- “Young women had 3.5 times higher risk of death from heart issues after AstraZeneca jab” – The ONS found a dramatically greater risk for 12-29 year-olds in the first three months after a single dose of AstraZeneca Covid vaccine compared to a later period, the Telegraph reports. Yet not after the mRNA vaccines and little in other demographics – contrary to other studies. Sounds dubious to me, but then it is a self-controlled study. Also in the Mail.
- “IgG4 Antibodies Induced by mRNA Vaccines Generate Immune Tolerance to SARS-CoV-2’s Spike Protein by Suppressing the Immune System” – A new preprint summaries evidence which “suggests that the reported increase in the IgG4 [antibody] levels detected after repeated vaccination with the mRNA vaccines is not a protective mechanism; rather, it may be a part of the immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses” . It may also “cause autoimmune diseases and promote cancer growth and autoimmune myocarditis in susceptible individuals”.
- “The Lockdown Lunacy in Retrospect” – How and why most of the world succumbed to the lockdown lunacy – a new overview from the Swiss Doctor.
- “Rainmaking and Mask Mandates, or: The dumb chain of coincidences that brought community masking tyranny to the West” – Pandemic policies were deeply, profoundly stupid, in a way that we have hardly come to terms with even now, says Eugyppius.
- “Why didn’t America’s Covid hypocrites pay a price?” – Partygate all sounds a bit silly, but then at least the U.K. takes its Covid hypocrites seriously – in America, not so much, writes Matt Purple for Spectator World.
- “Jabbed pilots’ roll call of death and injuries” – Sally Beck in TCW on the worrying rate of serious adverse reactions to Covid jabs among pilots.
- “EU’s energy summit ends in division over Net Zero” – The EU may aspire to become a geopolitical superpower, but arguments over energy at a leaders’ summit this weekend suggested it has enough difficulties keeping its internal affairs in order, says William Nattrass in UnHerd.
- “Council chiefs ‘covered up’ data that could put climate zones ‘into jeopardy’” – Oxford council chiefs “covered up” data that risked “jeopardising” its controversial climate zones, which will ban residents from travelling directly between suburbs, the Telegraph reports.
- “Berliners vote down referendum on tighter climate goals” – Reuters reports that a referendum in Berlin on Sunday that would have bound the city to strive to be climate neutral by 2030 has failed, the city’s mayor Franziska Giffey said in a statement.
- “Putin and Xi’s plot to control the internet will leave the West in the dust” – Britain’s creaking framework risks being left behind by the leaders’ technology pact, says Andrew Orlowski in the Telegraph.
- “Victory for ‘continuity candidate’ Humza Yousaf in SNP battle” – Humza Yousaf, seen as the ‘continuity’ candidate, emerged victorious and is now set to take over from Nicola Sturgeon as First Minister tomorrow, the Mail reports. He has indicated he wants to persist with Sturgeon’s disastrous transgender self-ID policy, despite its key role in her downfall.
- “Six of the worst Humza Yousaf scandals” – It can be a difficult task picking out the most incompetent minister in the Scottish Government, but the new First Minister is definitely in the running, says Steerpike in the Speccie.
- “Killing my own dinner taught me about my relationship with animals and humans” – Fascinating story from Laura Dodsworth about coming to terms with where meat comes from – but when it was published in the Sunday Times she wasn’t prepared for the aggression she received from the militant vegans.
- “Dan Snow is the ultimate midwit historian” – To the Midwit historian, like Snow, there simply is no greater thrill than slaying the most sacred cow you can find, writes Samuel Rubinstein in the Spectator.
- “More than 60% of Scotland’s trans prisoners began transitioning after being convicted” – Data obtained under Freedom of Information Act show 12 of 19 in custody identified as the opposite sex “after their date of admission”, the Telegraph reports. Almost as though they’d prefer to be in a women’s prison…
- “Trans activism is sexist and delusional” – By denying science, the medical profession is committing some of the worst moral crimes in modern times, and it must end, says Jordan Peterson in the Telegraph.
- “‘I’m not biased.’ Google’s chatbot denies any political leaning, but promotes trans drugs, Joe Biden and veganism, and bashes Fox News, gun rights and the January 6th rioters” – Google’s new chatbot insists it does not have a liberal bias, but the Daily Mail‘s 10 tests of Bard reveal its implicit political support for Joe Biden, transgender ideology and universal healthcare access.
- “How I survived the trans mob” – Listen to Kellie-Jay Keen aka Posie Parker talk to Spiked‘s Brendan O’Neill about her violent encounter with gender extremists.
- “Toby Young of the Free Speech Union explains how a freedom of information request shows police forces across the country are giving ‘little or no time’ for training officers about legal protections for free speech” – Watch Toby on GB News speaking with Andrew Doyle.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
It could never really happen anyway. If such a treaty were to be accepted it would be an implicit destruction of any country’s sovereignty and thus and ruling power structure would immeditely become defunct. All of the power players know this. They just feed you this to give you the impression that you’re still in Kansas. We were very lucky to be exposed to the film The Wizard Of Oz because it contains several hints and warnings and they have become subsumed into our psyche.
That’s why I’m amazed sunak hasn’t signed it. Yet..
The Jabs are dangerous ! Hopefully they will soon be like trying to sell a car with square wheels ( mind you if it was classed as Eco friendly some muppets would buy them
)
So I imagine the WHO might just tweak that little part of the treaty, and let countries hold on to all their domestically produced jabs. So now the deal becomes: We, the WHO, will repeal the sovereignty of all signatory states during times of pandemic, “potential” pandemic or “potential” global health alert, deny the autonomy and freedom of their citizens and halt all democratic processes as we know them – and that is all fine because we’ve taken away the clause that requires the governments of such states to poison citizens of other countries as well as just their own.
What? Won’t sign because
our sovereignty would be given away? No, because the poison death and injury shots would be given away. Unbelievable. Clown World.Absolutely correct not to sign it. We should only think about compliance in the event that we’re mandated to hand over the lot, 100%. Having ‘got rid,’ we should then refuse to sign in any circumstances.
The real rulers know that we are heading for cataclysm or reset. The game is to keep the charade going on long enough to maximise their gains. Part of that is having a much reduced population after the catclysm. If you look at events from the perspective of a coming catastrophe then they start to make more sense.
That is ‘their’ hill to die on!
Look at investments in areas that are currently desert they know that things are shifting. In Russia the pole shift is common knowledge. They are already building a trade route in the Arctic with China which will bypass Anglo-American channels. To begin with it will be with high tech icebreakers but they know that the far north is going to thaw very soon. Similarly the Brits know the fate of this country in terms of climate – significantly worse. It makes a big difference if you are armed with this knowledge. How many people actually think about their people or brethren.
I fear that this is just part of the scam.
UK Gov: Look! We’re being all tough about this, Protecting our sovereignty. Not putting up with any bullshit.
WHO: OK. You don’t have to do that bit about sharing stuff. You just have to do lockdowns and masks and stuff and closing schools and doing tests and surveillance when we say so.
UK Gov: Great! (Trebles all round! See, we aren’t pushovers. We were really tough with them!)
Once again, currently-sovereign nation states are shying away from the risk of becoming outliers assuming the the WHO is going to form a kind of “club of nations” (much like the UN), this time comprised of the signatories to the Pandemic Treaty and the amendments to the IHR. Much as local populations of potential member states have absolutely no desire to be part of such a “club”, the governments of those member states probably feel themselves pressured into joining so as to avoid the the vilification and isolation from the rest of the world that they fear might result from the abstention from signing. All of this is completely unfounded, of course, as people hold national and individual sovereignty to be of greater importance than their representatives in government do. So any state that boldly refuses the coercive offer to serve under a “pandemic dictatorship” will earn the respect of the world as one who stood up for the sovereignty of the nation and its people.
Given the regard that the recent vaccines are held in by many, it seems to me that giving 100% of them to the WHO would be ideal provided that Tedros, Gates and their cronies are required to be injected with all of the doses.
Jacob Rees Mogg pushing the establishment line with no counter argument. Where is oFcom! Only joking, would not want to entertain that state censor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0Hmz9-Ok34
Yes I guess the UK thinks it is absolutely fine to give away its sovereignity to the WHO, but dear Lord don’t take away are unsafe and ineffective vaxxes
. This country, this government has its priorities mixed up.
‘has its priorities mixed up’
That’s too kind, too gentle a way of describing the government – not the country, by the way: the government of whatever tint is not the country, nor does the government represent the views of the vast majority of people – far from it. We don’t live in a real democracy, for heaven’s sake!
The Uniparty government represents only its own views. An elite cabal of liblabcon has been managing this country for 100 years and mismanaging it appallingly since the end of WW2.
It doesn’t matter if it’s the cons or the labs who sit on the front benches or the opposition benches; they take turn and turnabout again and again (only fair!) with the limp dims occasionally allowed to snuggle up to whichever faction needs propping up after a doubtful ‘election’ result.
There are alternative ways of viewing the bubble-dwellers who have a stranglehold on this country’s politics: they are either incompetent morons or they are cowardly traitors to every British man, woman and child.
Only incompetent morons would even think of signing up to China’s lickspittle Tawdry Tedros’s Treaty and the WHO’s blatant attempt at a power grab to further the ends of the globalist malefactors.
Only cowardly traitors intent on selling us all down the river for personal gain and approval from their masters would sign up to the Treaty of aforesaid globalist malefactors who care nothing for nations, national sovereignty, and the native people’s rights to freedom, independence and self-rule in their own land.
‘Mixed-up priorities’ don’t come into it. The Uniparty Undemocrats who misgovern our country are either unfit for purpose or they are treacherous scoundrels.
This is Sunak electioneering, trying to look tough, standing up for British sovereignty. Two years earlier and he’d have signed it. Had the election been last month, he’d now be signing it
Starmer will be signing it soon after the next election, if Sunak hasn’t signed it by then.
To my mind, the biggest threat facing humanity is the political class, on a par with the super-rich.