I have come across this suggestion a few times. Different dosages and also placebos.
Is there any firm evidence of this being the case?
Is there any record being kept of who received what dose?
I have come across this suggestion a few times. Different dosages and also placebos.
Is there any firm evidence of this being the case?
Is there any record being kept of who received what dose?
yes, when one is testing drugs, it is necessary to calibrate the doses by trying different doses in different sets of people and seeing what happens, this is sometime called titration. The goal is to find the smallest dose that is just as effective as bigger doses. If one keeps no records, no comparisons can be made between the groups, hence no calibration is possible.
...and on a related topic....
is there any indication yet of the new flu vax having a changed mode of operating?
Presumably antibody tests could show who has antibodies of a certain type (jab created or natural immunity) given the jab spike protein is quite specific. It should be incumbent on all members of the cabinet including Johnson to prove they have been jabbed with the actual jab juice not saline or some other placebo as one by one they appear on TV and radio instructing the public to be jabbed and operating a dictatorship until people do and that they should be jabbed whether or not they have been infected naturally. MPs more widely not included as they are not in the cabal. An they would be needed to elect from when the cabinet ministers die "after a short illness" following the below.
If they don't show up positive to jab antibodies then they should be whisked off to be jabbed with a pre-tested vial so everyone knows it has the right jab juice, by a randomly selected ab administerer (not a govt Dr, just a random one so they have the same chance as us of the jab being delivered incorrectly).
