The WHO have a lot to answer for, shifting the goalposts, contradicting their own guidance and scaremongering with their "test, test, test" message. They are corrupt and unaccountable. Few governments are prepared to stand up to them. Meanwhile ours has the added problem that the NHS and PHE are incapable of managing outbreaks of infectious diseases. I recently had a phone call and now received a stern letter telling me I must get my flu jab to save the NHS. I may be 66 but I'm fit and healthy and it seems I'm a priority over all the people needing cancer screening ...
Rachel, I didn't know they were that aggressive with flu jabs. I thought it was an invitation to have one, rather than an order. But I shouldn't be surprised. If you are going to regulate everyone, you have to do it with simple boundaries like age, without taking personal state of health into account (or, for those ordered to self-isolate, previous covid infection). And it would be absolutely contrary to the spirit of the age to let you exercise your own judgement.
I am 62 and have never even been offered a flu jab directly, although my doctor did send out a text a few months ago saying I might be offered one later in the year. Never had anything that might be actual flu (rather than a cold), either. Perhaps there are T-cells in there somewhere.
They are doing it at the moment because they can...
you are right on that, it's opportunistic. Dom Cummings is the only fella amongst them to think he could turn a pandemic into an opportunity; that's his style. He's a historian, and he follows the power politics of Bonapart and Bismark, but with the added spice of also being a datatrician. When you add those unusual attributes all together you soon get to where we are. And only at this exact point is timeand place where he was, he could do this, so the cunning bastard just did it; to test the United Kingdom to the absolute limits.
thi dry run.
there is much in what you suggest. It's a dry run for sure, but we don't know what for exactly yet. I though bio-terrorism, you say cerbon-zero. Either way, it stll makes logical sense,
All over the world, with even hitherto sensible governments now jumping on the PCR/overreactlon bandwagon (Sweden and Japan)?
..and what do you suggest they use instead of PCR?
Its not perfect but its not utterly useless. The problem is how the data is interpreted and used.
