Once again a very good and very balanced post from you RR.
Yes if the vaccine prevents serious Covid complications and fatalities as opposed to spread of infection, what odds does is make to anybody else whether a certain individual is vaccinated or not, agreed RR it makes not a scintilla of difference.
If fearful of Covid, by all means exercise your prerogative to have the vaccine, if you so wish, however DO NOT inflict your views on the freedom of choice of others to THINK and act differently to you.
Sadly l agree also with Darwinmarcus l think Covid Fundamentalism has taken such a grip of the nation, its very hard to stop the run away steam train. However l fervently believe our numbers may be greater than many of us realise! So l still hope the emergency brake will be applied to stop this Covid Fundamentalism at some point.
It is this very fact that you can't say anything against their views, that make the most suspicious of the underlying motives here!!!

I am definitely against mass vaccination

But it's done in other areas, MMR etc., so why be actively opposed to mass vaccination in one area but (I assume) not another.
- once the vulnerable have been vaccinated I really can't see why we just don't go completely back to normal.

I'm tempted to agree with that. but I understand caution, to a degree, but too much caution. It's hard to know with caution when one is over doing it.
While recklessness means automatically over doing it.
The vaccines don't appear to prevent infection, or prevent people from being infectious - so what on earth is the point of a vaccine passport then?

Many strands to that. In the first place, we need digital ids for the rest of the 4th industrial revolution (which is a better name than the Great Reset). So they will be real, their technological time has come, there will be digital ids which we will use instead of name/address/dob in record keeping systems, that is inevitable.And "Vaccine Passport" is the medias name for online medical records, in reality. Which you can print out, digitally sign and they become a defacto vaccine passport, mainly because their most obvious use it to pass through ports. Although there may be many other application, e.g. getting a job. You are half right in that they can only be a risk mitigation. But that is true for pass ports, they don't tell you the bearer is a good person, or that the passport is really his.
If I have the vaccine it means I (probably) won't get seriously ill if I catch covid - but it won't stop me being able to pass on the infection to others - so really, what the hell is some certificate of vaccination meant to prove? That I won't get too sick?

It proves you've had the shots. There is a lot of evidence now that vaccines reduce transmission by 75%. It's a helluva lot better than 0 percent.
In favour of vaccines for the vulnerable (with the caveat of the worrying indications of side effects) - but vaccine passports don't make a single scintilla of rational sense.

vaccines for the vulnerable is goes without saying.
As for resistance? I fear we are too few voices crying in the wilderness - our voices are lost as the zombie-like masses shuffle forward in their worship of the cult of covid.

Don't worry ,you're alive and healthy, 130,000 covid sufferers did not reach this far into this thing. We'll resume our pursuit of happiness in due course, let's get through March and pick up the pieces.

But it's done in other areas, MMR etc., so why be actively opposed to mass vaccination in one area but (I assume) not another.

One vaccination is in a demographic susceptible to and at high risk of mortality or serious illness from the disease in question, the other is not.
One vaccination is near sterilising permanently. The other is not.

Long standing public health principle is you don't vaccinate groups from a disease they're either unlikely to be exposed to or if they do, get sick from.
In other words, you don't reduce a negligible risk by exposing them to more risk.

Many strands to that. In the first place, we need digital ids for the rest of the 4th industrial revolution (which is a better name than the Great Reset).

We need no such thing.

It proves you've had the shots. There is a lot of evidence now that vaccines reduce transmission by 75%. It's a helluva lot better than 0 percent.

Not really. Pfizer data is good. 90% or so. Ox AZ is about 60% at most and 0% against E484K variants.
Most of the UK is Ox/AZ.
Don't worry ,you're alive and healthy, 130,000 covid sufferers did not reach this far into this thing. We'll resume our pursuit of happiness in due course, let's get through March and pick up the pieces.

130,000 people who died that happened to test positive with 28 days. That doesn't say anything about what they died of or whether they'd have died of something else regardless.

77 Brigade?

I heard it said, and I am sorry, but don;t recall who said it but ...

"We all fall asleep at once, but wake up one at a time"

If you can get one or two people to question anything, it is progress, but sadly it seems to be the characteristic of modern man to hypnotically sleep . .. oblivious to the terror.