Memorandum guaranteeing Ukrainian territorial integrity in 1994, ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention in 1997.

Syria breached the Chemical Weapons Convention in 2013. Britain did nothing. Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014 and seized Crimea. Britain did nothing. Russia, having once more invaded Ukraine, now threatens Moldova and the Baltic States, potentially Poland, Sweden and Finland.

If the Baltic States are invaded by Russia, and they certainly believe they might be, as does Poland, Britain will have to respond militarily.

With a land war in Europe, if ever there was a right time to increase defence spending (in order to rebuild an expensively constructed conventional deterrence now clearly in ruins) now would be that time.

Or am I missing something?

10
-76
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

What you’re missing is that it simply doesn’t matter to us who rules which bits of Eastern Europe and never has.

The politicians who favour supporting Ukraine are the people who gave us lockdowns, population replacement, the tranny evil, increasing restrictions on freedom of speech and movement, the indoctrination of our children with PC nonsense, tens of millions of injections of dangerous gunk in response to a trivial virus, multiculturalism, Net Zero and second class status for the indigenous population.

Last edited 2 years ago by Nearhorburian
122
-3
NeilParkin
NeilParkin
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

Along with the other major powers we have de-nuded our arsenals to provide weapons for the proxy war, and turned the rest into woke versions of what used to be the greatest fighting services in the world. Right now I wouldn’t be confident of victory if the Isle of Man invaded us, never mind Russia. I reckon we’d have to capitulate in a week.

65
-1
ELH
ELH
2 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

I quite agree and further wonder why we are “disarming” ourselves by sending our weapons stocks to Ukraine to be blown up? We cannot replace them readily. Seems like “a cunning plan”. Nothing is as it seems in this conflict.

17
0
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

It matters very much to us now that the Baltic states are members of NATO.

It mattered very much to us that Ukraine gave up its nuclear warheads in 1994. That is why we guaranteed its territorial integrity in exchange for their surrender.

What signal does it send to the rest of the world if the only country ever to surrender its nuclear arsenal is then dismembered by invasion?

The signal is clear. That is why Iran, Saudi and the UAE (and Libya whilst under Gaddafi) now seek nuclear weapons.

And just how do you think that will play out?

So you see it matters very much to us. That is why we, and so many of our allies, are now, expensively, having to rebuild our entirely broken conventional deterrence; broken by the weakness, pusillanimity and short sightedness of you and so many others like you in this country.

5
-54
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

Don’t those countries want nukes because the racial supremacist state has them?

Didn’t South Africa give up its nukes?

And I’ve never been consulted about our armed forces, so I accept no responsibility for them. But I will point out that we haven’t been experiencing a Russian invasion over the last few years.

28
-4
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

If Iran has nuclear weapons, Saudi and UAE will develop/obtain nuclear weapons.

South Africa never tested a nuclear device.

They had some technology which they gave up, dismantled.

Regarding Russian invasions:

Article 5
The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Maybe pop down to Salisbury and chat to the locals about Russian invasions, then move on to Amesbury.

Let us know how you get on……

3
-30
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

Oh God, you’re so thick you believe the official narrative about Salisbury.

But, even if it were true, it hardly constitutes an invasion, does it?

Hundreds of thousand of barbarian invaders crossing the Channel, assisted by the RN, on the other hand….

39
-2
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

You haven’t been to Salisbury….or Amesbury…..ever…..have you?

Come back and let us know when you have.

2
-26
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

I’ve been to Salisbury – with a Finnish girlfriend! – but not Amesbury.

Why would I need to have gone to either to know that the official narrative is a pile of crap?

Last edited 2 years ago by Nearhorburian
29
-1
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

Because then you could talk to the friends and family of those who died and learn a thing or two…..

0
-24
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

“Those who died”

Didn’t only one person die?

Has there yet been an inquest into her death?

What exactly could I learn from her “friends and relatives”?

18
-1
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

You may be very relaxed about the death of a British citizen, another seriously affected and a police sergeant, badly injured, who lost his career, plus two Russians badly poisoned on British soil.

I will not be alone in finding that attitude very odd indeed.

Of course you will never go to Amesbury, but, if you did, I wonder very much what the locals would make of you and your callous, frankly bizarre, mentality.

Last edited 2 years ago by Monro
0
-21
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

Hi Monro. Tell me, which country is the only country to have actually used nuclear weapons in anger?

Last edited 2 years ago by Marcus Aurelius knew
19
-1
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

That very much depends on how you define nuclear weapons.

Typically they come under the heading NBC (Nuclear, Biological and Chemical) now called CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear)

The U.S.A. of course dropped two atomic bombs on Japan in 1945.

However CBRN weapons have been used through the ages, dating back to the siege of Troy and beyond.

0
-14
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

What you’re missing is that it simply doesn’t matter to us who rules which bits of Eastern Europe and never has.

… provided it’s the Russians and not the Germans, that is. Britain has fought two large wars in the last century to help with accomplishing that, the second one, supposed to become a finished business this time, ending with the violently enforced (by Russian soldiers) deportation of German farmers, villagers and small town people from all of eastern middle Europe.

4
0
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
2 years ago
Reply to  RW

I regard British participation in WW2 (and WW1, for that matter) as an utter disaster for our people.

14
-2
George L
George L
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

What an absolute load of garbage you talk sometimes Monro. So much so that I’ll not waste my time refuting your idiotic opinions. You read like a press release from Downing Street..

44
-4
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  George L

Thank you.

3
-25
George L
George L
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

You’re more than welcome. I always get a whiff of the 77th brigade when reading you..

35
-3
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  George L

I always enjoy the humour on here.

2
-22
George L
George L
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

Well you supply the majority of it.. bit conceited what!! 😉

21
-2
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  George L

You are far too modest.

1
-16
George L
George L
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

Yes.. I get it from Queer Smarmer who we’re meant to be discussing..

13
-1
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  George L

‘A modest man, with much to be modest about.’

1
-14
George L
George L
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

Well I’m calling you out Monro. As soon as you mentioned Syria using chemical weapons, which is a blatant, cooked up lie, I stopped listening to you.

30
-1
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  George L

Oh dear!

‘On 2 February 2023, the Director-General of OPCW and the Identification Team’s Coordinator briefed States Parties in The Hague on the Identification Team’s third report, in which it concluded that the Syrian Arab Air Force was responsible for chemical weapons use in an incident in Douma on 7 April 2018, killing at least 43 named individuals and affecting dozens of others………’

U.N. Security Council 9275 meeting 06 March 23

So, who to believe? The U.N. Security Council or some random numpty on here….

Tricky…..or not really…..

4
-24
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  George L

😀😀😀😀😀😃😃

13
0
DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

Didn’t the majority of people in Crimea vote that they join the Russian Federation?

Was the UK military not involved in increasing military ties with Ukraine prior to the Russian invasion? This would have been when it was also persistently reported that Ukraine had a Neo-Nazi problem.

Was the UK mainstream media not curiously silent on the conflict in Eastern Ukraine prior to the Russian invasion?

Was it not reported in 2021 that the UK plan was to significantly increase UK war spending over the following 4 years?

I would suggest that the UK Government, with media support, has been very active in order to get to something resembling the current situation.

51
-2
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

Nope. No. No. Nope again. And no, definitely not. But well done on the grammar and spelling.

2
-30
DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

Some examples.

From my MP, March 2021:

…let me turn to the defence budget and the role of the military.

 

The Prime Minister has recently announced what will be the largest UK military investment in the last 30-years, representing an extra £24.1billion over the next four years. This spending increase recognises the need for our Armed Forces to pursue a generational modernisation programme in order to defend the UK, our allies and the world’s most vulnerable people. This will also see the creation of a new agency dedicated to Artificial Intelligence, the formation of a National Cyber Force and a new ‘Space Command’, capable of launching the UK’s first rocket in 2022. These investments are both crucial to our national defence but also in our recovery from the pandemic, supporting jobs and industries in the UK.

 

Investment in defence also delivers real benefits to Scotland, particularly to Scottish shipbuilding and the thousands of service personnel based across Scotland. This is a real, long-term commitment to the growing numbers of personnel across Scotland, with £1.5 billion being invested in defence infrastructure for Scotland alone. The wider benefits for our economy are important too, as UK Defence spends £1.76 billion a year on industry contracts, supporting 10,200 Scottish private sector jobs.

https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/2018-12-06/ty-article/meet-the-lonely-ukranian-jew-fighting-his-countrys-new-fondness-for-nazis/0000017f-f452-d47e-a37f-fd7ee25a0000

https://wiesenthal-europe.com/en/news-releases-menu/15-news-releases-2016/255-wiesenthal-centre-to-nantes-mayor-ban-reportedly-neo-nazi-azov-battalion-meeting-bent-on-recruitment-of-french-youth

https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/ocha-ukraine-situation-report-17-feb-2022-enuk

https://counterhate.com/research/hatebook/

https://declassifieduk.org/uk-commanders-in-ukraine-met-neo-nazi-linked-national-guard-to-deepen-military-cooperation/

https://euromaidanpress.com/2022/02/17/now-its-official-ukraine-uk-poland-form-security-alliance/

13
-1
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

Britain can put one weak armoured brigade in the field with about 120 tanks

That’s it.

Poland just ordered 1250 tanks.

Russia isn’t going away.

If we do not deter them now, we will have to fight down the road.

And given the state of our armed forces, we will probably lose….

3
-16
DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

one weak armoured brigade

and zero diplomats.

8
-1
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

I very much agree that the world would be a much safer place if diplomats were made to serve on the front line.

2
-2
DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

My response with examples has been sent for approval.

7
-1
RW
RW
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

Didn’t the majority of people in Crimea vote that they join the Russian Federation?

Stalin deported the people of Crimea to other locations in Russia, creating the usual, depopulated wilderness he was so fond of. Present-day Crimea is a large Russian naval based and a city which has grown around that. These people, ie, Russian soldiers and civilians economically dependent on them –
unsurprisingly – voted to become Russian after Putin decided that he want to annex Crimea formally (instead of continuing to lease it from Ukraine). And that was doubtlessly a vote where everybody was free to chose between I want to become Russian and I want to be driven accross the border by Russian soldiers.

Last edited 2 years ago by RW
8
-2
George L
George L
2 years ago

Is this the same Smarmer that admitted openly on the BBC that he follows the lead of the WEF and not parliament? Oh.. and he’s a member of the Trilateral Commission.. the one world government pushers extraordinaire..

62
0
DHJ
DHJ
2 years ago
Reply to  George L

Apparently his colleague David Lammy is once again at the Bilderberg meeting along with Tom Tugendhat.

33
0
George L
George L
2 years ago
Reply to  DHJ

Yes.. I saw that DHJ.. the plotting both continues and thickens..

23
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
2 years ago

So, Starmer says Londoners risk getting lung cancer without “it” ie clean air zones.
Idiot. Has he ever measured the toxicity of the London Underground?

That said, I could name several candidates which have the proven capacity to elicit all sorts of cancers, starting with my old favourite – traditional vaccines, which have now been magnificently superseded by the mRNA covid jabs (but don’t worry, soon all jabs will be mRNA based.
If you want proof, digest this –

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X

I have yet to see any of this coherently criticised. If anyone would like to then please enlighten me.

Last edited 2 years ago by Sforzesca
34
0
George L
George L
2 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

Yeah.. he also needs to look to the sky occasionally and maybe comment on the obvious chemical trails being omitted from planes.

18
-2
RW
RW
2 years ago

The amazing thing about this ULEZ is that everybody may drive in it freely with any kind of vehicle provided he coughs up the money. Londoners are dying of air pollution but only if the polluters don’t pay £12.50 before doing their surely dirty work. Either Khan doesn’t really believe in his own back story or he’s selling the health of the people he claims to want to protect very cheaply.

31
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago

If anybody seriously believes that Kneel is concerned about Joe Public coming down with lung cancers they must have a hole in their head. And if anybody believes that Kneel believes that the climate in London is about to unleash a tsunami of cancers on the population then they deserve a hole in the head.

Lying Tw#t.

34
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I remember another politician who was not in the least bit concerned about Lung Cancer. ———–Gordon Brown. He gave tax relief on diesel cars to encourage us to buy them because they had less CO2 emissions than petrol ones, knowing full well that diesel is bad for lungs.

5
0
1984imminent
1984imminent
2 years ago

First they came for Leicester… (picked on as the epicentre of the tier 3 experiment)
Then they came for Oxford…
Then they came for London…

25
-1
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  1984imminent

“First they came for Leicester…”

Leicester was chosen by the Davos Deviants because the city rioted in the late 19th century when central government tried to impose the smallpox virus. The situation became so serious that the imposition was abandoned.

The DD’s do enjoy historical references in their kill games.

9
0
Smudger
Smudger
2 years ago

Who gives a fig what Starmer says he will do or what the Tories say Starmer will do for that matter. All establishment parties are taking their orders from the same unelected powerful organisations and individuals. For the last 30 years the only difference between Labour and the Tories is a matter of time.

Last edited 2 years ago by Smudger
19
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago

If we are all to have electric cars in the next 10 years why would you need a “low emission zone”. ——-Don’t electric cars have zero emissions already? The squiring parasite politicians just cannot seem to stop pretending to save the planet harder and faster than each other. They are determined to heap as much misery on the people who vote for them as they can.—— It is like a game of Climate Poker ——“I will venture 2 billion quid on Smart meters”————-“OK, I will see your 2 billion and raise you 8 billion on Hydrogen”———–Pretending to save planets is all the rage and very popular with the parasite class gravy train eco socialists which seem to comprise our whole parliament these days as not a single one of them asked a single question as to the cost/benefit of NET ZERO. It was simply waved through so they can all get on with their Climate Poker game.

13
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.37: David Frost on Starmer’s EU Surrender, James Price on Broken Britain and David Shipley on Lucy Connolly’s Failed Appeal

by Richard Eldred
23 May 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

News Round-Up

23 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

44

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

28

Trump Slaps 50% Tariffs on EU – as He Tells Starmer to Get Drilling for Oil

25

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

20

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

17

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Starmer Has No Intention of Cutting Immigration

22 May 2025
by Joe Baron

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The BBC’s Mark Poynting Shows How to Spread Climate Alarm

22 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

POSTS BY DATE

May 2023
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Apr   Jun »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

May 2023
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Apr   Jun »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

News Round-Up

23 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

44

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

28

Trump Slaps 50% Tariffs on EU – as He Tells Starmer to Get Drilling for Oil

25

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

20

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

17

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Starmer Has No Intention of Cutting Immigration

22 May 2025
by Joe Baron

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The BBC’s Mark Poynting Shows How to Spread Climate Alarm

22 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences