• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

And Finally…

by Toby Young
8 February 2022 12:33 AM

In this week’s episode of London Calling, James and I discuss the Freedom Convoy, which has restored our faith in Canadians; the Jimmy Carr joke imbroglio, in which various left-wing comedians and assorted Mary Whitehouse wannabes have called for Carr to be cancelled for telling a tasteless joke; the first ever review of London Calling, published in a progressive, online magazine called Left Foot Forward; and, in Culture Corner, Reacher, All of us Are Dead and Ozarks.

You can listen to the podcast here and subscribe on iTunes here.

Tags: Freedom ConvoyJimmy CarrLondon Calling

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Putting Tights Over a Face Mask Makes it Work Better, Study Finds

Next Post

News Round-Up

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
crazypaving17
crazypaving17
3 years ago

Why no mention of passenger locator forms being scrapped? If we’re not expected to test it isolate why are those pointless forms required?

86
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  crazypaving17

It’s not just the locator form, it’s the requirement to test before and after travel if you’re not vaxxed. That’s a “domestic” restriction as it applies to UK residents returning home, and if it’s to remain then “all remaining domestic restrictions dropped” is a lie.

145
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Lies are Johnson’s’ ‘stock in trade”.

48
0
SAGE LIARS
SAGE LIARS
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Your comment applies to Ferguson, SAGE, MSM and all the other Big Pharma shrills as well

14
0
annicx
annicx
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

I don’t think he even realises he’s lying.

0
0
marebobowl
marebobowl
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Of course it will remain. You are being punished for refusing an experimental biological with little if any safety or efficacy data. A cheap price to pay for not putting an experimental biological into your body. By the way the powers that be in 5he UK have been bought and paid for so do not expect anything to change for the unvaxxed.

4
0
Watney
Watney
3 years ago
Reply to  crazypaving17

The PLF makes no sense with no legal requirement to test or isolate and it’s one of the stupid rules that is the same whatever the vax status or whether you live here or are a tourist.
I presume it’s mainly about getting us used to government documenting our unnecessary travel in order to limit it later to save the planet

45
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago
Reply to  Watney

I have decided to play my part in bankrupting the airlines by never going abroad again

101
-1
Dave Angel Eco Warrior
Dave Angel Eco Warrior
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

I hope there are enough of us to make that happen but I doubt there will be. Most will accept ‘a small price to pay’ for holidaying abroad.

36
0
Draefend
Draefend
3 years ago
Reply to  Dave Angel Eco Warrior

Disclosure time, I work in the travel industry. Run my own businesses and have been pretty much wiped out financially and mentally.

I suspect airlines have been told to enforce pointless restrictions in cabin so that they can operate.

I know a few customers who have had the jabs purely to travel. I’m not jabbed and won’t be but it is hard to cross off a part of my life that I have loved.

There’s no deeper meaning to this but not going to Spain next month to host a trip is a genuine regret. Still not getting f!@÷ing jabbed though.



179
-1
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  Draefend

Keep up the good work. I won’t step inside a plane again until all the so called Covid restrictions are lifted. If that means I never fly again so be it.

104
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Rowan

Me too. I’ll see you in Cornwall, sir 😀

49
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

You can still get a coach to the Med!

23
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Still need Vaxx Pass of ‘proof of negative test result’ for that both ways. Who wants to sit and sleep in a bumpy, dirty coach full of ‘cheap travellers’ for 2-3 days?

9
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

I’ve done it – and they’re not ”bumpy” let alone ”dirty, and my fellow travellers were delightful people, with a sense of adventure.
With a narrow-minded attitude like yours it’s a good thing you don’t get out more!

5
0
imp66
imp66
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Or a dinghy to France!

8
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

If you don’t mind sitting muzzled in a coach for that length of time.

0
-1
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

I’ll see you in Cornwall

With all the PentaG and military surveillance equipment everywhere. Nice.

3
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

Many of those living in Cornwall & Devon hated tourists visiting during the ‘lockdowns’. Many swore they’d never visit Cornwall or Devon ever again. How easily these promises are broken.
All tourists should stay firmly away from Cornwall and Devon so those nasty folk down there can wallow in the thoughts of how truly nasty they really are.

cornwall.jpg
18
-3
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

“A woman’s car has sustained serious damage after vigilantes poured paint on it believing she was occupying a second home in a Cornish village.

Sue Skyba garnered dozens of supportive comments after she posted a picture of the damage to her yellow VW Beetle.

She believes she was targeted because people thought she was using a second home near to St. Austell in Cornwall.

Signs have also apparently appeared in the village telling second home users to ‘stop spreading the virus.'”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8221117/Vigilantes-pour-PAINT-womans-car-wrongly-believing-second-home-lockdown.html

7
0
maccone
maccone
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Plenty of other lovely (and much quieter!) spots in the UK. Seek them out!

10
0
marebobowl
marebobowl
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Hahaha. You are right. I live in Devon, not a Brit, and I always found it a little rich when people said they wished all these people from elsewhere would not come to Devon/Cornwall. Desperate for tourism but don’t want anyone there.

1
0
VAX FREE IanC
VAX FREE IanC
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Northumbria for me, Cornwall is full.

Backpacker.jpg
15
0
LizT
LizT
3 years ago
Reply to  VAX FREE IanC

Shhhh, don’t tell everyone

6
0
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  VAX FREE IanC

That looks like Cameron on his way to his Cornwall redoubt…

1
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Rowan

Have you been into Tesco’s since the Christmas advert came out?

1
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Draefend

Good for you. I found it relatively easy to decline my death shot. But I greatly admire those who have had to make great sacrifices.

Things will improve. Even if you have to create Freedom Travel and help us unclean holiday abroad somewhere.

49
0
sam s.j.
sam s.j.
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

yes Freedom Travel  will have lot s of us for customers!

3
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Draefend

Disclosure time, I work in the travel industry. Run my own businesses and have been pretty much wiped out financially and mentally.

I’m very sorry to hear that.
Do you know what airlines do with regard to those who have mask exemptions? Do they refused to have them on board, along with the “unvaccinated”?

15
0
Gefion
Gefion
3 years ago
Reply to  Draefend

Ditto my husband – but don’t tell anyone this – he worked in the oil industry…

4
0
imp66
imp66
3 years ago
Reply to  Draefend

My partner works in the international travel industry. I refuse to get the injections. If my other half’s job was endangered by masses choosing like me ( and therefore not permitted to travel beyond our borders), then it’s a price we are both willing to pay. Some principles really do matter more than earnings or holidaying abroad. Never taking these “vaccines”!

14
0
Sambagirl
Sambagirl
3 years ago
Reply to  Draefend

Anyone got any ideas as to pressurising the powers-that-be into removing these ridiculous, divisive and unscientific regulations for travellers? There’s got to be something…
I’d love to travel again, but there is no way I’m taking a test or putting an unknown into my system to travel – so many others I know have done this. I’ve had plenty of real – and safe – vaccines for travel in the past. If we can all transmit it equally, then the only reason for this stupid restriction is as a punishment. Don’t they realise that the remaining unvaccinated have waited, reviewed the information, and thought about the issue of vaccination?

1
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Dave Angel Eco Warrior

Th “vaccine” will eventually determine whether this is “a small price to pay”.

25
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Dave Angel Eco Warrior

It’s a bit like all those who said they were going to boycott Tesco’s because they were outraged at the Christmas advert where Santa shows his Vaxx Pass.
But then suddenly it’s OK to go to Tesco because “it’s convenient”.

Awaiting downticks from all those who can’t face up to this ugly and painful truth. Get angry at yourselves for breaking your own promise!

Last edited 3 years ago by Emerald Fox
17
-1
Gefion
Gefion
3 years ago
Reply to  Dave Angel Eco Warrior

Don’t forget that restrictions are protections for the good of everyone. Or so I was told by a friend…

4
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

You probably weren’t planning to go abroad anyway. People stop flying when they become too old and infirm – do the airlines worry? Of course not – younger people replace them all the time.
Your absence won’t help to bankrupt any airline.

2
-8
Human Resource 19510203
Human Resource 19510203
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

Me too. And I was an airline pilot for 27 years. I don’t care if I never go abroad again if the price is to take the state injectable stuff ( I’ve had two AZ but no more), test when not ill and wear a mask.

10
0
marebobowl
marebobowl
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

I am in Portugal. Mask world. Boy do they love their masks, one of the greatest signs of stupidity. I guess a history of a dictatorship gov’t is hard to erase from the mind of the dictated.

2
0
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  Watney

Take it from a person who knows, the PLF is …..not robust, shall we say. It can be “adapted” and the travel authorities know this…..in other words a veritable con and someone /some people are making a wedge from the software.

7
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  crazypaving17

Ask Boris…. if you’d like to hear another lie. All governments have imprisoned their populations with the aim of ultimate control of movements. THIS is what ‘Covid’ is all about.
I read someone saying that the protests in London are what forced the Government’s hand… well, talk about being deluded! That’s just as much rubbish as claiming your Covid symptoms would be worse if it weren’t for the ‘vaccines’.
The Government is very much in control – as we see with the travel restrictions.

A snap of Boris’s fingers, when he is again “advised by SAGE” and the nation will be back in face masks the next day. You know it.

22
0
FrankFisher
FrankFisher
3 years ago
Reply to  crazypaving17

Because the database is going nowhere, and it’s the database that matters.

1
0
marebobowl
marebobowl
3 years ago
Reply to  crazypaving17

Because someone told a porky. No, not all covid mandates were dropped. I won’t say someone lied, but you get the picture.

0
0
PatrickF
PatrickF
3 years ago

I’m unvaxxed. Am I free to travel abroad, without let, or hindrance? No. I’m not free.

201
-1
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

The travelling abroad is largely out of our control, it’s the requirements on return that are the problem.

69
0
ElSabio
ElSabio
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

.

Toast 22.jpg
76
-4
Watney
Watney
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Agreed, the changes announced are quite limited. We can’t do much about other countries entry rules except to show a way forward by removing all our rules and paperwork just like countries such as Norway have recently done

27
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Well, my wife, two children and I just returned from four nights in Lisbon. We’re all unjuic’d. UK Border Force didn’t even ask about the stupid PLF. Didn’t even ask if we’d arranged stupid Day 2 tests.

77
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

That’s good to know, though I suppose you might get unlucky and get checked. Not sure where you’d stand then. They can’t stop you entering the country, or going home. Maybe you’d get fined.

27
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

The inducing of Fear and the casual random criminalisation or ordinary behaviour is still in force.

41
0
crazypaving17
crazypaving17
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

We’ve travelled to Greece twice and Spain in 2020 and 2021, despite having to pay for tests and fill in forms, no one ever checked. If this pointless bullshit remains by the time I head to Turkey I’ll just write any old shit in the boxes and I’m not paying a penny for tests. No one ever followed up on any of the stuff we’ve done prior so why, after all restrictions are dropped would they suddenly start? Plus they can bollocks if they think I’m wearing a mask on a plane too. Happily waved a bit of paper with an nhs logo last year to exempt myself but I’m not doing that this time. I’m just not wearing one.

56
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  crazypaving17

This is how we stop it. Don’t play along. In Scotland no one is checking vaccine passports. When the clubs were told they had to, but pubs didn’t, they stuck one chair on the dancefloor and said they were a pub and therefore exempt.

The goal is ridicule. Show contempt. We often forget the government pontificates from a big fancy building in London and aims at the media and chattering classes. They lap it up. But it is ordinary working class people who have to enforce the nonsense. That’s why it isn’t enforced.

So next time you should ignore it all. Brazen it out. If they challenge you then loudly accuse them of transphobia 💃

Last edited 3 years ago by Vaxtastic
81
0
TSull
TSull
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

This is more or less the same strategy that brought about the fall of the Soviet Union.

33
0
CovidiotAntiMasker
CovidiotAntiMasker
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Yes, do not comply with the lie.

22
0
SteveHoffmanUK
SteveHoffmanUK
3 years ago
Reply to  crazypaving17

Will be interested to see what happens to you. My sister celebrates her 100th birthday next year in the US (I’m in the UK), and I’d like to go, but can’t face the idea of hours with a mask on.

13
0
CovidiotAntiMasker
CovidiotAntiMasker
3 years ago
Reply to  SteveHoffmanUK

Stow away in the undercarriage instead.

0
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  SteveHoffmanUK

You need to be ‘fully vaxxed’ to enter the USA. Are you?

0
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  crazypaving17

Airlines have been throwing passengers off for not wearing face masks, and having the Police to meet them at the other end if deemed ‘awkward’ on the plane once it’s up.
Governments have told airlines and airports they want passengers wearing face masks, and why would they risk fines and penalties for the odd person who refuses to wear a face mask?
I’m not saying it’s good to have to wear face masks for plane travel, what I am saying to all those who say “I won’t be wearing one at the airport or on the plane” is ‘seeing is believing’; I’d like to see someone actually trying this and to see for how long they can get away with it.

Last edited 3 years ago by Emerald Fox
5
-1
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

Many details are missing, such as:
1 – you would have needed to fill in Passenger Locator Forms – did you do that? What address did you put? Your own home address?
2 – PCR tests have to be taken before returning, and pre-purchased for taking upon arrival to the UK – from which company did you buy these, and how much did they cost?
3 – which flight for the return?

“Didn’t even ask if we’d arranged stupid Day 2 tests.”

Which airport did you land at? If you went through the automatic machines then there would be no Border Force asking you anything… so we have to presume you went to the ‘manual’ desks – but why that?

You say you weren’t asked about the tests, but had you written the details/codes down on the Passenger Locator Forms?

This is the moment you start huffing and puffing and getting ‘angry’ with me (the “forum retard”) – but without details which can be proven, it’s all hearsay. If you can answer the above questions, we’ll be making progress with seeing how people can travel back to the UK. I don’t think my questions are unreasonable.

3
-2
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Neg LFT pre departure still required by many EU countries; day 2 tests largely abandoned; pre-purchased LFT tests on return abandoned a while ago by UK.

Scam is that large parts of EU have treated the UK as – almost – a country as a “variant concern” or “high risk” – that is a fact. However just scope the stats from Worldmeter filtered for Europe and be prepared for a shock – I have monitored this for months and the UK has always been , apart from a very short period, immediately post Omicron, nowhere near the top of the “cases” lead – this has more often or not been France/Germany/Netherlands and is still the case; “cases’ in the UK have fallen off a cliff – guess which European country has the highest tests per million population …..

So it is about fear and control, not about health; Germans of our acquaintance have stated that “vaccines lead to herd immunity”…….. .

The mask mandate in western EU countries is rigorously applied to the fearful; horrible to see.

5
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Hi Emerald, as I told you on previous BTL comments and via private message, details to come in a Postcard from Portugal. I shan’t provide too many specifics about what we wrote for the bureaucracy, but perhaps a few subtle pointers will suffice for us thinking, sceptical people 😉

0
0
Gefion
Gefion
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

Which airline did you fly with? Didn’t they need LFT proof before you let both countries?

0
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago

Together with the treatments and scientific understanding of the virus we’ve now built up…

Just more waffle, or is it the beginning of a defence strategy?
The ‘scientific understanding’ has resulted in successive illogical measures, and the ‘treatments’ were all pooh-poohed or banned, instead of being tested before the vaccines arrived. Of course, had the ‘treatments’ proved to be successful, then the ‘temporary authorisation’ for the vaxxes would have been harder to justify.

64
0
Moderate Radical
Moderate Radical
3 years ago
Reply to  John Dee

You’re hitting nails on the head all over the place.

15
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  Moderate Radical

No he isnt hes perpetuating the falsehood that there has been a novel virus which has been proven to exist and cause disease and that on some levels measures were justified- which is bullsh1t. No nails, just another so called sceptic spreading the exact message that the government wants him to spread – that there was a viral pandemic and that Big Pharma (evil corrupt corporate) saved the day with its potions – and yes I mean ivermectin and all the other crap they have sewn into your subconscious to make you believe in convid. You people believing in this despite the fact that from day one it has been clear that there was never anything in circulation that increased mortality are as much a part of the problem as those running the scam. You are like their marketing department, only you work for free and dont charge the chunky salary they pay to their regular sales and marketing people. How can you still believe in this crap. I dont get it. THERE WAS NEVER A SUPER KILLER MEGA VIRUS. YOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO.

Here is a good exercise for you to prove they are lying to you and that this is only a scamdemic. Compare population sizes for 2020 and before. Let me know if you find any evidence of a “deadly pandemic” anywhere on Earth. Start with the UK then look at world population. Yet another compelling proof that convid is a scam.
Heres a taster:

The current population of U.K. in 2021 is 68,207,116, a 0.47% increase from 2020. The population of U.K. in 2020 was 67,886,011, a 0.53% increase from 2019. The population of U.K. in 2019 was 67,530,172, a 0.58% increase from 2018.

16
-1
Moderate Radical
Moderate Radical
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

‘[Dee is] perpetuating the falsehood that there has been a novel virus which has been proven to exist and cause disease and that on some levels measures were justified…’

1. There’s definitely something which has been going about, so what is it? Careful how your answer that. Think about it.

2. Non Sequitur. Acknowledging the existence of a virus does not entail justifying the measures implemented in order to ‘combat’ that virus.

You’re tilting at windmills.

‘No nails…’

Not in your case, judging from what follows.

‘…just another so called sceptic spreading the exact message that the government wants him to spread…’  

Let’s see…

‘…that there was a viral pandemic and that Big Pharma (evil corrupt corporate) saved the day with its potions – and yes I mean ivermectin and all the other crap they have sewn into your subconscious to make you believe in convid.’

Now you’re conflating acceptance of a virus with acceptance of a ‘pandemic’. That’s another non sequitur. For someone so confident you’re making some very basic errors here.

‘You people believing in this despite the fact that from day one it has been clear that there was never anything in circulation that increased mortality are as much a part of the problem as those running the scam.’ 

1. ‘You people’? Get a grip, pal.

2. On your own terms, all-cause mortality not increasing significantly does not negate the existence of a virus. There are multiple potential variables rendering that assertion another non sequitur.

3. On (2), again, you’re conflating the existence of a virus with a pandemic. One can acknowledge the existence of a virus without acknowledging the existence of a pandemic. You’re the king of non sequiturs.

‘You are like their marketing department, only you work for free and dont charge the chunky salary they pay to their regular sales and marketing people. How can you still believe in this crap. I dont get it. THERE WAS NEVER A SUPER KILLER MEGA VIRUS. YOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO.’

You’re big on assertions but poor on substantiation. Where did Dee or I assert that there has been a ‘super killer mega virus’? Are you dense?

‘Here is a good exercise for you to prove they are lying to you and that this is only a scamdemic. Compare population sizes for 2020 and before. Let me know if you find any evidence of a “deadly pandemic” anywhere on Earth. Start with the UK then look at world population. Yet another compelling proof that convid is a scam.’

Again, non sequitur. Acknowledging the existence of a virus does not equate to acknowledging a ‘deadly pandemic’. Dee [I believe, being familiar with his position] and I do not subscribe to the ‘deadly pandemic’ narrative, and your assertions are utterly irrational and stupid.

‘The current population of U.K. in 2021 is 68,207,116, a 0.47% increase from 2020. The population of U.K. in 2020 was 67,886,011, a 0.53% increase from 2019. The population of U.K. in 2019 was 67,530,172, a 0.58% increase from 2018.’

Again, non sequitur.

You’ve offered nothing of substance. Your post is utterly confused. It’s an orgy of non sequiturs.

By the way, whence you do get your ‘population’ figures, and how can you trust them?

Last edited 3 years ago by Moderate Radical
6
-5
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  Moderate Radical

Although there may well have been a virus, it seems that the HIV virus was something of a myth. And there were rather a lot of symptoms being claimed for “covid”.

As for mortality, so far as I understand, there were about 68,000 excess deaths adjusted for age and population in 2020, in a year when we know that tens of thousands of people were killed by the lockdowns, and evidence is mounting that the lockdowns made little or no difference to “covid” mortality. And 2020 was only the worst year for excess deaths since 2008. I think it’s likely atb any rate that there was nothing very exceptional about 2020 (apart from the lockdown harms).

10
0
Stephensceptic
Stephensceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

Clearly there was a spike in mortality in early 2020. However, by the standards of any past pandemic it was not that. We know too that it was concentrated amongst the elderly, and even then the death rates were not at pandemic levels.

Nobody has shown that the mortality spike was caused by a virus. Nobody has managed to isolate a virus in nature, nor to show that it transmits, nor to show that it has created illness. What we think of as viruses could be exosomes which are a consequence of illness not a cause. We have been brain washed in the modern era to fear viruses and a whole “science” of virology exists that in reality is based on intellectualizing from a false premise. Think alchemy. Germ Theory is unproven and the marginalization of Terrain Theory has been one of the biggest medical disasters of the past century or so.

My view is that we simply do not know what caused the mortality spike in early 2020. Owing to the obsession with viruses, nobody with funding is looking for the answer either.

Last edited 3 years ago by Stephensceptic
3
0
SAGE LIARS
SAGE LIARS
3 years ago
Reply to  Stephensceptic

‘Germ Theory is unproven and the marginalization of Terrain Theory has been one of the biggest medical disasters of the past century or so’…………not been a disaster for Rockafella ‘medicine’ or Big Pharma though. They have trained the modern day medical ‘professionals’ one way, and woe betide ANYONE of them who dares to even think outside the ‘box’………….I would respectfully change the word ‘unproven’ with complete and utter b*llocks!!

1
-1
Moderate Radical
Moderate Radical
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

I don’t disagree in any significant way with any of that, and none of what you say negates my position.

0
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  Moderate Radical

1. There’s definitely something which has been going about, so what is it? Careful how your answer that. Think about it.

There has been an epidemic of government criminality and deceit, aka terrorism, genocide and fraud. You assert that something has definitelty been going around but the reality is that – as I have posted on here probably fifty or more times – since the very start of the scamdemic even the authorities admitted and published documents to confirm that nothing entered the world that was more deadly than the common flu. Since then the whole science of virology has been exposed as a fraud and no proof of a novekl virus has been demonstrated anywhere on Earth. Christine Massey has obtsained FOIs form all over the world and this is coinfirmed. But keep believing the known proven liars, despite the lack of evidence.

If you dont know this by now, you must have your head in the sand. I guess you never read my posts so ill post some links to make my point. I cant be bothered to argue with someone who uses military language like “get a grip”. The population figures come from worldometer but you can cross reference them with other sources. Just search “uk population growth 2020” or similar and you should get lots of credible sources coming up. There has been no discernible “like never seen before” respiratory illness. Thats a lie and they admit it.

CONVID was a nothing burger from the start, just common ailments and symptoms cynically and blatantly relabelled and with a fraudulent not fit for puropose test spewing out the positives to make the whole thing seem real, especially on the wards. Its hard to overstate how big a psychological trick that is, following all the terrorism about a novel super killer mega virus. They have a transparently criminal system of recording Convid deaths – any death within 28 or sixty days of a positive unvaslidated PCR test which cannot EVER diagnose disease. They also changed the protocols regarding death certificate registration to facilitate death cerificate forgery on a grand scale. Its organised crime, not a legitimate response to a genuine health issue.

Convid was always a nothing burger a fabrication, a scam. Low mortality rates as confirmed by the worlds foremost epidemiologist Professor John Ioannidis and GOVUK:

APRIL 2020 – BREAKING NEWS ! Prof Dr John Ioannidis Stanford University On Real Data On Coronavirus Pandemic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btvDL6kIDsA

Global perspective of COVID-19 epidemiology for a full-cycle pandemic
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13423

Global infection fatality rate is 0.15-0.20% (0.03-0.04% in those <70 years)

Quick everyone, Convid has a 99.97percent survival rate in the under 70s from natural immunity and an over IFR equal to the COMMON FLU which has miraculously disappeared form the face of the Earth, SHUT THE WORLD DOWN NOW!

High consequence infectious diseases (HCID)
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid#status-of-covid-19

Status of COVID-19

As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK. There are many diseases which can cause serious illness which are not classified as HCIDs.

The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.

The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID.

Last edited 3 years ago by ComeTheRevolution
3
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

John P.A. Ioannidis
Professor of Medicine (Stanford Prevention Research), of Epidemiology and Population Health and by courtesy, of Statistics and of Biomedical Data Science

https://profiles.stanford.edu/john-ioannidis

Read this document to understand the basics about PCR test fraud and murder on the wards via ventilation. They were fast tracking people to the vents for no valid reason other than the fact they had been filled iwth terror about a nonexistent super killer mega virus.

The Chinese Communist Party’s Global Lockdown Fraud
https://ccpgloballockdownfraud.medium.com/the-chinese-communist-partys-global-lockdown-fraud-88e1a7286c2b

3. Deadly Recommendations for Early Mechanical Ventilation Came from China

4. The World’s Predominant, Wildly-Inaccurate PCR Testing Protocols Are Based on Incomplete, Theoretical Genome Sequences Supplied by China

GOVUK criminality exposed. Explains death certificate forgery and corruption of the ONS:

COVID 19 Is A Statistical Nonsense
https://in-this-together.com/covid-19-is-a-statistical-nonsense/

Last edited 3 years ago by ComeTheRevolution
0
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

2021-10-25 ::: Nature of the COVID-era public health disaster in the USA, from all-cause mortality and socio-geo-economic and climatic data
https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=107&name=2021_10_25_nature_of_the_covid_era_public_health_disaster_in_the_usa_from_all_cause_mortality_and_socio_geo_economic_and_climatic_data

We conclude that a pandemic did not occur.

UK Population Data confirming no discernible effect on population grooth.

https://www.bing.com/search?q=uk+population+growth+2020&go=Search&qs=ds&form=QBRE

CHRISTINE MASSEY – 137 INSTITUTIONS AND 25 COUNTRIES – VIRUS NEVER ISOLATED/ PURIFIED
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aN1Yo1N81fsy/

0
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

The Final Refutal Of Virology – Dr. Stefan Lanka – Covid And It’s Spike Protein Do Not Exist.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1RF4eHWqBW0j/

Dr. Kevin Corbett Interview | Following the Science? | Oracle Films
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rCzXdMmhEQ4a/

External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

0
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

GOVUK CONvid Terror campaign exposed:

COVID 19 – The UK Scamdemic – Part 2
https://in-this-together.com/covid-19-the-uk-scamdemic-part-2/

THE ‘OMICRON’ VARIANT THAT DOES NOT EXIST FROM THE UNICORN VIRUS ‘COVID’ – BY DR ANDREW KAUFMAN
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DI8XDVfqBhuf/

Killing patients with Remdesevir (in the UK as well) explained:

Dr. Ardis talks about remdesevir genocide
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rjnDRmf00QBi/

Last edited 3 years ago by ComeTheRevolution
1
0
Moderate Radical
Moderate Radical
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

You’re tilting at windmills again. You seem hysterical.

‘There has been an epidemic of government criminality and deceit, aka terrorism, genocide and fraud.’ 

Agreed.

‘You assert that something has definitelty been going around but the reality is that – as I have posted on here probably fifty or more times – since the very start of the scamdemic even the authorities admitted and published documents to confirm that nothing entered the world that was more deadly than the common flu.’ 

How on earth does that contradict anything I’ve said. You essentially just confirmed my point that there’s ‘definitely something which has been going about’. Are you actually paying attention?

‘Since then the whole science of virology has been exposed as a fraud and no proof of a [novel] virus has been demonstrated anywhere on Earth. Christine Massey has obtsained FOIs form all over the world and this is coinfirmed. But keep believing the known proven liars, despite the lack of evidence.’

So what is the nature of this virus, then? Do you realise you haven’t even attempted to address this? What is the nature of this virus (that you acknowledge is ‘[not] more deadly than the common flu’), and can you demonstrate that it has been isolated?  

‘If you dont know this by now, you must have your head in the sand.’ 

Again, you’re tilting at windmills. You’re arguing with a ghost.

‘I guess you never read my posts so ill post some links to make my point.’

You seem to believe your posts are the definitive ruling on the matter. This is bizarre. Having scanned your links, I’ve watched or read most if not all of the them. You’re not presenting anything new. 

‘I cant be bothered to argue with someone who uses military language like “get a grip”.’

What on earth are you talking about. ‘Get a grip’ is not ‘military language’, at least not exclusively. It simply means stop being irrational. Ironically, by scarpering from the discussion in response to an imperative phrase you only accentuate your irrationality. It would be funny if it were not so tragic.

‘The population figures come from worldometer but you can cross reference them with other sources. Just search “uk population growth 2020” or similar and you should get lots of credible sources coming up.’

Population figures are notoriously difficult to ascertain and contradictory. I wasn’t actually expecting you to be able to substantiate your claim; my point is it seems you like to pretend to have certainty when it helps your position.

‘There has been no discernible “like never seen before” respiratory illness. Thats a lie and they admit it.’

Again, agreed. Would you like to be honest and admit I never claimed otherwise? When will the penny drop that you’re arguing with a ghost?

‘CONVID was a nothing burger from the start, just common ailments and symptoms cynically and blatantly relabelled and with a fraudulent not fit for puropose test spewing out the positives to make the whole thing seem real, especially on the wards.’

Again, you’re not engaging with anything I’ve claimed. You’re shadow-boxing. You’re not engaging with anything I’ve ever said or claimed.

‘Its hard to overstate how big a psychological trick that is, following all the terrorism about a novel super killer mega virus.’

Keep tilting at those windmills, won’t you?

‘They have a transparently criminal system of recording Convid deaths – any death within 28 or sixty days of a positive unvaslidated PCR test which cannot EVER diagnose disease. They also changed the protocols regarding death certificate registration to facilitate death cerificate forgery on a grand scale. Its organised crime, not a legitimate response to a genuine health issue.’

Good grief. This is so old. Do you think I’m new to the debate/fraud?

‘Convid was always a nothing burger a fabrication, a scam. Low mortality rates as confirmed by the worlds foremost epidemiologist Professor John Ioannidis…’

It’s interesting that you quote/link to Ioannidis. Ioannidis’s work on the IFR assumes the existence of SARS-2 and COVID-19. So on the one hand you cite Ioannidis’s work, work which assumes the existence of SARS-2 and COVID-19, and on the other hand you link to work claiming SARS-2 and COVID-19 don’t exist, thus if you believe SARS-2 and COVID-19 don’t exist, why are you citing Ioannidis’s work on an IFR for a virus/disease which doesn’t exist? Again, you appear to want to have your cake and eat it too. 

In sum, you’re all over the place. ‘Sceptics’ like you are emphatically not my ally. You argue like a leftist arguing with a conservative, or an atheist arguing with a Christian. You are unfocused, erratic, you tilt at windmills, and you commit non sequiturs like they’re going out of fashion.

All the best.

Last edited 3 years ago by Moderate Radical
1
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  Moderate Radical

Your responses are top heavy on the ad hominum which is telling. Your language style screams military, you were already earmarked as an operator in my book from a few previous posts of yours, potential 77th or similar, although this can never be proven either way. But just to clarify Im making the point that even according to the highest authorities with direct links to goverments, including GOVUK itself, there was never evidence of a novel super killer mega virus – which is the notion the past two years of insanity is based upon – there has only been state terrorism based on lies to make people believe there is a novel mega virus. They began by telling everyone there was a novel virus with an IFR of 3.4percent, then when that was exposed as BS – by Ioannidis for example – they buried it and carried on with the agenda regardless. Alarm bells should be ringing loud and clear due to this – they were caught lying right form the get go, so stop auto-believing their other claim about a novel virus unless the evidence is compelling. People who consume nothing but lies from the MSM will unsurprisingly believe that Convid is proven beyond doubt to exist and deadly on a scale like never seen before – hence all the ridiculous measures – so my first point is to prove that this is untrue. Given that you do believe there is a novel virus (presumably you give credence to the lab leak theory as well – the gain of function released virus which evidently never gained much function), I am partly showing that was a fraudulent assertion to terrorise everyone, which then opens up and adds weight to the notion that they have just been relabelling existing illnesses and killing people (as with the Midazolam scandal) and calling it convid, because none of what they are saying adds up. Its a complex web with many layers, so I am tryoing to paint the whole picture with those links. If you cant understand this approach, thats your problem, not mine.

Dees post is highly suggestive that there has been a novel virus, which required novel treatment. If you believe that, which you clearly do, I would say that you are doing the dirty work of the criminals by accepting their first big lie – that there is a novel virus. This is an unsubstantiated claim, coming from known lying criminals, and if we are to defeat this evil, we need to stop believing in the word of proven known criminals with no moral compass, hence my post which is born out of frustration at what is going on here and how people allow themselves to be deceived on the cheap when there is solid proof that Convid is only a scam. When you write “hitting nails all over the place”, my response is to bring that back because it is getting very tiring on a so called sceptics website to see so much blind faith in the unproven assertion that a novel virus is among us. Near enough all posts on here below the line and one hundred percent of posts above the line assert that there is a novel virus. Calling your site a sceptics site and then being non-sceptical is nonsensical and could cost us dearly in the long run.

Im not saying I believe there was a novel virus, although I can see how my reponse may be confusing to you, showing the authorities themselves confirming low IFR is partly to support the statements about them relabelling existing illnesses, as Kevin Corbett says they did with the HIV scamdemic, the original scamdemic, the blueprint for this current scamdemic. With Convid, their first move was to terrorise everyone about a super killer mega virus, so the first step is to extinguish that notion with proof that there was never a super killer mega virus, and if you know where to look, you will find they actually admit this themselves, albeit on the quiet. Were in a situation where anyone who gets a cough will think convid, even if in just a humourous way. That seed has been germinated planted and is sprouting in every mind which has awareness of the scamdemic. Its unavoidable and due to the power of suggestion and the size of the psychological warfare operation they have waged upon us. This needs to be reversed, we need to go back to the start and ask what is the proof of a novel virus, and even challenge the whole field of virology and its methods. The proof is not there, and what “proof” they have like the PCR test is easy to disprove, so believing the criminals main assertion when there is no proof is a BIG mistake, which you are making, in my opinion. You say:

There’s definitely something which has been going about,

I say no, nothing has been “going about”, you have allowed yourself to be deceived. There is no evidence of anything “going about”, as the paper and statements of Denis Rancourt show, for example, and as has been clearly evident by just opening your eyes and looking at the world. Or you could have done things like I did, such as going in to dozens of supermarkets to ask if the staff had been going down with convid in the first six months. I couldnt find one such example. Real world proof that the novel virus story is a fairytale, not a fact. The liars are lying again, what a surprise.

To be clear, I do not believe there is any novel virus – I believe the whole episode to be a fabricated conjured up con, and I believe the science of virology overall has been exposed to be based on fraudulent science which has been allowed to proliferate until now. You and Dee obviously believe there is a novel virus. If you go through the links I have provided, you will see this is unproven and has essentially been debunked, its based on fraudulent science and its coming from liars and criminals who should not be trusted ever, given their track record. I cant know that you believe there is a novel virus but that you also believe its no more deadly than the common flu – you never said that so why would I assume this is your position.

I wish that DS would tackle no virus reasonably, and bring it into the light, because if we allow these lies from these terrorists to reign over us and if we give them such an absurd level of undeserved slack and credibility when they are clearly lying and manipulatingand when they have such an appalling track record for being nothing but liars, these criminals will be rinsing and repeating as they see fit, because too few people stood up and confronted the fraud and evil head on, even when the information was there on a plate.

Toby often publishes the image of the old grandad with his grandson saying “so we had no choice but to blah blah blah”. The irony being he is playing exactly that role with the lack of evidence of a novel virus.

Last edited 3 years ago by ComeTheRevolution
0
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

3. On (2), again, you’re conflating the existence of a virus with a pandemic. One can acknowledge the existence of a virus without acknowledging the existence of a pandemic. You’re the king of non sequiturs.

The definition of pandemic has been altered by the criminals, to satisfy their Orwellian urges and to overcome the fact they are running the world on bullshit. A pandemic used to be declared only if high levels of death occurred, according to officialdom, so they changed that around the time of their last big scamdemic, the Swine Flu scamdemic removing the requirement for high levels of death to be pobserved for a pandemic to be declared. Swine Flu – same drill, same players, same bullshit. Your stance here is quite Orwellian actually, youre believe some of the unproven assertions, but not all of them. Why not take a step back and re-assess the whole thing.

Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic
https://web.archive.org/web/20100208182828/https://www.forbes.com/2010/02/05/world-health-organization-swine-flu-pandemic-opinions-contributors-michael-fumento.html

Also I wrote this:

I cant know that you believe there is a novel virus but that you also believe its no more deadly than the common flu – you never said that so why would I assume this is your position.

You did say that you believe there is a novel virus but its not very deadly, which I acknowledge, before you get your knickers in a twist again.

Last edited 3 years ago by ComeTheRevolution
0
0
Moderate Radical
Moderate Radical
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

You have utterly failed to interact with my arguments. Like I said, you’re unfocused and all over the place. You pluck one or two quotes from my post and then go off on another confused, disjointed rant. It’s pathetic. You’re not sceptical in any meaningful sense. Part of being sceptical is evaluating your own arguments in light of your interlocutor’s/opponent’s responses, and acknowledging your errors by changing your line of argument when you’ve been corrected with regard to your arguments and assumptions. In contrast to this, you double down on your ignorance by reasserting already refuted/corrected assumptions/lines of argument. You’re on autopilot. You’re not a rational sceptic.

Your responses are top heavy on the ad hominum which is telling. 

Are you dense? You clearly do not understand the subtleties of ad hominem argumentation. We’ve both produced ad hominem arguments, none of them fallacious. The only difference is I don’t whine about your ad hominem arguments; on the contrary, I understand that, from your perspective, misguided as it is, and though you’re shooting at a fabricated target, they are relevant and necessary.

Do yourself a favour and acquaint yourself with ad hominem argumentation. There are valid and proper ad hominem arguments and there are invalid and improper ad hominem arguments.

Your language style screams military…

That’s an assertion crying out for an argument. It’s a convenient line for you to take since you are being bombarded with rationality and logic. You don’t like it, so you resort to the childish/cultish ‘You must be 77th’ trope.

…you were already earmarked as an operator in my book from a few previous posts of yours, potential 77th or similar…

1. You’re such a bore. 

2. Guess what? That’s an ad hominem line of ‘reasoning’. You really are quite dim, aren’t you? 

But just to clarify Im making the point that even according to the highest authorities with direct links to goverments, including GOVUK itself, there was never evidence of a novel super killer mega virus – which is the notion the past two years of insanity is based upon – there has only been state terrorism based on lies to make people believe there is a novel mega virus. They began by telling everyone there was a novel virus with an IFR of 3.4percent, then when that was exposed as BS – by Ioannidis for example – they buried it and carried on with the agenda regardless.

1. Again, are you dense? I’ve not claimed otherwise regarding any of this. 

2. Ioannidis believes in the existence of the virus, so how can you positively cite his work on the virus when you don’t even believe in the existence of the virus? Your position is utterly inconsistent and incoherent.

Alarm bells should be ringing loud and clear due to this – they were caught lying right form the get go, so stop auto-believing their other claim about a novel virus unless the evidence is compelling.

You are one of the most irrational human beings I have ever encountered. You have absolutely no idea what I believe. My position is far more nuanced than merely ‘believing…[in] a novel virus’. You haven’t even attempted to try to understand my position. You’re an embarrassment to true scepticism.

For example, ‘coronaviruses,’ such as the common cold or pneumonia, are endemic in human society. Yet this one example hasn’t occurred to you, has it? Rather you hysterically tilt at windmills and construct Aunt Sallies out of sheer ignorance.

Moreover, contra your simplistic approach, ‘novel’ can have more than one meaning in this context. Your approach is embarrassingly narrow and rigid.

People who consume nothing but lies from the MSM will unsurprisingly believe that Convid is proven beyond doubt to exist and deadly on a scale like never seen before… 

You’re shadow-boxing with your ghost again. Do you have a name for him yet?

Given that you do believe there is a novel virus…

You have no earthly idea what I believe about the nature of the virus. You don’t even appreciate the nuance with regard to the term ‘novel’ in this context.

…(presumably you give credence to the lab leak theory as well – the gain of function released virus which evidently never gained much function)…

You’re doing it again. Your irrationality seems to know no bounds. Okay, please articulate my position on the lab leak theory and GoF. Go ahead, enlighten me.

Its a complex web with many layers, so I am tryoing to paint the whole picture with those links. If you cant understand this approach, thats your problem, not mine.

Again, your sense of self-importance is astounding. I understand your approach very well. I’m familiar with most if not all aspects of this debate. I’ve been arguing with the COVID cultists since this fraud began. Your dogmatism is both misplaced and absurd. Once again, you seem to believe your posts are the definitive ruling on the matter.  

You display your own cultish traits.

If you believe that, which you clearly do, I would say that you are doing the dirty work of the criminals by accepting their first big lie – that there is a novel virus.

Yet again, you haven’t defined your terms, and you have no idea what I believe. You’re a bore.

Im not saying I believe there was a novel virus, although I can see how my reponse may be confusing to you, showing the authorities themselves confirming low IFR is partly to support the statements about them relabelling existing illnesses…

1. I never said you believe there is a ‘novel virus’. Never made that claim.

What did your ghost have for dinner this evening?

2. By acknowledging a ‘low IFR’ you imply that something has been ‘going about’, which you acknowledged earlier when you said it is ‘[not] more deadly than the common flu’. 

You’re a mess.

I say no, nothing has been “going about”… There is no evidence of anything “going about”…

Again, you’re contradicting yourself. Earlier you acknowledged that ‘even the authorities admitted and published documents to confirm that nothing entered the world that was more deadly than the common flu.’

This acknowledges that something has been ‘going about’. You are engaged in a contradiction here (p and -p). You need to keep track of your own words.

So again, on your own terms, what is the nature of what has been ‘going about’? You haven’t even attempted to address this? What is the nature of this ‘nothing more deadly than the common flu’, and can you demonstrate that it has been isolated? 

…as has been clearly evident by just opening your eyes and looking at the world. Or you could have done things like I did, such as going in to dozens of supermarkets to ask if the staff had been going down with convid in the first six months. I couldnt find one such example.

These are not arguments. Saying ‘look at the world’ and ‘go down your local supermarkets’ is about as subjective and anecdotal as it gets! 

Real world proof that the novel virus story is a fairytale, not a fact.

1. Your subjective and anecdotal experiences do not equate to ‘real world proof’! Good grief. The level of irrationality and cultishness is astonishing.

2. You’re still tilting at windmills. You’re arguing with a ghost, you’re constructing Aunt Sallies. And you still haven’t defined your terms. This is beyond embarrassing.

You and Dee obviously believe there is a novel virus.

Prove it. First define ‘novel virus’ then demonstrate from my own words that I believe what you assert I believe.

I cant know that you believe there is a novel virus but that you also believe its no more deadly than the common flu – you never said that so why would I assume this is your position.

You let the cat out of the bag here. 

The definition of pandemic has been altered by the criminals, to satisfy their Orwellian urges and to overcome the fact they are running the world on bullshit. A pandemic used to be declared only if high levels of death occurred, according to officialdom, so they changed that around the time of their last big scamdemic, the Swine Flu scamdemic removing the requirement for high levels of death to be pobserved for a pandemic to be declared. Swine Flu – same drill, same players, same bullshit. 

How on earth is this a response to my point that ‘one can acknowledge the existence of a virus without acknowledging the existence of a pandemic’? Show me one place where I have denied or disputed anything you wrote above. I don’t really disagree with what you wrote here. Are you having an aneurysm? You’re utterly irrational. Stop tilting at windmills.

Your stance here is quite Orwellian actually, youre believe some of the unproven assertions, but not all of them. Why not take a step back and re-assess the whole thing. 

You’re doing it again. You’re fighting a ghost and assuming things out of sheer ignorance.

You did say that you believe there is a novel virus but its not very deadly, which I acknowledge, before you get your knickers in a twist again.

The only one getting their knickers in a twist is you. Your swivel-eyed rants are a thing to behold. Again, you are unfocused, erratic, ignorant, and your posts are full of irrelevant rants and fallacious assertions.

Now, if you decide to respond, please interact with all I have to say in terms of substance, not 1% of it. It is standard practice in serious debate/discussion.

Last edited 3 years ago by Moderate Radical
0
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

I agree with CTR’s post. People need to step back and see the big picture, that the whole ‘Covid pandemic’ has been, and still is, a big con. Why order Ivermectin from an unknown seller in India for something you don’t have?
Two years gone by and I still don’t know of a single person who has had ‘Covid’, let alone become ill or died of it. Just where are all these ‘cases’? Thousands reported every day of the ‘News’ – why don’t I know any of them?

What is real is the Government control with the restrictions on movement. What ‘Covid’ has shown governments is how very easily their citizens can be frightened by propaganda and adverts.

6
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  John Dee

The Queen is reported as having precautionary treatment with a drug that includes an element of….Ivermectin.

Pity about her subjects who were not allowed the much media abused proven life-saver (Banned by Hancock, Johnson, Whitty and Javid)!

34
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  John Dee

There were the rigged vitamin D trials (I suppose they had to be rigged so they could legally bring out their “vaccines”). Just one of many things they need to be held to account for.

6
0
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

Vit D plus Vit K……..thanks for the help with that, Whitty.

1
0
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  John Dee

Have you noticed that the term “therapeutics” is creeping into the “official” narrative as per Johnson’s statement to the HoC yesterday.

While he might mean the recently approved AV drugs, we all know that therapeutics – approved and/or out of patent repurposed drugs – saver saved the lives of millions worldwide – US/Europe/India/Far East etc.

Absolutely a “defence” scrabbling to rewrite history; very significant because that door is now open and will inevitably lead to “….why did you NOT approve early treatment therapeutics in late winter/early Spring 2020, as successfully developed by treating Doctors worldwide..”

Spectacular own goal imho.

3
0
DJ Dod
DJ Dod
3 years ago

Good news, but travel not back to normal yet:

109. Last month the Government announced its new system for international travel,
underpinned by a commitment to see a return to unrestricted travel and to support
recovery across all sectors. There are now no requirements on eligible vaccinated
travellers apart from the need to complete a simplified Passenger Locator Form.
Travellers who do not qualify as eligible vaccinated also need to take a
pre-departure test and an arrival test on or before day 2, but no longer need to
isolate or take a day 8 test.

International travel regulations
133. With the intention to continue to facilitate safe travel and sector recovery, and in the
context of having significantly reduced travel restrictions, the Government will
review The Health Protection (Coronavirus, International Travel and Operator
Liability) (England) Regulations 2021 before Easter and ahead of their expiry date
of 16 May.

21
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  DJ Dod

“All remaining domestic Covid restrictions in the U.K. are to be removed on Thursday, February 24th”

So this statement is therefore a lie

67
0
Watney
Watney
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Par for the course with Bunter

32
0
Hypatia
Hypatia
3 years ago

In years gone by, if I felt ill with a cold or tummy bug, I stayed at home until I felt better. I still do.

I didn’t need the blasted government to tell me to do that either.

What is wrong with people? When they go to the loo, do they need instructions on how to flush it?
Mind you, the places I’ve been where they have instructions on how to wash your hands, with helpful pictures, maybe they do.

Taking everything else out of it, why oh why can’t we be treated like adults, allowed to make decisions, and take our own responsibilities? Why do we need a Nanny State to hovver over us, sometimes threateningly, and why do people accept it? How hard is it to say “NO”?

120
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Hypatia

Because many people clearly don’t think like adults. A great many don’t make it beyond adolescence. A quick jaunt through Twitter will confirm this.

68
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

They’re called ‘kidults’. All the nasty sentimental side of Peter Pan, but totally without the charm.

42
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Sentimentality actually accounts for a lot in today’s world. Like perpetual teenagers.

21
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  Hypatia

Actually, in years gone by, I used to carry on with my life even if I was a bit sick. I only stayed home if I felt so bad I couldn’t get myself out of bed.

I also remember meeting with people who had colds all the time. Sneezing and coughing.

In years gone by, we didn’t act as if colds were a plague. We accepted it as things that needed to go around and did. And it was absolutely fine.

In fact, if you stayed home just because you had a bit of a runny nose or a sore throat, you were considered to be a bit of a skiver.

104
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

In Oz, if you turn up to work with a runny nose or sore throat, people are alarmed – because if anyone there then gets the wrong test score, the entire place will be shut down and all who worked within coo-ee of it locked away.
Not so long ago (2019), we would just laugh and say, “Keep away from me – I don’t want your bloody lurgie!”
If people sneezed, after a couple of “bless you’s”, someone would say, “Die you bastard!”
In years gone by, we had a sense of humour.

63
0
CovidiotAntiMasker
CovidiotAntiMasker
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Absolutely right, as well as a skiver, you were also considered to be a bit of a Nancy if you took a day off for a cold.

18
0
chris-ds
chris-ds
3 years ago
Reply to  Hypatia

When the Tv/radio/papers say your killing your Nan for not getting vaccinated and everyone including those dearest to you are parroting the same, you have some doubt if your pig headedness is justified.

as you can tell I’m a bit bitter I didn’t stick to my guns despite knowing better.

my dad had his 3 shots with no side effects.

before #1 I felt amazing, hadn’t felt that good in maybe 5 years. After #1 I felt crap until ~2 weeks before #2 where I perked up, the nurse told me often those who had strong reactions to the vaccine likely had it and it’s your antibodies rejecting the vaccine, I wondered then again why I was bothering.

i’ve decided not to go for #3, I just hope holiday destinations drop the requirement come summer.

26
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  Hypatia

Its not that you need it, its just that a cabal of corporate criminals are controlling your government and they have decided that this is to be your “New Normal”. They have infiltrated your government and installed their stooges – such as Alexander De Pfeffel, a student and graduate of how to be a total traitor and destroy the country that made you who you are and keep a straight face. This is what they call “leadership”. This easing of restrctions etc is just a withdrawal because they have pushed to the brink, so now they are pulling back a bit before they decide to run their next scam on you. They may try to fake an alien invasion for example, or just roll out another scamdemic with a new flava. Gates has already released his new book to condition people into expecting their next scamdemic, with more fake unvalidated tests and genetic bioweapons. Past scams include 911, 77, Skripals, Climate Change (ongoing). Iraq Afghan war and the destruction and Balkanisation of the MIddle East in preparation of the expansion of Greater Israel, JFK, the Moon Landings, Iran Contra, Operation Gladio, Operation Mockingbird and essentially every headline terrorist event you can think of. Its all them. This is what is running the world. You cant have any freedom because that prevents the poisonous maggots from rolling out their Digital Communism package, so they have to brainwash and terrorise everyone into submission.

Last edited 3 years ago by ComeTheRevolution
9
0
olaffreya
olaffreya
3 years ago

Hardly anything to rejoice as the implicit message is the regressive nonsense is still the orthodoxy. Masks still much in evidence, so the reality and evidence has hardly come knocking on the door of this ongoing madness..

55
0
Silke David
Silke David
3 years ago
Reply to  olaffreya

Yes, unless the govt now starts a campaign mask wearing is wrong, along with stop testing yourself you idiots, and employers get your senses back and do not use your H&S “requirement” to protect your workers as an excuse to impose non-sensical rules, nothing is coming to an end.

66
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Silke David

Why would they do that? This is the technocrats big moment. Covidmania was even better than climategeddon, which was being ignored.

Top marks all round. And the nudge unit will have learned a thing or two during the last few years.

Expect more of the same. It stops only when we put a stop to it.

35
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Years ago, I read a fascinating book called The Politics of Everyday Fear (edited by Brian Massumi). Read in conjunction with Umberto Eco’s earlier The Name of the Rose, it was thought-provoking back in the 1990s.
This has been a long time coming.

11
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

I stops when they get nudged back hard.

9
0
PatrickF
PatrickF
3 years ago

Name one country, where an unvaxxed person can travel, without a test, or a vaxx, like I could in 2019.

45
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Norway, Mexico, Costa Rica and El Salvador I believe, though you’ll need to test when you come back here

33
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Costa Rica? You must be joking. They have the most punitive vax laws in the world. It’s a crime NOT to jab your child.

8
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

I believe you can enter the country unvaxxed and untested. What you can do once you’re there, I know not.

9
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

You’re right. I stand corrected.

8
0
RobbieT
RobbieT
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Just don’t have a kid whilst you’re there

15
0
peyrole
peyrole
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

The problem lies with where you are coming from. With the exception of Norway you cannot enter those countries unvaxed from France without a ‘qualifying purpose’ which excludes just about everyone. Thar is an example there are loads. Between most countries they have stitched up travel for unvaxed either leaving or entering. Unless you now the wrinkles, eh!

3
0
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

But in recent times when the cases for France, Belgium, Germany, Netherlands – as they are now – where hugely higher than the UK, EU citizens were “green listed” whereas UK folks were “high risk” areas or even a “special case” for a time , grace a Mnsr. Macron.

Work that out for logic……

0
0
Hypatia
Hypatia
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

2019….halcyon days. You could travel, eat out, go where you liked, see who you wanted and your body was your own!
I regret I didn’t do more when we were free.
I don’t feel free now.

74
0
CovidiotAntiMasker
CovidiotAntiMasker
3 years ago
Reply to  Hypatia

Sounds wonderful in the old days, did our forbears really live that way, we would be frightened of such freedoms now. I prefer the new normal and the protection we enjoy from those freedoms.

Last edited 3 years ago by CovidiotAntiMasker
1
0
Watney
Watney
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Apparently Norway is one. On their government website it specifically says the situation has returned to pre pandemic. No paperwork, no jabs. You would have hoops on return to blighty

26
0
Hypatia
Hypatia
3 years ago
Reply to  Watney

Shame it’s so expensive.
And I’ve never had a stick stuck up my nose yet, I’m not starting now.

40
0
RobbieT
RobbieT
3 years ago
Reply to  Hypatia

I believe the stick tests are just as efficient when conducted rectally. I’ve not tested positive yet

11
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago
Reply to  Hypatia

Yes there’s a lot more to those sticks than we are being told. https://www.orwell.city/2022/02/technetium.html

5
0
Davke
Davke
3 years ago

Quantum Quirk … on this day in 1952 it was no longer a requirement to card your wartime I.D. card.
Boris channeling his inner Churchill again.

25
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Davke

Churchill?

Joker Johnson is just clown and poodle stooge of the WEF.

6
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  Davke

Alright, what about this one then?

On 23rd June 1916, the British steamer Brussels was captured by Germans. Its captain was later court-martialled and shot after being picked up in the North Sea by the Germans.What an anniversary for the UK Independence referendum 100 years later, though to be fair, dodgy Dave probably didn’t realise (or anyone else).

Incidentally, the war was costing Britain six million pounds a day at the time, probably equivalent to about 100 times that today. Was it more expensive than the response to that Winter bug that’s been going round?

1
0
Bellingcat
Bellingcat
3 years ago

Yawn – still lying about omnicold

Last edited 3 years ago by Bellingcat
13
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago

BJ: “extraordinary success of the vaccine programme”. Absolute boll*cks, but hardly any of the idiots in the masses will understand that. Gov/MSM approved ‘science’ good, anything else bad. Still can’t get my head around how all the hardcore lefties suddenly decided that the Tories had their backs because the Guardian told them so. Child-like idiocy.

51
0
Eric Olthwaite
Eric Olthwaite
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

….

FCPkj1dXoAUWQt2.jpg
48
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Eric Olthwaite

Many a true word said in jest 😉

12
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

Still can’t get my head around how all the hardcore lefties suddenly decided that the Tories had their backs because the Guardian told them so.

That is easy. The last two years gave them permission to explore collectivism with a plausible excuse. Remember all the bile, the venom aimed at the selfish? That’s a more accurate reflection of their real selves than anything they retweet.

Leftism thrives on yearning for protection. Forcing all of us to live by their whims.

26
0
Smelly Melly
Smelly Melly
3 years ago

So has the Covid Act been repealed then? If not don’t trust the snake oil salesmen.

32
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Smelly Melly

I read somewhere that most of it was going apart from some “improvements” that are to be made permanent.

It’s the Public Health Act 1984 that needs to go though, and they won’t touch that as it enables them to do whatever they want.

38
0
John
John
3 years ago
Reply to  Smelly Melly

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1056202/COVID-19_Response_-_Living_with_COVID-19__1_.pdf

1
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Smelly Melly

No – we are still under a Dictator with irrational mood swings.

6
0
BS665
BS665
3 years ago

Gaslighter’s charter.

23
0
Caibre65
Caibre65
3 years ago

What about wearing masks in hospital? Can they refuse you entry if you decline to wear one?

12
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Caibre65

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/face-coverings-when-to-wear-one-and-how-to-make-your-own/face-coverings-when-to-wear-one-and-how-to-make-your-own#:~:text=prevent%20the%20spread.-,Summary,you%20do%20not%20normally%20meet.

Suggests that it is guidance not law

7
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Can a private business insist? No shoes no shirt and all that…

The data centre I visited 2 weeks ago were militant maskerbaters.

11
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

I think they may be breaching the Equalities Act if they do insist

11
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

I wondered as much, however the exemptions were only introduced to cover the government’s law/guidance iirc, they didn’t really exist (or most likely need to exist) beforehand?

4
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

Well places cannot discriminate but that might be limited to protected characteristics. I think the law is pretty vague based on my limited understanding.

3
0
ElSabio
ElSabio
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

LOL! Maskerbaters. I’ll be using that; have a star…

Pure blood.jpg
10
-1
TheBluePill
TheBluePill
3 years ago
Reply to  ElSabio

You might have a bit of a shock if you shove that word in your search engine.

4
0
ElSabio
ElSabio
3 years ago
Reply to  TheBluePill

.

Eye wash.jpg
3
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

A data centre that doesn’t comprehend the data that shows masks are useless, they sound good.

9
0
SweetBabyCheeses
SweetBabyCheeses
3 years ago
Reply to  Caibre65

Of course not! It’s all one massive bluff. I can confirm I recently spent two nights in hospital following a planned operation.
no mask
no stupid plastic visor
no testing
no jibbyjabs
no gel slime
I just said no thanks, gave my reasons if asked and it was all taken v well, no fuss from anyone.
whatever any of us think about arrr enaichess they’re not in a position to refuse to treat anyone and any threats otherwise are empty.

26
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago

FOR THE ZILLIONTH TIME, IT’S NOT THE SODDING UK, IT’S ONLY BLOODY ENGLAND. COVVILOONYLAND IS STILL ENSLAVED.

46
0
dante
dante
3 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Drakeford and Sturgeon must be going off their nuts right now!

I am going to sit back and enjoy the show.

28
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  dante

Dungford and first fish. What’ll they say in a month or 2 if Scotland still has worse figures than England?

2
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

That it would be worse without muzzles and vaxpässen, and so they must be increased further.

The Celtic Fringe is too far gone to save now. I fear that it will take “regional stabilisation” to liberate us.

1
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Given how often DS – and Will Jones in particular – has conflated England with the UK, it feels like deliberate trolling at this point.

Not that I’m whinging like a burst Blackford. To be honest, it’s nothing more than we deserve.

9
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago

If you are an optimist you’ll think that the cautious wording about opening being thanks to high ‘vaccine’ uptake, low deaths, and the bit about keeping an eye on variants is just necessary for the government to come across as sensible and cautious at a time when it is pushing for opening. Basically to appease the still large numbers of bedwetters in the population and do a minimum amount of arse covering.

If you are a pessimist, you are certain that as soon as the next bug comes along, the very same machinery of media, technocrats, pharma and self serving institutions controlled by a bunch of oligarchs that has been terrorising the population for two years will kick in again and pressure the government into bringing in some of the covid measures. Masks indoors, testing, another round of jabs.

The pessimist view has been right pretty much every time these last two years. So I wouldn’t bet against it.

60
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

All it ill take is for Neil Ferguson to produce another model based on an OAP doing a hard fart in a hospital and it will be lockdown for another two years.

8
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

They’re still listening to that discredited modeller?

1
0
186NO
186NO
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

That you conflate Ferguson with other – ethical, empirical and applying statistically robust methodologies – modellers is a massive sleight on them ( Haha..)

0
0
Backlash
Backlash
3 years ago

So when can I get on a plane without a disgusting rag over my face, go on holiday and come back without bureaucracy and costs/tests? Until I can do that, “all restrictions” are not gone.

Last edited 3 years ago by Backlash
93
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Backlash

Wherever you go you will be met by people wearing face masks. Fly to Helsinki/Finland if you want to see 99-100% in the shops and on public transport wearing face masks.

2
0
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
3 years ago

“Would Sir prefer his frogs boiled in water, champagne, Best Bitter or Pfizer?”

22
0
Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago

This kind, lovable old lady says: “We’re a peaceful protest …”

Check out this video of a harmless and very sweet old lady getting charged and trampled on by thug Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

The way this sweet harmless old lady got charged and trampled on by these RCMP thugs is going to be a defining incident of this present COVID-19 era. If what was done to this harmless old lady doesn’t make your blood boil, you have a heart of stone. 

If this was a mother or grandmother of mine, there would be vengeance. 

The RCMP left this lovable and harmless old lady lying badly injured, dying or dead after charging over her on their horses.

RCMP members sneered on a messaging app about policing the protests.

A coward RCMP officer, Cst. Andrew Nixon, stated that people needed to hear their jackboots on the ground. And also bragged about how pleased he and his fellow officers were to be getting overtime.  

Another RCMP member found the scene where the mounted Canadian police officers changed into and trampled the defenceless old lady “awesome”.

A question that needs to be asked is: “How many thugs and low-brows have been shoved into police services and militaries around the world in the last decade?

This was all planned well ahead, so it’s to be assumed the Cabal knew they’d need compliant military commanders and obedient police.

Take a look at Cst. Andrew Nixon in the RCMP, he’s a little cowardly brainless twat like Justin (The Turd) Trudeau. A little pr*ck like Nixon isn’t fit for any job of authority, and a job interview would clearly have revealed that – unless, of course, it was braindead bullying thugs the interviewer wanted. 

By the way, until the “vaccines” are binned and an independent investigation is held into the deaths and injuries they have caused – and those involved held criminally responsible – nothing has been won or gained by the people.

“Our betters” are just pulling-back to regroup. While all the time still pushing the gene toxins, and going full blast in introducing more gene serums to defend against a fake variant HIV virus.

It’s about time they were told to shove all this crap where the sun don’t shine. As well as all their other woke rubbish.

Last edited 3 years ago by Anonymous
43
0
ElSabio
ElSabio
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

.

Tread.jpg
6
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

I knew a chap in the police.
When talking about policing protests he said ‘I’ll split anyone’s skull for double time’.
They recruit sociopaths for this very purpose.

32
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  Anonymous

As I say, Tyrant Trudeau’s Peterloo.

Wasn’t there something a bit like that at a Newcastle Upon Tyne protest last year?

1
0
dante
dante
3 years ago

Why vaccinate children now? Roll out for 5 – 11 starts in April, surely they can shelf this now?

19
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  dante

How would scrapping it help condition the populace for obedience? I mean, really 🧐

12
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Forcing vaccines on children, which went on to cause their death, while imprisoning or fining the parents who objected was common practice in the England of the 1870s.

It looks like the concern for ‘Human Rights’ interval in global human society started in 1946 and ended in 2020

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
14
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  dante

Sure the virus it was designed to counter ceased to exist with the arrival of Delta (about 18 months ago) so the existing vaccine is useless even according to their own dodgey narrative.
But contracts have been signed and Pfizer et al have the right to pump this gene therapy slop into everyone.

13
0
Liz F
Liz F
3 years ago

Meanwhile, Johnson is set to use the Online harms bill to silence any questioning of the vaccine’s efficacy. In the Telegraph’s latest news update just now he’s said “One of the things the online harms bill does is try to tackle that kind of pernicious disinformation online.” And who decides what constitutes “pernicious disinformation” ?

66
0
Backlash
Backlash
3 years ago
Reply to  Liz F

The BBC and Twitter

27
0
PatrickF
PatrickF
3 years ago
Reply to  Backlash

All roads lead to Gates.

19
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

And yet this is hardly ever noticed!

9
0
Backlash
Backlash
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Totally agree, lead between the ears of Gates, Putin and Xi and the world is a happy place

1
0
SAGE LIARS
SAGE LIARS
3 years ago
Reply to  Backlash

you missed out the Rothchilds, Rockerfellas, the Vatican and many others

0
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Liz F

Bingo. With the wheels coming off the COOFS-19 plandemic, they’ve had to back off the despotism a little for now. But every necessary balloon has been floated, and every scheme trialled.

Cheer for the burning of the Coronavirus Act to the waterline, but the Online Safety (nee Harms) Bill is the submarine threat sneaking into the harbour. It will tie all online activity to a real ID, enabling crimething to be punished, and social credit scores to be administered efficiently.

Given what Jolson Trudeau is currently getting away with in the colonies, I have no doubt that similar expropriation powers will be added to our own statute book one way or another.

Premiere Johnson’s husband may not personally agree, but he will be gone soon, and replaced with Dishy Davos Rishi, and the Great Reset can pick up steam again.

37
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

Rishi has got WEF young leaders graduate written all over him.

28
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

He is the perfect candidate for modern Britain. I mean, what are his cultural ties with the UK? It’s not like his ancestors would have fought at Waterloo.

I’m half hoping and Indian as PM will wake a few people up to what is happening to our country and it’s culture.

13
-3
AnneL
AnneL
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Have you forgotten that India was once part of the British Empire? Indian soldiers fought as part of Britain’s forces during WW1 and WW2, so it is incorrect to say that people from India have no cultural connection to Britain.

5
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  AnneL

How many Indians have you known or worked beside? A couple of months working with our cousins from the Indian subcontinent will soon rid you of your sentiment and remind you how cultures differ.

We conquered India; they were a subject peoples. That’s not a “cultural connection”. Australians and Canadians have a cultural connection with us.

I do acknowledge their role in the wars of course. But I am also aware indians in India would not accept a white European as their PM. Even here they have a strong ingroup preference for their own, unlike us. As I get older I recognize the wisdom in this.

20
-2
Judy Watson
Judy Watson
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

iI have worked with very many Indian s the NHS. Would have sunk without trace in the 60s ,70 and 80 s

They were all committed to patient care

1
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  AnneL

They were forced to fight in the wars which had nothing to do with them.

The 1941-45 War in the East with Japan was seen as an opportunity by Indian nationalists, seeking independence and the break up of the Raj, which was achieved just two years later with a humiliating British ‘cut and run’ similar ti what happened in Afghanistan recently, which led to at least a million deaths on the frontiers of India and the ‘new’ British created state of Pakistan.

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
7
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

‘Waterloo’ no – the Indian Mutiny …perhaps.

2
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

I’m sure they’ve all flown on air-epstein or his successor’s flights.

1
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  TheyLiveAndWeLockdown

They must, after all, have something in common.

1
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

I wondered at the WEF if they have all the tapes, like Scientology, you have to reveal all of your deepest fears and most embarrassing secrets to “cleanse” yourself upon entry… and subsequently facilitate being blackmailed for the rest of your life.

4
0
SAGE LIARS
SAGE LIARS
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

agree, he’s a complete idiot with the IQ of a rocking horse!!

0
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

censorship in order to protect the establishment’s narrative is never safe,

1
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Liz F

Replace “pernicious disinformation” with free speech.

11
0
prod_squadron
prod_squadron
3 years ago
Reply to  Liz F

Online Censorship Bill.

6
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Liz F

Wickedly dangerous legislation in the pipe-line.

The “Russian Diversion” should keep the sheep in ignornace.

6
0
Alan M
Alan M
3 years ago

The worrying problem with using “expected deaths as a measure” is that it is an average and by definition the average will be exceeded occasionally under all normal circumstances.

10
0
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  Alan M

Assuming that an average is a sensible indicator of anything, about 50% of anything ought to be above average.

4
0
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  RW

Afterthought: A better critertion would be Is it significantly outside the range average +/- standard deviation? with significantly being defined as some percentage of the standard deviation, say, 10%. But I doubt over would-be overcovis are that keen on putting a mathematical foundation below their reasoning.

4
0
Ross Hendry
Ross Hendry
3 years ago

For some strange reason the globalists pulling the strings of puppets like Trudeau, Ardern and Morrison are doubling down with restrictions and police action in those states while elsewhere the puppets are lifting restrictions and it’s all heading back to normal.

Go figure.

18
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  Ross Hendry

Different franchises trying out different tactics to see what is most effective.

23
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

I do wonder what is going on myself. I suspect the globalists don’t have the influence we imagine. Politicians do have to get voted back in after all.

But I’m still perplexed as to why the UK reversed direction just as France and Germany doubled down. Should it give us hope?

13
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Ross Hendry

Al the Five Eyes nations are committed to the same policy …we are just dragging our feet and observing the ‘methods’ which achieve the greatest success.

5
0
Paul B
Paul B
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Bozo will have to win another general before he can collapse sterling completely and remove cash, it’s to close now, pause a bit and regroup time.

4
0
Hypatia
Hypatia
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

That’s what I think. Two years more or less, is my bet. Long enough for memories to fade a bit, long enough for people to get used to what we now have (which isn’t freedom as we know it), long enough for things to settle.
Then bam! My guess is “climate emergency” will be the next thing. I’ve long thought that covid was just the warm up act, “climate change ” will be the main attraction.

1
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago

Boris and his cabal have subjected us to two years worth of terror propaganda.
This terrorism was used to frighten people into accepting insane policies that stripped people of their basic rights whilst Boris and his cabal looted the nation.
The only question is how long will it be before the next time?

33
0
chris-ds
chris-ds
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Just imagine the chaos if we had a Corbyn or Starmer Labour government through this mess?

11
-5
PaulMac66
PaulMac66
3 years ago
Reply to  chris-ds

Corbyn actually voted against the government along with the 100 Tory MPs for the last restrictions the government brought in because of omicron.

30
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  PaulMac66

Corbyn is not a tool of the Trilateral Commission and the WEF – unlike Starmer and Johnson.

23
0
Backlash
Backlash
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Corbyn is simply a tool

1
-4
SAGE LIARS
SAGE LIARS
3 years ago
Reply to  PaulMac66

The only reason the REAL owners of our ‘democracy’ didn’t allow Corbyn in was because they had nothing on him, and hence couldn’t control him. Starmer is obviously different, so it really doesn’t matter whether he or Johnson are in power

0
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  chris-ds

That is like comparing a kick in the nuts to a punch in the nuts and deciding the punch is preferable.
The mentality that we must have Tory or Labour is the reason that this nation is in such a terrible state.

19
0
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Or Do you prefer meeting a lunatic who sets your dog on fire over meeting a lunatic who sets you on fire? with the answer being Assuming it already happened, clearly the former, otherwise, neither of both!

4
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Well put!

2
0
A passerby
A passerby
3 years ago

After putting up with two years of lies, I don’t trust one word this Government says. You have converted me, not only am I now a firm anti vaxer in all senses of the word (not withstanding that the recent batch weren’t vaccines at all) but I’m now also what could be called, a dissident (also in all senses of the word), something to bear in mind if you’re planning any further antics.

68
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  A passerby

This footage of the WHO vaccine experts discussing vaccine hesitancy is gold dust.
These experts admit that the safety testing for vaccines is a joke and that the long term safety testing and vaccine interaction testing simply does not happen.

This is some of the best footage an anti-vaxxer can refer to because it comes from the most pro vaccine group there is.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/wOXtTS4djENX/

19
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Script written by B. Gates and GAVI – the WHO is now a Gates owned organisation.

1
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

After living all of my life thinking our government is benign, I no longer think that, that’s the covid legacy for me.

50
0
TheBluePill
TheBluePill
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

Indeed, I am going to be at war with the government for the rest of my life. As someone else stated earlier, I am now a dissident.

45
0
iane
iane
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

I take it that you are still rather young: hard to believe that anyone who, as an adult, has lived through the last 5 PMs could possibly be inclined to think of our government as benign!

14
0
iane
iane
3 years ago
Reply to  iane

p.s It did however take me rather longer to accept how dreadfully our Royals have treated ‘their’ population (and I don’t even include the two royals-formerly-known-as-prince!).

20
0
Star
Star
3 years ago

Section 112:

“(…) (T)he Government is developing options to increase compliance with home isolation (…) should quarantine measures need to be reintroduced.”

What options are they then? Electronic tagging?

15
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

So this is just a short respite before they come at us again. Thought so.

11
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

Perhaps they’ll weld your door shut like the Chinese.

4
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

All fake -just like the Chineses ’emergency’ hospitals and men collapsing in the street.

7
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

Israel to the rescue:

Israel Launches Positive PCR Test GPS Surveillance Grid, Citizens With High Spreader Scores Punished
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ajsjfV92SLdI/

1
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago

Sadly most Brits are locked into the two party paradigm that guarantees we will only ever have a Tory or Labour government.
As both of these political organisations are political globalists we will get the same set of policies, they will just be dressed up and delivered in slightly different ways.

We live in a nation with a uniparty but most have been fooled into thinking they have some meaningful choice at the ballot box.

17
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago

Doesn’t make him any less of a ****

11
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago

This statement to the House presented the perfect opportunity for Bozo to condemn in the strongest terms the conduct of Trudeau and Ardern. A positively pro-democracy speech lauding the way England was putting the C1984 behind us and going back to normal. But no.

Absolutely nothing to say about Canada, New Zealand or Australia .

We are being taken to the same destination by a different route.

This war is a long way from over.

46
-1
loopDloop
loopDloop
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Notice this. This is the deafening silence, the denunciation of Trudeau. There is only one route to normal, and the only leeway offered to different countries is that they can go at their own pace. Up to a point. Horses for courses. Canada, Oz and NZ, as the soft rump of the old commonwealth, are on the accelerated program, because the population are placid and easily pushed around. Convoys and truckers excepted.

20
-1
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Absolutely agree. The weakest parts of the Anglosphere are being pushed into line because the Anglosphere itself is the biggest threat to globalism given our very long history of freedom.

Aided of course by wokery, nonstop diversity claptrap, insane levels of immigration and the nanny state.

But I still think their gambit failed and will always fail. Some of the published ideas of the WEF crowd are laughably bad.

But at some point we will have to fight. That’s what most haven’t yet accepted. This is a culture war.

26
-1
GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
3 years ago

Meanwhile the great back-pedal continues; this time the NYT that “bastion of truth” (/s) will teach us about natural immunity, while at the same time saying it was the boosters what done it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/21/health/covid-vaccine-antibodies-t-cells.html

7
0
BJs Brain is Missing
BJs Brain is Missing
3 years ago

“…maintaining our contingent capabilities so we can respond rapidly to any new variant”.

I take it the Coronavirus Act 2020 still stands then – why?

12
0
cloud6
cloud6
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

The Coronavirus Act 2020 will remain on the statute book along with The 1984 Public Health Act, both have been used to great effect, so why abolish them?

7
0
BJs Brain is Missing
BJs Brain is Missing
3 years ago
Reply to  cloud6

I know, they clearly have no intention of relinquishing the power these two Acts have given them.

7
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago

The Covidians must be given a reward for getting jabbed and pointlessly throwing their lives away

The Covidians reward is to be told the unjabbed will not be allowed to travel

Soon enough the jabbed will cease to exist

I’ll bide my time

21
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

Do you think this will happen? Sincere question.

I know many who’ve been jabbed and I’ve certainly seen plenty come down with colds etc. Although no deaths. And it is winter.

I remained unjabbified myself. Wasn’t even remotely tempted. I couldn’t understand the total lack of critical thinking I was seeing all around me.

But what do you think will happen? ADE? Knackered immune systems? VAIDS? I see few people discuss this. Including this site.

14
0
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Maybe an overall increased/above average attrition rate, earlier death than previously expected, caused by a myriad of accelerated degenerative health issues ( cardiac, neurological, cancers, autoimmune etc )? And/or diminished immune system effectiveness against infectious disease; respiratory illnesses, herpes et al, other previously “mild” type diseases.

2
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago

So some restrictions to end. But no acknowledgement of what this cabal might have got wrong.

No mention of Sweden, Belarus and South Dakota among other places, which clearly demonstrate that the lockdowns killed (and will continue to kill for many years) far more people than they purportedly saved.

No mention of the rigged vitamin D trials which were nothing like the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service recommended.

No detailed mortality figures giving people’s vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc, selenium, magnesium levels.

No mention that poor people and coloured people (we’re not supposed to say “BAME” now) are more likely to be unhealthy and less likely to have these “vaccines” (hence the figures from those London hospitals).

And of course no hint that the leading spirits in this foolery might have any sort of conflict of interest with the pharmaceutical industry. No mention of figures from Romania, Israel (which yesterday recorded its highest deaths with “covid” according to Worldometer) or Gibraltar (or Kenya) and what we might learn from them.

We must go on asking questions and pushing for them to be held properly to account.

Last edited 3 years ago by Hugh
19
0
Vaxtastic
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

No mention whatsoever of lifestyle factors we can control.

One positive of all this for me is I did the reading and really got to grips with my supplements. Vitamin D, zinc, magnesium, vitamin K, quercetin etc.

That alone is something of a giveaway. How little discussion there has been of this.

12
0
Bolloxed Britannia
Bolloxed Britannia
3 years ago

It’s fucking window dressing people! The insidious corona virus act remains and Gates’s money still controls science and media….It ain’t over yet, programmable CBDC imminent? Governments across the globe are waging a covert war against their populations, a perverted Eugenicist totalitarian ideology is at play and they have spent many decades arranging this evil power grab, get ready for the fight of our lives!

33
-1
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Bolloxed Britannia

Sadly 100% correct!

12
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago

Chris Whitty warns next Covid variant could be worse than Omicron as PM axes rules
Blimey that didn’t take long.

Add in the Gates of Hell and his “next time” and at this rate we’ll be back to March 2020 before Bozo has had his next jump.

24
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Nothing could be worse or more dangerous to the health and welfare of the British people than “Sir” Whitty.

Whitty is a creature of the Gates WHO and its new bid to take control of all Global “Health”.

19
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago

Just another tactic …wait for the next “Fake Emergency” excuse for reluctant re-imposition of all restrictions – backed by violent police!

Johnson still has his “Dictator Powers” – they represent potential Fascist tyranny and need to go now!

Johnson could turn into Trudeau whenever he feels the whim and inclination.

20
0
CovidisCommunism
CovidisCommunism
3 years ago

Just thinking the likes of Bill Gates Mark Carney George Soros, Justin Trudeau and the billionaires multi- millionaires have never had too follow the rules regarding masks and travel at the weekend . I wonder if the likes of Bill gates would go in a airplane next to a normal person, who funny the only people who wear them are tv actors Hollywood stars Tom Cruise , and Jessica Alba a lot

They love to virtual signal the celebs .

They also are never pictured wearing masks , Bill gates rules are just for small people sadly lots cannot see this they still believe we are in a deadly plague and the narrative friends mother father sister all vaxxed former friends colleagues . I still see about 90 percent wearing masks inside and outside in London I also went to Costa for my weekly twice a week today coffee there is a Starbucks Costa near my work no independent cafe still the QR code on the door and also the Perspex screens I ask for coffee they cannot hear you . I ended up picking up a vegan ham and cheese toastie and crisps lentil barbecue ones all vegan with my oat mocha ,

I like too support small businesses by buying organic cotton and organic sportswear, or go too organic cafes yet they are few nearly all cashless , Costa accepts card and cash , I wonder how long the normal small people will accept this forever probably most are too stupid to question the narrative or research the Great reset or heard of the World Economic Forum , also reading Brave New World my dystopian reading brought it off Amazon last year hardly any children born if not forbidden it was written in the 30’s children born through artificial wombs I mean I see the human race in a decline,

The human race cannot survive without man woman sex strong family units marriage to stop crime and a underclass of ill educated easy going drones we are not a underclass but they want to make us one and make the middle class teachers , civil servants pay more such is not many now have more than one child , instead of two or three, the smaller the family gets the less if more hard to pass down intelligence, education family values etc, also who will reply a dying white English race clever ordinary people immigrants probably will have more births , in 2020 “We continue too see a delay in
childbirthing with woman born in 1990 become the first cohort of woman who remain childless by their 30th birthday’’ “Levels of childlessness by age 30 have been rising steadily since a low of 18 percent for woman born in 1941” “Lower Levels of fertility in those currently in their 20s indicate that tread is more likely to continue’’ according to Ons.gov.UK

if we are in a pandemic I exceythe billionaires the multimillionaires to die and also not for cafes to open up and serve avocado on toast as mine did not vegan local meat two vegetarian vegan options a bit masks on stuff plastic screens , around July 24th 2020 after that around August 2020 I went with a lanyard god I hate these people the elite the behavioural psychologists Chris Whitty horrible little goblin, and Susan Mitchie I just wish they would die they cannot be human .

5
-1
CovidisCommunism
CovidisCommunism
3 years ago

I use to stay at home with a cold or flu , though I have worked for the same place eight years in September never caught it badly Covid mingled up and close no distancing, I have had bad colds yet unless it is a cough or very bad headache I still have worked yet the vaxxed in my workplace isolate with a posture test for a runny nose insane .

8
0
Fraser Nelsons Underpants
Fraser Nelsons Underpants
3 years ago

The travel restrictions remain as a reward for the good boys and girls who did what they were told. There is no other justification.

24
0
psychedelia smith
psychedelia smith
3 years ago

“Travel restrictions also remain in place, especially for the ‘not fully vaccinated’, and there was no mention of when these might be brought to an end.”

This is punishment for non-compliance so I doubt they will be. I’m increasingly with Delingpole in that I fear this is simply a terrifying lull in proceedings. Like the calm eye of the hurricane that in an hours time will to continue to smash your Caribbean hotel to splinters of wood.

Last edited 3 years ago by psychedelia smith
24
0
NonCompliant
NonCompliant
3 years ago

Feels like half time to me. They need to concentrate on getting Canada, New Zealand and Australia over the line and then they’ll come back for us.

11
0
Gregoryno6
Gregoryno6
3 years ago

Australia: Ha ha, we won the Ashes!
England: Ha ha, we’re throwing out all the covid crap!
Australia:…

2
0
EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 years ago

We will not be safe from the authoritarians until the Covid emergency legislation is abolished. Even then we will live under the fear it might be reintroduced on some pretext based on unsafe projections of a non-auditable “model”.

Businesses, especially private employers, will have to continue many of the restrictions for fear of claims which their insurers will not meet. After insurers were stung by surprising interpretations of business interuption insurance policies, they will not be inclined to make payouts they don’t have to make.

4
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago

To be fair he might get a manslaughter verdict (or unproven in some courts), especially if he faced some of the sentences that have been suggested. That’s the trouble with overly draconian punishment, it can make convictions more difficult.

1
0
Martin Frost
Martin Frost
3 years ago

I welcome the end of useless restrictions but not the reasons given for doing so. Until the narrative of the Covid fetishists is overridden we will remain at risk of further lockdowns and reverting to Government by health pressure group, either due to a new Covid variant emerging or on some other pretext. A heap of nonsense has been accepted as scientific fact. Perhaps 1/3rd of our population have been irreversibly brainwashed and may never live a normal life again. Freedom Day my foot.

10
0
mm99
mm99
3 years ago

What about travel?

If Johnson dropped the UK entry requirements, other countries would be under pressure to do the same.

Hasn’t Switzerland done this?

1
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago

“SAGE is certain there will be new variants” Mr. Johnson concluded:

“Covid will not suddenly disappear.”

Why would it ‘disappear’ when ‘Covid’ has been a planned scam all along?

“Travel restrictions also remain in place, especially for the ‘not fully vaccinated’, and there was no mention of when these might be brought to an end. Why not?”

-because ‘Covid’ is all about the control of people, and sod all to do with their ‘health’.

3
0
TheEngineer
TheEngineer
3 years ago

Is Boris finally admitting that the lockdown was wrong? Some humility and compensation would be good but we all know who would pay for it whilst government ministers and senior civil servants continue to gorge at the taxpayer funded trough.

1
0
Corky Ringspot
Corky Ringspot
3 years ago

“moving from Government restrictions to personal responsibility” –
… ‘personal responsibility’ is of course that quaint old idea that in a former age – say, the late 1950s – would have been allowed to take control of the situation. People would have self-isolated anyway. The age of ‘personal responsibility’ is over – through its words and actions the government has shown that to be the case. Any iteration of the concept is pure condescension. How nice of Johnson to acknowledge that the public might in some way be ‘responsible’. He can announce whatever restrictions he likes; I won’t ever trust him.

Last edited 3 years ago by Corky Ringspot
4
0
vivaldi
vivaldi
3 years ago

Johnson won’t declare an end (to the ‘pandemic’ because that then ends the rationale for the jab programme…..that “decade of vaccines”, endorsed by Gates for the previous decade, is now in perpetuity…..but not for humanity’s benefit, just Big Pharma and ‘Doctor’ Gates.

5
0
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  vivaldi

Isn’t that nice.

I suppose they wouldn’t let us vote for someone else at the next general elections….

0
0
JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  vivaldi

That is probably true, as they are only authorised for use in an emergency at present.

0
0
bowlsman
bowlsman
3 years ago

I also won’t go near a plane until restrictions are gone. So that’s me done flying forever.
Also, there’s gonna be a furore from the medics and MSM etc for next few weeks trying to get Boris to change his mind, so watch this space.
At least we’ll have a bit more time to try and fight back against the eco loons. There’s a long road ahead on that subject too.

3
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  bowlsman

“I also won’t go near a plane until restrictions are gone. So that’s me done flying forever.”

Sajid says “Sorry to hear that!”

baldtosser.jpg
0
-2
wantok87
wantok87
3 years ago

For those of us in the dystopian world of Drakeford in Wales we are not free from either the futile rules or the imbeciles who just want to be different!.
Covid19 has demonstrated is that health in the U.K. should not be a devolved issue.
Yes Drakeford and Sturgeon SARS-CoV-2 does not have a GPS!

Last edited 3 years ago by wantok87
2
0
FrankFisher
FrankFisher
3 years ago

So, can I hope on a plane without a test or a jab? No? So in what way are ALL covid measures ended?

Last edited 3 years ago by FrankFisher
3
0
attilathemum
attilathemum
3 years ago

Does this herald the official end of the emergency measures under which the jabs were rolled out?

1
0
WorriedCitizen
WorriedCitizen
3 years ago

Until Johnson declares that SARS-Cov2 is no longer a virus of international concern, repeals the Coronavirus Act, actually lifts ALL restrictions including travel restrictions, I will consider his offerings nothing more than what an abuser would do to a victim with Stockholm Syndrome. Remember, the passports are now in place internationally in readiness for CBDCs to be introduced so job done. Covid-19 was phase one and it is largely complete. Expect a new emergency soon be it another variant or war in Ukraine to integrate more restrictions to ‘protect us’.

5
0
Jane G
Jane G
3 years ago

How the hell did they come by those graphs at the Presser? The slides of hospital admissions/deaths etc by vaccine status looked like an exact opposite of what I saw on UK Column earlier in the day (and in recent days/weeks here).
If Whitty’s figures are correct, then PHScotland would not only not be publishing their figures, they would be pasting them on billboards.
???

0
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago

”…there will be new variants and it is very possible they will be worse than Omicron…”

When they say ”worse” what they mean is ”even more mild and effectively transmitted, giving immunity to other variants”. What a dreadful scenario that would be for them!

2
0
JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago

And they want us to feel good about it? I always like April Fools day, though. No doubt there will still be problems ahead in one form or another, that we will have to deal with as best we can.

0
0
Bella Donna
Bella Donna
3 years ago

To state he was lifting all Covid restrictions was a Lie. Another Lie to add to all the others he’s been spouting ever since coming into office.

2
0
John David
John David
3 years ago

“…[SAGE] is certain there will be new variants and it is very possible they will be worse than Omicron…”

So we spend the rest of our lives locked down in case there’s an errant coronavirus. This is insane. It’s also not science. What happened to all the variants of SARS 1? Covid-19 is SARS 2. SARS 1 actually disappeared from the wild environment. And let’s not forget it’s quite likely that the Omicron variant will provide natural immunity against any further variants. To hear these people at SAGE comment you think that natural immunity doesn’t exist.

0
0
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  John David

Sars-CoV2 has the sars prefix solely for political reasons.

0
0
marebobowl
marebobowl
3 years ago

Sadly for so many of us who declined the experimental biologicals due to lack of safety and efficacy data, will continue to be discriminated against. Exactly why, when the vaxxed are contracting and transmitting virus at a rate of knots, are the unvaxxed being punished? I feel very sorry for the millions who accepted these jabs without informed consent. Perhaps Boris should be spending a little more time on the laws broken each time a jab was given without informed consent. But no, we all know where this is headed and the unjabbed will continue to be the scapegoat and discriminated against. Only because it would take an intelligent person to recognise the unvaxxed are not the menace. The vaxxed are though. So very happy I declined the news for the vaxxed worsens each day. The latest is the aids concern for the vaxxed. Not good.

0
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago

Until the CoronaCircus Act is completely done away with, this all means very little.

0
0
flyingjohn
flyingjohn
3 years ago

The PM announces in a tweet “Today is not the day we can declare victory over Covid, because this virus is not going away.

But it is the day when all the efforts of the last two years finally enabled us to protect ourselves while restoring our liberties in full.”

Our liberties are not restored in full until the Coronavirus Act is repealed, the state of emergency ended, government by diktat is over and Parliamentary Democracy is restored.

The PM is lying to us.

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 46: Ofcom’s Ill-Fated Imperialism, One Year of Two-Tier Keir and Phoney Green Jobs

by Richard Eldred
1 August 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

6 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

6 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Does ‘The Village WhatsApp’ Reflect the Reality of Rising Crime Rates?

6 August 2025
by Joanna Gray

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

6 August 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

Reeves Faces £50 Billion Black Hole as Tax Pressure Mounts

6 August 2025
by Will Jones

Reeves Faces £50 Billion Black Hole as Tax Pressure Mounts

37

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

27

The EU Has Spent Over a Million Euros Fighting Online Hate Speech in South Sudan, Where Almost Nobody Has Internet Access

23

News Round-Up

20

The Government Has No Idea Who is in Britain

15

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

6 August 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

6 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

The Ministry of Truth? The Government, Police and Media Monitoring

5 August 2025
by Dominic Adler

Green Elites Broke Britain, Not Beijing

5 August 2025
by Ben Pile

Votes for 16 and 17 Year-Olds Will Be a Disaster for the Right

4 August 2025
by Noah Carl

POSTS BY DATE

February 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
« Jan   Mar »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

February 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
« Jan   Mar »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

6 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

6 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Does ‘The Village WhatsApp’ Reflect the Reality of Rising Crime Rates?

6 August 2025
by Joanna Gray

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

6 August 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

Reeves Faces £50 Billion Black Hole as Tax Pressure Mounts

6 August 2025
by Will Jones

Reeves Faces £50 Billion Black Hole as Tax Pressure Mounts

37

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

27

The EU Has Spent Over a Million Euros Fighting Online Hate Speech in South Sudan, Where Almost Nobody Has Internet Access

23

News Round-Up

20

The Government Has No Idea Who is in Britain

15

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

6 August 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

6 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

The Ministry of Truth? The Government, Police and Media Monitoring

5 August 2025
by Dominic Adler

Green Elites Broke Britain, Not Beijing

5 August 2025
by Ben Pile

Votes for 16 and 17 Year-Olds Will Be a Disaster for the Right

4 August 2025
by Noah Carl

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences