27 March 2021  /  Updated 17 July 2021
SAGE is lying - Pas...
 
Notifications
Clear all

SAGE is lying - Pass on the SAGE lies

Page 6 / 39

kyta
Posts: 176
 kyta
Topic starter
(@kyta)
Joined: 1 year ago

The key is this

The government must immediately make public the False Positive Rate for each of the last eight weeks, together with the technical audit reports that underwrite them.

A government petition must be started for the release of this information. Once released the whole charade will fall apart because the false positives will be shown to be 100%.

That means, the Covid19 “cases”, hospital admissions & even deaths are NOT COVID19 AT ALL.

Reference DR MIKE YEADON - Twitter Thread
https://twitter.com/MichaelYeadon3/status/1322451404452225026

Reply
MikeAustin
Posts: 1193
(@mikeaustin)
Joined: 1 year ago

The key is this

The government must immediately make public the False Positive Rate for each of the last eight weeks, together with the technical audit reports that underwrite them.

FPR is certainly key. It was from the start with 'case' numbers but is now even more significant in the misattribution of deaths.

However, we do know the specificity and FPR they are using. It is implied from published data: cases/tests and the ONS' estimate of infection rate (1.04% was the last estimate). We need them to admit to this. The ONS will not explain their estimate.

Apart from the inadequacy of PCR tests, there are two misuses of its results.

A positive result is not a real 'case'. It is neither a symptomatic case, nor a medical case requiring treatment, nor an infectious case. It may also be one of these, but mostly it is not. It is a 'lie' (aka intentional deceit) to portray a positive result as a case.

They are now conflating 'death with covid' and 'death due to covid'. An incidental positive PCR test does not represent a covid death. It is a 'lie' (aka intentional deceit) to portray a positive result as a cause of death.

So this is a second lie to substantiate the first lie. The nature of lies, particularly when covering up, is that they have to multiply. Eventually, they become apparent to everyone and the liar is even more culpable than with the initial lie.

Reply
kyta
Posts: 176
 kyta
Topic starter
(@kyta)
Joined: 1 year ago

But I'm afraid that, such voice won't find a place in the mainstream media, leaflets in cafes will only raise suspicion. I've been through such a period, having a huge urge to share and post information on every pole in town but who would be bothered to read, check and think? Unless it comes via trusted sources/authorities/political figures I'm quite pessimistic about the usefulness of such pursuit.

I fear this is true. The situation is no longer about a virus, it's about the fundamental transformation of society. The crisis is held in place through the charade of PCR testing. Why else does the government not release the False Positive Rate (FPR) of the PCR Test? If they did, the charade would come crashing down. The False Positives would be seen to be 100%, i.e. no one has Covid-19. As long as there is mass PCR testing the lockdowns will continue. There is no end in sight!

"I CANNOT OVERSTATE THE IMPORTANCE of us not being told this seemingly irrelevant piece of information, the FPR.
I think the pandemic is essentially over & has been since June, just like it has in Sweden. Both countries suffered the same loss of life to Covid19 in spring: 0.06%..."

Reference DR MIKE YEADON - Twitter Thread
https://twitter.com/MichaelYeadon3/status/1322451404452225026

Reply
kyta
Posts: 176
 kyta
Topic starter
(@kyta)
Joined: 1 year ago

We are living through a PCR FALSE POSITIVE PSEUDO-EPIDEMIC.
DR MIKE YEADON

In recent weeks it is no longer possible to stand up the claim that covid19 deaths & excess deaths are causatively linked. In formal terms the data are not consistent with the hypothesis that covid19 deaths are the cause of any excess deaths.

The most likely explanation for this inconsistency is that our measurements are WRONG.

The PCR test for Covid19, like all such tests, is capable of ‘producing a misdiagnosis’, which are technically called false positives.

All admissions to hospital are tested & every long stay patient gets tested repeatedly. Those who become longer stay patients are obviously increasingly likely to die. Those same long stay patients get tested REPEATEDLY. If they get a positive test & then die within 28 days, they are defined as a Covid19 death.

The critical thing to know is that even if the virus stops circulating, the misdiagnoses, the ‘false positives’ continue.

Despite this absolutely central role PCR testing plays in U.K. national life, the basics of quality control appear not to be in place.

What specifically am I calling for?

“Mr. Hancock, please immediately make public the False Positive Rate, FPR for each of the last eight weeks, together with the technical audit reports that underwrite them”.

The answer on the misdiagnosis rate is that it’s likely to be a VERY high. If I am right & I think I am, then the positives we are seeing are ALL false positives.

I CANNOT OVERSTATE THE IMPORTANCE of us not being told this seemingly irrelevant piece of information, the FPR (False Positive Rate).

I think the pandemic is essentially over & has been since June, just like it has in Sweden. Both countries suffered the same loss of life to Covid19 in spring: 0.06% and, like Sweden, the daily deaths drifted down from their mid-April peak until in June, when they became essentially zero.

The ONLY difference between us is this error prone monster of a badly characterised PCR test.

I am telling you that, as a very experienced lab scientist, the misdiagnosis rate will certainly be considerable. If you were told this & it is roughly where I believe it be, then the Covid19 “cases”, hospital admissions & even deaths are all NOT COVID19 AT ALL.

Are you seeing what I’m seeing yet??

Reference DR MIKE YEADON - Twitter Thread
https://twitter.com/MichaelYeadon3/status/1322451404452225026

Reply
Rob47
Posts: 1
(@rob47)
Joined: 1 year ago

Not really sure how to use forums, but I'm a sceptic too and I started a petition to have SAGE members pay cut by 20%. I think their work for the government is voluntary, however they get paid by someone. So I thought if they want the country to lockdown, we need to make sure they have some skin in the game, it might make those idiots think twice before they issue any more lockdown advice to Boris.
Please can you share the link to the petition below.

https://www.change.org/p/boris-johnson-sage-members-to-have-20-pay-cut-44d0ebf2-b464-46c1-9b5d-85951dbda2ad/dashboard?source_location=user_profile_started

Reply
Page 6 / 39
Share: