Please disregard the https://covid19up.org , they are nutters.Oxford's a good but subtle methodology designed excellently. ... You can trust Oxford, I think.
Huh?
Long blast of ignorant bluff and bluster and ridiculous naivety removed for brevity.
I don't see any real malicious intent with the Oxford people. Just fairly typical incompetence with is (sic) standard with most studies in this area.
That is why they are peer reviewed by the most highly regarded journals in the world!
Game set and match again jmc...it must be tiring trying to educate simpletons...credit where credits due...you have the patience of a saint....
Excellent again Mike....
😀
Fon has told me before that I'm thick so please don't let me influence anyone
Fon has checked and only three posts by fon contain the word thick, in one case directed at Devi Sridhar and and the govt. in another case. The last time, it was directed at scientists in general, so unless Jane G is a scientist, then she's lying or exaggerating.
The actual word was 'dim', I believe, but it was a while ago, and you lumped me in with a group of others who happen to disagree with you on certain matters.
You clearly have time on your hands - pity you can't find something more useful to do with it, as you will never get it back.
Fon has told me before that I'm thick so please don't let me influence anyone
Fon has checked and only three posts by fon contain the word thick, in one case directed at Devi Sridhar and and the govt. in another case. The last time, it was directed at scientists in general, so unless Jane G is a scientist, then she's lying or exaggerating.
The actual word was 'dim', I believe, but it was a while ago, and you lumped me in with a group of others who happen to disagree with you on certain matters.
You clearly have time on your hands - pity you can't find something more useful to do with it, as you will never get it back.
I had mentioned that the medical establishment is turning a blind eye to Ivermectin.
I still think that's happening. But I hope the Oxford trial can find out.
The actual word was 'dim'
Dim is different to thick, take your pick!
