Covid Fundamentalists, like all religious fanatics nobody is allowed to utter a word against their firmly devout beliefs.
I'd like to know the difference been vaccine scepticism and anti-vaxxer, since
the things stopping the current infection rates to fall are
It is quite certain the lockdown would be prolonged and deeper were it not for the vaccines. If you profit from lockdown, try vaccine scepticism, that will deliver what you crave, a longer and deeper lockdown.
StPlos Cafe.
1. It's not a vaccination, it's Gene therapy, never previously tried en masse.
2. Seasonality l would agree is clear, so when nearly at the the Spring Equinox, we are nearly at the end of that season.
3. Lockdown as highlighted in today's lead article on LS does not work, this l myself believed all along and ultimately have been proved right, living in Leicester l have first hand proof lockdown does not work, so as much as you may love your CCP Lockdown Science, l am afraid it doesn't work.
Let's examine some NPI facts.
1. Lockdown was a lie that didn't work.
2. Masks are a lie and clearly don't work.
3. Constant use of hand sanitiser is damaging to the skin, fact.
4. Asymptomatic transmission,as l believed all along, is BS.
5. Formites living on surfaces for hours on end is also BS.
St.Plos Cafe stop preaching your religions fake news, its damaging our children's future, for which you should be ashamed.
On the ball as always speedstick and calling out the 77th brigade..again..
😆 😆 😆 😆
Is there a difference between a anti vaccine skeptic and an anti anti-vaxxer?
Covid Fundamentalists, like all religious fanatics nobody is allowed to utter a word against their firmly devout beliefs.
I'd like to know the difference been vaccine scepticism and anti-vaxxer....
You are not a vaccine sceptic. That's a rather cultish act of faith, isn't it?
Contrast this lot linked at a website called lockdownsceptics.org:
As physicians and scientists, we are supportive in principle of the use of new medical interventions which are appropriately developed and deployed, having obtained informed consent from the patient. This stance encompasses vaccines in the same way as therapeutics.
We note that a wide range of side effects is being reported following vaccination of previously healthy younger individuals with the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. Moreover, there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents. While we recognise that these occurrences might, every one of them, have been unfortunate coincidences, we are concerned that there has been and there continues to be inadequate scrutiny of the possible causes of illness or death under these circumstances, and especially so in the absence of post-mortems examinations.
In particular, we question whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
More: https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/urgent-open-letter-from-doctors-and-scientists-to-the-european-medicines-agency-regarding-covid-19-f6e17c311595
