All that matters is the narrative.

Confirmation bias will then ensure that the narrative is preserved. Undesirable facts will be filtered out.
We therefore need a new, hard hitting narrative that is simple to state.

"Influenza is not caused by a virus".

The chart below shows a sudden jump in the incidence of Influenza in 1889, the year the first electricity grid went live.

Arthur Firstenberg - The Invisible Rainbow

At the heart of the mainstream narrative is the idea that fatal illnesses are caused by tiny invisible particles that can pass from person to person.

Whilst this idea has validity and salience they will always be able to capitalise on the fear that the spread of disease can get out of hand and attain 'pandemic' status.

The only way to tackle this is head on with a full attack on so called Germ Theory and the presentation of credible alternatives to virus theory.

The idea that 'No disease is cased by a virus' is simple to state and so shocking that it cannot be ignored. The big problem for the hoaxers being that it has never been refuted.

Try, as an experiment, believing that covid is not in any way transmissible and go and look at some stats on lockdowns, masks and fatalities.
All of a sudden - everything makes sense!

The chart below shows a sudden jump in the incidence of Influenza in 1889, the year the first electricity grid went live.

This is nonsense.

We Lockdown Sceptics because the government is following pseudoscience and we want them to follow real science instead.

We don't need idiotic stuff like this muddying the waters, so we can all be dismissed as conspiracy theory loons.

There were influenza epidemics for centuries before the first electricity grid went live. See this, for example ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22148/ ):

"The pandemic in 1918 was hardly the first influenza pandemic, nor was it the only lethal one. Throughout history, there have been influenza pandemics, some of which may have rivaled 1918's lethality. A partial listing of particularly violent outbreaks likely to have been influenza include one in 1510 when a pandemic believed to come from Africa “attacked at once and raged all over Europe not missing a family and scarce a person” (Beveridge, 1977). In 1580, another pandemic started in Asia, then spread to Africa, Europe, and even America (despite the fact that it took 6 weeks to cross the ocean). It was so fierce “that in the space of six weeks it afflicted almost all the nations of Europe, of whom hardly the twentieth person was free of the disease” and some Spanish cities were “nearly entirely depopulated by the disease” (Beveridge, 1977). In 1688, influenza struck England, Ireland, and Virginia; in all these places “the people dyed … as in a plague” (Duffy, 1953). A mutated or new virus continued to plague Europe and America again in 1693 and Massachusetts in 1699. “The sickness extended to almost all families. Few or none escaped, and many dyed especially in Boston, and some dyed in a strange or unusual manner, in some families all were sick together, in some towns almost all were sick so that it was a time of disease” (Pettit, 1976). In London in 1847 and 1848, more people died from influenza than from the terrible cholera epidemic of 1832. In 1889 and 1890, a great and violent worldwide pandemic struck again (Beveridge, 1977). "

Maybe these facts will suggest a new narrative.

This is Hope-Simpson's correlation of sunspot peaks and influenza pandemics.