There was something vaguely familiar about the BBC’s Matt McGrath reporting that our “overheating” world was set to break the 1.5°C threshold within the next five years, meaning average global temperatures would be 1.5°C warmer than they were in the second half of the 19th Century. At the same time last year, McGrath told us there was a 50-50 chance the world would hit 1.5°C “over the next five years”. And the year before that, BBC Science Editor David Shukman reported it was likely that the key 1.5°C “global temperature limit” would be broken – yes you guessed it – “in one of the next five years”.
But it might not surprise you to learn that this particular alarmist song has been around for even longer than its recent reappearance in the charts. In early 2019, the Guardian reported that “within five years”, global temperatures could temporarily climb to 1.5°C above 19th Century levels. The Guardian noted the view of the Met Office that previous results had “demonstrated the accuracy of such decadal reports”, which were said to cover the ground between short-term weather forecasts and long-range climate models. For its part, the Met Office stated as far back as 2017 there was a 39% chance of one month at 1.5°C within – you guessed it – five years.
Missing from all these stories is the admission that the 1.5°C threshold has no basis in science and is just a political invention designed to hasten the implementation of Net Zero. Suggestions that the planet will encounter ‘tipping points’ are pseudoscientific fear-mongering produced by climate models fed with improbable climate data. As we have noted, the recently published Clintel report –The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC – showed that about half the work produced by the IPCC and the wider scientific community is corrupted by incorporating predictions of up to 5°C warming within 80 years. It is a fair comment to say that almost nobody now believes these predictions are remotely plausible.
The other major problem in promoting Thermogeddon is that global warming ran out of steam 25 years ago. The high point of the small jump in temperatures from 1980 occurred in 1998, and current readings are similar to this day. Two inconvenient long pauses during the current century were separated by a small uptick in warmth caused by a very powerful El Nino natural oscillation around 2016.
There may well be some warming caused by humans burning fossil fuel during this period but it seems you need a vivid imagination and a well-prompted climate model to spot it. It can be argued that surface temperatures measurers have done their best to get them through the heat drought with large retrospective additions of warming, poor siting of measuring devices – airport runways an obvious cause of concern – and big boosts from growing urban heat distortions. But there is a feeling that the gig is up on global warming unless some proper heat makes a long overdue appearance.
In fact, the current linear temperature pause – which is about nine years old – could be broken since an El Nino is likely to become apparent in the Pacific ocean in the next few months. The alarmists and their trusted messengers are in two minds about how to play this. McGrath reports that the chances of temperature movement are rising “due to emissions from human activities and a change in weather patterns expected this summer”. Of course, El Nino, which transfers huge amounts of heat around the planet, is a natural recurring event. Getting rid of the pesky pause, as in 2016, will be welcome, but drawing too much attention to El Nino will suggest temperature movement is largely a product of natural influences.
This of course opens the Pandora’s Box that has been firmly sealed by the ‘settled’ science community as far as the important role played by natural influences is concerned. On page 59 of its latest Sixth Assessment Report, the IPCC’s “best estimate” for warming since 1850-1900 is 1.06°C. It attributes between –0.1°C to +0.1°C to natural causes – give or take zero, in other words. The suggestion that all the warming over the last 120 years is down to the activities of humans is relentlessly promoted as a settled gospel truth. It is an interesting position to hold that all the changes in the climate before the 20th century were caused by natural influences, and yet they somehow ceased playing a part from that date onwards.
There are many scientists who dispute that it is only humans controlling the climate thermostat. Heat exchanges from the tropics to the poles, ocean currents of countless durations and size, changing amounts of heat from the sun, all operate in a chaotic non-linear manner to make climate modelling a largely fruitless, if politically necessary, activity.
Recent findings from six top international scientists revealed that the Northern hemisphere may be entering a temperature cooling phase until the 2050s, with a decline of up to 0.3°C. Led by Nour-Eddine Omrani of the Norwegian Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, the scientists say that the North Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), an important current that has been pumping warmer water into the Arctic, is weakening, and that’s leading to a cooler North Atlantic area and lower temperatures, as was observed in the period 1950-1970.
Observational evidence seems to lend some credence to the Omrani findings that puts the AMO at the centre of changes in the Arctic’s short-term weather and longer term climate. Over the last few years, the extent of summer sea ice has made a small recovery, while the vast Greenland ice sheet last year could, within a reasonable margin of measurement error, have increased in size.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.
Stop Press: Net Zero could push British energy bills up by £120 a year to fund the development of hydrogen gas, reports the Telegraph.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Gee I wonder if it has to do with the curious correlation to the rolling gout of a novel medical product with a host of known side effect profiles? I also have no doubt that closing hospitals down on and off for a year and limiting healthcare for two years will have detrimental effects. Mindless idolatry and financial incentives kept any dissenting thoughts from healthcare workers away from top of mind, free to work on their social media dance routines
https://odysee.com/@AnotherFrog:7/TIKTOKNURSES:c
I don’t disagree with anything in your post…but a relative is currently on a waiting list of a waiting list for cancer treatment…..so I’m seeing the ineptitude and feeling the unconscionable delay very personally….
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/12/09/cancer-centres-could-treat-3500-patients-month-gather-dust/
The oncologist Karol Sikora has been talking about the closed cancer centres for months…it’s a National Scandal….
Get them opened….
The UK committed £2.3 billion to Ukraine last year……it’s estimated that £3 billion was spent in 2022 on ‘hosting’ refugees (I’d argue most were illegal immigrants)…and I suspect the estimate is way under the true cost….
In October ministers agreed a £930 million advertising budget for the Government…..
thatwould open these hospitals wouldn’t it?
I could go on and on…..
“Musk to take on PayPal as Twitter prepares to launch online payments”
Musk is a controversial character and did say he wanted to build a Chinese WeChat style mega App for everything, including payments, that can obviously eventually be co-opted, incorporate all the social credit scoring nasties you can think of and turned against its users, but right now the awake not woke are aided by his financial and vocal support for his occasionally traditional Western cultural beliefs.
No one is perfect, we’re all allowed a diversity of opinions, for now.
It will be interesting to see whether a Twitter on-line payments service is used to promote cryptocurrencies and the underlying blockchain technology. I’ll keep using cash where I can.
Increasingly Twitter is ground zero for free debate, and here are some short yet interesting twitter threads on Ukraine’s biolabs, touching the history of the Russian conflict and potential R&D of Covid.
Sadly one must labour doing their own research in this time, checking the source of claims, their provenance and their evidence, and the quality, strength and provenance of that evidence. This is the reason why most people believe the television, because few have the time, resources or perhaps inclination to bother, that was the remit of journalists. Unfortunately legacy media auto cue readers aren’t your parents journalists.
https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/1619886319181905922
https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/1620156400893829120
https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/1619955400316690433
A video from JudicialWatch on the US funding of the labs through FOIAs
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1619980637766815744
And a deeper look at the latest fraudsters that were moonlighting as establishment dis- and mis-informationistas, providing cover while doing the establishments bidding
https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1620226975465107457
Eventually there will be wholesale rejection of the West’s woeful current cultural and social trajectory but who knows how long it will take.
Perhaps before our share of global GDP shrinks to inconsequential levels or perhaps after.
Maybe it will start politically or maybe through violence, and maybe initiated internally or perhaps externally. Though for external confrontation we have to have something desirable, and in a future world where London’s financial and professionals clout is hijacked by regulation, why bother when there’s bigger populations in more tempting parts of the world?
When the West is not rotting from within it has shown its people physically strong, innovative and well organised, capable of excellent administration. A good work ethic has even been known. These traits are king. The Jordan Peterson article about a counter-WEF highlighting Western and corporate successes is a great antidote to the perma-crisis charlatans and gangsters that seem to occupy most of our rotten institutions.
My favourite investigative journalist, the walking encyclopedia that is Whitney Webb, talking here ( 24mins duration ) about the new chief scientist for the WHO, Jeremy Farrar and the plans of this organization, with some very disturbing revelations. It seems there is no getting away from these control freaks and their obsession with transhumanism.
https://odysee.com/@IvorCummins:f/Whitney-Webb-Exposes-Scary-Truths-About-WHO–New-Chief-Scientist-Farrar:4
… Whitney, along with people like Aaron Mate, Max Blumenthal, Rogan and Brand, and many other ‘citizen journalists’….are giving the public much more investigative and better information that the MSM…who I don’t think will ever recover…
James O’Keefe from Project Veritas hit the nail on the head…
“For those who don’t like the video having 30 million views
Ask yourself: Why does Project Veritas even have a mission?
If YouTube weren’t taking down our video, and large multinational corps weren’t telling journalists not to cover stories, there wouldn’t be a need for people like me…”
Thanks Mogs. An informative although disturbing vid.
I have been reading up on Farrar these last few months and he is seriously evil. Very much a Billy buddy. He has been involved in the Eugenecist movement pretty much all his adult life and is a very, very evil piece of a crap. For the last forty years his MO mirrors that of Carnage Carney I.e. in the shadows and below the radar. I suspect however as his hubris and self-aggrandisement gets the better of him this next couple of years his notoriety will become more widely known.
The NHS was advertising for Diversity Officers and Events Managers in spring 2020, during what we were told was the worse pandemic in history.
**
First Friday Freedom Drinks For all freedom lovers to meet.
Friday 3rd February 7pm
The Foundry Bell
London Rd,
Wokingham RG40 1RD
**
Stand in the Park Make friends & keep sane
Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Elms Field
near Everyman Cinema & play area
Wokingham RG40 2FE
And yet again, one more article by Heneghen and Jefferson looking at causes of excess death that are not “vaccine” related. And there’s that title ‘Professor’ once more..How disillusioned I’ve become with that once highly respected title. I’m glad it’s not just me but somebody in the comments has said how disappointed she is that they aren’t tackling the glaringly obvious.
Edit; Actually Tom Jefferson replies in the comments as to the reason they won’t be addressing the jabs as a possible cause. I had no idea, interesting….
I found his reply somewhat illogical and evasive, my comments in italics.
“….It is a good thing to propose an investigation such as you are doing (she suggested investigating vaxx as possible cause). However, I am not quite sure the logistical implications of such an undertaking are clear (but he goes on to sort of outline them below). Both Carl and I are signees of the motion that led to the release of the Pfizer Biological Licensing Application to the FDA papers. See here for a list of names:
https://phmpt.org
and here:
https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
for an idea of the size of task for one initially configured vaccine (it’s a big task – maybe, but so what?). To this sizeable documentation add all possible variation in content (vaccines are biologics, they do not have a chemical formula), across the scores of marketed vaccines plus post marketing data. To undertake an impartial review you would need a group of reviewers at arm’s length from anyone involved in the decisions and or course a truly independent funder. It is impossible to estimate the time that this would take and the potential benefits as well as the potential risks would have to be taken into account to provide balance”
So the “vaccine” industry has made trillions, it’s our money, but proper safety and efficacy analysis would be too tricky, cost too much? Is he saying that finding out if vaccines are killing people en masse isn’t good use of public money? It just doesn’t stack up. Any thorough investigation into excess deaths is going to be complex and challenging, yet there they are speculating away about everything except the vaccines. It just looks like they are rationalising their position which is most likely driven by wanting to keep their funding so they can carry on doing valuable work – a defensible position, IMO, though in an ideal world not one they would feel they needed to take.
I find it quite telling that a lot of the medical people who have spoken out about covid are either most likely economically secure (Malhotra?) or retired. That in itself tells a story.
Yes I agree. I’m wondering just how conflicted they are. The authors are another pair of experts I’d like to get viewpoints from off the record as I’d imagine what they have to say in private on the matter of excess deaths and the jabs is very different to what they’re at great pains to avoid saying in public. It’s just beyond ridiculous now, given the amount of subjects they’ve covered regarding causation for the excess deaths. They’re obviously content remaining in their comfort zone and avoiding controversy or inviting unwanted attention. And isn’t Prof Heneghen employed by the NHS? But it does make a mockery of his full job title though.
I can’t view comments, only replies, so it doesn’t have much context….
One thing I would say is that they don’t mention the withdrawal of antibiotics for ‘Covid’ patients…..as Jikky has mentioned…3 tablets of Azithromycin could treat bacterial pneumonia…so people might have survived had it been used?
So, while a co-infection might be a reason for a ‘Covid death’…surely the withdrawal of an effective treatment might have an huge effect?
..bit gobbledygook… what I’m trying to say..did the co-infection cause the death…or the lack of treatment of the co-infection? Which, if it had been treated, would not have resulted in a ‘Covid death’?
If you need a reminder that there are good people in this world who will never give up and are prepared to show some leadership you only have to look to Vera Sherav. Watch her interview on last week’s Highwire. She’s produced a documentary series called “Never Again is now Global” see website
http://www.neveragainisnowglobal.com.
Thanks rachel. Watched and signed up.
To Kevin Bass
Well said, hear hear!
Real humanity and intelligence begins by admitting your mistakes and then learning from them.
There’s a lot of that to be done from many different high profile people
O.K…I’m JK Rowling…I have written a set of classical children’s books that will be read, enjoyed and loved by millions, for many years to come…and the people reading them won’t care about my political attitude, either way.…
I have taken a stance against extreme transgender indoctrination, and the vast vast majority of people agree with me….
My personal fortune is somewhere north of £800 million pounds…..
Now, am I worried that woke gamers are distancing themselves from me?
Let me think….?
LOL!
Got round to watching this JC entry today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSzar6T3zJw&list=WL&index=5 “Pfizer Issue a Press Statement”. A few minutes for those with a certain sense of humour.
JC plays this very well.
Re the Sam Smith video: just what constitutes pornography these days?
I heard a snippet on the radio this morning about how the online safety bill will protect children against pornography. After watching the Sam Smith video at the weekend (which I do not advise) I felt like Mary Whitehouse with the language I used. I have never before wanted to unsee something so badly. Just because there was no genitalia on display that is acceptable viewing for children?
I didn’t think there was a downside to switching off live television three years ago, but I obviously haven’t realised how bad the world has got.
….and all the while BigPharma does what it does….what it’s always done….
(N.B J+J have a net worth of $400+ billion)…..
A federal court said Monday Johnson & Johnson can’t rely on a bankruptcy filing to resolve multibillion-dollar litigation related to its baby powder. In response, JNJ stock tumbled.
The decision upends Johnson & Johnson’s efforts to shift some 38,000 legal claims to the subsidiary it now calls LTL Management.
J&J created the division and filed for bankruptcy in 2021, saying that would offer an easier route to resolution for thousands of people who claim the company’s baby and talcum powders led them to develop cancer.
(J+J have a net worth of $400+ billion)…..!
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/djokovic-prince-of-dissidents-thrashes-gates-the-glum/
A bit of a limp wristed piece but worth reading for the pictures of Billy Boy who is looking decidedly pfissed off as Djokovic does the job.
Bill Gates video clip re Epstein relationship
If you haven’t seen this, it is definitely worth a watch – his body language throughout the last few years has been highly revealing, but this clip even more so, IMHO.
https://rumble.com/v27r5vc-things-get-awkward-when-bill-gates-is-confronted-about-jeffrey-epstein-conn.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab
I got the distinct impression that Billy was suffering from ‘twitchy bottom syndrome’ in this vid. Quite enjoyable
Totally agree, HP – he is not a good liar…
Can’t add much to this!!
Michael P Senger
@MichaelPSenger
Just in: Biden to end the national COVID-19 emergency on May 11.
Some “emergency” that it can simply be ended on an arbitrary date several months down the road. The only purpose of such a years-long “emergency” is to bypass the legislature. An Orwellian farce.
Cochrane Review of masks & other interventions re disease control in the last few years.
Sceptics 1 Interventionists 0
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full
You have to ask how much actual evidence will put a stop to the mask nutters, but with a ‘religion’..it’s very difficult….
It really only confirms what many of us knew before the ‘great mask reset’ of 2021…’
The data speaks for itself: there is no significant advantage to wearing masks, be it surgical or N95. People have been lied to and thoroughly mis-lead….
Anyone asked Trish Greenhalgh to comment…? LOL!
It’s making waves on Twitter&co.
One of Germany’s top mask proponents, Dr. Scheuch, on whose studies a lot of the German mask fetishism was and is based, has thrown in the towel on the back of that report.
Hand washing and disinfection is equally useless as of that review.
So, I am a bit more optimistic that this could be the nail in their coffin.
Bring the popcorn.
One of his tweets today.
He is a physicist and aerosol scientist and businessman, see his Wikipedia page for more info.
A Cochrane Review is the highest level of evidence in scientific research, so no wonder he threw in his towel. Any shred of credibility he had left would have been in tatters.
“Biden to end Covid emergencies on May 11th” – The emergencies have been repeatedly extended by Biden since he took office in January 2021, but are finally set to expire in the coming months, according to the Mail. But will it mean the end of the ban on the unvaccinated entering the country?
He is ending it on May 11, 2023, exactly three years to the day after South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem lifted all statewide Covid restrictions (which were barely any to begin with) on May 11, 2020. And in terms of cumulative all-cause excess deaths, South Dakota ended up an average state by now. They had their worst wave BEFORE the jabs, not after, so even Delta had no teeth over there.
“Biden to end Covid emergencies on May 11th”
What exactly is Sleepy Joe expecting to happen between now and May 11th?
Another wave of the C1984? Alphabet variety ‘zx 4468 X 797?’
If you want to sit down with a cuppa and watch a truly evil psychopath, spouting non-science hypocrisy you will ‘enjoy’ this two-part story about Dr Peter Hotez…who I’m sure many of you are familiar with…
..the fact that these creatures have so much power is insane….
”Who is Peter Hotez? This doctor is on the shortlist to replace Dr. Fauci but is he any better? Or could he possibly be worse? We look at his track record from Ebola to Covid to Bill Gates. Yep, it’s all in there.…”
If you are not familiar with ‘Redacted with Clayton Morris’ on YouTube, he’s well worth a follow….
(Part1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lVbMCVlpkY
(Part2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7Td291R0YM
Another philanthropath. Or is that villainthropist?
This….
Andrew Bridgen@ABridgen
I was suspended from the Conservative Party for having serious concerns about the harm that ‘vaccines’ cause.
Nadhim Zahawi has been fined for tax avoidance and breaking the ministerial code and he’s still a Conservative MP.
Funny old world, isn’t it?
Well, if I was Andrew Bridgen I would be very, very angry and as a consequence looking for every opportunity to undermine and besmirch the leadership. Nothing to lose.
Stick the boot in Mr Bridgen.
And if he has problems with his local Party, he could try standing as an independent and win quite well in the next GE. There have been occasions like that for other reasons.
Absolutely John.
https://thecountersignal.com/covid-deaths-in-canada-almost-doubled-in-2022-with-a-85-vaccinated-population/
With 85% of the population injected with poisons Canada is suffering.
“Health Canada no longer provides data on death by vaccination status. As such, there’s no way to decipher which deaths in 2022 were among vaccinated populations and which were among unvaccinated.”
No surprises there then.
ONS weekly deaths publication out today
Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional: week ending 20 January 2023
Excess deaths (the red bars in my chart) in all the older age groups in the first 3 weeks even when you control for population and ageing of the population. And this is despite improvements in mortality up to about 2019
And excess mortality in every age group in the second half of 2022 even when you control for population and ageing (all the blue bars are above the zero excess line).
In the first half of 2022 the excess doesn’t extend into the older age groups once you control for population and ageing hence some negative yellow bars. Probably due to the lack of ‘dry tinder’ effect in those older age groups. But that lack of ‘dry tinder’ effect seems to have run its course and since mid 2022 mortality back to being high in the older age groups
And this is the excess chart for the whole of 2022 controlling for ageing and population.
You can see the excess mortality in all the younger age groups, something missed by some of the more superficial articles on the daily sceptic that just look at age standardised mortality.
And the illusion that mortality isn’t running high in the older age groups that this chart (or looking at the crude measure of age standardised mortality gives) hides the current trend since mid-2022 of high mortality in those older age groups. See the half year splits.
I also don’t agree with the view that there hasn’t been significant mortality effects in the older age groups in 2022 because of the vaccines and/or disastrous pandemic response based on the fact that age standardised mortality has been undeniably low in 2022.
I would argue that there has been a clear mortality effect (see the top of the two charts attached below for England) because the solid blue line is above the dotted blue line, based on the trend of improving mortality in the older age groups up to 2019 and because 2022 follows two harsh years of mortality in 2020 and 2021 (lack of ‘dry timber’ affect). Older people have died in 2022 because of the vaccines and lockdown harms.
Judging it based on the bottom graph doesn’t seem to reflect the trend of what was happening up to 2019.
That said judging it based on total deaths being higher than some sort of say 5 year average of some non-pandemic years without adjusting for population or population ageing, i.e. the red line being above some version of the dotted red line (depending on which average is used), which is what many headline claims of excess deaths in the elderly are based, is somewhat broad brush, albeit it gets the general point across
Latest JC story about the 77th brigade, published in the last 24 hours: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6THYNgk8Ew&list=WL&index=2