The term ‘Davos Man’ was originally coined by the Harvard political scientist Samuel Huntington in an essay entitled ‘Dead Souls’. It was intended to describe a member of “an emerging global superclass”, or “gold collar workers”, who owed more allegiance to the elite cosmopolitan class than they did to their countries. Why ‘Davos Man’? Because the members of this class – or, at least, the gold-tier members – meet every January in Davos at an annual conference organised by the World Economic Forum, dating back to 1988.
In UnHerd, Thomas Fazi, co-author with Toby Green of the forthcoming book Covid Consensus, has written a good piece about the WEF, which, as readers of this site will know, features in many conspiracy theories that have circulated in the last 21 months. Fazi doesn’t think the WEF is guilty of secretly trying to use its global political influence to pursue a particular policy agenda – rather, it’s doing that quite openly and has been for years.
The issue, to my mind, isn’t whether Klaus Schwab and his cronies are trying to implement various policies in different countries without worrying about democratic accountability – if that’s a conspiracy, it’s a conspiracy in plain sight. Rather, the question is about how it goes about doing this. My view is that the WEF, via annual jamborees like the one that’s about to kick off in Davos, has been so successful at selling its policy solutions to ‘crises’ such as the pandemic, ‘global heating’ and the ‘infodemic’ – to PR-ing them, you might say – it doesn’t have to worry about the mechanics of implementing them. That’s where the conspiracy theorists go wrong. They make all sorts of implausible claims about the degree of control exercised by Schwab and his coterie of billionaire buddies over senior political leaders because, in their minds, that’s the only way to make sense of the fact that so many governments are dancing to the WEF’s tune. As I’ve argued before, it’s just not credible to claim that Joe Biden, Rishi Sunak, Justin Trudeau, Mark Rutte, Jacinda Arden et al are receiving instructions from Schwab or one of his intermediaries via a back channel because: (a) someone in their governments would have leaked that by now; (b) there are numerous forces at play when it comes to political decision-making, not least “events, dear boy, events”, and the wishes of one person or cabal of people are never more than one consideration among dozens, if not hundreds; (c) the day-to-day decisions political leaders make are often so last-minute, chaotic and contradictory, seeming to follow one agenda one day, only to do a U-turn the next, the idea of there being some controlling intelligence or mastermind behind these decision simply doesn’t make sense. But above all, there’s no need for such micromanagement because the world’s senior political leaders, with a handful of exceptions, have already embraced the broad sweep of the WEF’s policy agenda. Schwab is the global power elite’s in-house public intellectual; he’s not a puppet-master. Indeed, if he tried to be he would soon lose his intellectual influence.
Fazi is more conspiratorially-minded than me, although we agree that the WEF has far too much influence, most of its policies are designed to further the interests of “gold collar workers” and the way it goes about promoting these policies is designed to by-pass the ballot box. Here are the final paragraphs of Fazi’s piece:
Global health policy and ‘epidemic preparedness’ have long been a focus of the WEF. In 2017, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) — an initiative aimed at securing vaccine supplies for global emergencies and pandemics, funded by government and private donors, including Gates — was launched in Davos. Then, in October 2019, just two months before the official start of the outbreak in Wuhan, the WEF co-sponsored an exercise called Event 201, which simulated “an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic”. In the event of a pandemic, the organisers noted, national governments, international organisations and the private sector should provide ample resources for the manufacturing and distribution of large quantities of vaccines through “robust forms of public-private cooperation”.
So, it is safe to say that when the Covid pandemic broke out, the WEF was well-positioned to take a central role in the pandemic response. It was at the 2020 gathering in Davos, on January 21st-24th — a few weeks after the novel coronavirus had been identified in China — that CEPI met with the CEO of Moderna, Stéphane Bancel, to establish plans for a COVID-19 vaccine, in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the US. Later in the year, CEPI was instrumental in setting up COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (Covax), in partnership with the WHO, and in providing funding for several Covid vaccines.
These public-private and corporate-centred coalitions — all with ties to the WEF, and beyond the reach of democratic accountability — played a crucial role in promoting a vaccine-centric and profit-driven response to the pandemic, and then in overseeing the vaccine rollout. In other words, the pandemic brought into stark relief the consequences of the WEF’s decades-long globalist push. Again, it would be wrong to view this as a conspiracy, since the WEF has always been very candid about its objectives: this is simply the inevitable result of a ‘multistakeholderist’ approach in which private and ‘philanthropic’ interests are given greater voice in global affairs than most governments.
What is troubling, however, is that the WEF is now promoting the same top-down corporate-driven approach in a wide range of other domains, from energy to food to global surveillance policies — with equally dramatic consequences. There is a reason governments often seem so willing to go along with these policies, even in the face of widespread societal opposition: which is that the WEF’s strategy, over the years, hasn’t just been to shift power away from governments — but also to infiltrate the latter.
The WEF has largely achieved this through a programme known as the Young Global Leaders (YGL) initiative, aimed at training future global leaders. Launched in 1992 (when it was called Global Leaders for Tomorrow), the initiative has spawned many globalist-aligned heads of states, cabinet ministers and business leaders. Tony Blair, for instance, was a participant in the first event, while Gordon Brown attended in 1993. In fact, its early intake was packed with other future leaders, including Angela Merkel, Victor Orbán, Nicholas Sarkozy, Guy Verhofstadt and José Maria Aznar.
In 2017, Schwab admitted to having used the Young Global Leaders to “penetrate the cabinets” of several governments, adding that as of 2017, “more than half” of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s cabinet had been members of the programme. More recently, following Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s proposal to drastically cut nitrogen emissions in line with WEF-inspired ‘green’ policies, sparking large protests in the country, critics drew attention to the fact that, in addition to Rutte himself having close ties to the WEF, his Minister of Social Affairs and Employment was elected WEF Young Global Leader in 2008, while his Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Sigrid Kaag is a contributor to the WEF’s agenda. In December 2021, the Dutch Government published its past correspondence with representatives of the World Economic Forum, showing extensive interaction between the WEF and the Dutch Government.
Elsewhere, the former Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe — who last year was forced to resign following a popular uprising against his decision to ban fertilisers and pesticides in favour of organic, ‘climate-friendly’ alternatives — was also a devoted member and Agenda Contributor of the WEF. In 2018, he published an article on the organisation’s website titled: ‘This is How I Will Make My Country Rich by 2025.’ (Following the protests, the WEF swiftly removed the article from its website.) Once again, it seems clear that the WEF’s role in forming and selecting members of the world’s political elites is not a conspiracy, but rather a very public policy — and one which Schwab is happy to boast about.
Ultimately, there is no denying that the WEF wields immense power, which has cemented the rule of the transnational capitalist class to a degree never before seen in history. But it is important to recognise that its power is simply a manifestation of the power of the “superclass” it represents — a tiny group amounting, according to researchers, to no more than 6,000 or 7,000 people, or 0.0001% of the world’s population, and yet more powerful than any social class the world has ever known. Samuel Huntington, who is credited with inventing the term ‘Davos man’, argued that members of this global elite “have little need for national loyalty, view national boundaries as obstacles that thankfully are vanishing, and see national governments as residues from the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the elite’s global operations”. It was only a matter of time before these aspiring cosmocrats developed a tool through which to fully exercise their dominion over the lower classes — and the WEF proved to be the perfect vehicle to do so.
Worth reading in full.
Some people will read the above and regard it as proof that the WEF goes beyond the intellectual role I’ve ascribed to it and applies pressure on political leaders in more sinister ways. But merely pointing to the political figures who’ve been to Davos, or were once members of the WEF’s Young Global Leaders initiative, doesn’t prove that Schwab controls them in the way the conspiracy theorists imagine, only that they’re likely to be influenced by him and his policy agenda when it comes to framing their own solutions to the global problems the WEF is constantly flagging up. Yes, Schwab boasts about penetrating the Cabinets of various governments, but I interpret that as egotistical braggadocio and fundraising flimflam, not a rare moment of candour. Let’s face it. If he really was a Bond villain he wouldn’t dress like one or do his best to sound like one.
Stop Press: Andrew Orlowski has written a different piece about the WEF for the Telegraph, taking it much less seriously than Fazi:
It’s a pity that Schwab’s networking club has become the focus of so many wild conspiracy theories, for if you had to create a surreal comedy movie to discredit the modern progressive Left, it would look very much like The WEF: not only for its tedious wokery, but it’s absurdly tone-deaf pleas to surrender our personal property, and eat insects. Needy and desperate for attention, it deserves to be mocked, not feared.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Ming the merciless has got nothing on Anal Schwab!
Ming’s got a better hairstyle!
“If he really was a Bond villain he wouldn’t dress like one or do his best to sound like one.”
Sorry TY, this is just insulting. We’re not stupid. It’s not binary. Do you really think there are no backroom conversations and attempts to influence things, that are not made public, and that the participants would not want to make public?
There is no doubt in my mind that part of the reason the danger posed by the WEF is systematically underestimated is precisely because Schwab looks and acts like such a ridiculous parody of a bond villain. It lures people into the false sense that he’s too comical to be dangerous. Furthermore we only see him speaking in English which he does with a poor accent which makes him look every more comical and incompetent.
We forget that Hitler was considered a bit comical and a bit of a joke early on. Mao was also ridiculed a bit. Putin is laughed for his macho displays.
This says more about the fools making these judgements. They are like schoolboys picking on another student for his appearance, too stupid to see beyond the veneer.
Schwab has set up an organisation from scratch that has no parallel in the world. Which privately set up organisation in the world has the reach, scope and notoriety of the WEF? Anything comparable has been set up by a collaboration of nations.
Schwab and the WEF are incredibly dangerous.
“This says more about the fools making these judgements. They are like schoolboys picking on another student for his appearance, too stupid to see beyond the veneer.”
Totally agree.
Putin has nothing nothing in common with Mao and Hitler.
He has many things in common not least of which is being a leader of a major nation in conflict with the US.
So Biden is De Gaulle.
Totally agree.
This continued ‘denial’ and ‘incompetence’ stance from TY et all is becoming nauseatingly infuriating.
Nowt as blind as someone that chooses not to see.
Adam Smith knew a thing or two about people of the same trade meeting in private.
“People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the publick, or in some contrivance to raise prices’
“You don’t need a formal conspiracy when interests converge. They went to the same Universities and fraternities, they belong to the same country clubs, their kids go to the same schools, they have like interests. They don’t need to call a meeting, they know what’s good for them, and they’re getting it. We have 600 channels on the TV and 23 flavours of bagels, but its an illusion of choice. You have no choice. Its a big club, and we aren’t in it.” – Paraphrased from George Carlin
walks like a duck, quacks like a duck
I’m a blue collar worker, and a group of us would gather annually in Torquay (commonly known as the end of season tour). We would discuss – amongst other vitally important things – the price of beer, fags and Spanish holiday destinations.
I suppose we could be known as Chavos Man?
Anyway, how sinister is Klaus Schwab? Read his Christmas Message and judge for yourself.
Rather than “Davos man” I prefer the more accurate and gender neutral “Davos Deviants,” invented by me.
I don’t believe the men in Davos have dicks anyway! Yuval Noah Harari probably had their nether regions replaced with extendable USB connectors!!
I never really thought of Schwab as being some all-powerful dictator pulling everyone’s strings. But that the WEF is a group of political and business leaders who come together and plot a future without any democratic mandate or feedback, seems pretty clear. I also do believe that Schwab, perhaps with a handful of higher-ups, will make short shrift of anyone who might stray from the programme.
Who knows how many of these power junkies actually believe what they spout? I am sure there are plenty who really think we can turn the world’s temperature up and down as if it were controlled by a little switch somewhere. There are undoubtedly many who think that we can switch over to ‘clean’ electricity within a year or two. How that electricity would be generated, how to generate enough to provide the power required for a doubling or tripling or more of the power as everything moves to electricity, how ‘clean’ it can be (getting rid of used up batteries and plastic windmills) is something they do not concern themselves with because they are idiots. Those in the WEF who are not idiots have made sure they will not suffer – they’ll probably move to China, where all these things will continue as before.
Just today on RTL7 news (sort of a business news channel) they were discussing Davos and all the conspiracy theories, pretending that Davos is just a type of networking event. No mention of why it should be accepted as a policymaking forum, as we have the useless UN, WHO, World Bank, etc. etc. precisely for that purpose. Nope, it’s all a conspirary and those who point to the power heist and lack of democratic mandate are conspiracy nuts. It used to be a reasonably objective news channel, but that changed some years back and now it just peddles the same crap as all the other MSM.
Now the Dutch government is attacking the party that calls them out the most for their ties to the WEF. But it is not Rutte who leads the way, it’s Kaag, probably the most hated person in the country. This female politician is not ruled by emotions, and is probably more devious, dishonest and dangerous than most male politicians. She is now trying to get the Forum voor Democratie, the party that opposes them the most, outlawed. She wants a prohibition on political parties she does not agree with and laws to silence people who think her attacks on democracy are wrong – under the guise of protecting democracy. This cabinet is the most corrupt, devious, untrustworthy cabinet NL has had in my lifetime and I am still astonished that so many people still give it the benefit of the doubt, even though most are unhappy with it. FvD is not the answer, its actions and policies do not seem to be geared to gaining more supporters, but it would be infinitely better than what we have now. Rutte – a political opportunist supreme, a second-rate Blair. I don’t think he necessarily believes everything the WEF comes up with, just goes along with whatever it takes to solidify his political career. If the WEF made a 180 degree turn next week, he’d turn right along with them. Kaag – she’d try to get Schwab out of the way and keep forging ahead.
What they are really up to now:
https://off-guardian.org/2023/01/15/a-new-system-inside-the-davos-summit-2023/
From a former senior employee there:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/wef-who-they-running-death-cult/5804177
Don’t forget it’s origin and that of others, like the CFR, German Marshall Fund etc..
These clubs overlap and are at the very least important parts and participants of their march through the institutions.
As you say, because of that, there is no need for a formal conspiracy anymore. They are all already thinking alike, which explains the last 3 years to a T.
Whether we can prevent them from doing so over the next 3/30 years is the big question and task now.
“Just how sinister is Klaus Schwab?”
Very.
He is of course one of many. They are all sinister. They have influence and power and have been building this for years. Their vision for the world is not one that I wish to see implemented. I hate their ideas and I hate them. They have harmed and will harm me and my family. I think the world would be a better place if all of the formal and informal institutions these people are involved with would be dissolved.
“framing their own solutions to the global problems the WEF is constantly flagging up”
What “global problems”? As soon as I hear people talking about global anything I get suspicious. Our government cannot even control our borders, provide electricity without us panicking, educate our workforce, catch criminals. We have plenty of problems that don’t need pointing out or advice from the WEF on. Our leaders should be focused on bread and butter stuff, not grandstanding trying to “save the planet”.
UN, the WHO, the WEF all of these supra-national bodies should be defunded and disbanded.
Agreed. The UN could operate out of one building as a neutral meeting place for discussions between countries. Y’know, like hosting Putin and Zelensky in order to negotiate a settlement. The UN is just an organ of oppression.
As with many things it can easily be made to seem like a good idea, then it takes on a life of its own…
Agreed. I did a short film about the foundation of the UN a couple of years ago. It’s so sad seeing all those traumatised post-WWII leaders creating something to try to prevent something like WWII ever happening again. Trouble is, all they did was lay the foundations of a bureaucratic technocracy that almost eight decades later has turned into an anti-liberty monster.
You could argue the EU seemed like a good idea at the time. Some people think it still is.
The original Coal and Steel Community and even the old EEC had its positives. It was when it morphed into the EU that the EC became a monster, created without democratic mandate. Had Baroness Thatcher or Norman Tebbit been in charge, the EU would have been vetoed.
It’s so sad seeing all those traumatised post-WWII leaders
What universe are you living in? The UN is a recreation of the league of nations. It’s based on the Atlantic Charta which set out the war goals of the UK and the USA, basically, their plan for eternal world domination and eternal suppression of Germany as an independent state. Both countries were virtually unaffected by the war itself (the Germans obviously bombed Britain but this was nothing compared to the coordinated US-UK bombing raids on German cities) and why would their victorious leaders be traumatized?
Having been born in 1975 into a city where large portions of the centre were still cleared wasteland until the 1990s, the UK was hardly ‘unaffected’. WWII was the final nail in its mortally wounded empire’s coffin. America cleaned out the UK’s remaining gold reserves (we still don’t know what happened to them) and turned us into a beggar nation. Germany flattened many of our cities. My Dad spent his entire childhood with running to a bomb shelter being normal practice. ‘Virtually unaffected!’ With respect (more than you showed me) what universe are you living in?
Do you honestly think even victorious leaders weren’t sitting there looking at ruined countries, millions dead, and were having a laugh about it?
I’m the first to attack giant supranational entities as corrupt. I consider them an existential threat not just to civilisation, but to the long term survival of the human species.
I’m sure people at the foundation of the UN were already plotting to turn it into the liberty-sucking, bureaucratic leech it is today, but I think it’s highly unlikely any leader in the free world was unmoved by the horrors WWII inflicted on his country. The whole world was traumatised. I give many leaders the benefit of the doubt and believe many genuinely founded it to ensure no era of prolonged global warfare like 1914-1945 ever happened again.
As for West Germany, Adenauer’s deregulation and creation of industry-based unions, rather than craft-based unions meant that they made none of the mistakes the UK did under Attlee’s disastrous government made. So I don’t think the establishment of the UN did much to reign in Germany!
I suppose we mean that a political conspiracy is a wilfull persistent and secretive plan to get policies imposed. I guess we also mean it is by a small number of motivators and a relatively small number of executives.
On that basis I am prepared to accept Toby’s analysis at least for the purposes of discussion. However, when a small secretive group begins to get its way, even if it is by the methods TY suggests and not through explicit instructions or subordination, then it starts to become conspiratorial.
Having tasted political blood so many times, how would the motivating group react if there was something they very much wanted but it didn’t happen. How long would it be before they suggested, pressed, or cajoled politicians in their network to act or even threatened them with adverse consequences if they failed to deliver. Not long, I suspect.
In short it is very dangerous and undemines trust in politics so they should back-off. They won’t back off and they will recruit replacements for the day the current motivators are unable to do what they do. In other words it is self-sustaining, highly beneficial to them and causes resentment among the rest of us.
It is clearly not democratic, they are unaccountable as are the politicians who “chose” to follow their advice (because all other politicians on the make will support them).
What to do about it. Clearly the political class won’t act against them, deny them their policies nor acknowledge thjeir influence, just as they didn’t acknowledge the instructions of the EU, but instead pretended policies were all domestic.
The idea that the WEF is a conspiracy requiring some unworkable vow of silence from those involved is a mainstream media caricature of what people like us generally think; it’s a straw man argument and wins no prizes. Most of what the WEF does is out in the open, with the absolutely crucial qualification that the mainstream media won’t generally cover their activities, except to scoff at the WEF’s critics. So if you actually want to learn about their not-a-secret activities then you have to know where to look online (for example the Tony Blair Global Institute’s website) and you have to take the trouble to go there, which not 1 in 1000 will do. This is a very effective way to make public activities effectively secret. The media get sponsorship from WEF-related groups, and in particular the news agencies, through which foreign news reaches us, have embedded journalists sponsored by WEF-related groups; these are matters of public record.
The idea that the WEF is a conspiracy requiring some unworkable vow of silence from those involved is a mainstream media caricature of what people like us generally think; it’s a straw man argument and wins no prizes. Most of what the WEF does is out in the open, with the absolutely crucial qualification that the mainstream media won’t generally cover their activities, except to scoff at the WEF’s critics. So if you actually want to learn about their not-a-secret activities then you have to know where to look online (for example the Tony Blair Global Institute’s website) and you have to take the trouble to go there, which not 1 in 1000 will do. This is a very effective way to make public activities effectively secret. The media get sponsorship from WEF-related groups, and in particular the news agencies, through which foreign news reaches us, have embedded journalists sponsored by WEF-related groups; these are matters of public record.
The WEF mainly controls straying politicians through the media; remember the howls for lockdown in 2020, the media demonisation of Boris that suddenly surfaced after he relaxed COVID restrictions, the bizarre but universal media attribution of the UK’s economic difficulties to the very brief Truss premiership rather than Sunak’s policies as Chancellor.
Yes, I mentioned the WEF to a friend yesterday. Nice guy, very intelligent. He’d never heard of them.
I am sure only a tiny percentage of the people I know would have heard of them, and they are all of above average IQ.
Perhaps you should send him this – it is a very detailed talk on the history of the WEF:
https://rumble.com/v1p0yhd-why-covid-and-climate-ruined-our-world-the-full-explanation.html
“it’s a straw man argument”
Totally agree. Not sure what the purpose is of making this argument here. Does TY want the BTL commenters to stop talking about “conspiracies”? Is he trying to convince himself? Is he trying to distance DS from possible accusations of being “conspiracy theorists”? Could this be part of a strategy of appeasement? It won’t work. But maybe I am reading too much into this.
‘The WEF mainly controls straying politicians through the media;’
Indeed they do – is there a newspaper that has not received funds from the likes of the Gates Foundation?
The sickening articles that were pumped out by the Daily Telegraph via their absurdly named Global Health Security department – under which no comments were allowed – are an example. They consistently pumped up the threat of Covid, the excellence of the vaccines etc etc and no other opinion was given a look in. The department was funded by Gates.
How anyone can trust any of the mainstream media and the overwhelming majority of goons that populate the benches of parliament anymore is beyond me and yet they do because they only get their info from the ‘Trusted News Network’ or through social media.
The prospects for us plebeians are not terribly rosy unless some miracle occurs.
The problem is that the WEF sets the agenda. If a problem emerges, Schwab’s acolytes will look to their WEF training for solutions rather than come up with ideas of their own. Together, the acolytes will coalesce around the same idea and use all their inside contacts (many of whom are WEF-trained) in the civil service and big business to push the WEF solution.
Put it this way: the ground zero starting point in any discussion comes from the WEF. It’s like going to a debate and the topic of the debate is something tabled by the WEF. Whether people are arguing for or against what the WEF has tabled, the basis of the discussion ultimately comes from the WEF.
If organisations like the EU, UN, WHO, US Federal Government, the Chinese Communist Party, BlackRock and other major corporations are like autonomic organs of a body – the heart, lungs, liver and kidneys – then WEF infiltration altering their behaviour, means the WEF is a cancer. ‘Stakeholder capitalism’ – economic fascism – makes businesses interfere in places they don’t belong.
In a free world, humans make a decision and the organs react to keep the body alive. If you decide to run, your heart has to beat faster; if you have a drink, your liver and kidneys come into play. In world of the WEF, your heart orders you to behave in the way it demands to make it beat at a particular rate; your liver and kidneys tell you what you can and can’t drink and how much you’re allowed. Or, in the real world, Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng make a statement of economic intention and, instead of reacting to compensate, the organs of state and big business deliberately tank the British economy. It’s like trying to run a race, but you heart refuses to beat faster.
I don’t wish anyone dead and I have friends working on press coverage over there, but if a sodding great asteroid dropped on the Davos and annihilated it in the middle of a WEF event, I’d laugh for joy first, then weep for my friends.
It does cross my mind sometimes that if some (totally unhoped for, of course) terrible fluke of nature were to occur just when the bulk of current world leaders were gathered in one tiny place in Switzerland, just imagine what such a shocking event would mean for the world. Then I snap out of my happy daydream and get back to gritty reality.
Yes, I have that dream often!! When I hear bad news, I use it to cheer myself up!
Don’t tease!
Same here. I’d cheer to the rafters if the lot of them were wiped out.
Sorry Toby, but I’d have the SAS, Royal Marines and Parachute Regiment planning the assault on his Davos lair now.
A nuke would be simpler. Not saying anyone should do it, but… y’know, it’s easier!
The zillions in unchecked offshore bank accounts and such ‘tax paradises’, the trillions traded in over the counter ‘markets’ which are ‘self regulated’ and NGOs acting as the medium of illegal practices and the like, could possibly help to connect the dots. It is not a club, it’s a corporation. Money does not talk, money swears (Bob Dylan).
As for Orlowski’s piece, sure, past totalitarian movements likewise provided much material to be mocked, but that doesn’t mean they didn’t do horrific damage for decades. This particular would-be totalitarian movement is global.
And, unlike past totalitarian regimes, this regime has won by ‘mission creep’ rather than any talent for warfare and diplomacy. Across the decades, the acolytes of this religion have infiltrated every important area of our lives. At some point, the Frankfurt School Cultural Marxists entered into an unholy alliance with the neo-liberals and doomed us all.
Anyone who openly admires the brutal totalitarian regime of China whilst maintaining the wafer thin veneer of giving a damn about injustices in the world, or who’s company spends approx 95% of their significant income on administration and staff wages whilst paying himself 1 million Swiss francs/year but feigns concern over inequity in the world sure as hell seems like a massive hypocrite to me. I think ”You’ll own nothing because we’ll have everything, and we will be happy” is more apt.
And as for the ”sinister” label…just his views alone on transhumanism and his vision for the future regarding where he sees the human species is beyond frightening so he definitely fits the bill as far as I’m concerned. A short video giving some lesser-known facts about Schwab;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6zy0D6YBfk&ab_channel=NotJustBikes
The video doesn’t fully explore his ties with Kissinger and, I think, his wife’s Rothschild heritage. There is a deep political agenda behind the WEF that we can’t fully see. Ultimately it is an extension of the Malthusian belief that there are too many people causing terrible damage to the planet. Frankly I’d love to shove bags of cement down the drains in Davos so they are forced to experience their own sh*t.
This has more depth:
https://rumble.com/v1p0yhd-why-covid-and-climate-ruined-our-world-the-full-explanation.html
It gives a detailed history of the WEF
The trouble with all the ‘conspiracy theories’ about world domination, killing everyone off, etc. is that they credit Schwab et al. with a whole lot more intelligence, power and ability than is justified. You should never over-estimate your enemy, or they’re half way to winning.
Truth is, these people are weak as shit. A little pushing and they’ll fall apart. That pushing is coming down the line as the truth about the stabs gets clearer by the day.
Apparantly even though everyone forks out a min of 20k to attend this shindig, regardless of Bill’s magic injection, you have to take a PCR test, if you don’t your pass is deactivated, and if you test positive your pass is once again deactivated.
Everywhere else in the world Covid is now no more than a cold, was it ever anything less?
The boys from Pharma, Gates lot etc the Medical guys that awful man from the Wellcome trust Jeremy whatsitt the advisors, all said the billion making injections would stop the virus, clearly have lots of belief in their magic potion, perfect example of hypocrisy.
finally, the digital pass and behaviour management is very much alive and kicking for the DAVOS set.
Finally Klaus could not make the opening ceremony due to being unwell, I wonder if its one of those “coincidence” incidents about to occur.
Well that’s a bit of good news for a change, Schwab unwell. Suffer you creep.
Please stop calling people who are aware of the WEF’s malign influence and, it appears, CONTROL, over Globalist-inclined politicians “conspiracy theorists.”
They are no such thing: they are awake, critical thinkers who are not easily brainwashed by governmental PsyOps campaigns, watch events closely and attempt to join the dots.
Starmer – almost certainly the next British Prime Minister – is off to Davos this week, basically to get his Orders. As did Sunak a couple of years’ ago.
(c) the day-to-day decisions political leaders make are often so last-minute, chaotic and contradictory, seeming to follow one agenda one day, only to do a U-turn the next
It’s called gaslighting!
I personally think the calibre of politicians is such that they very happily defer power to global institutions. A way to defect all blame for decisions. An easy ride.
Very Sinister.
WEF was formed at Harvard by Kissinger, who recruited this Teutonic fascist. Schwab is a Rothschild. Rockefellers are part of the WEF cabal as well.
If you view the WEF as part of a CIA operation setup long ago to push the NWO, than I would take this bald buffoon seriously, not because of him – but because of what is behind him and the real sources of power and influence. The WEF is simply the spear head of the NWO. You will find this out again when Rona part 2, or Climate Thingy totalitarianism comes knocking.
Mr Vedmore has an interesting historical approach.
If it wasn’t Schwab it would be some one else, or do the readers believe people should be banned from congregating in groups or clubs?
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/03/investigative-reports/dr-klaus-schwab-or-how-the-cfr-taught-me-to-stop-worrying-and-love-the-bomb/