27 March 2021  /  Updated 17 July 2021
Deaths of elderly p...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Deaths of elderly people in long-term care homes, where the majority of Covid-19 deaths took place, were directly accel

Page 2 / 2

Nobody
Posts: 745
(@nobody)
Joined: 1 year ago

I think what gives much of this its legitimacy is the status of science. People do not read and it has become a quickly established civic morality that wearing a mask is somehow protecting others. I heard one woman saying that she wore a mask all day around her children at home until they went to bed. Another was saying she found it suffocating to work in her mask. I suggested they read this site and check the information on mask wearing. They just ignored me like I was some kind of idiot. Unless you have any scientific authority yourself, you are just someone who reads the net. People have accepted this is some kind of lethal plague and we all must never go near one another and avoid breathing near one another for fear of contagion.
It would be nice to know from someone practically knowledgeable what the practicalities of infection are. I know there was a piece on here about the chance of contracting the virus going shopping that was very good. But, practically, how would one contract it? I saw that Dolores Cahill saying that the virus is not passed through the air and it is more passed by touch but then I read a piece on here today which suggested it is passed through the air.
Practically I find that the culture is so toxic that people want to be in their own bubble anyway and so none of this has really made much of a difference since most people are so unfriendly and anti-social that the rules have not really changed much apart from people wearing masks.

Reply
Dan1984
Posts: 3
Topic starter
(@dan1984)
Joined: 1 year ago

Hi all, thank you for commenting.

Just to make certain everyone is aware, the essay in my thread opening posts was my transcription of the video (linked) of DENIS RANCOURT talking. He is on twitter @denisrancourt, and has other videos on youtube too. He is an exceptionally clear thinker.

In my opinion he has done the necessary research to prove, without shadow of a doubt, that the initial peak was government policy made.

"@denisrancourt
Jan 6
The "crime" of not following the rules covers up the much larger actual crime of making and imposing the rules, which killed people, many people."

A lot more infor here:
https://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2021/01/what-i-believe-about-covid.html

And to answer your common observations - it really seems to be a missed explanation for the spike in March. The spike outside of the flu season somewhat undermines the seasonal argument - after all, how can it be seasonal if it is out of season. So once understood, it fills in that piece.

I would like to see this data given more credance - he has plenty to back it up (without repeating him)

Reply
Dan1984
Posts: 3
Topic starter
(@dan1984)
Joined: 1 year ago

Hi all, thank you for commenting. There is nothing that has been said by any of you that I don't 100% agree with.

Just to make certain everyone is aware, the essay was my transcription of the video (linked) of DENIS RANCOURT talking. He is on twitter @denisrancourt, and has other videos on youtube too. He is an exceptionally clear thinker.

In my opinion he has done the necessary research to prove, without shadow of a doubt, that the initial peak was government policy made.

The buggers on the TV show a graph, and show when lockdown came in, and say "look lockdown worked" as the graph doesn't change its trajectory one bit. Meanwhile when the graphs blatantly do change trajectory following the isolation or the elderly, and denial of hospital treatment, they say nothing. If I had more time I'd love to direct people's attention to it using video and graphics.

"@denisrancourt
Jan 6
The "crime" of not following the rules covers up the much larger actual crime of making and imposing the rules, which killed people, many people."

A lot more info here:
https://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2021/01/what-i-believe-about-covid.html

And to answer your common observations - it really seems to be a missed explanation for the spike in March. The spike outside of the flu season somewhat undermines the seasonal argument - after all, how can it be seasonal if it is out of season. So once understood, it fills in that piece.

I would like to see this data given more credence - he has plenty to back it up (without repeating him)

Reply
Page 2 / 2
Share: