Why wouldn't there be another wave?

We're dealing with a seasonal respiratory virus. All other HCoVs exhibit strong seasonality.Last year showed a drop off a cliff in May before a return in the autumn. No reason to suggest this year won't do the same.

They've lost the plot, they got one chance ro put it right, finish this in june, or we'll have another cycle.

OK, "hands up", you caught me out, I meant when everybody's immune by either having it or dead.

Again that isn't true. You're completely and utterly ignoring cross immunity.
Exposure doesnt guarantee infection.
But by choosing that route (and I know it's been v. frustrating to you) we left plenty of fuel for ongoing waves, and that's the pickle we've been in.

Nothing has changed with regards to that. Why have a (relatively slowly) mutating seasonal coronavirus. It'll have peaks and troughs completely and utterly unconnected with lockdowns or vaccines.

Really? What pandemics have left everybody dead?

We delayed it to when everybody's immune either by vaccination, or by having it and (recovered or dead), and then it'll be burnt out we thought. That was the logic. Point being we did not let it rip first time! We stored some of the dry tinder up until we could give it vaccine to make it fireproof. I think you get the point. But by choosing that route (and I know it's been v. frustrating to you) we left plenty of fuel for ongoing waves, and that's the pickle we've been in.

It is amazing the faith that people have in lockdowns. If you look at the evidence though, there is nothing to suggest that they slowdown the rate of infections, none at all.

The second wave was a very strange oddity. I remember thinking that they were going to construct a second wave when Hancock announced mass testing. Mass testing was a very odd thing to do when Covid had practically disappeared.

Mass testing on healthy people is something that makes no sense at all from a disease control point of view. No one sane is trying to eradicate the disease, even the government havent stated that objective. When the disease is widespread, and the mechanics of the spread so uncertain, what does mass testing achieve really, especially with faulty tests? False positives and false negatives cause people to make wrong decisions and lose confidence in the tests. Not everyone gets tested, the virus still has plenty of room to move around. Indeed, it wouldnt surprise me if immune people still carry the virus now and again. No way you can get rid of it, immunity is the only way out.

So if mass testing of healthy people is pointless from a disease prevention point of view, then what is the point of it? The only explanation left is to harvest cases so that you can use that as justification to continue the lockdown.

Worse, news from Ireland is that they want to jab schoolkids. Why would they want to do that to a group that are invulnerable to the virus? You really have to go back to what Dr Michael Yeadon said about the Pfizer jab, stating that there was a risk that it could cause women to have miscarriages and become effectively sterile. It was telling that after that interview he was disappeared from all media.

And that explanation seems to make sense when you look at all of the evidence from a holistic point of view. Censorship of certain people, mass testing of schoolkids and testing at home. There plans are clear if you look carefully.

Whitty et al know exactly what they’re doing, in my opinion.

If you test children, having vaccinated them with a live attenuated flu virus, over the Autumn, your going to pick up covid cases.

And flu vaccines tend to reduce symptoms of flu, whilst increasing susceptibility to coronaviruses.

https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m810/rr-0

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19313647?via%3Dihub

It is amazing the faith that people have in lockdowns. If you look at the evidence though, there is nothing to suggest that they slowdown the rate of infections, none at all.

Yet here you are saying they do delay (many more examples to chose from, all from you!)

We knew what they did, it was modelled and turned out to be true.
As even SPI-M and IC said, all they do is delay and spike. We knew this.

The second wave was a very strange oddity. I remember thinking that they were going to construct a second wave when Hancock announced mass testing. Mass testing was a very odd thing to do when Covid had practically disappeared.

You must have been sdisappointed when Mike Yeadon was utterly wrong. I know I was. Radio silence from Mike Yeadon now, licking his wounds I expect.

[lots omitted here since it gave me a panic attack!]