How can I reduce th...
 
Notifications
Clear all

How can I reduce the amount I donate to Daily Sceptics each month?

9 Posts
4 Users
1 Likes
920 Views
Posts: 11
Topic starter
(@hebairt)
Joined: 4 years ago

Nowhere on my banking app can I find Lockdown Sceptics or Daily Sceptics but I would like to reduce the amount I donate. If  I try to edit by going to the 'Donate' route I could add the amount I want but how would I know whether the system would treat this as a new or extra donation or whether it would modify the old donation. And if I wanted to change the donation amount to 0, the system will not accept that. Anyone know how I can edit my donation amount?

 

Topic Tags
8 Replies
Posts: 25
Admin
(@hardliner)
Joined: 4 years ago

Moderator here: Your admin request has been passed on for reply

Reply
Posts: 25
Admin
(@hardliner)
Joined: 4 years ago
Reply
Posts: 11
Topic starter
(@hebairt)
Joined: 4 years ago

Thanks, that works. I reduced it, I didn't cut to zero. I do feel that Daily Sceptics is past its best and I don't read it as much as I used to, and there are other deserving newsletters such as TCW that I want to support. And perhaps FSU too.

Reply
2 Replies
lordsnooty
(@lordsnooty)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 636
Posted by: @hebairt

Thanks, that works. I reduced it, I didn't cut to zero. I do feel that Daily Sceptics is past its best

I think it's coming into its stride now the focus is more on the Ukraine war, since the propaganda machine was rejigged overnight to point to Russia instead in British citizens objecting  to rights violations. There is absolutely no criticism of NATO or US foreign policy in the British MSM where Zelensky is the new Mother Theresa while Russia is the root of all evil. We need skeptics more than ever in this febrile environment. To counter the government which is using the war to make themselves look heroic, over the bodies of countless Russians and Ukrainians, it's an mi6/cia stitch up, for sure! Noah Carl is doing sterling work exposing the bullshit, although Ian Rons would be better off in SAGE or the MoD!

Reply
(@scepticscot)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 9

@hebairt I can't get into TCW since early this morning - a "currently unreachable" message appears. Anyone else finding this problem?

Reply
Posts: 11
Topic starter
(@hebairt)
Joined: 4 years ago

Honestly I don't feel that way at all. I made a lot of online friends during the pandemic years but when that story died down and Ukraine came up, there were people asking 'what's our position on this?' (as if we had to have one) and 'surely they're pulling the wool over our eyes again'. I didn't and don't want to be on perma-alert for conspiracies. I'm Team Toby on this one, not Team James. I must admit I groaned at Noah's articles and haven't/won't read them. I'm with Ronald Reagan's point of view when he said 'some things just are black and white', and the Ukraine invasion is.

Reply
2 Replies
lordsnooty
(@lordsnooty)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 636
Posted by: @hebairt

 and 'surely they're pulling the wool over our eyes again'. I didn't and don't want to be on perma-alert for conspiracies. I'm Team Toby on this one, not Team James. I must admit I groaned at Noah's articles and haven't/won't read them. I'm with Ronald Reagan's point of view when he said 'some things just are black and white', and the Ukraine invasion is.

It's not important, Ukraine has already lost the Donbas and the Crimea, the only outstanding question is Odesa, and whether Russia must slaughter  every last man and Jack of the JFO, some 70,000 soldiers. It's looking increasingly likely that the JFO is to be totally annihilated. hat's where it is leading.

Reply
lordsnooty
(@lordsnooty)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 636
Posted by: @hebairt

 I didn't and don't want to be on perma-alert for conspiracies.

But who hastime to care  what you want? In a sane world you would not need to always  be on alert. Reporters should do that, but they are subservient to the vile government's  western narrative. So I'm sorry you'll have to do some DIY since facts are facts. Even the West's craven media has finally started to bow to the inevitable, even FFS, Fox:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMo2IyePOV4

 

We have to quit this US dominated fixation with the cold war!Quote, China has decided that Russia's going to win. I agree, and here is why.

We have seen much of the high-tech NLAWs or Javelins , making mincemeat of Russian tanks, but all good deeds are selfish and now Russia is in place to  finally (in time for  for the may 9th  finale in Moscow!) be able to do as it has planned. And the battle field has a name now, like Dunkirk, Verdun and the Somme, it will come to be called  be called  the Severodonetsk Salient. If I am right, it has taken Russia  63 days to trap  the JFO into the Severodonetsk Salient, where the mechanical final slaughter of the Azov battalion and others can commence apace from afar without the  without the bothersome presence of civilians or reporters.

If I am right, it is literately all happening right above the Severodonetsk Salient at present , the Russians finally have what is left of the Azov battalion, right under their guns, clustered nice and tight to increase the kill per shell rate, it must be hell on earth to be stuck without food or ammunition in the Severodonetsk Salient (but serves the bastards right), you can see from the discarded NLaws and Javelins ,empty ammo boxes and dirty disorganised conditions that these JFO guys are finished.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mV-IYU91gBA

So, if I'm right, it basically all over for the JFO, fingers crossed, double crossed. And by June, this war will be a bump in the road at the start of 2022, and that's what we all want.

 

 

1651010702-killzon.png
Reply
Share:
March 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Free Speech Union

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.