- “Scientists urge delay to June 21st Covid lockdown lifting” – The Telegraph recounts the warnings of scientists urging for a delay to the end of lockdown
- “Longer queues than Glastonbury!: More than 15,000 under-30s swamp Twickenham stadium” – An account in the MailOnline of the rush of under 30 year-olds to get vaccinated at Twickenham stadium yesterday
- “Cancer patients who didn’t seek treatment during lockdown are overwhelming A&E” – A&E unites are struggling to cope with the number of people seeking treatment for cancer, hip and knee operations and other serious ailments, the Telegraph reports, with some trusts at 97% capacity
- “China is a hotbed for new Coronaviruses – report warns of ‘possible new hotspots’” – A team of researchers from Italy, the U.S. and New Zealand has found that China has the highest concentration of hotspots where humans are at risk of contracting pathogens from wildlife, according to the Express
- “Amateur choirs decline to fall silent over restrictive rule change” – The leaders of amateur choirs in Aldeburgh and Woodbridge are scratching their heads at the logic behind the tightened restrictions on group singing, the East Anglian Daily Times reports
- “Bank Holiday blow for Manchester bars and restaurants forced to temporarily close following Covid cases” – Several bars and restaurants in Manchester have been forced to close this weekend following cases of COVID-19, the Manchester Evening News reports, with their staff going into isolation
- “Wuhan lab leak may be the biggest economic shock for decades” – “If intelligence services find a Chinese lab really did create Covid then global trade would collapse,” says Matthew Lynn in the Telegraph
- “France’s travel ban is really just spiteful Macron’s latest Brexit punishment. He’ll regret it” – Writing in the Telegraph, Ross Clark is unimpressed by Macron’s near complete closure of France’s ‘border’ with the U.K.
- “Save us from a techno-fascist Covid dictator” – “It’s no surprise that the elites will take away from this crisis that we need a bigger, more powerful government staffed by yet more elites,” writes Tim Stanley in the Telegraph, but he suggests an alternative: “humility”
- “History shows us why vaccines must be voluntary” – “The history of vaccination is one of an heroic effort to rid humanity of deadly and blighting disease,” says James Heartfield, a vaccinator at Guy’s and St Thomas’s Hospital, in Spiked. And it “shows why the voluntary principle is still best”
- “Has Facebook unwittingly become a shill for China?” – Writing in Spiked, Brendan O’Neil points out that thanks to Facebook’s clampdown on any discussion of the lab leak theory people across the world were “essentially banned from saying things that might embarrass the Chinese Communist Party”
- “Covid Corruption: Assaulting Human Norms” – “We can be respectfully, lawfully, civilly disobedient, and make our voices heard, in concert, and purposefully,” says Omar S. Khan in his latest barnstormer
- “Our vaccine rebuttal competition – the winner!” – Read the three runners-up and the winning entry to the Conservative Woman‘s vaccine rebuttal competition
- “The Covid silence that drove a nurse to quit” – The Conservative Woman publishes the resignation letter of a nurse driven to leave the profession by the “complete lack of integrity that has been displayed since the beginning of the ‘COVID-19 Crisis'”
- “Back to work for (a re-educated) Ivan Dennison” – John Ellwood in the Conservative Woman with another instalment of the Life and Times of a Covid Marshal (Grade Two)
- “Climate change, wokeness and Covid – the un-Holy Trinity” – God was “long ago abandoned by western society”, says Roger Watson in the Conservative Woman, and “into the vacuum have flooded false gods and a new religion with its own un-Holy Trinity of beliefs”
- “The Real Pandemic Challenge” – Omar Khan talks to Dr. Peter McCullough about the importance of early treatment for COVID-19, the vaccines, and much else
- “21st June 2021 Lockdown – Will it end?” – Professor Robert Dingwall dissects the flaws in the use of scientific modelling by the Government to justify lockdown restrictions for Sketch Notes on a Pandemic
- “Weather and COVID-19 restrictions lead to France avalanche death toll doubling” – There were 39 people killed by avalanches this year, a much higher toll than usual. According to Euronews, the increase is blamed in part on the closure of ski-lifts in a misguided attempt to stop the spread of COVID-19
- “Florida threatens to fine cruises over Covid vaccine requirements” – Florida is threatening to slap cruise lines with tens of thousands of dollars in fines for requiring passengers to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination, the New York Post reports
- “Establishment journalists confess they dismissed Wuhan lab leak theory because Trump said it” – The Post Millennial reports on the growing numbers of journalists who now recognise “some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them”
- “Wuhan Lab Researcher’s Wife Died Of Covid-Like Illness In December 2019, Former Lead US Investigator Says” – In what might have been an early clue as to the origins of the virus, state department investigator David Asher tells the Daily Caller that the wife of Wuhan lab researcher died of Covid-like symptoms in December 2019
- “Mexico’s coronavirus deaths are plummeting. The ‘Biden wall’ could be a factor” – Confirmed deaths from COVID-19 in Mexico have fallen by more than 85% since January, according to the Washington Post, mainly because many Mexicans have been exposed to the virus, but the successful vaccine roll-out in the U.S. may also be a factor
- “Indian Bar Association Serves Legal Notice Upon Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist, WHO” – Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has been served with a legal notice by the Indian Bar Association for misleading people about the benefits of ivermectin in treating COVID-19, according to TrialSiteNews. You can read the Indian Bar Association’s press release here
- “Peru revises pandemic death toll, now worst in the world per capita” – Following a Government review, the official death toll in Peru has almost tripled to 180,764 and the country now has the highest death rate per capita in the world, according to Reuters. Peru also had one of the most stringent lockdowns in the world
- “Melbourne’s ‘ring of steel’ could be brought back as ‘critical’ Covid battle continues” – 7News with the latest from Victoria, where three of 11 new cases reported on Monday are linked to care homes and speculation mounts that the ‘ring of steel’ separating Melbourne from the rest of the state may return
- “Time has come’ for pandemic treaty as part of bold reforms” – The WHO Director-General is pushing for a new international treaty to boost pandemic preparedness, Reuters reports
- “Give poorer countries extra jabs to stop Covid variants, urge world bodies” – In an article in the Telegraph, the heads of the World Health Organisation, International Monetary Fund, World Bank Group and World Trade Organisation urge rich countries to give more Covid jabs to poor countries
- “They marched in their hundreds of thousands for your freedom” – Laurence Fox has produced his own report from Saturday’s anti-lockdown march to make up for the gap left by the mainstream media
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Regarding risk aversion the problem is one of balance with regard to imposing that aversion on everyone else. It seems to me that we had fairly well established boundaries, more recently those boundaries have been trampled on.
Indeed. And it is something that both genders (or should I say these days, ALL genders) are guilty of.
‘How else to explain the emergence of ‘safety’ as a sacred value in all areas of public policy?’
Another great article.
I think ‘safety’ as a sacred value also derives from ‘The Precautionary Principle’, itself a product of German, then EU, environmentalism.
Feminisation itself is now under threat from the monster of progressivism; no idea how that one ends.
But nut zero, a product of the replacement of scientific method by radical, expedient, venal zealotry, seems to me now to be the greater threat to the Humanist Democratic Capitalist way of life.
P.S. Mr Young, if you really are intending to take statins, why not set up a debate regarding their merits on here first?
‘….these drugs sometimes may cause neuromuscular side effects that represent about two-third of all adverse events. Muscle-related adverse events include cramps, myalgia, weakness, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and, more rarely, rhabdomyolysis. Moreover, they may lead to peripheral neuropathy and induce or unmask a preexisting neuromuscular junction dysfunction.’
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369175/ dated 28 July 2022
Another possible explanation is that socialism as it was having suffered a resounding defeat, people who love to force other people to live their lives in a certain way needed to find new pretexts for doing so.
Aseem Malhotra is not keen on statins!
Very impertinent of me to bring up the matter of statins but, from observation of a relative, I am a bit suspicious of them:
‘There is no evidence that high levels of total cholesterol or of “bad” cholesterol cause heart disease, according to a new paper by 17 international physicians based on a review of patient data of almost 1.3 million people.
The authors also say their review shows the use of statins – cholesterol lowering drugs – is “of doubtful benefit” when used as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.’
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17512433.2018.1519391
And statins do seem to have unpleasant side effects.
Indeed there is limited evidence linking statin use to cognitive impairment or dementia.
I would say not impertinent at all-
of all places people of sincerity should speak freely here.
It wouldn’t be the only time that the medical industry has oversold and under tested a product.
The “statin shuffle” walk. Also, statins deplete C0Q10 which is needed for mitochondrial function. Bet they are not good for the brain either.
I wasn’t aware that Toby was contemplating taking statins. If Toby reads these comments, please do as Monro suggests. My brother-in-law was put on them some years ago but went downhill in various areas so my sister got him to agree to come off them and they used mineral and vitamin supplements instead. He died last year, aged 96, on no medication, with no pain, in his own home, with good care and those he lived beside him. The pharmaceutical industry gains from as many people as possible being on such drugs, which should make us think carefully before taking them. Has that industry proved trustworthy?
Very well said, and much appreciated.
Mr Young mentioned it in last week’s Spectator.
Research gives very mixed signals, but ‘brain fog’ does appear to be quite common on commencing statin treatment, not, one would say, a ringing endorsement of that treatment but maybe it is balanced out by the benefits?
I agree with you. Exercise and diet are so important. The zeal with which statins are pressed upon the unwary also makes a convinced sceptic even more so!
I am with your last sentence 100%!!
Toby I wish you would stop using the ‘cisgendered’ bollocks. We’ve got perfectly good word for that, it’s ‘man’. You were at it on this week’s pod cast as well.
Thanks for pointing that out and seconded. We must not use the language of the enemy because it is deliberately designed to confuse and corrupt.
Before this nonsense I was aware of the term cis from Cisalpine Gauls, Gauls who lived this side of the Alps from Rome’s point of view compared to Transalpine Gauls who lived on the other side.
Is gender something you’re therefore either on the near side or the far side of, from which perspective, and what does the word gender in this context actually mean?
Your comment is stirring long lost memories of Latin O Level studies!
Absolutely. We must not fall for the language of the oppressors.
Men who believe they have been physically misgendered by evil, supernatural forces are also men. The best one can do with this inane pseudo-theologic terminology is to avoid it.
I’m not saying there isn’t a kind of female privilege BUT we’ve had years or decades of policy wrong-turns by men as well – QE by Ben Bernanke, liberalisation of the banks by Bill Clinton, Iraq war courtesy Bush, Blair etc. Maybe these were all “reckless” male policies as opposed to the “safety-oriented” policies ascribed to women.
I don’t think TY or any of us are saying that men don’t make bad decisions or that all “male” type decisions are good, just that certain shifts over the decades could be ascribed to increased “female” type thinking influencing decisions.
I see what you mean. Fair point.
Fairly based, for Toby.
I’m concerned that without James as a counterfoil, and no disrespect to Nick (surely the greatest podcast host of all time), he will retract into cuckery.
The relish with which he disavows the “conspiracy theory” that the US 2020 election was stolen annoys me every week. Specifically, it is the relish that annoys me.
“Fairly based, for Toby.”
And “based” means what exactly?
Talk about ceding the language.
From what I have gathered it means “talking sense”, but I may be wrong…
“It’s very recent internet slang, used as a compliment. Someone is “based” when they are courageously stating an opinion or otherwise being themselves without worrying that they might be unpopular. A “based” person doesn’t care what other people think. It was used a lot on 4chan and is sometimes associated with that crowd.”
This is one definition offered on Reddit.
Thanks, sounds about right. I’m not against it as it seems like a neutral term rather than a nonsense one designed to deceive, confuse and corrupt.
Just sounds like yet another made up American slang word that’s been exported over here to Europe and insidiously becomes mainstream before you know it. Well, in a certain age group anyway. Kiddo keeps saying ”slay”, like WTF is slay? I keep telling her it means to kill something, although probably more in a ‘George and the dragon’ dramatic type of way than merely swatting a housefly. I blame TikTok.
Historically “base” was a term for the lowest of the low of society. It may be construed that being based means your have reached the lowest level of todays’ society. In King Lear, there is a reference to being base bast**d base and another ref from where I cannot remember other than being a base footballer. I would suspect, that not unlike the Shakespeare reference towards the gutter, the modern one could be construed as from the gutter.
It was originally coined as the opposite of “debased”, I think.
The election actually was not stolen though. No more “stolen” than any other election, at least.
On average, women don’t make policy decisions and hence, claiming that certain policy decisions would be due to women being on average more risk averse makes no sense.
Spot on.
I think it is more nuanced than that. For lockdowns and such, men were the ones who originally imposed them and were most gung-ho about them, while women were the ones who were more likely to maintain such measures long after the curve was flattened. While men were more likely to intiate the the lockdowns, they were also the ones more likely to want to end them sooner. For men, acute lockdowns were a perversion of the hero instinct, while for women, chronic lockdowns were a perversion of the caregiver instinct.
It is entirely possible for both to be true at the same time, however. There is much nuance to this story that gets glossed over. Patriarchy (or androcracy) still exists in some form, but it is gradually (then suddenly) hollowing out as it inevitably gives way to what comes next.
As for what comes next, the late, great Buckminster Fuller, the Leonardo da Vinci of the 20th century, saw the writing on the wall:
https://fullerfuturefest.com/2013/01/14/why-women-will-rule-the-world-by-buckminster-fuller/
What tragic figures Toby quotes. They make me weep, particularly as our eldest grandson (22) currently makes up part of the prison population.
Women haven’t necessarily benefitted from so-called ‘equality’ (in the workplace, in the home, wherever). When was anyone or anything created equal?
Maybe boys fare worse than girls at school because they’re late developers, which is why 35,000 fewer 18-year-old boys will go to university this month than 18-year-old girls. Perhaps men are more likely to be addicted to drugs and alcohol and account for three-quarters of all suicides because they don’t talk about their feelings as freely. And perhaps men make up 96.2 per cent of Britain’s prison population because they commit more crimes (women are more risk averse, remember?) and are 23 times more likely to die at work than women because they are stronger and oftentimes are the ones performing more physically demanding jobs. The Committee of 300 is mostly made up of men who orchestrate the divide and rule Punch n Judy show that has kept them (and the bankers and aristocrats) in power for so long. So don’t worry, you’re still in charge. And yes, there is going to be a minister for men.
Maybe boys fare worse than girls at school because they’re late developers, which is why 35,000 fewer 18-year-old boys will go to university this month than 18-year-old girls.
Assuming this would be true, the conclusion would be that the educational system is stacked against men who are expected to compete against their physical betters at a time when they still can’t.
I think a word that needs to be introduced here is ‘entitled’. Women are far more entitled than men and always have been. This starts early when little girls are treated far better than little boys who “have to be toughened up”. Then, as puberty arrives, we get the curse that boys fancy 80% of girls, but girls only fancy 5% of men. The result is that young men spend a lot of time sucking up to girls who play them one off against each other. So for the first 15 years, girls get treated like little princesses by the whole of society, then from 15-35 men (except alpha men) treat them as goddesses. This used to do much to ‘equal’ the sexes in society. Women retain this sense of entitlement, as a type of defence, for as long as they can – often for their whole lives.
The feminisation of society now means everyone can have a sense of entitlement and judging by the younger generation they have! However, this does not equal equality as men find entitlement and sitting back expecting things to be handed to them, goes against their genetic hard-wiring.
After 10,000 years of doing things one way, the radical feminist have taken society in an entirely different direction. I can’t say it looks good unless you are one of those globalist who are just trying to bring down white western cultures for the greater good.
‘Women are far more entitled than men and always have been’. Says a man. Men want power to get sex, women use sex to get power. It’s called nature.
Women may still be a minority in the chancelleries of Europe – although for how much longer? – yet because they’re so much more confident and morally forthright than their ‘privileged’ male colleagues, they’ve become the key decision-makers. How else to explain the emergence of ‘safety’ as a sacred value in all areas of public policy?
A truly heroic logical leap. Can Toby really think of no other explanation? He might consider, for example, that we have more to lose these days or that this is an increasing litigious society or ….. there must be hundreds of possible explanations. Here is an idea for seeing if women are the key decision makers – count how many of them are in a position to make key decisions compared to men – I think we all know what the answer will be.
One possible explanation would be that this is simply wrong: While the Corona-policymakers used to bang on about safety without end, the policies they actually implemented where all untried, reckless and very harmful.
Some people get mixed up between the words ‘equal’ and ‘same’.
Women and men are equal but they are not the same.