AstraZeneca No Wors...
 
Notifications
Clear all

AstraZeneca No Worse Than Other Vaccines for Blood Clots, Study Finds

9 Posts
8 Users
0 Likes
3,086 Views
Posts: 64
Topic starter
(@theengineer)
Joined: 3 years ago

Perhaps that should read "Other Vaccines no better than AstraZeneca for blood clots? Either way I won't be having the jab. Anyone in doubt might the advised to read Vernon Coleman's boot published a few years ago on vaccines in general: "Anyone Who Tells You Vaccines Are Safe and Effective is Lying".

8 Replies
Posts: 83
(@amanuensis)
Joined: 3 years ago

Perhaps that should read "Other Vaccines no better than AstraZeneca for blood clots? Either way I won't be having the jab. Anyone in doubt might the advised to read Vernon Coleman's boot published a few years ago on vaccines in general: "Anyone Who Tells You Vaccines Are Safe and Effective is Lying".

Well, it is very interesting if it is true (you've not included a reference).

There are two competing theories as to why clotting might occur with the vaccines.

  • Adenovirus based therapies have been known to cause clot problems for some years.
  • There is evidence that clotting problems during covid-19 infection are due to antibodies to the various coronavirus proteins reacting with platelets in some way.
  • If all of the vaccines suffer from this problem then it suggests that the latter theory is more likely.

    The issue with this is that it might suggest that those that have been vaccinated might suffer from a risk of blood clotting problems every time there is a covid wave passing through. Ie, exposure to covid might stimulate new anti-covid antibodies to be produced, including those that result in a clotting problem. Note that if this were to be true it could be a risk for all vaccinated, rather than just those in the vulnerable groups. I'd say that there's no evidence for this at the moment, but it is a risk that I have not seen explored at all in the scientific press (I'd be very happy if it were to be considered and discounted based on evidence).

    I'd add that it makes me rather cross that AZ (and J&J) dismissed the risk of blood clotting problems when they first emerged, despite their scientists surely having knowledge of the risks of clotting disorders in adenovirus vectored therapies.

    Reply
    1 Reply
    (@statusquobuster)
    Joined: 3 years ago

    Posts: 2

    @amanuensis  For the latest best information on blood problems from COVID vaccines read this new article:

     

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/from-shots-to-clots-covid-vaccine-induced-blood-clots/

    Reply
    Posts: 1356
     fon
    (@fon)
    Joined: 3 years ago

    Vernon Coleman's boot

    He's got a long rap sheet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernon_Coleman
    Just saying..

    Reply
    Posts: 1608
    (@splatt)
    Joined: 3 years ago

    Terrible study using the same deliberately misleading figures.
    They're keen to use the overall population average for clots because it boosts the background rate.
    They're not keen to use the background rate broken down for specific age demographics because then its 10s or more times higher in AZ...

    Reply
    Posts: 847
     TTT
    (@ttt)
    Joined: 3 years ago

    Perhaps that should read "Other Vaccines no better than AstraZeneca for blood clots? Either way I won't be having the jab. Anyone in doubt might the advised to read Vernon Coleman's boot published a few years ago on vaccines in general: "Anyone Who Tells You Vaccines Are Safe and Effective is Lying".

    Anyone who listens to Vernon Coleman and believes him should get help.

    Reply
    Page 1 / 2
    Share:
    April 2024
    M T W T F S S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    2930  
    Free Speech Union

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Create New Account!

    Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.