We're testing healthy people to declare them unwell whilst refusing to treat actual sick people.

Thanks kyta

I spend hours and hours preparing my booklets and distributing them:
( https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1j7sIeHUSWkOgr5SARcB5f6o_0HYva0zJ )

... but this woman's scrappy piece of corrugated cardboard scribbled with a felt tip says it far better!

There are NO COVID-19 CASES.
Yardley Yeadon

Strictly you can’t culture (grow in isolation) a virus. They only grow if they can invade living cells. So that’s what we mean: “can you infect susceptible cells using a clinical sample?”

In this paper, the answer is no, in patients whose PCR was only positive if amplification is turned up high. In other words, if your sample is PCR positive only when amplification is turned up beyond 32 cycles, THEY ARE NOT INFECTIOUS.

Once we learned this, early in the spring outbreak, I bet you all think there was broad agreement that we’d set the maximum amplification to 32 cycles, you’d hope so, if there were any honest scientists doing this work.

They did no such thing. In U.K. they’ve kept the amplification turned up to FORTY (40) cycles, even AFTER it’d be repeatedly shown that positive results obtained at more than around 32 cycles of amplification were KNOWN NOT TO BE INFECTED OR INFECTIOUS.
And this is but one of half a dozen ways in which “cases” are generally NOT really infected people.

This is an appalling thing to do. Anyone I’ve worked with over the last 35y have a word for it: That word is CHEATING.

If it wasn’t so late & I so tired I’d outline all the other tricks in use to this day in U.K. Here’s one, which I assert accounts for ALL the claimed “cases”, meaning there aren’t ANY people with the virus now:

Government has admitted, in a written answer to Parliament, that they have NEVER determined the operational false positive rate. This means they can’t tell you what % of positive tests are genuine.

If the OFPR is just 10%, there are NO CASES. We’ve got plenty of evidence that this is a fair approximation of the OFPR.

So there are NO CASES.

By happy coincidence, earlier this week, the army tested over 49,000 children in schools in Liverpool using a new test, the ‘lateral flow test’ & found NO VIRUS. In the hot spot of the city allegedly in the middle of the worst outbreak in the country. Thus in the so called “second wave”.

Viruses do not do waves. It’s all an invention in Ferguson’s model, for which there’s no evidence at all. That means they’re lying to you. No Covid19 cases means no covid19 deaths.

There was virus & there were deaths, in the spring. But ever since, it’s all been a contrivance, a manufactured lie. And most people have fallen for it.

This has happened before. A “PCR false positive pseudo-epidemic”.

Read the article linked below & see if it reminds you of anything:

Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t (Published 2007)
Experts say tests that led to a false alarm at a New Hampshire hospital are coming into increasing use.
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html

Yardley Yeadon
https://twitter.com/MichaelYeadon3/status/1327045358808150016

There are some inaccuracies here....

In other words, if your sample is PCR positive only when amplification is turned up beyond 32 cycles, THEY ARE NOT INFECTIOUS.

Not strictly true. Firstly each test and assay has a different output per same cT cycle so you cant just put a number on it.

Secondly, people at the *start* of the infection chain may need a higher cT cycle to show anything...but a few hours later they're more infectious. Set that threshold too low you're telling borderline cases they're negative when they're not which is obviously a bad thing.
Some people due to immunological differences can remain low grade infectious for some time which would also be missed if thresold was adjusted too far.

Some mutations lately can have a 5 cT variation in output as some tests are less able to pick up a sequence.

Yes the UK (and most countries) cT is almost certainly too high but there is no magic number where all tests will perform the same output and a nice, clean infected v non-infected. It just isnt that simple.

You cant simply set a threshold for infectious v non infectious on a test that cannot actually determine infections/viable virus.

Viral culture in cells would be needed for *each* brand of test to determine a useful cT for it.

Best idea would be to include the cT in the result of the test and if its in a borderline area, tell them isolate and test again in a few days.

Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science
The BMJ

When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die.
Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425

“The UK’s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines.17 Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates”.

I’ve occasionally questioned the scientific judgement of people on SAGE. I’ve been around, and made decisions potentially involving a billion dollars more than once. Never did I or anyone I worked with make a decision primarily to enrich ourselves. Anyone doing that invites jail.

Yardley Yeadon
https://twitter.com/MichaelYeadon3/status/1327703847880503298

I demand we halt mass PCR testing.
Everyone should campaign for this. It’s the single action needed to save our society.
Yardley Yeadon

1. It’s untrustworthy. Government admits it’s out of control: basic Quality Control hasn’t been done, ever. If it was a diagnostic test in the NHS, it would immediately be stopped.

2. It’s not necessary. Track, trace & isolate might once have been useful but it’s proven to be a hopeless flop. It finds few contacts & far too late. Only a small minority of contacts are reacted. Of those contacts, 90% don’t do what was asked of them. It helps no one.

3. It only causes damage. Because of a positive test, almost all of which now aren’t of live virus, it damages lives & livelihoods for no gains. “Cases” aren’t true but drive lethally bad adaptations like restrictions to NHS, leading to excess deaths.

4. It blinds us to what’s true. (A) I’ve known for more than five months that the main pandemic was over by June as immunology & observation shows. Viruses don’t do waves. The daily diet of “cases” persuade even doctors that patients are dying of covid19 when they’re not.

4. It blinds us to what’s true. (B) When 60,000 ‘pregnancy-style’ tests in Liverpool, UK’s hotspot, show us there’s no virus in the city, the media just misses it & moves on. I’ve reviewed the specification. These are very sensitive tests. False negatives are relevant only at high virus prevalence.

5. There are reliable alternatives. Why use “industrialised molecule biology” in a crisis, never used in this scale in history, when we’ve reliable & rapid tests instead, tests not subject to potential for huge errors? Such tests used in Liverpool show they work well.

6. Even if I’m wrong, it’s the right thing to do. Mass PCR testing should cease immediately, pause for one month if you prefer. Use lateral flow tests in hospital instead & on people with symptoms.

Shut off fake “cases” & the country will begin to recovery immediately, because there isn’t anything much unusual going on in U.K. apart from our extreme & damaging responses to a health emergency which has passed.

There aren’t excess respiratory deaths. Or even many excess deaths. Despite thousands of Covid19 deaths. If you have the strong feeling that things are very wrong, your instincts are sound.

And it’s surprisingly simple to fix. Campaign relentlessly to immediately halt mass PCR testing.. There is absolutely no risk & only gains. One gain will be the rapid re-emergence of our country. It must be now.

So, “Mass PCR test? Best not to test. Use better alternatives only”.

Yardley Yeadon
https://twitter.com/MichaelYeadon3/status/1327684264977117185