Rupa Subramanya, a Canadian journalist, has written a comment piece for the Telegraph summarising her scoop for Bari Weiss’s Substack. In it she describes how a campaign by two disgruntled British ex-pats forced the Canadian Government to reveal that there was no scientific basis for the federal vaccine mandate.
On August 13th, 2021, two days before Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau called a federal election, his Government made a major announcement that “as early as at the end of September” federal government employees would be subject to a vaccine mandate. Further: “no later than the end of October” a vaccine mandate for travellers would also be implemented.
The Prime Minister’s tough position in the fall of 2021 was a far cry from what he said in March 2021, when Trudeau asserted that every Canadian who wanted to be vaccinated would have a dose available by the fall, implying that it would be voluntary – at a time when Canada was struggling to procure enough vaccine doses and was lagging far behind the UK, US, and other major Western countries in its vaccination campaign.
The vaccine mandate proposal was to become a cornerstone of Trudeau’s re-election bid. Speaking in a suburb of Toronto, home to Canada’s largest, and one of the world’s busiest airports, the prime minister reiterated his government’s intention – presumably if re-elected – to impose vaccine mandates on all sectors under the federal Government’s control, which boils down to federal employees and travel.
Trudeau always maintained his government’s Covid policies were based on the science and the latest evidence. Yet, his shifting rhetoric, before and after his election call, tells a different tale. Thanks to a civil lawsuit against the travel mandate by two British immigrants, we’ve now seen inside the guts of part of Trudeau’s Covid machinery, and it’s become abundantly clear that it has little if anything to do with science and everything to do with politics.
From recently released court documents, which I broke in a story for Bari Weiss’s Common Sense, show us senior Government bureaucrats scrambling to find a scientific rationale for the travel mandate mere days before it was due to come into force. We’ve had the opportunity to see into the inner workings of Trudeau’s vaccine machinery thanks to two British immigrants, Shaun Rickard and Karl Harrison, who filed a civil suit against the Trudeau government in the Federal Court. Thanks to their efforts, and that of their attorney, Sam Presvelos, the affidavits, testimonies, and cross-examination of key Government witnesses are now in the public domain.
These documents clearly show us that the bureaucrat charged with holding the pen, under repeated cross-examination, refused to go into details on who ordered the mandate, citing, “Cabinet confidentiality”. Exactly why the rationale for a public health mandate should be so confidential raises the disturbing possibility that there really was no rationale at all. It’s evident that a political decision was taken by Trudeau and his cabinet to go ahead with the mandates, and the hapless bureaucrats were charged with coming up with some rationale, any credible rationale after the fact.
As it happens, the bureaucrat in charge of crafting one of the world’s “strongest vaccination mandates in the world”, according to the bureaucrat herself and Trudeau, has an undergraduate degree in English literature and self-evidently didn’t have the scientific knowledge to take a call. Neither were there any doctors, epidemiologists and scientists on her team, a secretive panel whose membership is nowhere published, and which rates a passing mention on the government’s website.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
It’s nice to see that proper journalism that holds Governments to account is alive and well, it’s just not found in the MSM anymore.
The harder you look the bigger the lies you find…
Is that related to The less you look the fewer problems you see? As practiced by all medical regulators for the past two years.
Bravo!
Rule of Nature: everything the powers try to censor is true.
One of three things will follow from this.
a. No action, no repercussions and the perpetrators will feel even more untouchable by the fact that their malfeasance has been exposed and no one has the power to do make them pay for it.
b. The perpetrators will face consequences in the form of legal action and/or a political consequences.
c. The matter will be swept under the carpet, the bans and mandates will be quietly lifted at some point and everyone will try to pretend nothing ever happened.
I’m torn between a. and c. but if I had to put real money, probably a.
a, and c, are compatible with each other – and are quite common in many organisations, especially those in government. No shortage of c at present, at least.
It’s worked for Fauci and his gang since the 80s
the crook fauci
Yes but… Lessons Will Be Learnt™️
In Scotland any response would Be Proportionate.
Seriously, we needed a court case and paperwork with a lot of mumbo jumbo to ‘prove’ there was no scientific rationale for the vaxx mandates/coercion?
It was clear there was no scientific rationale when all the vaxx manufacturers based their trials on a chemical concoction that was aimed at reducing symptoms only and was intended for the groups most at risk, the elderly and the immoncompromised. At no point did they change the aim of the trial – they couldn’t, they knew full well that an injection leading to the production of antibodies in the blood would provide no protection against infection by a virus that comes in through the respiratory system.
It was clear there was no scientific rationale when ‘breakthrough’ infections started popping up left right and centre in spring 2021 – the fact that that fraud Pfauci said vaxxed people didn’t have to test if they had corona symptoms should have set off alarm bells – if you don’t test vaxxed people, how do you know the very new vaxx, still being studied was in fact ‘effective’?
It was clear there was no scientific rationale in summer 2021, when Israel was seeing serious illness and death among its highly vaxxed population and started giving people a 3rd poke – it was clear the vaxx stopped nothing.
It was clear there was no scientific rationale when all countries changed the tune from ‘you’ll be a dead end for the virus, vaxxed people don’t get the virus’ to ‘it will keep you out of hospital/ICU, you will be stripped of your fundamental rights to make sure you do not fall ill and burden the health care system that you fund and whose raison d’ etre is, in fact, to take care of people who have fallen ill”.
I suspect in all countries something similar will be the case – it will be unclear exactly who was calling for people to be forced into being vaxxed either by means of mandates or by means of the apartheid app. Wasn’t this type of ‘I was just following orders, guv’ from bottom to top one of the things we were meant to never forget?
To know this one doesn’t need a court case. To have the instruments to lawfully push back across all jurisdictions within international law, a lawful judgement & court case outcome is the evidence which cannot be lightly dismissed as ‘mis-information, tin foil hatters, conspiracy theories’.
These court judgements are dangerous to the cabal, hence why they have invested so much time, money & effort on corrupting & infiltrating the legal systems around the globe.
Second major hit piece against the Establishment Narrative by the Telegraph yesterday (after Karol Sikora’s piece).
Has something changed? Has the Gates money come to a stop, or has the Government advertising/bribery money run dry?
Maybe just wishful thinking on my part, but we’ll see.
Incidentally, Karol Sikora likes to paint himself as a long-term objector to lockdowns, but for the first few months at least he was more than a little equivocal. I recall having a go at him about it in the comments to a Spectator piece he wrote in about May 2020. Still, if the Great and the Good are now deciding it’s cool to be anti-lockdown then I suppose that’s progress of sorts – leaves the really guilty ones the more isolated and set up to pay their dues.
PS: here’s the Spectator article.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-to-find-a-safe-way-out-of-the-coronavirus-lockdown
No paywall if you only look at one or two articles a month. It was from 8 April 2020 – as I say, highly equivocal in his commentary on lockdowns.
An Honest Public Servant
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcqKMET87N8
“A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar.”
– H. L. Mencken
Tony Heller
Yellow Boards By The Road
The Globalists’ biggest weapon is our complacency
Wednesday 17th August 12pm to 1pm
Yellow Boards
Junction A332 Windsor Rd &
A330 Winkfield Road,
Ascot SL5 7UL
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Tyrant Trudeau/Peterloo Trudeau.
Rupa is trying to rebrand herself as some sort of moralistic freedom fighter. A few short months ago she was a champion of mandates and restrictions. This about face is welcome, but we must not let these people forget about the atrocities they participated and benefited from
Exactly. We who know will not forget and I for one, will not forgive, either.
Wow hopefully Canadians wake up