Following the Great Flu Scare, a lot of shops and restaurants have decided not to accept cash payments. And yet, as I understand it, cash is legal tender, and therefore when offered as payment they are obliged to accept it.
What, then, should happen under the following circumstances:
- I go to a restaurant for a meal, eat my food and request the bill
- I produce the cash with which to pay, but am told the restaurant only accepts card payments
- I do not actually have a card on my person, so cannot pay for my meal despite offering valid legal tender
Under such conditions, am I entitled to effectively have a free meal, because the restaurant has voluntary declined to receive payment which it is legally obliged to accept? Or am I showing a total lack of understanding?
legal tender has a very narrow misunderstood definition:
If you have a money debt you are able to use legal tender to settle it. If you have no debt, no-one is obliged to contract with you. They can set their own terms for that. They can insist you pay in gold, sacks of horse manure or lead ingots or whatever they please.
Not legal tender, but don't forget that if they agree to take a cheque you can give it to them written on a cow:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_Inland_Revenue_v_Haddock
Thanks for your replies. So it seems that if I were to consume a meal, having not been notified of any specific conditions of payment, I would be at liberty to insist on paying with cash, or else consider my debt settled. Good to know.
Of course, I don't intend to deliberately go around making trouble, but I have made a particular effort to only use cash since the first lockdown, and am now in the position of having to organise a pub meal. It seems a lot of pubs, here in Surrey, at least, are all to keen to hasten their downfall by insisting on card payments.