- “Massive spike in excess deaths sparks calls for an ‘urgent investigation’: NHS crisis is blamed for nearly 3,000 more Brits than usual dying each week’” – Some 17,381 deaths were registered in England and Wales in the seven days to January 13th – 2,837 above average for the time of year – the highest since the U.K.’s second Covid wave, reports the Mail.
- “Excess deaths highest since pandemic second wave – and less than 5% are from Covid” – High flu rates and record NHS waiting times are blamed by the Telegraph.
- “Deaths in England surge again” – The mortality crisis continues, but not in countries that did not heavily use mRNA Covid jabs, argues Alex Berenson.
- “Life after Zero Covid: markets bet big on China” – Vast inflows are flooding the Chinese stock market — at the expense of other countries, writes Philip Pilkington in UnHerd.
- “Covid and the disturbing facts my fellow-scientists don’t want to hear” – Professor Robert Clancy in TCW on the vaccine red flags the medical profession has shut its eyes to.
- “Why N95 Masks Fail to Stop the Spread” – Megan Mansell in Brownstone sets out the case against N95 masks for Covid in full detail.
- “The Downfall of the Gurus” – Jeffrey Tucker in the Epoch Times on the failure of the libertarian movement when we needed it most.
- “How the residents of Wuhan ended up questioning China’s Covid-control playbook” – In recent months, many Wuhan residents who had taken pride in enduring a strict 76-day lockdown in the early days of China’s Zero-Covid response became more critical of how the epidemic was being handled, according to the South China Morning Post.
- “Is that a cricket in my bread?” – EU bureaucrats want to add crushed cricket flour to bread, warns Laura Dodsworth.
- “A Weltanschauung causal model of excess deaths” – Norman Fenton and Martin Neil with a detailed “exposition on models and variables that might explain excess deaths”.
- “Pandemic Strategies, Lessons and Consequences” – Thorsteinn Siglaugsson reports on a hugely successful conference in Stockholm – shunned by the mainstream media, of course.
- “Ivermectin prescriptions in the U.K.” – ‘Bartram’ a.k.a. Amanuensis wonders what’s behind the sharp increase in NHS ivermectin prescriptions in 2022.
- “The Copper Conundrum” – Willis Eschenbach in WUWT runs the numbers finds there isn’t even enough copper to get us to Net Zero 2050, let alone sustain it for any length of time.
- “The phoney ethics of ESG” – Davos Man has a new fixation, says Ashley Rindsberg in UnHerd.
- “The Left has declared war on the poor” – The U.K. is engaged in an all-out economic war on poor and even middle income families, all in the name of Net Zero and greater equality, writes Matthew Lynn in the Telegraph.
- “Apartheid in the C of E – with whites the victims” – Karen Harradine in TCW on the woke ‘reverse’ racism that now pervades the Church of England and penalises white people.
- “Has a Quran-burning protest ended Sweden’s NATO dream?” – Sweden’s commitment to free speech wavers as offence taken by Turkish Muslims threatens its NATO application, writes Fraser Nelson in the Spectator.
- “‘This rapist decided he was no longer a man only after appearing in court on a rape charge’: Fury as sex attacker transitions before trial and is sent to a women’s prison – despite warnings about Sturgeon’s gender change law” – Sending a rapist to a women’s prison – what could go wrong? Reported in the Mail.
- “Twenty years ago Australians were prosecuted for saying masks work against viruses” – Now they get arrested for not wearing masks during viral outbreaks, tweets Tony Heller.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Interesting revelations here, and it becomes apparent why Starmer isn’t interested in Elon Musk investing in the UK. Musk has declared, ”This is war” over on X;
”The British are coming, to meddle in our elections!
In an explosive leak with ramifications for the upcoming U.S. presidential election, internal documents from the Center for Countering Digital Hate—whose founder is British political operative Morgan McSweeney, now advising the Kamala Harris campaign—show the group plans in writing to “kill Musk’s Twitter” while strengthening ties with the Biden/Harris administration and Democrats like Senator Amy Klobuchar, who has introduced multiple bills to regulate online “misinformation.”
The documents obtained by The DisInformation Chronicle and Racket show CCDH’s hyperfocus on Musk — “Kill Musk’s Twitter” is the first item in the template of its monthly agenda notes dating back to the early months of this year.
The Center for Countering Digital Hate is the anti-disinformation activist ally of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, and a messaging vehicle for Labour’s neoliberal think tank, Labour Together. Both the CCDH and Labour Together were founded by Morgan McSweeney, a Svengali credited with piloting Starmer’s rise to Downing Street, much as Karl Rove is credited with guiding George W. Bush to the White House.
The CCDH documents carry particular importance because McSweeney’s Labour Together political operatives have been teaching election strategy to Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, leading Politico to call Labour and the Democrats “sister parties.”
McSweeney is an ascendant figure, having just been promoted to Starmer’s Chief of Staff in something of a palace coup after the abrupt resignation of longtime Labour fixture Sue Gray. McSweeney is lionized, not just for a Carville-style rightward tilt within the party, but for mastery of fundraising and dark money, having reportedly pulled a host of new wealthy donors to Labour in the last two years.
After 25 years of the “special relationship” being essentially “one-way traffic,” with Washington politicos advising the Brits, the Democrats “now believe they actually have something to learn from Labour,” as Politico explained. Democrats will supposedly learn from Labour’s tactical brilliance. For example, Starmer countered former Conservative PM Rishi Sunak’s accusations of being soft on immigration by promising to “smash the criminal boat gangs” bringing migrants across the English channel.
The new British government also believes that a Harris defeat would leave Starmer “alone” as the “keeper of the center-Left flame” and in “worrying isolation” as “the Grand Atlantic Alliance’s last hope.”
https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/election-exclusive-british-advisors
And to further cement the story here is Reclaim the Net on the same subterfuge. Morgan McSweeney certainly thinks he’s fighting with the big boys. And Kneel wants to be very careful, the American Deep State won’t think twice about having him Magafulied if he phooks up.
British politicians interfering in American elections. What would the courts think…oh well skip that.
Naughty, naughty Kneel.
https://reclaimthenet.org/the-british-operatives-determined-to-kill-elon-musks-free-speech-platform-x
https://www.globalresearch.ca/global-tyranny-un-summit-future/5870659
And here is why the Democrats don’t care.
At the recent Summit of the Future 193 nations signed up to committing us to their vision of dystopia…
“Lost in the hoopla of the coming US presidential election and the pandemonium of current global affairs was an unheralded summit last month that could cause more upheaval on the planet than anything our self-described world leaders have thrown at the populace yet.
On September 22, representatives of 193 sovereign nation-states gathered at the United Nations headquarters in New York City to adopt a Pact for the Future.
The document, which includes a Global Digital Compact and a Declaration on Future Generations, promises to “open the door to new opportunities and untapped possibilities,” according to UN Secretary-General António Guterres.
The landmark agreement, which Guterres called a “step-change towards more effective, inclusive, networked multilateralism,” contains 56 “actions” that countries pledged to achieve.
The net effect of the Pact for the Future and its two so-called annexes is intended to radically accelerate the push toward completion of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and its Agenda 2030.
Marketed as a blueprint to “lay the foundations for a sustainable, just, and peaceful global order—for all peoples and nations” (and who could possibly object to such a heavenly vision?)—this latest flurry of UN paperwork may have set new records in linguistic maneuvers and platitudes per page.”
.
Sounds like 193 countries have signed up for immiseration. The big difference between the signatories is, unlike Kneeler, the majority will just ignore it if it’s not in their self-interest.
“the majority will just ignore it”
Exactly.
Whoa, you two!
Brilliant piece and Brilliant comments..but I’m left behind here!
Bit thick, but, explain for the many watches and future members of the sceptic, in laymens term?
One for all and all for one!
Thanks Dinger.
https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/election-exclusive-british-advisors
Kneel thinks he’s big enough to help Kamala Harris win the US election. He’s flexing his muscles. Of course he could also get badly burnt.
Hat tip Guido.
McSweeney & his cohorts set up a US office to export their methodology with aim of shutting down independent media & in particular X.
They got funding from Hollywood bigwigs & others. Teamed up with the Democrats & set about targeting X, Matt Taibi & others.
The methodology basically targets advertisers, persuade advertisers not to place adverts by claiming that X, or whoever, are spreading misinformation.
Wouldn’t you love to be in the room when Starmer goes to visit Trump & in walks Elon? Priceless.
Starmer, McSweenet et al are more dangerous than we gave them credit for.
Exactly.
First Amendment … no longer fit for purpose.
That depends on your purpose, doesn’t it? It was fine until they altered the purpose.