Every country in the world is broadly following the same path so there is a central steering committee somewhere.
That would be the WHO.
Or ... each starling in the murmuration follows, or copies, its adjacent bird-brained participants. The human equivalent is largely peer-pressure.
Due to internal conditioning and interdependence, humans and birds have knee-jerk reactions instead of analysis and scrutiny. We can see this happening in front of our eyes as there is wilful compliance - and even elaboration - in government, media, organisations, population. The result is a quasi-organised hysteria - the human equivalent to the starling murmuration. These groups or individuals cannot all be part of any great plan. The explanation for at least part of the current situation is immediately apparent.
We could trace this type of behaviour back continuously. Even if we assume there was a conspiracy, before that was the same conditioned behaviour. To find a start point is not possible, so we may arbitrarily stop tracing backwards and say "Look, there is a conspiracy - the beginning of it all". That would be our choice. It saves us investigating further. But it would be a mistake. We would be relying on projecting a fixed view - thinking that we know instead of realising how little we do actually know.
What we find as we investigate is that there have been errors borne out of lack of scrutiny. Those who make errors do not like to be found out, so they cover up. These are mini-conspiracies from negative, self-seeking emotions. We all have them. Instead of imputing a 'Great Reset', we find 'little contrivances' - no great plans, but a host of ego-preserving individuals - just like you and me.
We all oppose lockdown and seek to free people from unhealthy external impositions. Imposing an internal lockdown on ourselves - one of fixed views about some original cause - is not just unnecessary, it is counter-productive.
said on sat Oct 17, 2020 4:39 pm:
I don't think anybody has sufficient organisational skills to pull of mass vaccination etc.
Well, they are jabbing millions now. 2 months later!
Wasn't it reported the other day that the UK was only getting 800,000 doses of the Pfizer vaccine? We haven't quite reached the stage of jabbing millions.
said on sat Oct 17, 2020 4:39 pm:
I don't think anybody has sufficient organisational skills to pull of mass vaccination etc.
Well, they are jabbing millions now. 2 months later!
Wasn't it reported the other day that the UK was only getting 800,000 doses of the Pfizer vaccine? We haven't quite reached the stage of jabbing millions.
A day or two one way or the other makes no odds, the vaccine is flooding in in loads of around a million jabs... it's game on.
A day or two one way or the other makes no odds, the vaccine is flooding in in loads of around a million jabs... it's game on.
It could still turn out to be a damp squib.
After the initial media jubilation over the vaccinations of Margaret Keenan and William Shakespeare, the MSM has gone awfully quiet.
I had been expecting daily updates on the number of people vaccinated, with regular appearances in the media of people "just like us" happily extending their arms for the jab. Not to mention the queue-jumping celebs recruited to drum up outrage among the ordinary people that "privileged" people were getting theirs before Joe Public.
I wonder if there are actually few people coming forward for vaccination?
Every country in the world is broadly following the same path so there is a central steering committee somewhere.
That would be the WHO.
If it is the WHO that is controlling the entire world’s response to Covid, then why did they retract their stance on face coverings not being effective only after receiving political lobbying from governments? And why after they have now come out and said that lockdowns don’t work, are governments still implementing a them?
