Ed West is on fire at the moment. He keeps writing one great piece after the next – and I’m almost ready to forgive him for being completely unsound on lockdowns. His latest Substack post is about the need for a First Amendment in the UK and, as usual, it’s a tour de force.
Today, Britain in effect has two sets of blasphemy laws. There is a de facto law protecting Islam, illustrated by the recent removal of a film depicting Mohammed. And there are the more official hate speech laws protecting people’s identities, which are treated with almost comically-absurd harshness by the courts, like with the ancient crime of asebeia.
Just this week an ex-police officer was jailed for 20 weeks over racist messages sent to a WhatsApp group. James Watts had sent 10 offensive memes during May and June 2020, “including one featuring a white dog wearing Ku Klux Klan clothing and another showing a kneeling mat with [George] Floyd’s face printed on it”.
The magistrate told him that “The hostility that you demonstrated on the basis of race makes this offending so serious that I cannot deal with it by a community penalty or a fine. A message must go out and that message can only go out through an immediate sentence of imprisonment.“
Well, that message has certainly been sent out.
To illustrate how jarring this sentence is with the usual standards of British justice, just a fortnight ago two men in Lancashire were spared prison after putting a complete stranger in intensive care for no reason.
The Watts ruling is not an isolated incident. A teenager who sent a racist tweet to Marcus Rashford was given six weeks in jail, a quite extraordinarily harsh sentence in a country where violent offenders regularly avoid prison. In contrast a young man the same age who set fire to the flag on the Cenotaph avoided jail. What does society consider sacred — racial identity, or the sacrifice of young men dying for their country? The judiciary have clearly given their answer.
Like all Ed’s pieces, this one is worth reading in full.
You can subscribe to Ed’s Substack newsletter here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Net Zero Will Require a Command Economy”
Perhaps this gives a clue as to its popularity with the group that fancies doing lots of “commanding”.
Well there are just to many of us nasty human beings. Depopulation is the only answer I wonder how they will address this issue.
Interestingly the elite never suggest killing off the oldies at age 70 as a way to control population. I guess because Soros & the gang are oldies themselves.
None of it will ever apply to them. They are the Prize Pigs.
De-population?????? How do you propose we go about that? In reality it is the poorest countries who have the highest birthrates. Once a country becomes prosperous its birthrates fall to that seen in the wealthy west. So the answer to your alleged problem of too many people is wealth. ———-Ironically there is only one way that poor countries can become prosperous and that is by using the same fuels as we did ——Coal gas and oil. Fobbing poor people off with wind turbines is condemning them to misery and poverty for decades to come.
Great article, even if CO2 is the problem net zero is totally unachievable without a huge drop in our standard of living. That won’t go down to well with the electorate, that’s if you believe we are still living in a democracy.
To what extent is CO2 “the problem”? Remember that there is no evidence that CO2 is causing or will cause dangerous changes to climate. ——-But CO2 is something else. It is the one gas that can be directly tied to Industrial Capitalism , and that is what all of this is really about. Notice is always the progressive left and Communists who harp on about the climate. because it is a tool to redistribute and control the worlds wealth and resources. CO2 is the Globalist bureaucrats dream gas. It allows them to put in place policies they have long demanded, and they have the plausible excuse of climate to help them achieve that.
Of course Net Zero requires a central planning, command and control economy – it’s a Socialist wealth redistribution project.
Anyone not having seen that with the whole 30 year long global warming/climate change hoax has not been paying attention.
It is why it is so popular with the German Greens and the EU – nothing says central economic planning and control like the EU.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/israel-palestine-conflict-connecting-dots-more/5835802?doing_wp_cron=1697106680.1301569938659667968750
The best explanation of the Israel “war.”
Exellent, accurate, historically factual and spot on account.
Remember, it’s not just about the control of finance, land and resources, it’s far more sinister than that.
Thanking you for this link.
Oh well, you can’t even talk to normal people about this anymore!
Fat Pig News Investigates!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIO3fJpnXLE
People will not be permitted to vote against the policies of the political class. The nationalist parties were only permitted to flourish in the interests of splitting up the UK. Now that is achieved they will not get such an easy ride.
The Greens were allowed to kick start the policies the political class had already adopted. Now they are just a nuisance.
The chances of a new party are insignificant. Worth trying but with a minimal chance of having any impact. CBDC will not permit donations to them.
What a cheery article.
So Britain will become a North Korea type hermit state. A glowing example of a stale miserable, soul crushing, anti-human ideology.
It will probably need North Korean levels of indoctrination and repression to achieve too.
We’re still in time to vote against it in the next election… oh, yeah, no we can’t because both Team A and Team B are pushing it. Oh well….
Perhaps if enough commentators raise the alarm and plead with the powers that be to be reasonable,.like kowtowing supplicant before an emperor, maybe they’ll relax the goals and crush us into submission a little bit more slowly and gently.
That’s democracy folks.
throwing all that labour into Net Zero
I suggest a slightly different spelling: Throwing all that Labour into Net Zero. Makes much more sense in this way.
This conclusion is indeed what is happening already . We are being commanded to buy electric cars , heat pumps and expensive , unreliable wind and solar energy . The only way it will actually happen is in a Dictatorship like China and I fear our young are stupid enough to vote in a Dictator . It will be too late by the time they realise that their fate is sealed .
It’s been obvious all along. Net Zero is just communism rebranded.
CO2 will not kill us all, in fact it won’t kill anyone due to emissions. But getting to utterly worthless Net Zero will kill quite a few of us and it’ll bring the country to its knees. Net Zero must be stopped and the grifters getting rich off of it need to be jailed.
Net Zero comes from the Maurice Strong School of thought that that thinks that Industrial society should be destroyed and he said “Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about”? ——-Our own globalist parasite politicians are fully onboard with this impoverishment of their own citizens and they are a diabolical disgrace. Not one of them questioned the Net Zero amendment to the Climate Change act in 2019. No questions about cost or benefit were ever asked, and the cost to people in terms of their wallets, their standard of living, welfare and health will be enormous. The political class are squirming UN lackey parasites.
Personally I think NetZero is cloud cuckoo land.
not enough electricity
unsustainable energy sources: wind,solar, battery
a massive rethink is necessary.
“Net Zero Will Require a Command Economy and Massive Drop in Living Standards” – but surely that’s the point? Do people seriously think that Net Zero is about protecting the environment? Or that lockdowns, social distancing and jabs are about preventing the spread of infectious disease? Or that Wokeism is about combatting racism? Or that ESG scores are about creating a fairer society? Or that the Transgender movement is concerned about homosexual and transgender people? Or that Militant Veganism is about animal welfare? Or that the Communist and Socialist ideologies of the last century were about helping ordinary, working people?
It won’t be an issue that the climate hasn’t stopped “changing” by 2050, just like it wasn’t an issue that covid hadn’t disappeared after weeks of lockdown. It will just be our fault for not doing it all soon enough, hard enough, and long enough, so the answer will be to do it all even sooner and harder and longer.