On many issues – lockdowns, Net Zero, free speech, wokery, to name a few – the Daily Sceptic and Spiked are usually on the same page. Links to its articles frequently appear in our bulletins. However, one area where, since early 2021, we have diverged sharply is on Covid vaccines. At TDS we have maintained a sceptical guard against the often overhyped claims of safety and efficacy put out by Government and other sources. Articles questioning them – often by experts in the field – have become part of our standard fare. Spiked, on the other hand, has stuck firmly to its pro-vaccine position. Not a single article questioning the Government line on vaccine safety and efficacy has ever, to my knowledge, graced its pages – though despite this, to its credit, it has (mostly) maintained a firm line against vaccine coercion.
Rarely has this difference been so apparent as in a piece this week by Deputy Editor Fraser Myers that can only be described as a brutal polemic against Andrew Bridgen, the U.K. Member of Parliament who has been vocal in his criticism of the Covid vaccines and was last month kicked out of the Conservative Party.
The article, titled ‘The delusions of Andrew Bridgen‘ and setting the dismissive tone with its opening line, “It can be tempting to ignore the antivax conspiracy theorists”, contains many errors of fact, as well as misrepresentations. Many readers, I imagine, will be left wondering why a website that they read for viewpoints not found in the mainstream seems unwilling to countenance the possibility that the Government’s line on the vaccines might – just might – be skewed by the vested interest it has in claiming the vaccine rollout as a big success, or that all the independent experts who have stuck their heads above the parapet to urge caution might – just might – be saying something worth listening to.
Well, be that as it may, what we have instead is Myers’ attack on one of the few MPs raising these issues that are clearly of some concern to a number of his constituents and the medical experts he’s in contact with. Perhaps it would have been better if Myers had ignored him. But seeing as he didn’t, and in the spirit of rational debate rather than name-calling, I will endeavour to respond to Myers’s characterisation of him as an “antivax conspiracy theorist”.
One of the difficulties in responding, though, is that not all of Myers’s claims are backed up with sources or evidence. This makes it hard to know what he’s basing his statements on, or even at times what he’s referring to. For instance, he mentions a “now-infamous Westminster Hall debate last December” in which Bridgen “reeled off a list of academic papers, citations and statistics, all purporting to show that the vaccines are doing more harm than good (much of it based on misinterpretations or perhaps misrepresentations of the data)”.
But there was no Westminster Hall debate on vaccines in December 2022 (though there had been several in previous months). Rather, on December 13th there was a House of Commons debate on vaccine harms, led by Andrew Bridgen, and presumably it is this that Myers is referring to. Exactly why he deems this debate to be “now-infamous” is unclear, as is why he describes Bridgen’s citations as being “based on misinterpretations or perhaps misrepresentations of the data”.
Myers clearly regards Bridgen’s claim that the mRNA vaccines may be doing more harm than good to be nonsense, but in fact it is well-supported by evidence. For instance, British Medical Journal Editor Dr. Peter Doshi along with Dr. Joseph Fraiman and colleagues examined the data from the vaccine clinical trials and found that, compared to controls, the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of 10.1 events per 10,000 vaccinated for Pfizer and 15.1 events per 10,000 vaccinated for Moderna. When combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated, or 1 in 800. The authors note that these adverse event rates were considerably higher than the observed reductions in COVID-19-related hospitalisation rates, meaning the findings imply that among trial participants the vaccines were doing more harm than good.
Similarly, Dr. Kevin Bardosh and colleagues – hailing from the Universities of Harvard, Oxford, Johns Hopkins, Edinburgh and Washington, among others – found that for every COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented by boosters in previously uninfected young adults, 18 to 98 serious adverse events occurred, including 1.5 to 4.6 cases of booster-associated myocarditis in males. That’s more harm than good, at least for healthy young adults.
Does Myers deem Bridgen to be misinterpreting or misrepresenting these studies, or does he think these studies are themselves misinterpreting or misrepresenting the data? He doesn’t tell us.
Myers’s next objection is to Bridgen calling the vaccines “experimental gene therapy”. He writes:
Bridgen refers to the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA jab as “experimental gene therapy”. This technology is certainly novel. Rather than using a neutralised version of an infection or a close cousin, the mRNA vaccines deliver instructions to human cells which induce an immune response. The successful deployment of mRNA in the Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines marked a major scientific breakthrough. But these vaccines are not ‘experimental’, as they have gone through clinical trials. Nor are they ‘gene therapy’, as they make no changes whatsoever to a patient’s DNA.
What Myers is overlooking here is that while the vaccines were approved for use under an emergency provision, the Phase 3 trials were still some years from completion. An open letter from more than 60 doctors and scientists to the MHRA in May 2021 spelled this out. They wrote:
All Phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials are ongoing and not due to conclude until late 2022/early 2023. The vaccines are, therefore, currently experimental with only limited short-term and no long-term adult safety data available. (emphasis added)
It is also of significance that the products were tested only under the less-stringent safety protocols for vaccines, not under the more-stringent requirements for novel genetic products, as the HART group explained in October 2022:
The U.K. drug regulator, the MHRA, did not carry out the toxicity, biodistribution and pharmacokinetics studies that are required of new drugs because of the political pressure to approve. However, nearly two years have passed since then and the MHRA has not set a deadline for the pharmaceutical companies to provide these data. The MHRA allowed the treatments to be presented as vaccines like any other when they are a novel class of agents, never before approved for human use despite the technology being around for decades (mostly because they have been dangerous and ineffective in previous human trials).
Myers’s claim that the vaccines are not ‘gene therapy’ because “they make no changes whatsoever to a patient’s DNA” misses the fact that from a regulatory point of view gene therapy products include not only those which alter DNA but also those which “alter the biological properties of living cells“.
This is why Moderna’s November 2018 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registration statement says that its “mRNA [technology] is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA”.
Likewise, the September 2019 BioNTech SEC Registration notes that “[In] the United States, and in the European Union, mRNA therapies have been classified as gene therapy medicinal products”.
Myers is wrong: mRNA vaccines are classed as gene therapy products.
A particularly odd point in Myers’s article is when he says that Bridgen is “inconsistent” because he claims not to be opposed to vaccines in general, “only the ‘experimental gene therapy’ mRNA variety”. Myers notes that Bridgen regrets taking two doses of the AstraZeneca jab, which he points out “is not an mRNA vaccine (it uses a chimpanzee adenovirus to induce immunity to Covid)”. He adds: “When a BBC employee reportedly died following complications from the AstraZeneca vaccine, Bridgen blamed it on ‘experimental treatments‘.”
Leaving aside the reference to the BBC employee (presumably Lisa Shaw) “reportedly” dying from the AstraZeneca vaccine (Shaw’s death wasn’t merely “reported” as such, it was found by the coroner to be so), Myers here appears to be oblivious to the fact that the adenovirus vector vaccines also involve using genetic material (in their case DNA) to ‘reprogramme’ cells to make SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. His description implies that the chimpanzee adenovirus induces immunity to Covid directly. But in fact the adenovirus is just a vector or carrier, like a box, into which has been inserted the DNA encoding for the spike protein. The adenovirus vector is the vaccine’s way of getting the genetic code into the cells. This is no less “altering the biological properties of living cells” and thus a gene therapy product than the mRNA vaccines, and Bridgen is right to place them under the same umbrella.
Lastly, Myers gets onto the frequency of vaccine injuries. “Potential” vaccine harms like myocarditis and blood-clotting are “incredibly rare”, he says, quoting ONS data showing that by December 2022 “just 47 deaths in England and Wales where the underlying cause was a Covid vaccine” were recorded. Gotcha! Except, of course, in the censorious climate that prevailed during the pandemic doctors registering deaths would be very reluctant to identify a vaccine as the underlying cause of death without some strong grounds for certainty such as an autopsy. Much safer just to write the condition that was responsible for the death, rather than speculating on the role of the vaccine in inducing it. A more realistic estimate of reported vaccine deaths comes from the MHRA’s Yellow Card adverse event reporting scheme, which has logged around 2,500 U.K. deaths. These are all deaths which those who filed the report (mostly medics and healthcare practitioners) suspect were due to the vaccine that the deceased had recently received.
Myers has a few words to say about the Yellow Card scheme. He accepts that by November 2022 “the MHRA had received and analysed nearly 178,000 such cards for the Pfizer vaccines, 247,000 for the AstraZeneca jab and 47,000 linked to Moderna”. But while these “may sound like large numbers”, he says, “we shouldn’t forget the size of the vaccinated cohort – the U.K. has handed out more than 151 million doses of vaccine and has double-vaccinated almost nine in 10 residents”. Let’s leave aside whether 90% of the population has really been vaccinated (more realistic estimates from polls and the NIMS database suggest it’s more like 75% of adults who’ve had at least one dose). The key point is that Myers doesn’t offer any comparison data to tell us whether 472,000 Yellow Cards for 151 million doses is high or low, worrying or normal. Similar figures for the U.S. indicate that the reported vaccine fatality rate is still over 20 times higher for Covid vaccines than it is for flu vaccines, even taking into account the total number of doses distributed. The same data also indicate there has not been any great degree of over-reporting during the pandemic as there was no increase in death reports linked to other (non-Covid) vaccines. In the U.K., the reporting rate for non-COVID-19 Yellow Cards actually fell by 16% from 2020 to 2021.
Myers states that “the overwhelming majority of these reports relate to reactions at the injection site or include things like sore arms, dizziness, nausea, headaches and fatigues”. This is true, and I don’t believe anyone claims otherwise, although Myers writes that “for Bridgen every Yellow Card is to be taken as evidence of serious vaccine injury”, though, again, no source is provided for this. He then quotes Bridgen saying that Yellow Card reporting represents “only 10% of the true rate of serious adverse events”, which seems to contradict his claim as Bridgen refers here to serious adverse events, suggesting he is distinguishing serious and non-serious events and not, as Myers implies, conflating them.
Myers does not dispute the claim about 90% under-reporting, which may be because it is on the MHRA website. It states: “It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2-4% of non-serious reactions are reported.” However, it’s worth noting that MHRA has argued that this 10% estimate doesn’t apply to the Covid vaccines owing to the increased awareness of the scheme, though we have seen that that is not borne out in the reporting rate for other vaccines.
But we don’t really need to guess about this stuff as many governments carry out active monitoring via surveys of vaccinated people. The Israeli Government’s survey, for instance, found that 0.3% of vaccinated people (1 in 333) reported being hospitalised as a result of their first Covid booster, while a U.S. CDC survey found 0.9% of vaccinated people (1 in 111) reported seeking medical care as a result of their vaccination. A vaccine monitoring app in Germany found that 0.3% of vaccine recipients reported at least one serious adverse reaction to the first dose of the vaccine. The MHRA has never published the U.K. version of these data. A comparison of the Israeli active monitoring rate (from the survey) to the passive monitoring rate (from VAERS) showed that the true number of people hospitalised following their vaccination was 126 times higher than the number who reported it to VAERS, i.e., less than 1% of those who according to the survey were hospitalised following their vaccine reported it to VAERS. Other under-reporting rates in the Israeli survey (see examples in table below) were even higher, making Bridgen’s (and the MHRA’s) 10% estimate look very conservative. Note that these figures don’t have a control group for comparison to allow for incidental events.
If 0.3% of people who receive each dose of a Covid vaccine are hospitalised with a serious adverse reaction, as per the Government surveys, then after 151 million doses there would be around 450,000 hospitalisations following vaccination. It really is that many, because 0.3% of 151 million is still a big number.
Myers concludes: “[Anti-vax] conspiracy theories corrode reason, democracy and humanism. We cannot allow them to fester unchallenged.”
I think it’s fair to say, if Myers is worried about the corrosion of reason, he needs to start somewhere closer to home.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Agreed.
It must also be in our interests to have as President someone who expresses fondness for the UK rather than the open antipathy or worse which the Democrats have shown for many years.
More reasons than that to want the Donald in the White House.
Very relieved the Donald succeeded. The wokecratic Democrats are the most dangerous political movement in the world driven by crazy dogma lacking any semblance of sense and hell bent on autocratic authoritarian rule. This is entirely aside from being completely under the thumb of hidden hands including Pharma.
Very scary people. Trump might seem crazy sometimes but he has made a lot of sound decisions for the good of the USA.
Imagine what life in the UK would be like if Krazy Kumala were to be US president and the current Labour autocratic authoritarian national socialist party in parallel the UK.
The Democrats lost because they corruptly pretended Biden was not a demented senile man having elected him with a running mate who has a history which seems to me too weird for words and left it too late to do anything about the mess they created for themselves. A well-deserved crushing loss for US Democrats.
I will also be gratefully collecting my winnings from William Hill but I should have instead bought bitcoin before the voting started as a friend did.
“and, in any event, Kamala Harris, like her boss, is no friend of Britain’s”
Nancy Pelosi demonstrated in technicolour that US Democrats are hostile to the UK in threatening to block a UK-US trade deal.
I loved the photo of an armed American Patriot sitting in Pelosi’s office chair with his feet up on her desk. Even though the whole Jan 6th protest was a sad waste of their patriotic faith in Drumpf the AntiChrist, it was a shocking reminder that the people have more power than they realise.
Did you know that “Donald” means “World Ruler”, which is why he likes to be called “The Donald”.
This ties in with the Roman Emperor Nero, who didn’t start persecuting Christians, in whom he had no interest whatsoever, until his Hebrew “sages” complained that the annoying prayers of Christians were interfering with the Hebrew sages “readings of entrails” predicting Nero’s future.
Their entrail readings also told him that he would be “World Ruler” only if he moved his capital from Rome to Jerusalem. When he suggested this to the Roman Senate, they laughed him to scorn, so he got his sages to help him set fire to Rome.
It will be interesting to see the relationship between the Trump government and the Labour government going forward, and the amount of grovelling that involves. It’s when you see Lammy’s congratulatory message to Trump side by side with his various rude and contemptuous messages slagging off Trump from the past you have to think how the hell is he and people like him even in such jobs. Howard Cox wrote a good piece here;
“The legacy press, those Downing Street special advisors, and, of course, Labour’s front bench must have rushed to their anti-nausea tablets to quash a sick feeling deep in their collective gut when they learned Donald Trump, the 45th President of the US, has been re-elected as the 47th.
This political bombshell, not seen by pollsters but predicted by betting organisations, is a colossal nightmare for Sir Keir Starmer! His contriteness must now be more than sincere; it has to be convincing when he next meets the new leader of the free world.
This historic election result for the Western world’s supreme power is, without any doubt, the best outcome for the UK. For starters, it should help secure us lower energy costs, scrap the Net Zero fantasy, maintain fossil fuel supplies, deliver economic trade without punitive tariffs, improve global security, establish more robust border control, ensure the protection of free speech, help fight the worldwide spread of extreme Islamic terrorism, and end military conflicts around the globe.
But sadly, these widely popular common-sense outcomes will only materialise here if our mendacious Labour Government follows Trump’s healing fiscal plans and recognises that the further increase in spending of our bloated nanny state and their anti-business, economically illiterate policies have to be dumped. And that means cutting taxes. Watch Trump put that economic growth strategy into practice once inaugurated.
With that customary clueless stare into those political headlamps, Keir Starmer and the UK’s less-than-intelligent foreign secretary immediately and rightly so, tweeted congratulatory messages to President Trump.
David Lammy, who, as a backbench MP in 2018, with amoebic intelligence, called the ‘Donald’ a neo-Nazi sociopath. And he even attempted to defend his crass comment before this year’s General Election. He must now be quaking in those infamous less-than-appropriate white trainers that a popular right-wing administration is now to run America.
He has to eat diplomatic, humble pie and grovel remorsefully with a genuine apology. Failure to sincerely do so must mean Starmer should sack him. Frankly, he needs to go now. He is walking noose around Starmer’s neck; now Trump is in the White House.
Britain’s top foreign envoy abroad, in such an unstable world involving our closest ally, the United States, not only unnecessarily insulted the prize winner of the 2024 presidential election, but in doing so, he had stupidly accused the people of the US of returning someone unsuited for the most powerful elected office in the world.
Trump holds grudges big time, so watch this space to see how David Lamentable can rise to the occasion. I can’t see him lasting long after Christmas.”
https://x.com/HowardCCox/status/1854223664050225537
Peter Whittle speaks truth ( 5mins );
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoB7W8qF4L4
David Lamentable?
Lamey?
Lamee?
Peanut Brain?
Mogwai, I was quite depressed the other day by the below-the-line comments following the article on Kemi Badenoch’s win, that included an attack on me as a ‘globalist troll’! It was unpleasant, and I honestly found myself wondering whether I should support the site any more, as so many of the btl comments don’t do the site any favours and certainly bring me down periodically. But your posts, which I have come to like (I usually agree, and you’re very articulate) will keep me here. The piece from Howard Cox is good stuff! I do sometimes speculate on who you are…, but – thank you.
Hi Deborah. What a pleasant surprise your reply was and thank you for your kind words. No, please don’t go. I think we ladies are few and far between enough anyway ( I’m estimating those of us that comment with any regularity make up <1% of posters on this site, as the vast majority of account-holders are evidently men ) so we need numbers increasing not dwindling further.
There’s already quite the ‘anti-women’ sentiment pervading this place as it is.
I have to say I’ve felt exactly the same way. It would appear that certain individuals have an inability to simultaneously disagree with a fellow poster and debate respectfully. The particular individual you’re referring to though, I’ve already classified as suffering from ‘Mogwai Derangement Syndrome’, an affliction whereby certain sufferers troll you round the comments sections, hurl insults and slanderous allegations your way and try to beat anyone who disagrees with them into submission using their ever-present ‘CAPS LOCK RAGE!!’, just to further broadcast the fact they’re completely unhinged and exceedingly unpleasant.
So I get where you’re coming from. Just ignore them because they get satisfaction in reeling you into a stupid, childish spat, then you’re reduced to their level and it’s a win for them. But yes, “certain individuals” are indeed odious. Best thing to do is stick around and post even more. It’s guaranteed to get up their nose.
Says the Queen of Obscene Insults and Rabid, Frothing-at-the-Mouth Rage at anyone who dares to criticize or disagree with her. Now here she is masquerading as Sweet Reason. Give over!
Luckily, the Daily Sceptic editors appear to have put their foot down about obscenities.
Ooooo.
Someone does not like Freedom of Speech/
LOL. Heh, heh.
Don’t let ANYBODY on this site bring you down. If you are up for it give as good as you get or just ignore the flap heads. We don’t always agree with everybody but civility costs nothing.
Well said Hux
It’s called FREEDOM OF SPEECH,
and this website’s courageous founder also founded
THE FREE SPEECH UNION,
fighting valiantly to preserve
ALL OUR HUMAN RIGHTS TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
No one has any right to special protection against criticism or insults. NO ONE.
I never whine or complain about downvotes or insults directed at me, as long as they are not obscene, so why should you?
“I never whine or complain about downvotes or insults directed at me, as long as they are not obscene, so why should you?”
Freedom of speech?
LOL. Heh, heh.
David Lammy has infamous white trainers?
Not surprising. He has earned them.
He demonstrated that in trumps as he behaved like a dictatorial white imperialist colonialist of a long past age towards the Chagosians in tramping over their property rights and without even consulting them handed their land to Mauritians whose government has never ever owned nor had a claim over the Chagos Islands.
Clearly he has been well-taught and has adopted the worst kinds of practices and he does not even seem to realise it.
If only I had enough money to help the Chagosians to sue David Lamey and win a claim to recover their property [the Chagos Islands] from the dictatorial white trainered imperialist colonialist that he is.
Also of course an extremely stupid act of giving the islands away when completely unnecessary.
The Chagosians want to be under British protection so this country could have retained Diego Garcia on the Chagos Islands which could have been ruled by the Chagosians under the protection of the British Crown.
I agree with Toby. I would have voted for Trump too.
I hope the same will happen in Britain, although Labour is the epitome of woke, so I expect they will double down on their efforts to turn the country into a vibrant, multicultural, net-zero dystopia. They won’t change and they are beyond help. Only this morning, reading the analysis on the BBC website about why Kamala lost, their conclusion is that it was because she “couldn’t get her message through”. Not that the message was crap, oh, no, that’s just not possible. She just didn’t articulate it quite right. So I think we have some hard times ahead.
Call me shocked. Yet again the Lefties wailing that it wasn’t their policies that lost them an election. Remember that Jeremy Corbyn won the election other than getting the most votes.
Starmfuhrer should learn how to win elections like that. The world would be a better place.
And on Channel Four tonight, it was because she didn’t have enough time to get her message across.
Not as hawkish on the Uketopia?
Are you serious or stupid?
This conflict, started by NATO with 2 coups and 15K dead Russians and endless expansion, will end up going nuclear.
ONE OF THE MAIN REASONS TO VOTE TRUMP IS THAT HE MUST, WILL, HAS TO, END THIS CONFLICT. He can do so in 1 day – by withdrawing ALL funding. Gone. Without US money and NATO equipment, the Uketopia (US 51rst state) will have one or two weeks left.
What exactly was Hunter Biden up to in Ukraine?
Does everything a Biden touches end in corruption and disaster?
Remember what Obama promised during his own election campaign years ago? He railed against the War in Afghanistan, and declared that the first thing he would do if elected President would be to bring all the troops back home.
“That is the first thing I will do! And you can take that to the bank!”
The crowd went wild with cheers, but the first thing he did after getting elected was to announce “A Surge”, ordering masses more US servicemen and women to go get maimed and killed in Afghanistan.
Then he was given the Nobel Peace Prize, not long after.
The blob will not relinquish their intentions. Perhaps we can expect another global ‘pandemic’ or similar requiring global ‘collaboration’?
Of course. As the saying goes: “If at first you don’t succeed ……“
I watched Bannon’s War Room every day for 3 years after the 2020 steal. The Democrat corruption was massive, obvious and proven in hundreds of situations. Every one of these was ignored by the MSM.
That truth will now be properly aired, so get ready for criminalisations of many major figures.
Trump is arguably the finest American President in history.
Some inconvenient facts about his 2016 tenure for the haters:
1. No foreign wars.
2. No deaths of US Military personnel
3. Booming economy
4. Energy independence, energy exporter.
5. Strong dollar
6. China and Russia behaved
7.Record employment for blacks and Hispanics
8. Jerusalem recognised as Israel’s capital, embassy moved
9. Golan Heights recognised as sovereign Israel territory
10. Complete absence of Palestinian terrorism
11. Iran supressed, JCPOA cancelled.
I could go on.
I believe Trump will disdain Starmer and his gang, but differentiate with the people of Britain.
Interesting days ahead …
It’s going to be especially galling for Keir-Ching! to know that every policy area he raises with Trump (and vice versa) will be filtered through Nigel Farage
Why I would have voted for Trump. First 10 …. are are more.
And he thinks abortion is something other than healthcare?
I’m pretty optimistic that Trump will seriously degrade the power and influence of deep state actors, and their acolytes. Even if Trump is assassinated, JD Vance will carry the battle forwards. I hope our own ‘deep state’ and associated acolytes are sweating now.
I felt euphoric when he won but I was also aware that it is because we live in an age of diminished expectations. You see this pattern when empires fall. People come along promising to care for the people or bring back old glories but it can’t be done. At least he is is so volatile and unpredictable and sufficiently deranged that he might put a few spanners in the works of the Satanists. On the other hand this is a man who loves to boast about Warp Speed vaccines and he hasn’t recanted. It is a sad indictment on our sense of the possible that such a figure makes us happy. I suppose that you could retort that RFK Jr will be working with him which is a good start on the path to redemption.
Here is an interesting opinion from one of the Heroic Jews, Henry Makow of Canada, who boldly tells the truth about Jewish involvement in Globalism:
“Trump was reinstated to lead the USA into WW3. Gold and oil were down today because people think Trump will stop the “endless foreign wars.” But Trump is a Cabalist Jew. He is following a fanatical script that requires the destruction of the Old Order. He is leading the Masonic Zionist faction (Nazis, NATO, Israel, Ukraine) against the Masonic Communist faction (Russia, Iran, China, BRICS) in a repeat of WW2.
Israel is in deep trouble. Netanyahu just fired his Defence Minister Gallant because Gallant balked. Similarly, Wagner chief Progozhin balked when he realized there was AN OCCULT AGENDA THAT PRIORITIZED KILLING SLAVS OVER WINNING THE WAR.
Nevertheless I am elated that Trump has won. I much prefer the Zionist method of execution (a blinding white nuclear flash) to the Communist form of execution, the slow destruction of the soul, plandemic and police state. The first is over in a second, while the latter lasts for generations.
I am surprised the election was as close as it was. Americans truly are brain-dead to give Harris 67 million votes compared to Trump’s 72 million.”
(from Nov 6 – Deep State S-elects Trump; How I Knew it Would”)
henrymakow.com – Exposing Feminism and The New World Order
It doesn’t seem to matter to Will Jones that she’s an abortion enthusiast who can only speak of it in terms that implicitly deny what it is; does it not matter to you either?