27 March 2021  /  Updated 17 July 2021
Does anyone believe...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Does anyone believe David Icke on this?

Page 3 / 3

huxleypiggles
Posts: 150
(@huxleypiggles)
Joined: 1 year ago

Icke is correct with a lot of what he has said. Some I think - Lizards is a bit out there, but who knows. However, in today's Conservative Woman there is this excellent piece:

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/lockdown-is-part-of-the-grand-green-global-design/

I was of the opinion that this is what is going on since April when I started researching the alleged "virus."

Cash will be got rid of next year and at some point we will all be chipped up - Lord Bill of the Gates has openly confirmed this, the so-called 'digital passport.

And when we are chipped humanity is FINISHED. It's that simple.

Reply
jsampson45
Posts: 32
(@jsampson45)
Joined: 1 year ago

"Regarding the "vaccine," we can simply use first principles, which would entitle you to consider it this way:
Does it work? We don't know.
Is it safe? We don't know.
It's that simple."

It would be if a vaccine were introduced with no trials. There will be a risk as with all new treatments and medications.

Reply
J4mes
Posts: 16
(@j4mes)
Joined: 1 year ago

Icke, like Alex Jones and to an extent James Delingpole will all shout sensational truths about conspiracies, but they also ladle their statements with disinformation. Icke and Jones purely exist to make a mockery of conspiracy theorists, with them screaming (literally in the case of Jones) about water turning frogs gay, and the Illuminati being a class of lizard people from space.

They make it easy for legitimate arguments against the elite to be snuffed out and scoffed at. Alex Jones for certain is funded by the very people he supposedly wants to expose, Icke is most likely the same.

So when I saw Icke leading the protest against the lockdowns a couple months ago, I felt a pang of disappointment, though I should have expected such a person to show up eventually.

Reply
darwinmarcus
Posts: 38
(@darwinmarcus)
Joined: 1 year ago

"Regarding the "vaccine," we can simply use first principles, which would entitle you to consider it this way:
Does it work? We don't know.
Is it safe? We don't know.
It's that simple."

It would be if a vaccine were introduced with no trials. There will be a risk as with all new treatments and medications.

The point is you should be entitled to weigh the risk up for yourself and make your own decision.

Reply
miahoneybee
Posts: 1541
(@miahoneybee)
Joined: 1 year ago

Absolutely agree. Your decision should be yours alone yes or no. Simple. No restrictions at all should your answer be no.
😀

Reply
Page 3 / 3
Share: