Vaccines are designed to be injected not into a blood vessel, but into the deltoid muscle (arm) or buttock, this means the vaccine diffuses slowly into the cardiovascular system, however, even the deltoid muscle contains small blood vessels, hence the technique of aspiration was devised, it means to pull back slightly after the needle has been inserted, to look for blood, if blood is seen in the fluid pulled back the needle has hit a blood vessel, so it is necessary to choose a new site, this technique prevents the vaccination from occurring into a blood vessel, and may prevent the clots and other adverse reactions.
This fella explains it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkopHLQjtVQ
There is a theory that inadvertent injection into a blood vessel may cause the serious thrombosis clots that have been seen with e.g. the AZ oxford vaccine.
So I insist on aspiration and after a bit of argument they do it.
Vaccines are designed to be injected not into a blood vessel, but into the deltoid muscle (arm) or buttock, this means the vaccine diffuses slowly into the cardiovascular system, however, even the deltoid muscle contains small blood vessels, hence the technique of aspiration was devised, it means to pull back slightly after the needle has been inserted, to look for blood, if blood is seen in the fluid pulled back the needle has hit a blood vessel, so it is necessary to choose a new site, this technique prevents the vaccination from occurring into a blood vessel, and may prevent the clots and other adverse reactions.
This fella explains it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkopHLQjtVQ
There is a theory that inadvertent injection into a blood vessel may cause the serious thrombosis clots that have been seen with e.g. the AZ oxford vaccine.
So I insist on aspiration and after a bit of argument they do it.
And the reason why it has to be deep muscle is because these type of vaccines had such high immediate serious adverse events in previous candidate clinical trials when normal public health vaccination sites and methods were used.
You should read the basically catastrophic results of the mRNA influenza vaccine Phase 1 clinical trials where all but the deep muscle group had to be abandoned very early in the trials because the immediate hospitalization rate after vaccination was so high.
After this happening a few times all clinical trials for these type of vaccines have been deep muscle for reasons of safety. Deep muscle injection is inherently not a low risk procedure so is only used when there is no other alternative. So only used for low volume, special case vaccination for very high risk diseases. Like tropical disease.
Until now.
Well that accounts for maybe 5K of the 120K plus deaths in the US alone in VAERS and related ones in the CDC excess deaths numbers. Please explains away the rest please when the very well documented toxicology and adverse response found with other experimental vaccines in the past (but not with this magnitude) explains almost all these deaths very well?
Well that accounts for maybe 5K of the 120K plus deaths in the US alone in VAERS and related ones in the CDC excess deaths numbers. Please explains away the rest please when the very well documented toxicology and adverse response found with other experimental vaccines in the past (but not with this magnitude) explains almost all these deaths very well?
It's pointless to speculate now we are in the thick of it. When the clots responsible for this training fiasco (the WHO is responsible for dropping the requirement to aspirate the needle, but Witty and Vallence did not have to follow so obediently, they are paid to form their own viw) tell all the medics to resume needle aspiration, as they were trained in the first place, it will be possible to look into the residual cases, if any and get to the bottom of those as well, there is an old saying in the engineerng business; when you are in a hole stop digging, that's the first thing. I first raised this in August, WTF have they been doing since then?!?, this is a gift to the anti-vaxxers, step 1 is to chamge the guidance.
https://dailysceptic.org/forums/postid/41154/
It is interesting to postulate why the guidance was changed in the first place.I expect it was political in order to try to minimise hesitancy, since inexpert needle aspiration can cause delay or pain, and aspiration take a second or two to perform.Prof Hoiby mentions a Canadian study that points to these reasons. In any case, I hope it becomes clear that needle aspiration is necessary....unfortunately, ministers depend on the Wittys and Valences of this world and are too thick and obedient to form their own view. This is a truly shocking lapse, and they make it worse every day they continue with the current guidance.
Like dr Campbell, I have done what I can to change the guidance, please do likewise, this is a concern that we might address, which on its own might save lives.
Gee, the fact that these vaccines have been finding their way into the blood system is about 18 months old news - care of about 1,000 prize winning scientists. Perhaps it can be avoided by using alternative early, proven safe, cheap universally available treatments - oh but they've been made illegal in most first world countries. Meanwhile back at the ranch...
Gee, the fact that these vaccines have been finding their way into the blood system is about 18 months old news - care of about 1,000 prize winning scientists. Perhaps it can be avoided by using alternative early, proven safe, cheap universally available treatments - oh but they've been made illegal in most first world countries. Meanwhile back at the ranch...
I agree, the powers that be have been very slow to act on this.There have been no proven safe, cheap universally available treatments, ivermectin and HCQ are useless.
