Concerns may arise for those equating their 'self' or identity with their genes. A mere statement that this intervention is not 'gene therapy' may not suffice. Some explanation may be required. The article that I linked to attempts to do this - quite well, it seems to me. It then becomes moot whether the label 'gene therapy' is used or not.
Something must change due to this intervention (no point otherwise). Will something that constitutes 'self' be changed? Will it be a change of 'self' or a change in 'self'? Will it be revolutionary or evolutionary? Will it be permanent or reversible?
You're missing the fairly obvious scientific point here.
mRNA does not change genes and cannot changes genes or gene expression.
It fits into the protein synthesis chain MUCH further downstream than that.
Anyone claiming mRNA affects existing genes lacks a basic understanding of A-level biology. It simply does not and cannot. There is no mechanism how it can do so.
We're not using reverse transcriptase/integrase or anything here.
Its not "gene therapy". It cant modify genes. It cant alter genes. It cant alter gene expression.
mRNA vaccines skip past the transcription phase entirely.
Its not "gene therapy". It cant modify genes. It cant alter genes. It cant alter gene expression.
I think the record is stuck, Splatt.
Agree as well speedstick and huxleypiggles..its harm in itself to Bully and coerce anyone who says no to the experimental vaccines..the anti vax jibe is childish and boring...risk of the rona vs an experimental vaccine ? Mmm I know my choice others can do what they please.and therein lies the point..
No point in acknowledging the pro government stooges on here..its a waste of time and energy..i really dont see any point in them being on this forum at all other than to attention seek and get their rocks off..
😀
you are seeking to influence others against vaccination by speaking about it in a public forum. If that is not your intention, why are you doing it?
It's a form of attention seeking. They have lost all self-control. The vaccine is safe, the EMA, HMRA, WHO he Australian TGA, and the FDA have all found the same thing. The shit-stirrers are hell bent on pushing their Ernst Blofeld Stavro conspiracy theory nonsense. They should be deeply ashamed of themselves, no-one in authority will pay them any attention whatsoever.
How dare you! Making a point that an intervention - a so-called 'vaccine' - has been through an abbreviated test procedure and is not yet proven, draws attention to that fact - and that fact alone. Anyone who is circumspect would at least wait and see how it pans out. But you, with your "I'll have a pint of what he had" attitude, should be ashamed - not just at your own lack of caution but of encouraging others to lack caution as well!
Totally agree with you Speedstick.
This isn’t about ‘anti’ anything, it’s about Pro-choice (for all) which is protected by international law but clearly causing some existential distress for the hysterical ones frightened of stepping outside their sanitised, air tight homes. If an individual chooses not to receive an unlicensed ‘unavoidably unsafe’ mixture of manufactured ingredients still in the experimental phase for a few more years where initial studies conducted were on those selected of being ‘of good health’ rather than the vulnerable, then I think it’s only reasonable to exercise ones human right and be able to make a balanced personal decision based on this and not be forced or coerced or mocked to ‘take one for the team’ by those still struggling with the fact that they’re mortal beings and no amount of hiding or projecting fear onto others will stop the inevitable. For those that exercised pro-choice and have the ‘vaccine’ get on with life and may you enjoy mixing with those also exercising pro-choice who haven’t had the ‘vaccine’ and are getting on with their lives. If not, then please; stay at home, stop whining and protect the rights of those willing to live with liberty, self respect and self responsibility.
