Here we go: "hard d...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Here we go: "hard decisions" foreseen about which patients to "prioritise"

4 Posts
4 Users
1 Likes
1,398 Views
Star
Posts: 79
 Star
Topic starter
(@star)
Joined: 3 years ago

It's as if "experts", senior functionaries, and journalists are falling over themselves to get with the program and to show Big Pharma what good gobbers off they are, so skilled at speaking to a brief, at doing their bit for the National Effort, and (just as all good salesmen's manuals advise) at really believing this stuff while they're coming out with it:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2021/oct/20/coronavirus-news-live-singapore-reports-highest-ever-covid-cases-uk-urged-to-enact-plan-b-or-risk-nhs-crisis

"NHS exec: 'hard decisions' may have to be made about prioritising patients"

"Saffron Cordery, the deputy chief executive of NHS Providers, which represents NHS hospitals, ambulance, community and mental health services, has told the Guardian “hard decisions” may have to be made about which patients to prioritise if Covid cases continue to rise."

Can't get much clearer than that.

(Cordery describes herself as having "extensive experience in policy development, influencing and communication".)

"She said: “Trust leaders are looking on anxiously as the number of Covid cases, hospital admission rates and patients on ventilators steadily increases.

“It is vital that the government and national NHS leaders keep a close watch on these figures and act quickly and decisively to prevent any surge that could place overwhelming pressure on the NHS, particularly as we head into winter. This should include activating ‘plan B’ in the Covid winter plan, if needed.”

She added: “It is important to recognise that as Covid-related pressures intensify, this could impact on the NHS’s ability to bear down on the care backlog. Trust leaders understand only too well the importance of minimising any delays for planned treatment. But if other pressures continue to escalate they will have to take hard decisions about priorities.”"

In less traffic-wardenish language, "If you're ill, f*** off".

Who represents the anti-prioritised? The answer doesn't seem to be "NHS Providers".

 

3 Replies
2 Replies
 TTT
(@ttt)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 847
Posted by: @star

It's as if "experts", senior functionaries, and journalists are falling over themselves to get with the program and to show Big Pharma what good gobbers off they are, so skilled at speaking to a brief, at doing their bit for the National Effort, and (just as all good salesmen's manuals advise) at really believing this stuff while they're coming out with it:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2021/oct/20/coronavirus-news-live-singapore-reports-highest-ever-covid-cases-uk-urged-to-enact-plan-b-or-risk-nhs-crisis

"NHS exec: 'hard decisions' may have to be made about prioritising patients"

"Saffron Cordery, the deputy chief executive of NHS Providers, which represents NHS hospitals, ambulance, community and mental health services, has told the Guardian “hard decisions” may have to be made about which patients to prioritise if Covid cases continue to rise."

Can't get much clearer than that.

(Cordery describes herself as having "extensive experience in policy development, influencing and communication".)

"She said: “Trust leaders are looking on anxiously as the number of Covid cases, hospital admission rates and patients on ventilators steadily increases.

“It is vital that the government and national NHS leaders keep a close watch on these figures and act quickly and decisively to prevent any surge that could place overwhelming pressure on the NHS, particularly as we head into winter. This should include activating ‘plan B’ in the Covid winter plan, if needed.”

She added: “It is important to recognise that as Covid-related pressures intensify, this could impact on the NHS’s ability to bear down on the care backlog. Trust leaders understand only too well the importance of minimising any delays for planned treatment. But if other pressures continue to escalate they will have to take hard decisions about priorities.”"

In less traffic-wardenish language, "If you're ill, f*** off".

Who represents the anti-prioritised? The answer doesn't seem to be "NHS Providers".

 

It's a crying shame that people won't get treatment, just because so many people won't be vaccinated and fill up the hospitals.

Those that choose this path can blame themselves or the misinformation peddlers who have influenced them. The people they displace from treatment are actually their victims.

Does the anti-vaxx lobby ever consider the damage they do?

Reply
(@ewloe)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 319
Posted by: @star

, this could impact on the NHS’s ability to bear down on the care backlog.

If eveerything is a priority, nothing is a priority...

Reply
Posts: 25
Admin
(@hardliner)
Joined: 4 years ago

Moderator here, thanks for your message, there was a software bug which we believe has now been fixed

Reply
Share:
April 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
Free Speech Union

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.